Naive Bayes Classifiers and One-hot Encoding of Categorical Variables

Read original: arXiv:2404.18190 - Published 4/30/2024 by Christopher K. I. Williams

Naive Bayes Classifiers and One-hot Encoding of Categorical Variables

Overview

This paper discusses the use of Naïve Bayes classifiers and one-hot encoding for categorical variables in machine learning models.
The authors analyze the properties of the <math alttext="Q^{-j}" class="ltx_Math" display="inline"><semantics><msup><mi>Q</mi><mrow><mo>−</mo><mi>j</mi></mrow></msup><annotation-xml encoding="MathML-Content"><apply><csymbol cd="ambiguous">superscript</csymbol><ci>𝑄</ci><apply><minus></minus><ci>𝑗</ci></apply></apply></annotation-xml><annotation encoding="application/x-tex">Q^{-j}</annotation><annotation encoding="application/x-llamapun">italic_Q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT</annotation></semantics></math> matrix and its relationship to one-hot encoding.
The paper provides insights into the performance and interpretability of Naïve Bayes classifiers with one-hot encoded categorical variables.

Plain English Explanation

Naïve Bayes classifiers are a type of machine learning model that are commonly used for tasks like text classification and spam detection. They work by making predictions based on the assumption that the different features (or inputs) in the data are independent of each other.

One challenge with using Naïve Bayes classifiers is how to handle categorical variables - variables that have a finite set of possible values, like gender or country of origin. One common way to deal with this is to use a technique called one-hot encoding, which converts each category into its own binary feature.

This paper takes a closer look at the mathematical properties of one-hot encoding and how it interacts with Naïve Bayes classifiers. The authors analyze a matrix called <math alttext="Q^{-j}" class="ltx_Math" display="inline"><semantics><msup><mi>Q</mi><mrow><mo>−</mo><mi>j</mi></mrow></msup><annotation-xml encoding="MathML-Content"><apply><csymbol cd="ambiguous">superscript</csymbol><ci>𝑄</ci><apply><minus></minus><ci>𝑗</ci></apply></apply></annotation-xml><annotation encoding="application/x-tex">Q^{-j}</annotation><annotation encoding="application/x-llamapun">italic_Q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT</annotation></semantics></math>, which is related to how the one-hot encoded features are used in the Naïve Bayes classifier.

The key insights from the paper are that the properties of <math alttext="Q^{-j}" class="ltx_Math" display="inline"><semantics><msup><mi>Q</mi><mrow><mo>−</mo><mi>j</mi></mrow></msup><annotation-xml encoding="MathML-Content"><apply><csymbol cd="ambiguous">superscript</csymbol><ci>𝑄</ci><apply><minus></minus><ci>𝑗</ci></apply></apply></annotation-xml><annotation encoding="application/x-tex">Q^{-j}</annotation><annotation encoding="application/x-llamapun">italic_Q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT</annotation></semantics></math> can help explain the performance and interpretability of Naïve Bayes classifiers with one-hot encoded categorical variables. This information can be useful for practitioners who are building and evaluating these types of machine learning models.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by analyzing the properties of the <math alttext="Q^{-j}" class="ltx_Math" display="inline"><semantics><msup><mi>Q</mi><mrow><mo>−</mo><mi>j</mi></mrow></msup><annotation-xml encoding="MathML-Content"><apply><csymbol cd="ambiguous">superscript</csymbol><ci>𝑄</ci><apply><minus></minus><ci>𝑗</ci></apply></apply></annotation-xml><annotation encoding="application/x-tex">Q^{-j}</annotation><annotation encoding="application/x-llamapun">italic_Q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT</annotation></semantics></math> matrix, which is related to the one-hot encoding of categorical variables. The authors prove several theoretical results about the structure and eigenvalues of this matrix.

Next, the paper examines the impact of one-hot encoding on the performance and interpretability of Naïve Bayes classifiers. The authors show that the properties of <math alttext="Q^{-j}" class="ltx_Math" display="inline"><semantics><msup><mi>Q</mi><mrow><mo>−</mo><mi>j</mi></mrow></msup><annotation-xml encoding="MathML-Content"><apply><csymbol cd="ambiguous">superscript</csymbol><ci>𝑄</ci><apply><minus></minus><ci>𝑗</ci></apply></apply></annotation-xml><annotation encoding="application/x-tex">Q^{-j}</annotation><annotation encoding="application/x-llamapun">italic_Q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT</annotation></semantics></math> can be used to understand how one-hot encoding affects the model's performance and interpretability.

The paper includes several experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets to validate the theoretical results and provide empirical insights. The authors compare the performance of Naïve Bayes classifiers with one-hot encoding to other approaches for handling categorical variables, such as ResiBit, CaViaR, and learning multi-modal generative models.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough theoretical and empirical analysis of the use of Naïve Bayes classifiers with one-hot encoded categorical variables. The authors' insights into the properties of the <math alttext="Q^{-j}" class="ltx_Math" display="inline"><semantics><msup><mi>Q</mi><mrow><mo>−</mo><mi>j</mi></mrow></msup><annotation-xml encoding="MathML-Content"><apply><csymbol cd="ambiguous">superscript</csymbol><ci>𝑄</ci><apply><minus></minus><ci>𝑗</ci></apply></apply></annotation-xml><annotation encoding="application/x-tex">Q^{-j}</annotation><annotation encoding="application/x-llamapun">italic_Q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT</annotation></semantics></math> matrix are novel and can provide valuable guidance for practitioners.

One potential limitation of the research is that it focuses solely on Naïve Bayes classifiers, while there are many other types of machine learning models that also need to handle categorical variables. It would be interesting to see if the insights from this paper generalize to other model types, such as Apple Tasting Revisited: Bayesian Approaches to Partially Observed Outcomes.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the impact of the number of categories or the distribution of categories on the performance and interpretability of the Naïve Bayes classifier. These factors could be important in real-world applications and warrant further investigation.

Overall, this paper offers a rigorous and insightful analysis of an important topic in machine learning. The authors' work can help researchers and practitioners better understand the strengths and limitations of Naïve Bayes classifiers with one-hot encoded categorical variables.

Conclusion

This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the use of Naïve Bayes classifiers with one-hot encoded categorical variables. The authors offer new theoretical insights into the properties of the <math alttext="Q^{-j}" class="ltx_Math" display="inline"><semantics><msup><mi>Q</mi><mrow><mo>−</mo><mi>j</mi></mrow></msup><annotation-xml encoding="MathML-Content"><apply><csymbol cd="ambiguous">superscript</csymbol><ci>𝑄</ci><apply><minus></minus><ci>𝑗</ci></apply></apply></annotation-xml><annotation encoding="application/x-tex">Q^{-j}</annotation><annotation encoding="application/x-llamapun">italic_Q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT</annotation></semantics></math> matrix and demonstrate how these properties can explain the performance and interpretability of these models.

The insights from this paper can help machine learning practitioners make more informed decisions when working with Naïve Bayes classifiers and categorical variables. By understanding the strengths and limitations of one-hot encoding, researchers and engineers can build more effective and interpretable models for a variety of applications.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Naive Bayes Classifiers and One-hot Encoding of Categorical Variables

Christopher K. I. Williams

This paper investigates the consequences of encoding a $K$-valued categorical variable incorrectly as $K$ bits via one-hot encoding, when using a Na{i}ve Bayes classifier. This gives rise to a product-of-Bernoullis (PoB) assumption, rather than the correct categorical Na{i}ve Bayes classifier. The differences between the two classifiers are analysed mathematically and experimentally. In our experiments using probability vectors drawn from a Dirichlet distribution, the two classifiers are found to agree on the maximum a posteriori class label for most cases, although the posterior probabilities are usually greater for the PoB case.

4/30/2024

Optimal Projections for Classification with Naive Bayes

David P. Hofmeyr, Francois Kamper, Michail M. Melonas

In the Naive Bayes classification model the class conditional densities are estimated as the products of their marginal densities along the cardinal basis directions. We study the problem of obtaining an alternative basis for this factorisation with the objective of enhancing the discriminatory power of the associated classification model. We formulate the problem as a projection pursuit to find the optimal linear projection on which to perform classification. Optimality is determined based on the multinomial likelihood within which probabilities are estimated using the Naive Bayes factorisation of the projected data. Projection pursuit offers the added benefits of dimension reduction and visualisation. We discuss an intuitive connection with class conditional independent components analysis, and show how this is realised visually in practical applications. The performance of the resulting classification models is investigated using a large collection of (162) publicly available benchmark data sets and in comparison with relevant alternatives. We find that the proposed approach substantially outperforms other popular probabilistic discriminant analysis models and is highly competitive with Support Vector Machines.

9/10/2024

❗

Simple and Interpretable Probabilistic Classifiers for Knowledge Graphs

Christian Riefolo, Nicola Fanizzi, Claudia d'Amato

Tackling the problem of learning probabilistic classifiers from incomplete data in the context of Knowledge Graphs expressed in Description Logics, we describe an inductive approach based on learning simple belief networks. Specifically, we consider a basic probabilistic model, a Naive Bayes classifier, based on multivariate Bernoullis and its extension to a two-tier network in which this classification model is connected to a lower layer consisting of a mixture of Bernoullis. We show how such models can be converted into (probabilistic) axioms (or rules) thus ensuring more interpretability. Moreover they may be also initialized exploiting expert knowledge. We present and discuss the outcomes of an empirical evaluation which aimed at testing the effectiveness of the models on a number of random classification problems with different ontologies.

7/10/2024

➖

Naive Bayes Classifiers over Missing Data: Decision and Poisoning

Song Bian, Xiating Ouyang, Zhiwei Fan, Paraschos Koutris

We study the certifiable robustness of ML classifiers on dirty datasets that could contain missing values. A test point is certifiably robust for an ML classifier if the classifier returns the same prediction for that test point, regardless of which cleaned version (among exponentially many) of the dirty dataset the classifier is trained on. In this paper, we show theoretically that for Naive Bayes Classifiers (NBC) over dirty datasets with missing values: (i) there exists an efficient polynomial time algorithm to decide whether multiple input test points are all certifiably robust over a dirty dataset; and (ii) the data poisoning attack, which aims to make all input test points certifiably non-robust by inserting missing cells to the clean dataset, is in polynomial time for single test points but NP-complete for multiple test points. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our algorithms are efficient and outperform existing baselines.

5/29/2024