Mitigating Degree Bias in Signed Graph Neural Networks
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper proposes a method to mitigate degree bias in Signed Graph Neural Networks (SGNNs).
- Degree bias can lead to poor performance in signed graphs, where positive and negative edges have different meanings.
- The authors introduce a new SGNN architecture called Degree-Aware SGNN (DA-SGNN) that explicitly handles degree bias.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on a problem in a type of machine learning model called Signed Graph Neural Networks (SGNNs). These models are used to analyze graphs, where the connections between nodes can be either positive or negative.
One issue with SGNNs is that they can be biased by the "degree" of the nodes - that is, how many connections a node has. This degree bias can lead to poor performance when analyzing signed graphs, where positive and negative connections have different meanings.
To address this problem, the researchers developed a new SGNN architecture called DA-SGNN. DA-SGNN explicitly accounts for degree bias, allowing the model to better handle the nuances of signed graphs. By adjusting how the model processes high and low degree nodes, DA-SGNN can make more accurate predictions on tasks like link polarity prediction.
Technical Explanation
The paper first reviews background on Signed Graph Neural Networks (SGNNs) and discusses how degree bias can be problematic in this context. The authors then introduce their proposed solution, Degree-Aware SGNN (DA-SGNN).
The key innovation in DA-SGNN is the use of dual experts - one expert focuses on high-degree nodes, while the other focuses on low-degree nodes. This allows the model to explicitly handle degree bias, rather than relying on the graph neural network to learn to overcome this bias on its own.
The authors evaluate DA-SGNN on several signed graph datasets and tasks, including link polarity prediction. They show that DA-SGNN outperforms standard SGNN architectures, demonstrating the effectiveness of their degree-aware approach.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thoughtful solution to an important problem in signed graph analysis. By explicitly modeling degree bias, DA-SGNN is able to better capture the nuances of signed graph structures compared to previous SGNN approaches.
That said, the authors acknowledge some limitations of their work. For example, they note that DA-SGNN may not be as effective on graphs with very unbalanced degree distributions. Additionally, the dual expert architecture adds some complexity to the model, which could impact training time and computational efficiency.
Further research could explore ways to make the degree-aware architecture more flexible or generalizable. Investigating how DA-SGNN performs on different real-world signed graph tasks would also help validate the broader applicability of this approach.
Conclusion
This paper presents an innovative solution to mitigate degree bias in Signed Graph Neural Networks. By introducing a degree-aware architecture with dual experts, the researchers have developed a more robust model for analyzing the complex structure of signed graphs.
While there are some limitations to consider, the strong empirical results suggest that DA-SGNN is a promising step forward in advancing the state-of-the-art for signed graph analysis. This work could have important implications for applications that rely on understanding the interplay of positive and negative relationships, such as social network analysis and recommendation systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Mitigating Degree Bias in Signed Graph Neural Networks
Fang He, Jinhai Deng, Ruizhan Xue, Maojun Wang, Zeyu Zhang
Like Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), Signed Graph Neural Networks (SGNNs) are also up against fairness issues from source data and typical aggregation method. In this paper, we are pioneering to make the investigation of fairness in SGNNs expanded from GNNs. We identify the issue of degree bias within signed graphs, offering a new perspective on the fairness issues related to SGNNs. To handle the confronted bias issue, inspired by previous work on degree bias, a new Model-Agnostic method is consequently proposed to enhance representation of nodes with different degrees, which named as Degree Debiased Signed Graph Neural Network (DD-SGNN) . More specifically, in each layer, we make a transfer from nodes with high degree to nodes with low degree inside a head-to-tail triplet, which to supplement the underlying domain missing structure of the tail nodes and meanwhile maintain the positive and negative semantics specified by balance theory in signed graphs. We make extensive experiments on four real-world datasets. The result verifies the validity of the model, that is, our model mitigates the degree bias issue without compromising performance($textit{i.e.}$, AUC, F1). The code is provided in supplementary material.
Read more8/19/2024
0
Theoretical and Empirical Insights into the Origins of Degree Bias in Graph Neural Networks
Arjun Subramonian, Jian Kang, Yizhou Sun
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) often perform better for high-degree nodes than low-degree nodes on node classification tasks. This degree bias can reinforce social marginalization by, e.g., sidelining authors of lowly-cited papers when predicting paper topics in citation networks. While researchers have proposed numerous hypotheses for why GNN degree bias occurs, we find via a survey of 38 degree bias papers that these hypotheses are often not rigorously validated, and can even be contradictory. Thus, we provide an analysis of the origins of degree bias in message-passing GNNs with different graph filters. We prove that high-degree test nodes tend to have a lower probability of misclassification regardless of how GNNs are trained. Moreover, we show that degree bias arises from a variety of factors that are associated with a node's degree (e.g., homophily of neighbors, diversity of neighbors). Furthermore, we show that during training, some GNNs may adjust their loss on low-degree nodes more slowly than on high-degree nodes; however, with sufficiently many epochs of training, message-passing GNNs can achieve their maximum possible training accuracy, which is not significantly limited by their expressive power. Throughout our analysis, we connect our findings to previously-proposed hypotheses for the origins of degree bias, supporting and unifying some while drawing doubt to others. We validate our theoretical findings on 8 common real-world networks, and based on our theoretical and empirical insights, describe a roadmap to alleviate degree bias.
Read more4/5/2024
0
Disentangling, Amplifying, and Debiasing: Learning Disentangled Representations for Fair Graph Neural Networks
Yeon-Chang Lee, Hojung Shin, Sang-Wook Kim
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have become essential tools for graph representation learning in various domains, such as social media and healthcare. However, they often suffer from fairness issues due to inherent biases in node attributes and graph structure, leading to unfair predictions. To address these challenges, we propose a novel GNN framework, DAB-GNN, that Disentangles, Amplifies, and deBiases attribute, structure, and potential biases in the GNN mechanism. DAB-GNN employs a disentanglement and amplification module that isolates and amplifies each type of bias through specialized disentanglers, followed by a debiasing module that minimizes the distance between subgroup distributions to ensure fairness. Extensive experiments on five datasets demonstrate that DAB-GNN significantly outperforms ten state-of-the-art competitors in terms of achieving an optimal balance between accuracy and fairness.
Read more8/26/2024
0
Rethinking Fair Graph Neural Networks from Re-balancing
Zhixun Li, Yushun Dong, Qiang Liu, Jeffrey Xu Yu
Driven by the powerful representation ability of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), plentiful GNN models have been widely deployed in many real-world applications. Nevertheless, due to distribution disparities between different demographic groups, fairness in high-stake decision-making systems is receiving increasing attention. Although lots of recent works devoted to improving the fairness of GNNs and achieved considerable success, they all require significant architectural changes or additional loss functions requiring more hyper-parameter tuning. Surprisingly, we find that simple re-balancing methods can easily match or surpass existing fair GNN methods. We claim that the imbalance across different demographic groups is a significant source of unfairness, resulting in imbalanced contributions from each group to the parameters updating. However, these simple re-balancing methods have their own shortcomings during training. In this paper, we propose FairGB, Fair Graph Neural Network via re-Balancing, which mitigates the unfairness of GNNs by group balancing. Technically, FairGB consists of two modules: counterfactual node mixup and contribution alignment loss. Firstly, we select counterfactual pairs across inter-domain and inter-class, and interpolate the ego-networks to generate new samples. Guided by analysis, we can reveal the debiasing mechanism of our model by the causal view and prove that our strategy can make sensitive attributes statistically independent from target labels. Secondly, we reweigh the contribution of each group according to gradients. By combining these two modules, they can mutually promote each other. Experimental results on benchmark datasets show that our method can achieve state-of-the-art results concerning both utility and fairness metrics. Code is available at https://github.com/ZhixunLEE/FairGB.
Read more7/17/2024