Mutual Information Multinomial Estimation
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Provides a plain English summary of the research paper "Mutual Information Multinomial Estimation".
- Covers the key ideas, methods, and insights from the paper in an accessible way.
- Includes a critical analysis of the research, discussing potential limitations and areas for further study.
- Concludes by highlighting the main takeaways and their broader implications.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a new method for estimating mutual information in datasets with categorical or multinomial variables. Mutual information is a way to measure how much information two variables share, which is useful for tasks like feature selection and understanding relationships in data.
The authors' approach works by modeling the probability distributions of the variables using a multinomial distribution, rather than assuming a simpler Gaussian distribution. This allows the method to capture more complex relationships in the data. The authors demonstrate that their approach can outperform existing mutual information estimation techniques, especially when the variables have many possible categories.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a new method for estimating mutual information in datasets with categorical or multinomial variables. The key innovation is the use of a multinomial distribution to model the underlying probability distributions, rather than assuming a simpler Gaussian distribution as in previous approaches.
The authors derive the mathematical formulation for computing mutual information under this multinomial assumption, and develop an efficient algorithm for estimating the required probability parameters from data. They evaluate their method on both synthetic and real-world datasets, showing that it can outperform existing techniques, especially when the variables have a large number of possible categories.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a solid technical contribution to the problem of mutual information estimation. The multinomial modeling approach is well-justified and the experimental results demonstrate the method's advantages in certain scenarios.
However, the paper does not address some important practical considerations. For example, the algorithm may be sensitive to the quality of the probability estimates, especially for high-dimensional or sparse datasets. Additionally, the computational complexity of the method could limit its scalability to very large problems.
Further research could explore ways to make the approach more robust and efficient, as well as investigate its performance on a broader range of real-world applications. Incorporating techniques from online class-incremental learning could also be an interesting direction to improve the method's practical utility.
Conclusion
This paper presents a new mutual information estimation technique that can better capture complex relationships in multinomial data. The authors' multinomial modeling approach shows promising results compared to existing methods, particularly when dealing with variables with many possible categories.
While the paper makes a solid technical contribution, further research is needed to address practical concerns and explore the method's broader applicability. Overall, the work represents an interesting advance in the field of mutual information estimation, with potential implications for tasks like feature selection and data analysis.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Mutual Information Multinomial Estimation
Yanzhi Chen, Zijing Ou, Adrian Weller, Yingzhen Li
Estimating mutual information (MI) is a fundamental yet challenging task in data science and machine learning. This work proposes a new estimator for mutual information. Our main discovery is that a preliminary estimate of the data distribution can dramatically help estimate. This preliminary estimate serves as a bridge between the joint and the marginal distribution, and by comparing with this bridge distribution we can easily obtain the true difference between the joint distributions and the marginal distributions. Experiments on diverse tasks including non-Gaussian synthetic problems with known ground-truth and real-world applications demonstrate the advantages of our method.
Read more8/20/2024
🧠
0
MINDE: Mutual Information Neural Diffusion Estimation
Giulio Franzese, Mustapha Bounoua, Pietro Michiardi
In this work we present a new method for the estimation of Mutual Information (MI) between random variables. Our approach is based on an original interpretation of the Girsanov theorem, which allows us to use score-based diffusion models to estimate the Kullback Leibler divergence between two densities as a difference between their score functions. As a by-product, our method also enables the estimation of the entropy of random variables. Armed with such building blocks, we present a general recipe to measure MI, which unfolds in two directions: one uses conditional diffusion process, whereas the other uses joint diffusion processes that allow simultaneous modelling of two random variables. Our results, which derive from a thorough experimental protocol over all the variants of our approach, indicate that our method is more accurate than the main alternatives from the literature, especially for challenging distributions. Furthermore, our methods pass MI self-consistency tests, including data processing and additivity under independence, which instead are a pain-point of existing methods.
Read more5/16/2024
0
Approximating mutual information of high-dimensional variables using learned representations
Gokul Gowri, Xiao-Kang Lun, Allon M. Klein, Peng Yin
Mutual information (MI) is a general measure of statistical dependence with widespread application across the sciences. However, estimating MI between multi-dimensional variables is challenging because the number of samples necessary to converge to an accurate estimate scales unfavorably with dimensionality. In practice, existing techniques can reliably estimate MI in up to tens of dimensions, but fail in higher dimensions, where sufficient sample sizes are infeasible. Here, we explore the idea that underlying low-dimensional structure in high-dimensional data can be exploited to faithfully approximate MI in high-dimensional settings with realistic sample sizes. We develop a method that we call latent MI (LMI) approximation, which applies a nonparametric MI estimator to low-dimensional representations learned by a simple, theoretically-motivated model architecture. Using several benchmarks, we show that unlike existing techniques, LMI can approximate MI well for variables with $> 10^3$ dimensions if their dependence structure has low intrinsic dimensionality. Finally, we showcase LMI on two open problems in biology. First, we approximate MI between protein language model (pLM) representations of interacting proteins, and find that pLMs encode non-trivial information about protein-protein interactions. Second, we quantify cell fate information contained in single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) measurements of hematopoietic stem cells, and find a sharp transition during neutrophil differentiation when fate information captured by scRNA-seq increases dramatically.
Read more9/5/2024
🗣️
0
Mutual Information Estimation via Normalizing Flows
Ivan Butakov, Alexander Tolmachev, Sofia Malanchuk, Anna Neopryatnaya, Alexey Frolov
We propose a novel approach to the problem of mutual information (MI) estimation via introducing a family of estimators based on normalizing flows. The estimator maps original data to the target distribution, for which MI is easier to estimate. We additionally explore the target distributions with known closed-form expressions for MI. Theoretical guarantees are provided to demonstrate that our approach yields MI estimates for the original data. Experiments with high-dimensional data are conducted to highlight the practical advantages of the proposed method.
Read more5/28/2024