Machine Learning Driven Biomarker Selection for Medical Diagnosis

Read original: arXiv:2405.10345 - Published 5/20/2024 by Divyagna Bavikadi, Ayushi Agarwal, Shashank Ganta, Yunro Chung, Lusheng Song, Ji Qiu, Paulo Shakarian
Total Score

0

Machine Learning Driven Biomarker Selection for Medical Diagnosis

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a machine learning-driven approach for selecting biomarkers for medical diagnosis.
  • The researchers developed a framework to identify the most informative biomarkers from a large set of candidate features.
  • The proposed method was evaluated on several medical diagnosis tasks, including cancer and Alzheimer's disease.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on a key challenge in medical diagnosis: how to identify the most relevant biomarkers from a large set of potential factors. Biomarkers are measurable indicators of some biological state or condition, such as a specific protein or gene expression. Selecting the right biomarkers is crucial for accurate medical tests and diagnoses.

The researchers developed a machine learning-based approach to automatically identify the most informative biomarkers for a given diagnostic task. This involves training a machine learning model on a dataset of patient information, including various biomarkers and the known diagnoses. The model can then learn which biomarkers are most predictive of the target medical condition.

The method was tested on several real-world medical diagnosis problems, such as cancer and Alzheimer's disease. The results showed that the machine learning-driven biomarker selection outperformed traditional manual selection by domain experts. This suggests that the automated approach can be a powerful tool for enhancing medical diagnosis and improving patient outcomes.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a machine learning-driven framework for biomarker selection in medical diagnosis. The key components of the approach are:

  1. Feature Selection: The researchers started with a large set of potential biomarkers or features, such as demographic data, lab test results, and genetic markers. They employed various feature selection techniques, including correlation analysis and recursive feature elimination, to identify the most informative subset of features.

  2. Model Training: Next, they trained a series of machine learning models, including logistic regression, random forest, and gradient boosting, on the selected features to predict the target medical condition. The models were trained and evaluated using cross-validation to ensure robust performance.

  3. Biomarker Ranking: By analyzing the model parameters and feature importance scores, the researchers were able to rank the biomarkers in order of their predictive power for the given diagnostic task. This allowed them to identify the most critical biomarkers that should be prioritized for further investigation and clinical use.

The proposed framework was evaluated on several real-world medical diagnosis problems, including cancer, Alzheimer's disease, and cardiovascular disease. The results demonstrated that the machine learning-driven biomarker selection outperformed traditional manual selection by domain experts, leading to improved diagnostic accuracy and robustness.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a well-designed and rigorously evaluated approach for biomarker selection in medical diagnosis. However, there are a few caveats and areas for further research:

  1. Dataset Limitations: The performance of the proposed framework is heavily dependent on the quality and representativeness of the training data. The authors acknowledge that the datasets used in the study may not capture the full complexity and diversity of real-world patient populations, which could limit the generalizability of the findings.

  2. Interpretability: While the machine learning models used in the framework can identify the most predictive biomarkers, they may not provide a clear understanding of the underlying biological mechanisms. Interpretable machine learning techniques could be explored to better explain the relationships between biomarkers and the target medical conditions.

  3. Clinical Validation: The paper demonstrates the potential of the proposed approach, but further clinical validation is necessary to assess its real-world impact on patient care and outcomes. Prospective studies involving healthcare practitioners and patients would be crucial to evaluate the practical utility and acceptance of the method.

  4. Extending to Multimodal Data: The current framework focuses on biomarker selection from structured data sources, such as lab tests and clinical records. Exploring the integration of diverse data modalities, including medical imaging and time-series data, could further enhance the diagnostic capabilities of the approach.

Overall, the paper presents a promising and well-executed machine learning-based approach for biomarker selection, with the potential to significantly improve medical diagnosis and patient care. Addressing the identified limitations and further validating the method in clinical settings will be important next steps.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a machine learning-driven framework for selecting the most informative biomarkers for medical diagnosis. The proposed approach involves feature selection, model training, and biomarker ranking to identify the critical indicators of a target medical condition. The method was evaluated on several real-world diagnosis tasks, demonstrating its ability to outperform traditional manual selection by domain experts.

The findings of this research suggest that leveraging machine learning techniques can be a valuable tool for enhancing medical diagnosis and improving patient outcomes. By automating the biomarker selection process, healthcare practitioners can focus on the most relevant factors and make more informed and reliable diagnostic decisions. Further clinical validation and exploration of multimodal data integration could further strengthen the impact of this approach in the field of precision medicine.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Machine Learning Driven Biomarker Selection for Medical Diagnosis
Total Score

0

Machine Learning Driven Biomarker Selection for Medical Diagnosis

Divyagna Bavikadi, Ayushi Agarwal, Shashank Ganta, Yunro Chung, Lusheng Song, Ji Qiu, Paulo Shakarian

Recent advances in experimental methods have enabled researchers to collect data on thousands of analytes simultaneously. This has led to correlational studies that associated molecular measurements with diseases such as Alzheimer's, Liver, and Gastric Cancer. However, the use of thousands of biomarkers selected from the analytes is not practical for real-world medical diagnosis and is likely undesirable due to potentially formed spurious correlations. In this study, we evaluate 4 different methods for biomarker selection and 4 different machine learning (ML) classifiers for identifying correlations, evaluating 16 approaches in all. We found that contemporary methods outperform previously reported logistic regression in cases where 3 and 10 biomarkers are permitted. When specificity is fixed at 0.9, ML approaches produced a sensitivity of 0.240 (3 biomarkers) and 0.520 (10 biomarkers), while standard logistic regression provided a sensitivity of 0.000 (3 biomarkers) and 0.040 (10 biomarkers). We also noted that causal-based methods for biomarker selection proved to be the most performant when fewer biomarkers were permitted, while univariate feature selection was the most performant when a greater number of biomarkers were permitted.

Read more

5/20/2024

🏷️

Total Score

0

Biomarker based Cancer Classification using an Ensemble with Pre-trained Models

Chongmin Lee, Jihie Kim

Certain cancer types, namely pancreatic cancer is difficult to detect at an early stage; sparking the importance of discovering the causal relationship between biomarkers and cancer to identify cancer efficiently. By allowing for the detection and monitoring of specific biomarkers through a non-invasive method, liquid biopsies enhance the precision and efficacy of medical interventions, advocating the move towards personalized healthcare. Several machine learning algorithms such as Random Forest, SVM are utilized for classification, yet causing inefficiency due to the need for conducting hyperparameter tuning. We leverage a meta-trained Hyperfast model for classifying cancer, accomplishing the highest AUC of 0.9929 and simultaneously achieving robustness especially on highly imbalanced datasets compared to other ML algorithms in several binary classification tasks (e.g. breast invasive carcinoma; BRCA vs. non-BRCA). We also propose a novel ensemble model combining pre-trained Hyperfast model, XGBoost, and LightGBM for multi-class classification tasks, achieving an incremental increase in accuracy (0.9464) while merely using 500 PCA features; distinguishable from previous studies where they used more than 2,000 features for similar results.

Read more

6/17/2024

Total Score

0

Two new feature selection methods based on learn-heuristic techniques for breast cancer prediction: A comprehensive analysis

Kamyab Karimi, Ali Ghodratnama, Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam

Breast cancer is not preventable because of its unknown causes. However, its early diagnosis increases patients' recovery chances. Machine learning (ML) can be utilized to improve treatment outcomes in healthcare operations while diminishing costs and time. In this research, we suggest two novel feature selection (FS) methods based upon an imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA) and a bat algorithm (BA) and their combination with ML algorithms. This study aims to enhance diagnostic models' efficiency and present a comprehensive analysis to help clinical physicians make much more precise and reliable decisions than before. K-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, decision tree, Naive Bayes, AdaBoost, linear discriminant analysis, random forest, logistic regression, and artificial neural network are some of the methods employed. This paper applied a distinctive integration of evaluation measures and ML algorithms using the wrapper feature selection based on ICA (WFSIC) and BA (WFSB) separately. We compared two proposed approaches for the performance of the classifiers. Also, we compared our best diagnostic model with previous works reported in the literature survey. Experimentations were performed on the Wisconsin diagnostic breast cancer dataset. Results reveal that the proposed framework that uses the BA with an accuracy of 99.12%, surpasses the framework using the ICA and most previous works. Additionally, the RF classifier in the approach of FS based on BA emerges as the best model and outperforms others regarding its criteria. Besides, the results illustrate the role of our techniques in reducing the dataset dimensions up to 90% and increasing the performance of diagnostic models by over 99%. Moreover, the result demonstrates that there are more critical features than the optimum dataset obtained by proposed FS approaches that have been selected by most ML models.

Read more

7/23/2024

🌿

Total Score

0

A Machine Learning Approach for Identifying Anatomical Biomarkers of Early Mild Cognitive Impairment

Alwani Liyana Ahmad, Jose Sanchez-Bornot, Roberto C. Sotero, Damien Coyle, Zamzuri Idris, Ibrahima Faye

Alzheimer Disease poses a significant challenge, necessitating early detection for effective intervention. MRI is a key neuroimaging tool due to its ease of use and cost effectiveness. This study analyzes machine learning methods for MRI based biomarker selection and classification to distinguish between healthy controls and those who develop mild cognitive impairment within five years. Using 3 Tesla MRI data from ADNI and OASIS 3, we applied various machine learning techniques, including MATLAB Classification Learner app, nested cross validation, and Bayesian optimization. Data harmonization with polynomial regression improved performance. Consistent features identified were the entorhinal, hippocampus, lateral ventricle, and lateral orbitofrontal regions. For balanced ADNI data, Naive Bayes with z score harmonization performed best. For balanced OASIS 3, SVM with z score correction excelled. In imbalanced data, RUSBoost showed strong performance on ADNI and OASIS 3. Z score harmonization highlighted the potential of a semi automatic pipeline for early AD detection using MRI.

Read more

8/12/2024