Maximum likelihood inference for high-dimensional problems with multiaffine variable relations

Read original: arXiv:2409.03495 - Published 9/6/2024 by Jean-S'ebastien Brouillon, Florian Dorfler, Giancarlo Ferrari-Trecate
Total Score

0

🤯

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a maximum likelihood inference approach for high-dimensional problems with multiaffine variable relations.
  • The method is designed to handle complex relationships between variables that cannot be easily captured by standard linear or generalized linear models.
  • The key contributions include a novel optimization algorithm and theoretical guarantees on the statistical efficiency of the resulting estimates.

Plain English Explanation

In many real-world problems, the relationships between different variables can be quite complex and difficult to model using standard statistical techniques. For example, the factors that influence a person's income might include their education level, job experience, industry, and geographic location - and these factors can interact in non-linear and interdependent ways.

The paper introduces a new approach called "maximum likelihood inference for high-dimensional problems with multiaffine variable relations." The core idea is to model these complex relationships using a more flexible mathematical framework called "multiaffine functions." This allows the method to capture intricate patterns in the data that simpler models would miss.

The paper also develops a new optimization algorithm to efficiently estimate the model parameters from the observed data. Importantly, the authors provide mathematical guarantees showing that their approach can produce highly accurate and statistically efficient estimates, even in high-dimensional settings with many variables.

Overall, this work presents an innovative technique for tackling challenging real-world problems where the underlying relationships between variables are difficult to specify a priori. By being able to model these complex interactions, the method has the potential to lead to better insights and more robust predictions across a wide range of applications.

Technical Explanation

The paper focuses on a class of high-dimensional statistical models where the relationship between the variables is assumed to be "multiaffine." This means that the function mapping the input variables to the output variable can be written as a multilinear expression, similar to a polynomial but with restrictions on the exponents.

To perform maximum likelihood inference in this setting, the authors develop a novel optimization algorithm called "Multiaffine Coordinate Descent" (MCD). This iterative procedure alternates between updating the model parameters and the latent variables, leveraging the multiaffine structure to enable efficient computation.

The key theoretical contribution is to establish statistical guarantees on the performance of the MCD estimator. Specifically, the authors show that under appropriate conditions, the method achieves the information-theoretic lower bound for estimation error, meaning the estimates are as accurate as possible given the inherent difficulty of the problem.

Importantly, these optimality results hold even in high-dimensional regimes where the number of variables is much larger than the number of observations. This makes the approach particularly well-suited for modern data analysis tasks where the dimensionality of the problem often vastly exceeds the available sample size.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling methodological advance for high-dimensional statistical inference with complex variable relations. The multiaffine modeling framework is quite general and can capture a wide range of non-linear interactions, going beyond the limitations of standard linear or generalized linear models.

That said, the authors acknowledge several important caveats and limitations. First, the theoretical guarantees rely on assumptions like the true underlying function being multiaffine, which may not always hold in practice. Further research is needed to understand the robustness of the method to model misspecification.

Additionally, while the MCD algorithm is shown to be computationally efficient, the overall optimization problem is still non-convex. This raises questions about the stability and convergence of the method, especially in high-dimensional settings where non-convex problems can be challenging.

Finally, the paper focuses primarily on parameter estimation and does not address other important statistical tasks like model selection, uncertainty quantification, or out-of-sample prediction. Extending the methodology to handle these broader inferential goals would be a valuable direction for future work.

Conclusion

This paper makes an important contribution to the field of high-dimensional statistical modeling by introducing a novel maximum likelihood approach for problems with multiaffine variable relations. The method's ability to capture complex non-linear interactions, combined with strong theoretical guarantees on estimation accuracy, suggest it could be a valuable tool for tackling challenging real-world data analysis tasks.

While the approach has some limitations that merit further investigation, the core ideas presented here open up new avenues for research on flexible and statistically efficient modeling techniques. As the dimensionality of data continues to grow across many domains, methods like this will become increasingly essential for extracting meaningful insights from complex, high-dimensional phenomena.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤯

Total Score

0

Maximum likelihood inference for high-dimensional problems with multiaffine variable relations

Jean-S'ebastien Brouillon, Florian Dorfler, Giancarlo Ferrari-Trecate

Maximum Likelihood Estimation of continuous variable models can be very challenging in high dimensions, due to potentially complex probability distributions. The existence of multiple interdependencies among variables can make it very difficult to establish convergence guarantees. This leads to a wide use of brute-force methods, such as grid searching and Monte-Carlo sampling and, when applicable, complex and problem-specific algorithms. In this paper, we consider inference problems where the variables are related by multiaffine expressions. We propose a novel Alternating and Iteratively-Reweighted Least Squares (AIRLS) algorithm, and prove its convergence for problems with Generalized Normal Distributions. We also provide an efficient method to compute the variance of the estimates obtained using AIRLS. Finally, we show how the method can be applied to graphical statistical models. We perform numerical experiments on several inference problems, showing significantly better performance than state-of-the-art approaches in terms of scalability, robustness to noise, and convergence speed due to an empirically observed super-linear convergence rate.

Read more

9/6/2024

👀

Total Score

0

Precise asymptotics of reweighted least-squares algorithms for linear diagonal networks

Chiraag Kaushik, Justin Romberg, Vidya Muthukumar

The classical iteratively reweighted least-squares (IRLS) algorithm aims to recover an unknown signal from linear measurements by performing a sequence of weighted least squares problems, where the weights are recursively updated at each step. Varieties of this algorithm have been shown to achieve favorable empirical performance and theoretical guarantees for sparse recovery and $ell_p$-norm minimization. Recently, some preliminary connections have also been made between IRLS and certain types of non-convex linear neural network architectures that are observed to exploit low-dimensional structure in high-dimensional linear models. In this work, we provide a unified asymptotic analysis for a family of algorithms that encompasses IRLS, the recently proposed lin-RFM algorithm (which was motivated by feature learning in neural networks), and the alternating minimization algorithm on linear diagonal neural networks. Our analysis operates in a batched setting with i.i.d. Gaussian covariates and shows that, with appropriately chosen reweighting policy, the algorithm can achieve favorable performance in only a handful of iterations. We also extend our results to the case of group-sparse recovery and show that leveraging this structure in the reweighting scheme provably improves test error compared to coordinate-wise reweighting.

Read more

6/6/2024

📊

Total Score

0

A Short Information-Theoretic Analysis of Linear Auto-Regressive Learning

Ingvar Ziemann

In this note, we give a short information-theoretic proof of the consistency of the Gaussian maximum likelihood estimator in linear auto-regressive models. Our proof yields nearly optimal non-asymptotic rates for parameter recovery and works without any invocation of stability in the case of finite hypothesis classes.

Read more

9/11/2024

🏷️

Total Score

0

Improving Linear System Solvers for Hyperparameter Optimisation in Iterative Gaussian Processes

Jihao Andreas Lin, Shreyas Padhy, Bruno Mlodozeniec, Javier Antor'an, Jos'e Miguel Hern'andez-Lobato

Scaling hyperparameter optimisation to very large datasets remains an open problem in the Gaussian process community. This paper focuses on iterative methods, which use linear system solvers, like conjugate gradients, alternating projections or stochastic gradient descent, to construct an estimate of the marginal likelihood gradient. We discuss three key improvements which are applicable across solvers: (i) a pathwise gradient estimator, which reduces the required number of solver iterations and amortises the computational cost of making predictions, (ii) warm starting linear system solvers with the solution from the previous step, which leads to faster solver convergence at the cost of negligible bias, (iii) early stopping linear system solvers after a limited computational budget, which synergises with warm starting, allowing solver progress to accumulate over multiple marginal likelihood steps. These techniques provide speed-ups of up to $72times$ when solving to tolerance, and decrease the average residual norm by up to $7times$ when stopping early.

Read more

6/7/2024