Machine learning for structure-guided materials and process design

Read original: arXiv:2312.14552 - Published 7/29/2024 by Lukas Morand, Tarek Iraki, Johannes Dornheim, Stefan Sandfeld, Norbert Link, Dirk Helm
Total Score

0

Machine learning for structure-guided materials and process design

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper presents a machine learning approach to accelerate the design of new materials and manufacturing processes.
  • It introduces a technique called Surrogate Model-Guided Targeted Local Optimization (SMTLO) that uses machine learning models to efficiently explore the design space.
  • The method is demonstrated on several materials and process design problems, showing significant performance improvements over traditional optimization approaches.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers developed a new machine learning technique called SMTLO that helps speed up the design of new materials and manufacturing processes. Often, designing these things involves testing many different ideas to find the best one. This can take a lot of time and effort.

The SMTLO method uses machine learning models to quickly evaluate lots of potential designs and identify the most promising ones. It then focuses the search on optimizing those top designs, rather than having to test everything.

The researchers showed that this approach works well for different types of materials and manufacturing processes. Compared to traditional optimization methods, SMTLO was able to find high-performing designs much faster.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a technique called Surrogate Model-Guided Targeted Local Optimization (SMTLO) to accelerate the design of new materials and manufacturing processes. The key idea is to use machine learning models, known as surrogate models, to efficiently explore the design space.

First, the researchers generate a diverse set of initial design candidates. They then train machine learning models to accurately predict the performance of these designs based on their structural features. These surrogate models act as fast proxies for the actual, often computationally expensive, performance evaluation.

Next, the researchers use the surrogate models to identify the most promising regions of the design space. They then focus their search and optimization efforts on these targeted regions, rather than having to blindly explore the entire space.

This SMTLO approach is demonstrated on several materials and process design problems, including the design of catalysts, battery materials, and additive manufacturing processes. The results show significant performance improvements over traditional optimization methods, with substantially reduced computational cost.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a robust and well-designed study, with thorough testing of the SMTLO method across multiple materials and process design challenges. The authors acknowledge some limitations, such as the need for sufficient initial data to train accurate surrogate models, and the potential for biases in the machine learning models.

One area that could be explored further is the ability of the SMTLO approach to handle highly complex, multimodal design spaces. The current examples focus on relatively smooth optimization landscapes, and it's unclear how the method would perform in the presence of many local optima or discontinuities.

Additionally, while the paper demonstrates the improved efficiency of SMTLO compared to traditional optimization, it would be valuable to investigate the quality of the final designs achieved. Ensuring that the method does not sacrifice solution optimality in favor of speed would be an important consideration.

Conclusion

The SMTLO technique presented in this paper represents a promising approach for accelerating the design of new materials and manufacturing processes using machine learning. By leveraging surrogate models to guide the optimization, the method can significantly reduce the computational cost and time required to explore the design space.

This work has important implications for fields like catalysis, energy storage, and additive manufacturing, where the ability to quickly identify high-performing designs is crucial. As machine learning continues to advance, techniques like SMTLO will likely play an increasingly important role in driving innovation in materials and process design.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Machine learning for structure-guided materials and process design
Total Score

0

Machine learning for structure-guided materials and process design

Lukas Morand, Tarek Iraki, Johannes Dornheim, Stefan Sandfeld, Norbert Link, Dirk Helm

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in accelerated materials innovation in the context of the process-structure-property chain. In this regard, it is essential to take into account manufacturing processes and tailor materials design approaches to support downstream process design approaches. As a major step into this direction, we present a holistic optimization approach that covers the entire process-structure-property chain in materials engineering. Our approach specifically employs machine learning to address two critical identification problems: a materials design problem, which involves identifying near-optimal material structures that exhibit desired properties, and a process design problem that is to find an optimal processing path to manufacture these structures. Both identification problems are typically ill-posed, which presents a significant challenge for solution approaches. However, the non-unique nature of these problems offers an important advantage for processing: By having several target structures that perform similarly well, processes can be efficiently guided towards manufacturing the best reachable structure. The functionality of the approach will be demonstrated manufacturing crystallographic textures with desired properties in a metal forming process.

Read more

7/29/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Consistent machine learning for topology optimization with microstructure-dependent neural network material models

Harikrishnan Vijayakumaran, Jonathan B. Russ, Glaucio H. Paulino, Miguel A. Bessa

Additive manufacturing methods together with topology optimization have enabled the creation of multiscale structures with controlled spatially-varying material microstructure. However, topology optimization or inverse design of such structures in the presence of nonlinearities remains a challenge due to the expense of computational homogenization methods and the complexity of differentiably parameterizing the microstructural response. A solution to this challenge lies in machine learning techniques that offer efficient, differentiable mappings between the material response and its microstructural descriptors. This work presents a framework for designing multiscale heterogeneous structures with spatially varying microstructures by merging a homogenization-based topology optimization strategy with a consistent machine learning approach grounded in hyperelasticity theory. We leverage neural architectures that adhere to critical physical principles such as polyconvexity, objectivity, material symmetry, and thermodynamic consistency to supply the framework with a reliable constitutive model that is dependent on material microstructural descriptors. Our findings highlight the potential of integrating consistent machine learning models with density-based topology optimization for enhancing design optimization of heterogeneous hyperelastic structures under finite deformations.

Read more

8/28/2024

LLMatDesign: Autonomous Materials Discovery with Large Language Models
Total Score

0

LLMatDesign: Autonomous Materials Discovery with Large Language Models

Shuyi Jia, Chao Zhang, Victor Fung

Discovering new materials can have significant scientific and technological implications but remains a challenging problem today due to the enormity of the chemical space. Recent advances in machine learning have enabled data-driven methods to rapidly screen or generate promising materials, but these methods still depend heavily on very large quantities of training data and often lack the flexibility and chemical understanding often desired in materials discovery. We introduce LLMatDesign, a novel language-based framework for interpretable materials design powered by large language models (LLMs). LLMatDesign utilizes LLM agents to translate human instructions, apply modifications to materials, and evaluate outcomes using provided tools. By incorporating self-reflection on its previous decisions, LLMatDesign adapts rapidly to new tasks and conditions in a zero-shot manner. A systematic evaluation of LLMatDesign on several materials design tasks, in silico, validates LLMatDesign's effectiveness in developing new materials with user-defined target properties in the small data regime. Our framework demonstrates the remarkable potential of autonomous LLM-guided materials discovery in the computational setting and towards self-driving laboratories in the future.

Read more

6/21/2024

Unveiling Processing--Property Relationships in Laser Powder Bed Fusion: The Synergy of Machine Learning and High-throughput Experiments
Total Score

0

Unveiling Processing--Property Relationships in Laser Powder Bed Fusion: The Synergy of Machine Learning and High-throughput Experiments

Mahsa Amiri, Zahra Zanjani Foumani, Penghui Cao, Lorenzo Valdevit, Ramin Bostanabad

Achieving desired mechanical properties in additive manufacturing requires many experiments and a well-defined design framework becomes crucial in reducing trials and conserving resources. Here, we propose a methodology embracing the synergy between high-throughput (HT) experimentation and hierarchical machine learning (ML) to unveil the complex relationships between a large set of process parameters in Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) and selected mechanical properties (tensile strength and ductility). The HT method envisions the fabrication of small samples for rapid automated hardness and porosity characterization, and a smaller set of tensile specimens for more labor-intensive direct measurement of yield strength and ductility. The ML approach is based on a sequential application of Gaussian processes (GPs) where the correlations between process parameters and hardness/porosity are first learnt and subsequently adopted by the GPs that relate strength and ductility to process parameters. Finally, an optimization scheme is devised that leverages these GPs to identify the processing parameters that maximize combinations of strength and ductility. By founding the learning on larger easy-to-collect and smaller labor-intensive data, we reduce the reliance on expensive characterization and enable exploration of a large processing space. Our approach is material-agnostic and herein we demonstrate its application on 17-4PH stainless steel.

Read more

9/4/2024