Machine learning-based system reliability analysis with Gaussian Process Regression
2403.11125
0
0
↗️
Abstract
Machine learning-based reliability analysis methods have shown great advancements for their computational efficiency and accuracy. Recently, many efficient learning strategies have been proposed to enhance the computational performance. However, few of them explores the theoretical optimal learning strategy. In this article, we propose several theorems that facilitates such exploration. Specifically, cases that considering and neglecting the correlations among the candidate design samples are well elaborated. Moreover, we prove that the well-known U learning function can be reformulated to the optimal learning function for the case neglecting the Kriging correlation. In addition, the theoretical optimal learning strategy for sequential multiple training samples enrichment is also mathematically explored through the Bayesian estimate with the corresponding lost functions. Simulation results show that the optimal learning strategy considering the Kriging correlation works better than that neglecting the Kriging correlation and other state-of-the art learning functions from the literatures in terms of the reduction of number of evaluations of performance function. However, the implementation needs to investigate very large computational resource.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Proposes several theorems to explore the theoretical optimal learning strategy for machine learning-based reliability analysis
- Examines cases with and without considering the correlations among candidate design samples
- Proves that the well-known U learning function can be reformulated to the optimal learning function for the case neglecting Kriging correlation
- Mathematically explores the theoretical optimal learning strategy for sequential multiple training samples enrichment
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores ways to improve the efficiency and accuracy of machine learning-based methods for analyzing the reliability of engineering designs. Traditionally, these methods have relied on computationally expensive simulations to evaluate the performance of design options. However, recent research has proposed more efficient "learning" strategies to reduce the number of simulations required.
The key innovation in this paper is the development of mathematical theorems that help identify the theoretically optimal learning strategy. The theorems examine two cases - one that considers the correlations between candidate design samples, and one that does not. The researchers prove that the well-known "U" learning function can be reformulated to be the optimal strategy for the case where correlations are ignored.
The paper also mathematically explores the optimal learning strategy for sequentially adding new training samples, using Bayesian estimation techniques. Simulation results show that the optimal strategy that considers correlations performs better than other approaches in terms of reducing the number of performance simulations needed.
While the optimal strategies show promise, the researchers note that their implementation requires significant computational resources, which could be a practical limitation. Overall, this work provides a valuable theoretical foundation for developing more efficient machine learning-based reliability analysis methods.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes several theorems to explore the theoretical optimal learning strategy for machine learning-based reliability analysis methods. Two cases are examined: one that considers the correlations among the candidate design samples, and one that neglects these correlations.
For the case neglecting Kriging correlations, the researchers prove that the well-known U learning function can be reformulated to be the optimal learning function. This is an important result, as the U function is a widely-used approach in the literature.
Additionally, the paper mathematically explores the theoretically optimal learning strategy for sequential multiple training samples enrichment. This is done through Bayesian estimation with corresponding loss functions.
Simulation results demonstrate that the optimal learning strategy considering Kriging correlations outperforms the strategy neglecting correlations, as well as other state-of-the-art learning functions from the literature, in terms of reducing the number of performance function evaluations required.
However, the researchers note that the implementation of the optimal strategies requires significant computational resources, which could be a practical limitation.
Critical Analysis
The key strength of this work is the development of a rigorous theoretical foundation for identifying optimal learning strategies in machine learning-based reliability analysis. By providing mathematical proofs and theorems, the authors lay the groundwork for more efficient and accurate reliability assessment methods.
That said, the practical implementation challenges highlighted by the researchers are an important consideration. The computational resource requirements of the optimal strategies may limit their real-world applicability, at least with current hardware and software capabilities.
Additionally, the paper does not provide a comprehensive comparison to other state-of-the-art methods beyond the learning functions examined. Exploring the performance of the optimal strategies against a broader range of benchmarks could further strengthen the conclusions.
Overall, this research represents an important step forward in the quest for more efficient reliability analysis tools. By focusing on the theoretical underpinnings, the authors have created a foundation for future work to build upon and potentially overcome the practical challenges.
Conclusion
This paper proposes a set of theorems that enable the exploration of theoretically optimal learning strategies for machine learning-based reliability analysis. The key findings include the proof that the well-known U learning function can be reformulated as the optimal strategy for the case neglecting Kriging correlations, as well as the mathematical exploration of the optimal strategy for sequential training sample enrichment.
While simulation results demonstrate the superior performance of the optimal strategies, the researchers note that their implementation requires significant computational resources. This could be a practical limitation that future work will need to address.
Nevertheless, this research provides a valuable theoretical foundation for developing more efficient reliability assessment methods. By understanding the optimal learning strategies, researchers and engineers can work towards overcoming the computational challenges and unlocking the full potential of machine learning in this important field.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🌀
A New Reliable & Parsimonious Learning Strategy Comprising Two Layers of Gaussian Processes, to Address Inhomogeneous Empirical Correlation Structures
Gargi Roy, Dalia Chakrabarty
0
0
We present a new strategy for learning the functional relation between a pair of variables, while addressing inhomogeneities in the correlation structure of the available data, by modelling the sought function as a sample function of a non-stationary Gaussian Process (GP), that nests within itself multiple other GPs, each of which we prove can be stationary, thereby establishing sufficiency of two GP layers. In fact, a non-stationary kernel is envisaged, with each hyperparameter set as dependent on the sample function drawn from the outer non-stationary GP, such that a new sample function is drawn at every pair of input values at which the kernel is computed. However, such a model cannot be implemented, and we substitute this by recalling that the average effect of drawing different sample functions from a given GP is equivalent to that of drawing a sample function from each of a set of GPs that are rendered different, as updated during the equilibrium stage of the undertaken inference (via MCMC). The kernel is fully non-parametric, and it suffices to learn one hyperparameter per layer of GP, for each dimension of the input variable. We illustrate this new learning strategy on a real dataset.
4/22/2024
↗️
Efficient Two-Stage Gaussian Process Regression Via Automatic Kernel Search and Subsampling
Shifan Zhao (Carl), Jiaying Lu (Carl), Ji Yang (Carl), Edmond Chow, Yuanzhe Xi
0
0
Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) is widely used in statistics and machine learning for prediction tasks requiring uncertainty measures. Its efficacy depends on the appropriate specification of the mean function, covariance kernel function, and associated hyperparameters. Severe misspecifications can lead to inaccurate results and problematic consequences, especially in safety-critical applications. However, a systematic approach to handle these misspecifications is lacking in the literature. In this work, we propose a general framework to address these issues. Firstly, we introduce a flexible two-stage GPR framework that separates mean prediction and uncertainty quantification (UQ) to prevent mean misspecification, which can introduce bias into the model. Secondly, kernel function misspecification is addressed through a novel automatic kernel search algorithm, supported by theoretical analysis, that selects the optimal kernel from a candidate set. Additionally, we propose a subsampling-based warm-start strategy for hyperparameter initialization to improve efficiency and avoid hyperparameter misspecification. With much lower computational cost, our subsampling-based strategy can yield competitive or better performance than training exclusively on the full dataset. Combining all these components, we recommend two GPR methods-exact and scalable-designed to match available computational resources and specific UQ requirements. Extensive evaluation on real-world datasets, including UCI benchmarks and a safety-critical medical case study, demonstrates the robustness and precision of our methods.
5/24/2024
🎯
Enhancing Predictive Accuracy in Pharmaceutical Sales Through An Ensemble Kernel Gaussian Process Regression Approach
Shahin Mirshekari, Mohammadreza Moradi, Hossein Jafari, Mehdi Jafari, Mohammad Ensaf
0
0
This research employs Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) with an ensemble kernel, integrating Exponential Squared, Revised Mat'ern, and Rational Quadratic kernels to analyze pharmaceutical sales data. Bayesian optimization was used to identify optimal kernel weights: 0.76 for Exponential Squared, 0.21 for Revised Mat'ern, and 0.13 for Rational Quadratic. The ensemble kernel demonstrated superior performance in predictive accuracy, achieving an ( R^2 ) score near 1.0, and significantly lower values in Mean Squared Error (MSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE). These findings highlight the efficacy of ensemble kernels in GPR for predictive analytics in complex pharmaceutical sales datasets.
5/1/2024
Multi-fidelity Gaussian process surrogate modeling for regression problems in physics
Kislaya Ravi, Vladyslav Fediukov, Felix Dietrich, Tobias Neckel, Fabian Buse, Michael Bergmann, Hans-Joachim Bungartz
0
0
One of the main challenges in surrogate modeling is the limited availability of data due to resource constraints associated with computationally expensive simulations. Multi-fidelity methods provide a solution by chaining models in a hierarchy with increasing fidelity, associated with lower error, but increasing cost. In this paper, we compare different multi-fidelity methods employed in constructing Gaussian process surrogates for regression. Non-linear autoregressive methods in the existing literature are primarily confined to two-fidelity models, and we extend these methods to handle more than two levels of fidelity. Additionally, we propose enhancements for an existing method incorporating delay terms by introducing a structured kernel. We demonstrate the performance of these methods across various academic and real-world scenarios. Our findings reveal that multi-fidelity methods generally have a smaller prediction error for the same computational cost as compared to the single-fidelity method, although their effectiveness varies across different scenarios.
4/19/2024