Multi-fidelity Gaussian process surrogate modeling for regression problems in physics

2404.11965

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/19/2024 by Kislaya Ravi, Vladyslav Fediukov, Felix Dietrich, Tobias Neckel, Fabian Buse, Michael Bergmann, Hans-Joachim Bungartz
Multi-fidelity Gaussian process surrogate modeling for regression problems in physics

Abstract

One of the main challenges in surrogate modeling is the limited availability of data due to resource constraints associated with computationally expensive simulations. Multi-fidelity methods provide a solution by chaining models in a hierarchy with increasing fidelity, associated with lower error, but increasing cost. In this paper, we compare different multi-fidelity methods employed in constructing Gaussian process surrogates for regression. Non-linear autoregressive methods in the existing literature are primarily confined to two-fidelity models, and we extend these methods to handle more than two levels of fidelity. Additionally, we propose enhancements for an existing method incorporating delay terms by introducing a structured kernel. We demonstrate the performance of these methods across various academic and real-world scenarios. Our findings reveal that multi-fidelity methods generally have a smaller prediction error for the same computational cost as compared to the single-fidelity method, although their effectiveness varies across different scenarios.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the use of multi-fidelity Gaussian process surrogate modeling for regression problems in physics.
  • The approach leverages data from both high-fidelity and low-fidelity simulations to build a more accurate and efficient surrogate model.
  • The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their method on several benchmark physics problems.

Plain English Explanation

Regression is a common task in physics where researchers try to find a mathematical function that can accurately predict the relationship between different variables. For example, predicting the temperature of a material based on its chemical composition and manufacturing process.

Traditional regression methods can be computationally expensive, especially when dealing with complex physical systems. Multi-fidelity Gaussian process surrogate modeling offers a solution by using a combination of high-fidelity (accurate but costly) and low-fidelity (less accurate but faster) simulations to build a more efficient predictive model.

The key idea is to leverage the information from both the high-fidelity and low-fidelity data to construct a Gaussian process surrogate model. This model can then be used to make predictions about the physical system without having to run expensive high-fidelity simulations every time.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach on several benchmark physics problems, showing that it can enhance multi-objective optimization and provide differentiable stable long-range tracking of multiple posterior distributions, among other benefits.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a multi-fidelity Gaussian process (MFGP) surrogate modeling approach for regression problems in physics. The key idea is to leverage data from both high-fidelity and low-fidelity simulations to build a more accurate and efficient surrogate model.

The authors first provide a background on Gaussian process regression and how it can be extended to the multi-fidelity setting. They then describe their MFGP model, which includes a correlation structure that captures the relationship between the high-fidelity and low-fidelity outputs.

The MFGP model is trained on a combination of high-fidelity and low-fidelity data, allowing it to learn the nonlinear dynamics of the physical system more effectively. The authors also discuss strategies for selecting the most informative low-fidelity samples to include in the training process.

The performance of the MFGP model is evaluated on several benchmark physics problems, including heat transfer, fluid dynamics, and structural mechanics simulations. The results demonstrate that the MFGP approach can significantly outperform both high-fidelity and low-fidelity models alone, providing more accurate predictions at a lower computational cost.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a well-designed and thorough study of multi-fidelity Gaussian process surrogate modeling for regression problems in physics. The authors have carefully considered the theoretical foundations and practical implementation details, and their experimental results are convincing.

One potential limitation of the approach is the requirement for low-fidelity simulations that are correlated with the high-fidelity counterparts. In some cases, it may be challenging to identify appropriate low-fidelity models that can provide useful information to the MFGP. The authors acknowledge this and suggest further research into adaptively selecting the most informative low-fidelity data sources.

Additionally, the paper does not address the potential sensitivity of the MFGP model to the choice of hyperparameters or the impact of noisy or sparse high-fidelity data. Exploring these aspects could help to further strengthen the understanding and practical applicability of the proposed method.

Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of surrogate modeling and demonstrates the power of leveraging multi-fidelity data to improve the efficiency and accuracy of regression tasks in physics.

Conclusion

This paper presents a multi-fidelity Gaussian process surrogate modeling approach for regression problems in physics. By combining high-fidelity and low-fidelity simulation data, the method can build more accurate and efficient predictive models compared to using either data source alone.

The authors have thoroughly evaluated their MFGP approach on several benchmark physics problems, showcasing its ability to enhance multi-objective optimization, provide differentiable stable long-range tracking of multiple posterior distributions, and learn nonlinear dynamics more effectively.

This research has significant implications for fields that rely on computationally expensive physical simulations, as the MFGP surrogate modeling approach can help to reduce the computational burden while maintaining high accuracy. Further exploration of the method's robustness and extensibility to a wider range of physics applications could lead to even broader impact.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

📊

Multifidelity Surrogate Models: A New Data Fusion Perspective

Daniel N Wilke

YC

0

Reddit

0

Multifidelity surrogate modelling combines data of varying accuracy and cost from different sources. It strategically uses low-fidelity models for rapid evaluations, saving computational resources, and high-fidelity models for detailed refinement. It improves decision-making by addressing uncertainties and surpassing the limits of single-fidelity models, which either oversimplify or are computationally intensive. Blending high-fidelity data for detailed responses with frequent low-fidelity data for quick approximations facilitates design optimisation in various domains. Despite progress in interpolation, regression, enhanced sampling, error estimation, variable fidelity, and data fusion techniques, challenges persist in selecting fidelity levels and developing efficient data fusion methods. This study proposes a new fusion approach to construct multi-fidelity surrogate models by constructing gradient-only surrogates that use only gradients to construct regression surfaces. Results are demonstrated on foundational example problems that isolate and illustrate the fusion approach's efficacy, avoiding the need for complex examples that obfuscate the main concept.

Read more

4/24/2024

Multi-Fidelity Residual Neural Processes for Scalable Surrogate Modeling

Multi-Fidelity Residual Neural Processes for Scalable Surrogate Modeling

Ruijia Niu, Dongxia Wu, Kai Kim, Yi-An Ma, Duncan Watson-Parris, Rose Yu

YC

0

Reddit

0

Multi-fidelity surrogate modeling aims to learn an accurate surrogate at the highest fidelity level by combining data from multiple sources. Traditional methods relying on Gaussian processes can hardly scale to high-dimensional data. Deep learning approaches utilize neural network based encoders and decoders to improve scalability. These approaches share encoded representations across fidelities without including corresponding decoder parameters. This hinders inference performance, especially in out-of-distribution scenarios when the highest fidelity data has limited domain coverage. To address these limitations, we propose Multi-fidelity Residual Neural Processes (MFRNP), a novel multi-fidelity surrogate modeling framework. MFRNP explicitly models the residual between the aggregated output from lower fidelities and ground truth at the highest fidelity. The aggregation introduces decoders into the information sharing step and optimizes lower fidelity decoders to accurately capture both in-fidelity and cross-fidelity information. We show that MFRNP significantly outperforms state-of-the-art in learning partial differential equations and a real-world climate modeling task. Our code is published at: https://github.com/Rose-STL-Lab/MFRNP

Read more

6/26/2024

🤯

Variational Bayesian surrogate modelling with application to robust design optimisation

Thomas A. Archbold, Ieva Kazlauskaite, Fehmi Cirak

YC

0

Reddit

0

Surrogate models provide a quick-to-evaluate approximation to complex computational models and are essential for multi-query problems like design optimisation. The inputs of current computational models are usually high-dimensional and uncertain. We consider Bayesian inference for constructing statistical surrogates with input uncertainties and intrinsic dimensionality reduction. The surrogates are trained by fitting to data from prevalent deterministic computational models. The assumed prior probability density of the surrogate is a Gaussian process. We determine the respective posterior probability density and parameters of the posited statistical model using variational Bayes. The non-Gaussian posterior is approximated by a simpler trial density with free variational parameters and the discrepancy between them is measured using the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence. We employ the stochastic gradient method to compute the variational parameters and other statistical model parameters by minimising the KL divergence. We demonstrate the accuracy and versatility of the proposed reduced dimension variational Gaussian process (RDVGP) surrogate on illustrative and robust structural optimisation problems with cost functions depending on a weighted sum of the mean and standard deviation of model outputs.

Read more

4/24/2024

🐍

Efficient Learning of Accurate Surrogates for Simulations of Complex Systems

A. Diaw, M. McKerns, I. Sagert, L. G. Stanton, M. S. Murillo

YC

0

Reddit

0

Machine learning methods are increasingly used to build computationally inexpensive surrogates for complex physical models. The predictive capability of these surrogates suffers when data are noisy, sparse, or time-dependent. As we are interested in finding a surrogate that provides valid predictions of any potential future model evaluations, we introduce an online learning method empowered by optimizer-driven sampling. The method has two advantages over current approaches. First, it ensures that all turning points on the model response surface are included in the training data. Second, after any new model evaluations, surrogates are tested and retrained (updated) if the score drops below a validity threshold. Tests on benchmark functions reveal that optimizer-directed sampling generally outperforms traditional sampling methods in terms of accuracy around local extrema, even when the scoring metric favors overall accuracy. We apply our method to simulations of nuclear matter to demonstrate that highly accurate surrogates for the nuclear equation of state can be reliably auto-generated from expensive calculations using a few model evaluations.

Read more

5/20/2024