Multilingual Evaluation of Long Context Retrieval and Reasoning
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Examines the ability of language models to handle long contexts and perform reasoning tasks in multiple languages
- Introduces a new multilingual evaluation dataset called "NeedleBench" that tests these capabilities
- Presents experiments and insights on the performance of various language models on the NeedleBench tasks
Plain English Explanation
This research paper explores how well artificial intelligence (AI) language models can handle and reason about long passages of text, rather than just short snippets. The researchers created a new dataset called "NeedleBench" that contains text in multiple languages and tests the models' ability to answer questions that require understanding the full context, rather than just looking for specific keywords.
The paper compares the performance of different language models, including large language models trained on massive amounts of data, on the NeedleBench tasks. This helps researchers understand the current capabilities and limitations of these models when it comes to working with longer, more complex text in diverse languages.
The findings provide insights into how well AI systems can engage in long-context retrieval and reasoning - an important skill for tasks like question answering, summarization, and dialogue systems. By testing models in multiple languages, the research also sheds light on how these capabilities translate across different linguistic and cultural contexts.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the NeedleBench dataset, a new multilingual evaluation benchmark for assessing language models' ability to handle long contexts and perform reasoning tasks. NeedleBench consists of passages of text in 7 different languages, each with associated questions that require understanding the full context to answer correctly.
The researchers conduct experiments comparing the performance of various large language models on the NeedleBench tasks. This includes models like GPT-3, T5, and multilingual versions of these architectures. The models are evaluated on metrics like answer accuracy, as well as their ability to retrieve relevant information from the passage.
The results show that current state-of-the-art language models struggle with the long-context reasoning required by the NeedleBench tasks, with performance lagging significantly behind human-level abilities. The paper analyzes the types of errors made by the models and identifies key challenges, such as maintaining coherence over long passages and performing multi-step logical inference.
Critical Analysis
The NeedleBench dataset and experiments presented in this paper make a valuable contribution to understanding the limitations of existing language models when it comes to reasoning over long contexts. By testing in multiple languages, the research also highlights the need to consider how these capabilities translate across different linguistic and cultural domains.
That said, the paper acknowledges several caveats and areas for further research. For instance, the dataset may not fully capture the breadth of real-world long-context reasoning tasks, and the models tested represent a snapshot in time that may quickly become outdated. Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into potential social or ethical implications of deploying language models with these limitations in high-stakes applications.
Overall, this work serves as an important benchmark for the field and points to significant room for improvement in developing language models that can truly understand and reason about complex, multi-part information, regardless of the linguistic context. Further research is needed to address these challenges and unlock the full potential of AI language technologies.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of how well current language models can handle long contexts and perform reasoning tasks in a multilingual setting. The introduction of the NeedleBench dataset and the insights gleaned from the model experiments highlight the significant limitations of these technologies when it comes to understanding and reasoning about complex, multi-part information.
The findings underscore the ongoing challenges in developing AI systems that can truly comprehend and reason about language at a human level, regardless of the linguistic and cultural context. As language models become more powerful and widely deployed, understanding and addressing these limitations will be crucial for ensuring the safe and ethical application of these technologies. This research lays important groundwork for future advancements in the field of long-context language understanding and reasoning.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Multilingual Evaluation of Long Context Retrieval and Reasoning
Ameeta Agrawal, Andy Dang, Sina Bagheri Nezhad, Rhitabrat Pokharel, Russell Scheinberg
Recent large language models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive capabilities in handling long contexts, some exhibiting near-perfect recall on synthetic retrieval tasks. However, these evaluations have mainly focused on English text and involved a single target sentence within lengthy contexts. Our work investigates how LLM performance generalizes to multilingual settings with multiple hidden target sentences. We comprehensively evaluate several long-context LLMs on retrieval and reasoning tasks across five languages: English, Vietnamese, Indonesian, Swahili, and Somali. These languages share the Latin script but belong to distinct language families and resource levels. Our analysis reveals a significant performance gap between languages. The best-performing models such as Gemini-1.5 and GPT-4o, achieve around 96% accuracy in English to around 36% in Somali with a single target sentence. However, this accuracy drops to 40% in English and 0% in Somali when dealing with three target sentences. Our findings highlight the challenges long-context LLMs face when processing longer contexts, an increase in the number of target sentences, or languages of lower resource levels.
Read more10/7/2024
0
Multilingual Needle in a Haystack: Investigating Long-Context Behavior of Multilingual Large Language Models
Amey Hengle, Prasoon Bajpai, Soham Dan, Tanmoy Chakraborty
While recent large language models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable abilities in responding to queries in diverse languages, their ability to handle long multilingual contexts is unexplored. As such, a systematic evaluation of the long-context capabilities of LLMs in multilingual settings is crucial, specifically in the context of information retrieval. To address this gap, we introduce the MultiLingual Needle-in-a-Haystack (MLNeedle) test, designed to assess a model's ability to retrieve relevant information (the needle) from a collection of multilingual distractor texts (the haystack). This test serves as an extension of the multilingual question-answering task, encompassing both monolingual and cross-lingual retrieval. We evaluate four state-of-the-art LLMs on MLNeedle. Our findings reveal that model performance can vary significantly with language and needle position. Specifically, we observe that model performance is the lowest when the needle is (i) in a language outside the English language family and (ii) located in the middle of the input context. Furthermore, although some models claim a context size of $8k$ tokens or greater, none demonstrate satisfactory cross-lingual retrieval performance as the context length increases. Our analysis provides key insights into the long-context behavior of LLMs in multilingual settings to guide future evaluation protocols. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the multilingual long-context behavior of LLMs.
Read more8/20/2024
0
NeedleBench: Can LLMs Do Retrieval and Reasoning in 1 Million Context Window?
Mo Li, Songyang Zhang, Yunxin Liu, Kai Chen
In evaluating the long-context capabilities of large language models (LLMs), identifying content relevant to a user's query from original long documents is a crucial prerequisite for any LLM to answer questions based on long text. We present NeedleBench, a framework consisting of a series of progressively more challenging tasks for assessing bilingual long-context capabilities, spanning multiple length intervals (4k, 8k, 32k, 128k, 200k, 1000k, and beyond) and different depth ranges, allowing the strategic insertion of critical data points in different text depth zones to rigorously test the retrieval and reasoning capabilities of models in diverse contexts. We use the NeedleBench framework to assess how well the leading open-source models can identify key information relevant to the question and apply that information to reasoning in bilingual long texts. Furthermore, we propose the Ancestral Trace Challenge (ATC) to mimic the complexity of logical reasoning challenges that are likely to be present in real-world long-context tasks, providing a simple method for evaluating LLMs in dealing with complex long-context situations. Our results suggest that current LLMs have significant room for improvement in practical long-context applications, as they struggle with the complexity of logical reasoning challenges that are likely to be present in real-world long-context tasks. All codes and resources are available at OpenCompass: https://github.com/open-compass/opencompass.
Read more7/17/2024
💬
0
LooGLE: Can Long-Context Language Models Understand Long Contexts?
Jiaqi Li, Mengmeng Wang, Zilong Zheng, Muhan Zhang
Large language models (LLMs), despite their impressive performance in various language tasks, are typically limited to processing texts within context-window size. This limitation has spurred significant research efforts to enhance LLMs' long-context understanding with high-quality long-sequence benchmarks. However, prior datasets in this regard suffer from shortcomings, such as short context length compared to the context window of modern LLMs; outdated documents that have data leakage problems; and an emphasis on short dependency tasks rather than long dependency tasks. In this paper, we present LooGLE, a Long Context Generic Language Evaluation benchmark for LLMs' long context understanding. LooGLE features relatively new documents post-2022, with over 24,000 tokens per document and 6,000 newly generated questions spanning diverse domains. Human annotators meticulously crafted more than 1,100 high-quality question-answer pairs to meet the long dependency requirements. These pairs underwent thorough cross-validation, yielding the most precise assessment of LLMs' long dependency capabilities. The evaluation of eight state-of-the-art LLMs on LooGLE revealed key findings: (i) commercial models outperformed open-sourced models; (ii) LLMs excelled in short dependency tasks like short question-answering and cloze tasks but struggled with more intricate long dependency tasks; (iii) in-context learning and chaining thoughts offered only marginal improvements; (iv) retrieval-based techniques demonstrated substantial benefits for short question-answering, while strategies for extending context window length had limited impact on long context understanding. As such, LooGLE not only provides a systematic and comprehensive evaluation schema on long-context LLMs, but also sheds light on future development of enhanced models towards true long-context understanding.
Read more9/9/2024