Making Long-Context Language Models Better Multi-Hop Reasoners
0
💬
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Recent advancements in long-context modeling have improved language models (LMs) for complex tasks across various NLP applications.
- Despite this progress, LMs still struggle with multi-hop reasoning and exhibit decreased performance in the presence of noisy contexts.
- The paper introduces "Reasoning with Attributions," a novel approach that prompts LMs to provide attributions for each assertion during their reasoning process.
Plain English Explanation
Language models (LMs) have become increasingly advanced, allowing them to tackle more complex tasks in natural language processing (NLP). However, the researchers found that these models still have trouble with a specific type of reasoning called "multi-hop reasoning." This means they struggle to connect multiple pieces of information together to arrive at a conclusion.
The researchers also discovered that LMs perform worse when the context they're given is noisy or unclear. To address these issues, the researchers developed a new approach called "Reasoning with Attributions." This method prompts the LMs to explain the reasoning behind each statement they make during the task.
By requiring the LMs to provide these "attributions," the researchers hoped to make the models' thought processes more transparent and improve their performance on multi-hop reasoning tasks, even in the presence of noisy information.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel approach called "Reasoning with Attributions" that prompts language models (LMs) to provide attributions, or explanations, for each assertion during their reasoning process. The researchers validate this approach through experiments on three multi-hop datasets, using both proprietary and open-source LMs.
The experiments demonstrate the efficacy and resilience of the Reasoning with Attributions approach. Additionally, the researchers explore methods to further enhance the reasoning capabilities of LMs through fine-tuning. They offer an attribution-annotated dataset and a specialized training strategy, which enable a fine-tuned model to achieve competitive performance on multi-hop reasoning benchmarks, rivaling the results of proprietary LMs like ChatGPT and Claude-instant.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach to address the limitations of current LMs in multi-hop reasoning and noisy contexts. By requiring LMs to provide attributions, the researchers aim to make the models' thought processes more transparent, which could lead to improved performance and better understanding of their limitations.
However, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the potential drawbacks or limitations of the Reasoning with Attributions approach. It would be valuable to understand any trade-offs or potential issues that may arise, such as the impact on model complexity, inference time, or the ability to handle more open-ended or ambiguous reasoning tasks.
Additionally, the researchers mention fine-tuning methods to enhance the reasoning capabilities of LMs, but more information on the specific techniques and their effectiveness would be helpful for readers to better evaluate the overall approach.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel "Reasoning with Attributions" approach that prompts language models to provide explanations for their reasoning, addressing their struggles with multi-hop reasoning and performance in noisy contexts. The experiments demonstrate the efficacy of this approach, and the researchers also explore fine-tuning methods to further improve the reasoning capabilities of LMs.
The work presented in this paper represents an important step forward in enhancing the transparency and reliability of language models, which could have significant implications for a wide range of NLP applications. By making the models' thought processes more accessible, the Reasoning with Attributions approach opens the door to more trustworthy and interpretable language-based systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
0
Making Long-Context Language Models Better Multi-Hop Reasoners
Yanyang Li, Shuo Liang, Michael R. Lyu, Liwei Wang
Recent advancements in long-context modeling have enhanced language models (LMs) for complex tasks across multiple NLP applications. Despite this progress, we find that these models struggle with multi-hop reasoning and exhibit decreased performance in the presence of noisy contexts. In this paper, we introduce Reasoning with Attributions, a novel approach that prompts LMs to supply attributions for each assertion during their reasoning. We validate our approach through experiments on three multi-hop datasets, employing both proprietary and open-source models, and demonstrate its efficacy and resilience. Furthermore, we explore methods to augment reasoning capabilities via fine-tuning and offer an attribution-annotated dataset and a specialized training strategy. Our fine-tuned model achieves competitive performance on multi-hop reasoning benchmarks, closely paralleling proprietary LMs such as ChatGPT and Claude-instant.
Read more8/7/2024
💬
0
Seemingly Plausible Distractors in Multi-Hop Reasoning: Are Large Language Models Attentive Readers?
Neeladri Bhuiya, Viktor Schlegel, Stefan Winkler
State-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs) are accredited with an increasing number of different capabilities, ranging from reading comprehension, over advanced mathematical and reasoning skills to possessing scientific knowledge. In this paper we focus on their multi-hop reasoning capability: the ability to identify and integrate information from multiple textual sources. Given the concerns with the presence of simplifying cues in existing multi-hop reasoning benchmarks, which allow models to circumvent the reasoning requirement, we set out to investigate, whether LLMs are prone to exploiting such simplifying cues. We find evidence that they indeed circumvent the requirement to perform multi-hop reasoning, but they do so in more subtle ways than what was reported about their fine-tuned pre-trained language model (PLM) predecessors. Motivated by this finding, we propose a challenging multi-hop reasoning benchmark, by generating seemingly plausible multi-hop reasoning chains, which ultimately lead to incorrect answers. We evaluate multiple open and proprietary state-of-the-art LLMs, and find that their performance to perform multi-hop reasoning is affected, as indicated by up to 45% relative decrease in F1 score when presented with such seemingly plausible alternatives. We conduct a deeper analysis and find evidence that while LLMs tend to ignore misleading lexical cues, misleading reasoning paths indeed present a significant challenge.
Read more9/10/2024
0
CoTAR: Chain-of-Thought Attribution Reasoning with Multi-level Granularity
Moshe Berchansky, Daniel Fleischer, Moshe Wasserblat, Peter Izsak
State-of-the-art performance in QA tasks is currently achieved by systems employing Large Language Models (LLMs), however these models tend to hallucinate information in their responses. One approach focuses on enhancing the generation process by incorporating attribution from the given input to the output. However, the challenge of identifying appropriate attributions and verifying their accuracy against a source is a complex task that requires significant improvements in assessing such systems. We introduce an attribution-oriented Chain-of-Thought reasoning method to enhance the accuracy of attributions. This approach focuses the reasoning process on generating an attribution-centric output. Evaluations on two context-enhanced question-answering datasets using GPT-4 demonstrate improved accuracy and correctness of attributions. In addition, the combination of our method with finetuning enhances the response and attribution accuracy of two smaller LLMs, showing their potential to outperform GPT-4 in some cases.
Read more4/17/2024
0
Peering into the Mind of Language Models: An Approach for Attribution in Contextual Question Answering
Anirudh Phukan, Shwetha Somasundaram, Apoorv Saxena, Koustava Goswami, Balaji Vasan Srinivasan
With the enhancement in the field of generative artificial intelligence (AI), contextual question answering has become extremely relevant. Attributing model generations to the input source document is essential to ensure trustworthiness and reliability. We observe that when large language models (LLMs) are used for contextual question answering, the output answer often consists of text copied verbatim from the input prompt which is linked together with glue text generated by the LLM. Motivated by this, we propose that LLMs have an inherent awareness from where the text was copied, likely captured in the hidden states of the LLM. We introduce a novel method for attribution in contextual question answering, leveraging the hidden state representations of LLMs. Our approach bypasses the need for extensive model retraining and retrieval model overhead, offering granular attributions and preserving the quality of generated answers. Our experimental results demonstrate that our method performs on par or better than GPT-4 at identifying verbatim copied segments in LLM generations and in attributing these segments to their source. Importantly, our method shows robust performance across various LLM architectures, highlighting its broad applicability. Additionally, we present Verifiability-granular, an attribution dataset which has token level annotations for LLM generations in the contextual question answering setup.
Read more5/29/2024