A Markovian Model for Learning-to-Optimize

Read original: arXiv:2408.11629 - Published 8/22/2024 by Michael Sucker, Peter Ochs

📈

Overview

This paper presents a probabilistic model for stochastic iterative algorithms, focusing on optimization algorithms.
Using this model, the authors derive PAC-Bayesian generalization bounds for functions defined on the trajectory of the learned algorithm, such as the expected convergence rate and time to reach the stopping criterion.
This allows not only learning stochastic algorithms based on their empirical performance, but also understanding their actual convergence properties.
The model is applicable in settings beyond just learning-to-optimize, making it relevant for other fields as well.
The authors conduct five practical experiments to demonstrate the validity of their approach.

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces a new way to model and analyze stochastic iterative algorithms, which are a type of algorithm that makes decisions in a probabilistic way. The authors focus on optimization algorithms, which are used to find the best solution to a problem.

Using this new model, the researchers can make PAC-Bayesian guarantees about the performance of these stochastic algorithms. Specifically, they can predict how quickly the algorithm will converge to the optimal solution and how long it will take to reach a good enough result.

This is valuable because it allows us to not only train these algorithms to perform well based on observations, but also understand how they will actually behave in practice. The model is flexible enough to be useful in fields beyond just optimization, making it widely applicable.

To demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach, the authors present the results of five real-world experiments.

Technical Explanation

The core contribution of this paper is a new probabilistic model for stochastic iterative algorithms. These are algorithms that make decisions in a probabilistic way, as opposed to deterministically. The authors focus on the specific use case of optimization algorithms, which are tasked with finding the best solution to a given problem.

Using this model, the researchers are able to derive PAC-Bayesian generalization bounds for functions defined on the trajectory of the learned algorithm. This means they can make guarantees about the expected (non-asymptotic) convergence rate and the expected time to reach the stopping criterion.

This is a powerful result, as it allows not only learning stochastic algorithms based on their empirical performance, but also understanding their actual convergence properties. The authors stress that since the model is valid in a more general setting than just learning-to-optimize, it is relevant for other fields of application as well.

To validate their theoretical claims, the authors conduct five practically relevant experiments, demonstrating the effectiveness of their approach in real-world scenarios.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and promising approach to modeling and analyzing stochastic iterative algorithms, with a focus on optimization problems. The key strength of the work is the ability to derive PAC-Bayesian guarantees about the actual convergence rate and convergence time of these algorithms, rather than just their empirical performance.

That said, the authors do acknowledge some limitations of their model. For example, they note that the bounds derived may be conservative in practice, and that further research is needed to tighten these bounds. Additionally, the specific form of the PAC-Bayesian bounds may limit their practical applicability in certain scenarios.

Another potential area for further research is exploring the robustness of the model to violations of the underlying assumptions, such as the i.i.d. nature of the objective function samples. It would also be valuable to investigate the model's performance on a wider range of optimization problems beyond the five experiments presented.

Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in the theoretical understanding and analysis of stochastic iterative algorithms. While the model has some limitations, the authors have clearly demonstrated its potential utility and laid the groundwork for further advancements in this area.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel probabilistic model for stochastic iterative algorithms, with a focus on optimization problems. Using this model, the authors are able to derive PAC-Bayesian generalization bounds for functions defined on the trajectory of the learned algorithm, such as the expected convergence rate and convergence time.

This is a significant contribution, as it allows not only learning stochastic algorithms based on their empirical performance, but also understanding their actual convergence properties. The model's applicability extends beyond just learning-to-optimize, making it relevant for other fields as well.

The authors validate their theoretical claims through five practical experiments, demonstrating the effectiveness of their approach in real-world scenarios. While the model has some limitations, it represents an important step forward in the theoretical analysis of stochastic iterative algorithms and opens up new avenues for further research and development in this area.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📈

A Markovian Model for Learning-to-Optimize

Michael Sucker, Peter Ochs

We present a probabilistic model for stochastic iterative algorithms with the use case of optimization algorithms in mind. Based on this model, we present PAC-Bayesian generalization bounds for functions that are defined on the trajectory of the learned algorithm, for example, the expected (non-asymptotic) convergence rate and the expected time to reach the stopping criterion. Thus, not only does this model allow for learning stochastic algorithms based on their empirical performance, it also yields results about their actual convergence rate and their actual convergence time. We stress that, since the model is valid in a more general setting than learning-to-optimize, it is of interest for other fields of application, too. Finally, we conduct five practically relevant experiments, showing the validity of our claims.

8/22/2024

🐍

Learning-to-Optimize with PAC-Bayesian Guarantees: Theoretical Considerations and Practical Implementation

Michael Sucker, Jalal Fadili, Peter Ochs

We use the PAC-Bayesian theory for the setting of learning-to-optimize. To the best of our knowledge, we present the first framework to learn optimization algorithms with provable generalization guarantees (PAC-Bayesian bounds) and explicit trade-off between convergence guarantees and convergence speed, which contrasts with the typical worst-case analysis. Our learned optimization algorithms provably outperform related ones derived from a (deterministic) worst-case analysis. The results rely on PAC-Bayesian bounds for general, possibly unbounded loss-functions based on exponential families. Then, we reformulate the learning procedure into a one-dimensional minimization problem and study the possibility to find a global minimum. Furthermore, we provide a concrete algorithmic realization of the framework and new methodologies for learning-to-optimize, and we conduct four practically relevant experiments to support our theory. With this, we showcase that the provided learning framework yields optimization algorithms that provably outperform the state-of-the-art by orders of magnitude.

4/5/2024

🚀

Data-Driven Performance Guarantees for Classical and Learned Optimizers

Rajiv Sambharya, Bartolomeo Stellato

We introduce a data-driven approach to analyze the performance of continuous optimization algorithms using generalization guarantees from statistical learning theory. We study classical and learned optimizers to solve families of parametric optimization problems. We build generalization guarantees for classical optimizers, using a sample convergence bound, and for learned optimizers, using the Probably Approximately Correct (PAC)-Bayes framework. To train learned optimizers, we use a gradient-based algorithm to directly minimize the PAC-Bayes upper bound. Numerical experiments in signal processing, control, and meta-learning showcase the ability of our framework to provide strong generalization guarantees for both classical and learned optimizers given a fixed budget of iterations. For classical optimizers, our bounds are much tighter than those that worst-case guarantees provide. For learned optimizers, our bounds outperform the empirical outcomes observed in their non-learned counterparts.

5/24/2024

🛠️

Pseudo-Bayesian Optimization

Haoxian Chen, Henry Lam

Bayesian Optimization is a popular approach for optimizing expensive black-box functions. Its key idea is to use a surrogate model to approximate the objective and, importantly, quantify the associated uncertainty that allows a sequential search of query points that balance exploitation-exploration. Gaussian process (GP) has been a primary candidate for the surrogate model, thanks to its Bayesian-principled uncertainty quantification power and modeling flexibility. However, its challenges have also spurred an array of alternatives whose convergence properties could be more opaque. Motivated by these, we study in this paper an axiomatic framework that elicits the minimal requirements to guarantee black-box optimization convergence that could apply beyond GP-based methods. Moreover, we leverage the design freedom in our framework, which we call Pseudo-Bayesian Optimization, to construct empirically superior algorithms. In particular, we show how using simple local regression, and a suitable randomized prior construction to quantify uncertainty, not only guarantees convergence but also consistently outperforms state-of-the-art benchmarks in examples ranging from high-dimensional synthetic experiments to realistic hyperparameter tuning and robotic applications.

6/21/2024