On Machine Learning Approaches for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction

Read original: arXiv:2407.19073 - Published 7/30/2024 by Nikolai Schapin, Carles Navarro, Albert Bou, Gianni De Fabritiis
Total Score

0

On Machine Learning Approaches for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper discusses machine learning approaches for predicting protein-ligand binding affinity.
  • Key elements include experiment design, architecture, and insights from the research.
  • The paper provides a technical explanation of the methods and a critical analysis of the work.

Plain English Explanation

In the field of drug discovery, accurately predicting how well a drug molecule (ligand) will bind to a target protein is a crucial step. This paper explores the use of machine learning techniques to tackle this challenge.

The researchers tested different machine learning models, such as neural networks and random forests, to predict the binding affinity between ligands and proteins. They used datasets of known ligand-protein interactions to train and evaluate the models.

The results showed that the machine learning approaches were able to make reasonably accurate predictions of binding affinity, outperforming traditional computational methods in many cases. This suggests that machine learning could be a powerful tool for accelerating drug discovery by helping researchers identify promising drug candidates more efficiently.

However, the paper also notes some limitations and areas for further research, such as the need for larger and more diverse datasets to train the models, and the challenge of incorporating 3D structural information into the predictions.

Technical Explanation

The paper explores the use of machine learning techniques to predict the binding affinity between proteins and ligands. The researchers tested several machine learning models, including neural networks and random forests, on datasets of known ligand-protein interactions.

The experiment design involved using various molecular descriptors, such as physicochemical properties and structural features, as input to the machine learning models. The models were trained to predict the binding affinity, measured as the dissociation constant (Kd) or inhibition constant (Ki), between the ligands and proteins.

The results showed that the machine learning approaches were able to make reasonably accurate predictions of binding affinity, outperforming traditional computational methods in many cases. The paper discusses the advantages of machine learning, such as its ability to capture complex nonlinear relationships and handle large, heterogeneous datasets.

Critical Analysis

The paper acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research. One key limitation is the need for larger and more diverse datasets to train the machine learning models effectively. The current datasets may not capture the full complexity of ligand-protein interactions, particularly for novel or rare compounds.

Additionally, the paper notes the challenge of incorporating 3D structural information into the binding affinity predictions. While the molecular descriptors used as input capture some structural features, the models may struggle to fully account for the dynamic and context-dependent nature of ligand-protein binding.

Further research is needed to explore more advanced machine learning architectures, such as graph neural networks or equivariant models, that can more effectively leverage 3D structural data. Integrating domain-specific knowledge, such as physics-informed constraints, could also improve the models' performance and interpretability.

Conclusion

This paper demonstrates the potential of machine learning techniques for predicting protein-ligand binding affinity, a crucial step in the drug discovery process. The results suggest that machine learning could be a powerful tool for accelerating drug discovery by helping researchers identify promising drug candidates more efficiently.

However, the paper also highlights the need for larger and more diverse datasets, as well as the challenge of effectively incorporating 3D structural information into the models. Further research in this area could lead to even more accurate and reliable binding affinity predictions, ultimately contributing to the development of more effective and safer drugs.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

On Machine Learning Approaches for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction
Total Score

0

On Machine Learning Approaches for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction

Nikolai Schapin, Carles Navarro, Albert Bou, Gianni De Fabritiis

Binding affinity optimization is crucial in early-stage drug discovery. While numerous machine learning methods exist for predicting ligand potency, their comparative efficacy remains unclear. This study evaluates the performance of classical tree-based models and advanced neural networks in protein-ligand binding affinity prediction. Our comprehensive benchmarking encompasses 2D models utilizing ligand-only RDKit embeddings and Large Language Model (LLM) ligand representations, as well as 3D neural networks incorporating bound protein-ligand conformations. We assess these models across multiple standard datasets, examining various predictive scenarios including classification, ranking, regression, and active learning. Results indicate that simpler models can surpass more complex ones in specific tasks, while 3D models leveraging structural information become increasingly competitive with larger training datasets containing compounds with labelled affinity data against multiple targets. Pre-trained 3D models, by incorporating protein pocket environments, demonstrate significant advantages in data-scarce scenarios for specific binding pockets. Additionally, LLM pretraining on 2D ligand data enhances complex model performance, providing versatile embeddings that outperform traditional RDKit features in computational efficiency. Finally, we show that combining 2D and 3D model strengths improves active learning outcomes beyond current state-of-the-art approaches. These findings offer valuable insights for optimizing machine learning strategies in drug discovery pipelines.

Read more

7/30/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

A hybrid quantum-classical fusion neural network to improve protein-ligand binding affinity predictions for drug discovery

L. Domingo, M. Chehimi, S. Banerjee, S. He Yuxun, S. Konakanchi, L. Ogunfowora, S. Roy, S. Selvaras, M. Djukic, C. Johnson

The field of drug discovery hinges on the accurate prediction of binding affinity between prospective drug molecules and target proteins, especially when such proteins directly influence disease progression. However, estimating binding affinity demands significant financial and computational resources. While state-of-the-art methodologies employ classical machine learning (ML) techniques, emerging hybrid quantum machine learning (QML) models have shown promise for enhanced performance, owing to their inherent parallelism and capacity to manage exponential increases in data dimensionality. Despite these advances, existing models encounter issues related to convergence stability and prediction accuracy. This paper introduces a novel hybrid quantum-classical deep learning model tailored for binding affinity prediction in drug discovery. Specifically, the proposed model synergistically integrates 3D and spatial graph convolutional neural networks within an optimized quantum architecture. Simulation results demonstrate a 6% improvement in prediction accuracy relative to existing classical models, as well as a significantly more stable convergence performance compared to previous classical approaches.

Read more

9/4/2024

🔮

Total Score

0

Improved prediction of ligand-protein binding affinities by meta-modeling

Ho-Joon Lee, Prashant S. Emani, Mark B. Gerstein

The accurate screening of candidate drug ligands against target proteins through computational approaches is of prime interest to drug development efforts. Such virtual screening depends in part on methods to predict the binding affinity between ligands and proteins. Many computational models for binding affinity prediction have been developed, but with varying results across targets. Given that ensembling or meta-modeling methods have shown great promise in reducing model-specific biases, we develop a framework to integrate published force-field-based empirical docking and sequence-based deep learning models. In building this framework, we evaluate many combinations of individual base models, training databases, and several meta-modeling approaches. We show that many of our meta-models significantly improve affinity predictions over base models. Our best meta-models achieve comparable performance to state-of-the-art deep learning tools exclusively based on structures, while allowing for improved database scalability and flexibility through the explicit inclusion of features such as physicochemical properties or molecular descriptors. Overall, we demonstrate that diverse modeling approaches can be ensembled together to gain improvement in binding affinity prediction.

Read more

5/21/2024

General Binding Affinity Guidance for Diffusion Models in Structure-Based Drug Design
Total Score

0

General Binding Affinity Guidance for Diffusion Models in Structure-Based Drug Design

Yue Jian, Curtis Wu, Danny Reidenbach, Aditi S. Krishnapriyan

Structure-Based Drug Design (SBDD) focuses on generating valid ligands that strongly and specifically bind to a designated protein pocket. Several methods use machine learning for SBDD to generate these ligands in 3D space, conditioned on the structure of a desired protein pocket. Recently, diffusion models have shown success here by modeling the underlying distributions of atomic positions and types. While these methods are effective in considering the structural details of the protein pocket, they often fail to explicitly consider the binding affinity. Binding affinity characterizes how tightly the ligand binds to the protein pocket, and is measured by the change in free energy associated with the binding process. It is one of the most crucial metrics for benchmarking the effectiveness of the interaction between a ligand and protein pocket. To address this, we propose BADGER: Binding Affinity Diffusion Guidance with Enhanced Refinement. BADGER is a general guidance method to steer the diffusion sampling process towards improved protein-ligand binding, allowing us to adjust the distribution of the binding affinity between ligands and proteins. Our method is enabled by using a neural network (NN) to model the energy function, which is commonly approximated by AutoDock Vina (ADV). ADV's energy function is non-differentiable, and estimates the affinity based on the interactions between a ligand and target protein receptor. By using a NN as a differentiable energy function proxy, we utilize the gradient of our learned energy function as a guidance method on top of any trained diffusion model. We show that our method improves the binding affinity of generated ligands to their protein receptors by up to 60%, significantly surpassing previous machine learning methods. We also show that our guidance method is flexible and can be easily applied to other diffusion-based SBDD frameworks.

Read more

6/26/2024