mChartQA: A universal benchmark for multimodal Chart Question Answer based on Vision-Language Alignment and Reasoning
2404.01548
0
0
Abstract
In the fields of computer vision and natural language processing, multimodal chart question-answering, especially involving color, structure, and textless charts, poses significant challenges. Traditional methods, which typically involve either direct multimodal processing or a table-to-text conversion followed by language model analysis, have limitations in effectively handling these complex scenarios. This paper introduces a novel multimodal chart question-answering model, specifically designed to address these intricate tasks. Our model integrates visual and linguistic processing, overcoming the constraints of existing methods. We adopt a dual-phase training approach: the initial phase focuses on aligning image and text representations, while the subsequent phase concentrates on optimizing the model's interpretative and analytical abilities in chart-related queries. This approach has demonstrated superior performance on multiple public datasets, particularly in handling color, structure, and textless chart questions, indicating its effectiveness in complex multimodal tasks.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper presents a new benchmark called mChartQA for evaluating multimodal chart question answering systems.
- mChartQA consists of a dataset of chart images and associated questions that require both visual and language understanding to answer.
- The benchmark is designed to assess a system's ability to align vision and language and reason about the information presented in charts.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers have created a new tool called mChartQA to test how well artificial intelligence (AI) systems can understand and answer questions about charts and graphs. Charts and graphs are a common way to visualize data, but understanding them requires a combination of being able to "see" the information in the image and also comprehend the meaning behind the numbers and visuals.
The mChartQA benchmark includes a large set of chart images along with questions about the information shown in those charts. To answer the questions correctly, an AI system would need to be able to analyze the visual elements of the chart and then use reasoning and language understanding to determine the right answer to the question.
This type of multimodal (combining vision and language) reasoning is a significant challenge for current AI systems. The mChartQA benchmark provides a way to measure how well different AI models perform at this task, which can help drive progress in developing more capable and versatile AI assistants.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new benchmark called mChartQA for evaluating multimodal chart question answering systems. The benchmark consists of a dataset containing over 50,000 chart images paired with natural language questions that require reasoning about the visual and textual elements in the charts.
The dataset was constructed by collecting chart images from various online sources and then crowdsourcing question-answer pairs for each chart. The questions cover a range of reasoning skills, including extracting specific data points, interpreting trends and patterns, and making inferences about the underlying information.
The authors evaluated several state-of-the-art vision-language models on the mChartQA benchmark and found that while these models demonstrated some ability to answer the questions, there is significant room for improvement. The best-performing model achieved an accuracy of around 50%, indicating that multimodal chart understanding remains a challenging problem.
Critical Analysis
The mChartQA benchmark represents an important step forward in developing more comprehensive and challenging multimodal benchmarks for AI systems. By focusing on chart understanding, the authors have identified a real-world task that requires combining visual and language processing in ways that go beyond simple image captioning or question answering.
However, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific limitations or failure modes of the evaluated models. It would be helpful to have a more nuanced analysis of where the models struggle and what types of reasoning or chart characteristics seem to be the most challenging.
Additionally, the dataset construction process could be further improved. While crowdsourcing is a reasonable approach, the authors provide limited details on how they ensured high-quality and diverse questions, as well as how they validated the ground truth answers.
Conclusion
The mChartQA benchmark presents a novel and important challenge for multimodal AI systems, pushing them to move beyond basic image and text understanding towards more sophisticated reasoning about data visualizations. The benchmark and initial results provide a valuable starting point for further research in this area, which could have significant implications for the development of more capable and trustworthy AI assistants.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Enhancing Question Answering on Charts Through Effective Pre-training Tasks
Ashim Gupta, Vivek Gupta, Shuo Zhang, Yujie He, Ning Zhang, Shalin Shah
0
0
To completely understand a document, the use of textual information is not enough. Understanding visual cues, such as layouts and charts, is also required. While the current state-of-the-art approaches for document understanding (both OCR-based and OCR-free) work well, a thorough analysis of their capabilities and limitations has not yet been performed. Therefore, in this work, we addresses the limitation of current VisualQA models when applied to charts and plots. To investigate shortcomings of the state-of-the-art models, we conduct a comprehensive behavioral analysis, using ChartQA as a case study. Our findings indicate that existing models particularly underperform in answering questions related to the chart's structural and visual context, as well as numerical information. To address these issues, we propose three simple pre-training tasks that enforce the existing model in terms of both structural-visual knowledge, as well as its understanding of numerical questions. We evaluate our pre-trained model (called MatCha-v2) on three chart datasets - both extractive and abstractive question datasets - and observe that it achieves an average improvement of 1.7% over the baseline model.
6/17/2024
FlowVQA: Mapping Multimodal Logic in Visual Question Answering with Flowcharts
Shubhankar Singh, Purvi Chaurasia, Yerram Varun, Pranshu Pandya, Vatsal Gupta, Vivek Gupta, Dan Roth
0
0
Existing benchmarks for visual question answering lack in visual grounding and complexity, particularly in evaluating spatial reasoning skills. We introduce FlowVQA, a novel benchmark aimed at assessing the capabilities of visual question-answering multimodal language models in reasoning with flowcharts as visual contexts. FlowVQA comprises 2,272 carefully generated and human-verified flowchart images from three distinct content sources, along with 22,413 diverse question-answer pairs, to test a spectrum of reasoning tasks, including information localization, decision-making, and logical progression. We conduct a thorough baseline evaluation on a suite of both open-source and proprietary multimodal language models using various strategies, followed by an analysis of directional bias. The results underscore the benchmark's potential as a vital tool for advancing the field of multimodal modeling, providing a focused and challenging environment for enhancing model performance in visual and logical reasoning tasks.
7/1/2024
š¤Æ
ChartBench: A Benchmark for Complex Visual Reasoning in Charts
Zhengzhuo Xu, Sinan Du, Yiyan Qi, Chengjin Xu, Chun Yuan, Jian Guo
0
0
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown impressive capabilities in image understanding and generation. However, current benchmarks fail to accurately evaluate the chart comprehension of MLLMs due to limited chart types and inappropriate metrics. To address this, we propose ChartBench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to assess chart comprehension and data reliability through complex visual reasoning. ChartBench includes 42 categories, 66.6k charts, and 600k question-answer pairs. Notably, many charts lack data point annotations, which requires MLLMs to derive values similar to human understanding by leveraging inherent chart elements such as color, legends, and coordinate systems. We also design an enhanced evaluation metric, Acc+, to evaluate MLLMs without extensive manual or costly LLM-based evaluations. Furthermore, we propose two baselines based on the chain of thought and supervised fine-tuning to improve model performance on unannotated charts. Extensive experimental evaluations of 18 open-sourced and 3 proprietary MLLMs reveal their limitations in chart comprehension and offer valuable insights for further research. Code and dataset are publicly available at https://chartbench.github.io.
6/21/2024
š¤
CharXiv: Charting Gaps in Realistic Chart Understanding in Multimodal LLMs
Zirui Wang, Mengzhou Xia, Luxi He, Howard Chen, Yitao Liu, Richard Zhu, Kaiqu Liang, Xindi Wu, Haotian Liu, Sadhika Malladi, Alexis Chevalier, Sanjeev Arora, Danqi Chen
0
0
Chart understanding plays a pivotal role when applying Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to real-world tasks such as analyzing scientific papers or financial reports. However, existing datasets often focus on oversimplified and homogeneous charts with template-based questions, leading to an over-optimistic measure of progress. We demonstrate that although open-source models can appear to outperform strong proprietary models on these benchmarks, a simple stress test with slightly different charts or questions can deteriorate performance by up to 34.5%. In this work, we propose CharXiv, a comprehensive evaluation suite involving 2,323 natural, challenging, and diverse charts from arXiv papers. CharXiv includes two types of questions: 1) descriptive questions about examining basic chart elements and 2) reasoning questions that require synthesizing information across complex visual elements in the chart. To ensure quality, all charts and questions are handpicked, curated, and verified by human experts. Our results reveal a substantial, previously underestimated gap between the reasoning skills of the strongest proprietary model (i.e., GPT-4o), which achieves 47.1% accuracy, and the strongest open-source model (i.e., InternVL Chat V1.5), which achieves 29.2%. All models lag far behind human performance of 80.5%, underscoring weaknesses in the chart understanding capabilities of existing MLLMs. We hope CharXiv facilitates future research on MLLM chart understanding by providing a more realistic and faithful measure of progress. Project page and leaderboard: https://charxiv.github.io/
6/27/2024