Navigating Dimensionality through State Machines in Automotive System Validation
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Navigates dimensionality in automotive system validation through state machines
- Explores scenario-based testing for automated driving systems
- Discusses techniques for managing complexity in testing processes
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses how to effectively validate automotive systems, particularly those used in automated driving. One key challenge is the high dimensionality of the testing space - there are countless possible driving scenarios and conditions that need to be evaluated.
The researchers propose using state machines as a way to manage this complexity. State machines allow you to model the different states a system can be in and the transitions between those states. This provides a structured way to represent and reason about the different scenarios that need to be tested.
By organizing the testing around state machines, the researchers argue that it becomes easier to explore the full dimensionality of the problem in a systematic way. This can lead to more comprehensive testing and help uncover edge cases or unexpected behaviors that might otherwise be missed.
The paper also discusses techniques for scenario-based testing, where test cases are designed around specific real-world driving scenarios. This helps ensure the system is evaluated in a way that is representative of actual driving conditions, rather than just arbitrary generated test cases.
Overall, the key ideas are using state machines to structure the testing process and scenario-based approaches to make the testing more realistic and relevant to the real-world use of automated driving systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a state machine-based approach for managing the complexity of testing automotive systems, particularly those used in automated driving.
The authors note that the testing space for such systems is extremely high-dimensional, as there are countless possible driving scenarios and environmental conditions that need to be evaluated. To address this challenge, they propose using state machines to model the different states the system can be in and the transitions between those states.
By organizing the testing process around these state machines, the researchers argue that it becomes easier to systematically explore the full dimensionality of the problem. The state machine representation provides a structured way to reason about the different scenarios that need to be tested and ensure comprehensive coverage.
The paper also discusses the benefits of scenario-based testing, where test cases are designed around specific real-world driving situations. This helps ensure the system is evaluated in a way that is representative of actual driving conditions, rather than just randomly generated test cases.
The researchers demonstrate their approach through a case study involving a lane change scenario for an automated driving system. They show how the state machine model can be used to systematically explore the different factors that influence the lane change maneuver, such as traffic conditions, road geometry, and environmental factors.
Overall, the key technical contributions of the paper are:
- A state machine-based framework for managing the complexity of automotive system validation
- The integration of scenario-based testing approaches to ensure realism and relevance
- A case study demonstrating the practical application of the proposed techniques
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach for navigating the high-dimensional testing space of automotive systems, particularly those used in automated driving. The use of state machines to structure the testing process is a well-established technique, and the authors demonstrate its potential benefits in this context.
One potential limitation of the approach is that it still requires significant human effort to model the state machines and define the relevant test scenarios. While the state machine representation can help manage complexity, the initial setup and maintenance of the models may still be a significant undertaking.
Additionally, the paper does not address the challenge of automatically generating the test cases and scenarios. While scenario-based testing is proposed, the process of identifying and defining the relevant scenarios is not discussed in detail. Automating this aspect of the testing process could further enhance the scalability and efficiency of the approach.
Another area for potential improvement is the validation of the state machine models themselves. The paper focuses on using the state machines to structure the testing process, but does not provide insights into how the models can be verified or validated to ensure they accurately represent the behavior of the automotive system.
Despite these potential limitations, the overall approach presented in the paper is compelling and could have significant practical implications for the automotive industry. The combination of state machines and scenario-based testing offers a structured way to tackle the complexity of automotive system validation, which is crucial for the development of safe and reliable automated driving technologies.
Conclusion
This paper presents a state machine-based approach for managing the high-dimensional testing space of automotive systems, particularly those used in automated driving. By organizing the testing process around state machines, the researchers argue that it becomes easier to systematically explore the full dimensionality of the problem and ensure comprehensive coverage of relevant scenarios.
The integration of scenario-based testing techniques helps ensure the testing is representative of real-world driving conditions, rather than just arbitrary generated test cases. While the approach still requires significant human effort in modeling the state machines and defining the test scenarios, the potential benefits in terms of complexity management and testing effectiveness make it a promising direction for the automotive industry.
Future work could focus on automating the generation of test cases and scenarios, as well as validating the state machine models themselves to ensure they accurately represent the behavior of the automotive system. Overall, this research contributes to the ongoing efforts to develop safe and reliable automated driving technologies through rigorous system validation.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Navigating Dimensionality through State Machines in Automotive System Validation
Laurenz Adolph, barbara Schutt, David Kraus, Eric Sax
The increasing automation of vehicles is resulting in the integration of more extensive in-vehicle sensor systems, electronic control units, and software. Additionally, vehicle-to-everything communication is seen as an opportunity to extend automated driving capabilities through information from a source outside the ego vehicle. However, the validation and verification of automated driving functions already pose a challenge due to the number of possible scenarios that can occur for a driving function, which makes it difficult to achieve comprehensive test coverage. Currently, the establishment of Safety Of The Intended Functionality ( SOTIF ) mandates the implementation of scenario-based testing. The introduction of additional external systems through vehicle-to-everything further complicates the problem and increases the scenario space. In this paper, a methodology based on state charts is proposed for modeling the interaction with external systems, which may remain as black boxes. This approach leverages the testability and coverage analysis inherent in state charts by combining them with scenario-based testing. The overall objective is to reduce the space of scenarios necessary for testing a networked driving function and to streamline validation and verification. The utilization of this approach is demonstrated using a simulated signalized intersection with a roadside unit that detects vulnerable road users.
Read more8/21/2024
📊
0
Statistical Modelling of Driving Scenarios in Road Traffic using Fleet Data of Production Vehicles
Christian Reichenbacher, Jochen Hipp, Oliver Bringmann
Ensuring the safety of road vehicles at an acceptable level requires the absence of any unreasonable risk arising from all potential hazards linked to the intended au-tomated driving function and its implementation. The assurance that there are no unreasonable risks stemming from hazardous behaviours associated to functional insufficiencies is denoted as safety of intended functionality (SOTIF), a concept outlined in the ISO 21448 standard. In this context, the acquisition of real driving data is considered essential for the verification and validation. For this purpose, we are currently developing a method with which data collect-ed representatively from production vehicles can be modelled into a knowledge-based system in the future. A system that represents the probabilities of occur-rence of concrete driving scenarios over the statistical population of road traffic and makes them usable. The method includes the qualitative and quantitative ab-straction of the drives recorded by the sensors in the vehicles, the possibility of subsequent wireless transmission of the abstracted data from the vehicles and the derivation of the distributions and correlations of scenario parameters. This paper provides a summary of the research project and outlines its central idea. To this end, among other things, the needs for statistical information and da-ta from road traffic are elaborated from ISO 21448, the current state of research is addressed, and methodical aspects are discussed.
Read more4/10/2024
🤿
0
Scene-Extrapolation: Generating Interactive Traffic Scenarios
Maximilian Zipfl, Barbara Schutt, J. Marius Zollner
Verifying highly automated driving functions can be challenging, requiring identifying relevant test scenarios. Scenario-based testing will likely play a significant role in verifying these systems, predominantly occurring within simulation. In our approach, we use traffic scenes as a starting point (seed-scene) to address the individuality of various highly automated driving functions and to avoid the problems associated with a predefined test traffic scenario. Different highly autonomous driving functions, or their distinct iterations, may display different behaviors under the same operating conditions. To make a generalizable statement about a seed-scene, we simulate possible outcomes based on various behavior profiles. We utilize our lightweight simulation environment and populate it with rule-based and machine learning behavior models for individual actors in the scenario. We analyze resulting scenarios using a variety of criticality metrics. The density distributions of the resulting criticality values enable us to make a profound statement about the significance of a particular scene, considering various eventualities.
Read more4/29/2024
0
An Approach to Systematic Data Acquisition and Data-Driven Simulation for the Safety Testing of Automated Driving Functions
Leon Eisemann, Mirjam Fehling-Kaschek, Henrik Gommel, David Hermann, Marvin Klemp, Martin Lauer, Benjamin Lickert, Florian Luettner, Robin Moss, Nicole Neis, Maria Pohle, Simon Romanski, Daniel Stadler, Alexander Stolz, Jens Ziehn, Jingxing Zhou
With growing complexity and criticality of automated driving functions in road traffic and their operational design domains (ODD), there is increasing demand for covering significant proportions of development, validation, and verification in virtual environments and through simulation models. If, however, simulations are meant not only to augment real-world experiments, but to replace them, quantitative approaches are required that measure to what degree and under which preconditions simulation models adequately represent reality, and thus, using their results accordingly. Especially in R&D areas related to the safety impact of the open world, there is a significant shortage of real-world data to parameterize and/or validate simulations - especially with respect to the behavior of human traffic participants, whom automated driving functions will meet in mixed traffic. We present an approach to systematically acquire data in public traffic by heterogeneous means, transform it into a unified representation, and use it to automatically parameterize traffic behavior models for use in data-driven virtual validation of automated driving functions.
Read more5/6/2024