MindDial: Belief Dynamics Tracking with Theory-of-Mind Modeling for Situated Neural Dialogue Generation
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper introduces "MindDial", a system that tracks the belief dynamics and theory-of-mind modeling for situated neural dialogue generation.
- It aims to enable AI systems to better understand and respond to the beliefs, intentions, and mental states of their conversational partners during dialogue interactions.
- The research explores techniques for imbuing language models with theory-of-mind capabilities to improve their conversational abilities in situated, goal-oriented tasks.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new approach called "MindDial" that helps AI systems have more natural and effective conversations. The key idea is to enable the AI to better understand and reason about the beliefs, intentions, and mental states of the person it is talking to.
Imagine you're chatting with a virtual assistant about booking a vacation. Typical language models may struggle to fully grasp what you're thinking or trying to achieve. MindDial aims to equip the AI with "theory-of-mind" capabilities - the ability to model and reason about the mental states of its conversational partner.
This allows the AI to make more informed and contextual responses, anticipating your needs and goals more accurately. For example, if you mention being on a budget, the AI can adjust its suggestions accordingly, rather than blindly recommending the most expensive options.
By tracking the belief dynamics - how your beliefs and understanding change over the course of the conversation - the MindDial system can engage in more natural, goal-oriented dialogue. This could lead to better task completion, more personalized interactions, and an overall more satisfying conversational experience.
The researchers explore different techniques for imbuing language models with these theory-of-mind capabilities, with the goal of improving the conversational abilities of AI systems in various real-world scenarios.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the "MindDial" system, which aims to equip neural dialogue models with the ability to track the belief dynamics and theory-of-mind of their conversational partners. This is achieved through a multi-task learning approach that jointly learns to generate responses and model the mental states of the user.
The key components of the MindDial architecture include:
- Belief Tracker: A module that maintains a representation of the user's beliefs and updates them based on the dialogue history.
- Theory-of-Mind Predictor: A component that predicts the user's mental states, such as their beliefs, goals, and intentions, based on the dialogue context.
- Response Generator: A neural dialogue generation module that leverages the belief and theory-of-mind representations to produce contextually appropriate responses.
The researchers evaluate the MindDial system on a series of situated, goal-oriented dialogue tasks, where the AI must assist the user in achieving specific objectives. The results demonstrate that incorporating belief dynamics tracking and theory-of-mind modeling can lead to more coherent, goal-oriented, and personalized dialogue, compared to standard language models.
The paper also discusses the challenges and limitations of current theory-of-mind modeling approaches, such as the difficulty in ground-truthing mental state representations and the need for more sophisticated reasoning capabilities. The authors suggest avenues for future research, including the exploration of more advanced theory-of-mind architectures and the integration of MindDial with real-world applications.
Critical Analysis
The MindDial approach represents a promising step towards imbuing language models with more sophisticated social and cognitive capabilities. By explicitly modeling the belief dynamics and theory-of-mind of their conversational partners, these systems can engage in more natural and effective dialogues, which is a key challenge in developing advanced AI assistants.
However, the paper also acknowledges the significant challenges in accurately representing and reasoning about human mental states. Inferring beliefs, goals, and intentions from dialogue alone is a complex and often ambiguous task, which can lead to errors or biases in the system's understanding.
Additionally, the paper primarily focuses on goal-oriented, task-completion scenarios, where the user's objectives are relatively well-defined. In more open-ended, social conversations, the theory-of-mind requirements may be even more demanding, as the AI would need to navigate a broader range of mental states and conversational dynamics.
Further research is needed to explore more sophisticated theory-of-mind modeling techniques, potentially drawing insights from cognitive science and human development. Integrating MindDial with other advanced dialogue capabilities, such as commonsense reasoning and adaptive language strategies, could also lead to more robust and versatile conversational AI systems.
Conclusion
The MindDial system presented in this paper represents an important step towards developing AI assistants with more natural and effective conversational abilities. By enabling language models to track the belief dynamics and theory-of-mind of their conversational partners, the system can engage in more goal-oriented, personalized, and coherent dialogues.
While the research highlights significant challenges in accurately modeling human mental states, the proposed approach lays the groundwork for further advancements in situated dialogue systems and collaborative AI agents. As the field of conversational AI continues to evolve, techniques like MindDial could play a crucial role in bridging the gap between human-like dialogue and the practical, task-oriented capabilities of AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
MindDial: Belief Dynamics Tracking with Theory-of-Mind Modeling for Situated Neural Dialogue Generation
Shuwen Qiu, Mingdian Liu, Hengli Li, Song-Chun Zhu, Zilong Zheng
Humans talk in daily conversations while aligning and negotiating the expressed meanings or common ground. Despite the impressive conversational abilities of the large generative language models, they do not consider the individual differences in contextual understanding in a shared situated environment. In this work, we propose MindDial, a novel conversational framework that can generate situated free-form responses with theory-of-mind modeling. We introduce an explicit mind module that can track the speaker's belief and the speaker's prediction of the listener's belief. Then the next response is generated to resolve the belief difference and take task-related action. Our framework is applied to both prompting and fine-tuning-based models, and is evaluated across scenarios involving both common ground alignment and negotiation. Experiments show that models with mind modeling can achieve higher task outcomes when aligning and negotiating common ground. The ablation study further validates the three-level belief design can aggregate information and improve task outcomes in both cooperative and negotiating settings.
Read more5/27/2024
0
Grounding Language about Belief in a Bayesian Theory-of-Mind
Lance Ying, Tan Zhi-Xuan, Lionel Wong, Vikash Mansinghka, Joshua Tenenbaum
Despite the fact that beliefs are mental states that cannot be directly observed, humans talk about each others' beliefs on a regular basis, often using rich compositional language to describe what others think and know. What explains this capacity to interpret the hidden epistemic content of other minds? In this paper, we take a step towards an answer by grounding the semantics of belief statements in a Bayesian theory-of-mind: By modeling how humans jointly infer coherent sets of goals, beliefs, and plans that explain an agent's actions, then evaluating statements about the agent's beliefs against these inferences via epistemic logic, our framework provides a conceptual role semantics for belief, explaining the gradedness and compositionality of human belief attributions, as well as their intimate connection with goals and plans. We evaluate this framework by studying how humans attribute goals and beliefs while watching an agent solve a doors-and-keys gridworld puzzle that requires instrumental reasoning about hidden objects. In contrast to pure logical deduction, non-mentalizing baselines, and mentalizing that ignores the role of instrumental plans, our model provides a much better fit to human goal and belief attributions, demonstrating the importance of theory-of-mind for a semantics of belief.
Read more7/10/2024
📈
0
Learning mental states estimation through self-observation: a developmental synergy between intentions and beliefs representations in a deep-learning model of Theory of Mind
Francesca Bianco, Silvia Rigato, Maria Laura Filippetti, Dimitri Ognibene
Theory of Mind (ToM), the ability to attribute beliefs, intentions, or mental states to others, is a crucial feature of human social interaction. In complex environments, where the human sensory system reaches its limits, behaviour is strongly driven by our beliefs about the state of the world around us. Accessing others' mental states, e.g., beliefs and intentions, allows for more effective social interactions in natural contexts. Yet, these variables are not directly observable, making understanding ToM a challenging quest of interest for different fields, including psychology, machine learning and robotics. In this paper, we contribute to this topic by showing a developmental synergy between learning to predict low-level mental states (e.g., intentions, goals) and attributing high-level ones (i.e., beliefs). Specifically, we assume that learning beliefs attribution can occur by observing one's own decision processes involving beliefs, e.g., in a partially observable environment. Using a simple feed-forward deep learning model, we show that, when learning to predict others' intentions and actions, more accurate predictions can be acquired earlier if beliefs attribution is learnt simultaneously. Furthermore, we show that the learning performance improves even when observed actors have a different embodiment than the observer and the gain is higher when observing beliefs-driven chunks of behaviour. We propose that our computational approach can inform the understanding of human social cognitive development and be relevant for the design of future adaptive social robots able to autonomously understand, assist, and learn from human interaction partners in novel natural environments and tasks.
Read more7/26/2024
0
Explicit Modelling of Theory of Mind for Belief Prediction in Nonverbal Social Interactions
Matteo Bortoletto, Constantin Ruhdorfer, Lei Shi, Andreas Bulling
We propose MToMnet - a Theory of Mind (ToM) neural network for predicting beliefs and their dynamics during human social interactions from multimodal input. ToM is key for effective nonverbal human communication and collaboration, yet, existing methods for belief modelling have not included explicit ToM modelling or have typically been limited to one or two modalities. MToMnet encodes contextual cues (scene videos and object locations) and integrates them with person-specific cues (human gaze and body language) in a separate MindNet for each person. Inspired by prior research on social cognition and computational ToM, we propose three different MToMnet variants: two involving fusion of latent representations and one involving re-ranking of classification scores. We evaluate our approach on two challenging real-world datasets, one focusing on belief prediction, while the other examining belief dynamics prediction. Our results demonstrate that MToMnet surpasses existing methods by a large margin while at the same time requiring a significantly smaller number of parameters. Taken together, our method opens up a highly promising direction for future work on artificial intelligent systems that can robustly predict human beliefs from their non-verbal behaviour and, as such, more effectively collaborate with humans.
Read more8/29/2024