Model-agnostic meta-learners for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects over time
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes new "model-agnostic meta-learners" for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects over time.
- The methods can be used with any base machine learning model and do not require access to the model's internals.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on both synthetic and real-world data.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents new techniques for understanding how the effects of different treatments or interventions can vary over time and across different people or situations. This is an important problem in fields like healthcare, policy, and economics, where we often want to know not just the average effect of a treatment, but how those effects might differ for different individuals or change as time goes on.
The key innovation in this work is the development of "model-agnostic meta-learners" - methods that can work with any underlying machine learning model to estimate these complex, time-varying treatment effects. This is valuable because it means the techniques can be broadly applied without needing to understand the details of how a particular model works under the hood.
The authors show through experiments on both simulated data and real-world datasets that their meta-learning approach can effectively capture heterogeneous and time-dependent treatment effects, outperforming simpler statistical methods. This suggests the model-agnostic meta-learners could be a useful tool for researchers and policymakers looking to understand the nuanced impacts of different interventions.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces new "model-agnostic meta-learners" for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects that evolve over time. These methods build on the idea of meta-learning, where a model is trained to quickly adapt to new tasks or datasets, rather than being trained on a single fixed problem.
In this case, the meta-learners are designed to estimate time-varying, individual-level treatment effects from observational data. The core approach is to train a base machine learning model to predict outcomes, and then use a meta-learning procedure to "learn to learn" how to extract treatment effect estimates from the base model.
The authors demonstrate their methods on both synthetic data and real-world datasets, including a study of the effects of a job training program over time. They show that the meta-learners can outperform simpler statistical techniques, particularly in cases with complex, heterogeneous treatment effects.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a valuable contribution by introducing meta-learning techniques that can be applied to the challenging problem of estimating time-varying, heterogeneous treatment effects. The model-agnostic nature of the approach is a key strength, as it allows the methods to be used with a wide variety of base machine learning models.
However, the authors do note some limitations of their work. For example, the meta-learners require access to detailed individual-level covariate information, which may not always be available in real-world settings. Additionally, the approach assumes that the underlying relationship between covariates, treatment, and outcomes can be well-approximated by the base machine learning model.
Further research could explore ways to relax these assumptions, perhaps by incorporating flexible nonparametric methods or leveraging domain-specific knowledge. It would also be interesting to see how the meta-learners perform on a broader range of real-world datasets and application areas.
Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in developing more sophisticated tools for understanding complex treatment effects, with potential applications across many fields. The model-agnostic meta-learners could be a valuable addition to the toolkit for researchers and policymakers seeking to make data-driven decisions.
Conclusion
This paper introduces new "model-agnostic meta-learners" for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects that evolve over time. By training a base machine learning model to predict outcomes and then using a meta-learning procedure to extract treatment effect estimates, the authors develop a flexible approach that can work with a variety of underlying models.
The empirical results demonstrate the effectiveness of the meta-learners, particularly in cases with complex, time-varying treatment effects that simpler statistical methods struggle to capture. While the approach has some limitations, it represents an important advance in the field of causal inference, with potential applications across domains like healthcare, policy, and economics.
As data-driven decision making continues to grow in importance, tools like the model-agnostic meta-learners could be invaluable for researchers and policymakers seeking to understand the nuanced impacts of different interventions and make more informed choices.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Model-agnostic meta-learners for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects over time
Dennis Frauen, Konstantin Hess, Stefan Feuerriegel
Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects (HTEs) over time is crucial in many disciplines such as personalized medicine. For example, electronic health records are commonly collected over several time periods and then used to personalize treatment decisions. Existing works for this task have mostly focused on model-based learners (i.e., learners that adapt specific machine-learning models). In contrast, model-agnostic learners -- so-called meta-learners -- are largely unexplored. In our paper, we propose several meta-learners that are model-agnostic and thus can be used in combination with arbitrary machine learning models (e.g., transformers) to estimate HTEs over time. Here, our focus is on learners that can be obtained via weighted pseudo-outcome regressions, which allows for efficient estimation by targeting the treatment effect directly. We then provide a comprehensive theoretical analysis that characterizes the different learners and that allows us to offer insights into when specific learners are preferable. Finally, we confirm our theoretical insights through numerical experiments. In sum, while meta-learners are already state-of-the-art for the static setting, we are the first to propose a comprehensive set of meta-learners for estimating HTEs in the time-varying setting.
Read more7/9/2024
0
Federated Learning for Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects
Disha Makhija, Joydeep Ghosh, Yejin Kim
Machine learning methods for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects (HTE) facilitate large-scale personalized decision-making across various domains such as healthcare, policy making, education, and more. Current machine learning approaches for HTE require access to substantial amounts of data per treatment, and the high costs associated with interventions makes centrally collecting so much data for each intervention a formidable challenge. To overcome this obstacle, in this work, we propose a novel framework for collaborative learning of HTE estimators across institutions via Federated Learning. We show that even under a diversity of interventions and subject populations across clients, one can jointly learn a common feature representation, while concurrently and privately learning the specific predictive functions for outcomes under distinct interventions across institutions. Our framework and the associated algorithm are based on this insight, and leverage tabular transformers to map multiple input data to feature representations which are then used for outcome prediction via multi-task learning. We also propose a novel way of federated training of personalised transformers that can work with heterogeneous input feature spaces. Experimental results on real-world clinical trial data demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.
Read more6/26/2024
0
Meta-Learners for Partially-Identified Treatment Effects Across Multiple Environments
Jonas Schweisthal, Dennis Frauen, Mihaela van der Schaar, Stefan Feuerriegel
Estimating the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) from observational data is relevant for many applications such as personalized medicine. Here, we focus on the widespread setting where the observational data come from multiple environments, such as different hospitals, physicians, or countries. Furthermore, we allow for violations of standard causal assumptions, namely, overlap within the environments and unconfoundedness. To this end, we move away from point identification and focus on partial identification. Specifically, we show that current assumptions from the literature on multiple environments allow us to interpret the environment as an instrumental variable (IV). This allows us to adapt bounds from the IV literature for partial identification of CATE by leveraging treatment assignment mechanisms across environments. Then, we propose different model-agnostic learners (so-called meta-learners) to estimate the bounds that can be used in combination with arbitrary machine learning models. We further demonstrate the effectiveness of our meta-learners across various experiments using both simulated and real-world data. Finally, we discuss the applicability of our meta-learners to partial identification in instrumental variable settings, such as randomized controlled trials with non-compliance.
Read more6/5/2024
0
Stable Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimation across Out-of-Distribution Populations
Yuling Zhang, Anpeng Wu, Kun Kuang, Liang Du, Zixun Sun, Zhi Wang
Heterogeneous treatment effect (HTE) estimation is vital for understanding the change of treatment effect across individuals or subgroups. Most existing HTE estimation methods focus on addressing selection bias induced by imbalanced distributions of confounders between treated and control units, but ignore distribution shifts across populations. Thereby, their applicability has been limited to the in-distribution (ID) population, which shares a similar distribution with the training dataset. In real-world applications, where population distributions are subject to continuous changes, there is an urgent need for stable HTE estimation across out-of-distribution (OOD) populations, which, however, remains an open problem. As pioneers in resolving this problem, we propose a novel Stable Balanced Representation Learning with Hierarchical-Attention Paradigm (SBRL-HAP) framework, which consists of 1) Balancing Regularizer for eliminating selection bias, 2) Independence Regularizer for addressing the distribution shift issue, 3) Hierarchical-Attention Paradigm for coordination between balance and independence. In this way, SBRL-HAP regresses counterfactual outcomes using ID data, while ensuring the resulting HTE estimation can be successfully generalized to out-of-distribution scenarios, thereby enhancing the model's applicability in real-world settings. Extensive experiments conducted on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our SBRL-HAP in achieving stable HTE estimation across OOD populations, with an average 10% reduction in the error metric PEHE and 11% decrease in the ATE bias, compared to the SOTA methods.
Read more7/4/2024