A Nested Model for AI Design and Validation

Read original: arXiv:2407.16888 - Published 8/2/2024 by Akshat Dubey, Zewen Yang, Georges Hattab

📈

Overview

Presents a nested model for designing and validating AI systems
Aims to address challenges in AI regulation and governance
Proposes a multi-layered approach to ensure the safety and reliability of AI

Plain English Explanation

This paper introduces a nested model for the design and validation of AI systems. The goal is to address the complexities and challenges faced in regulating and governing AI technologies.

The key idea is to have a multi-layered approach, where each layer focuses on different aspects of the AI system. The innermost layer deals with the technical specifics of the AI model, such as its architecture and training process. The middle layer considers the intended use case and real-world deployment of the AI system. The outermost layer examines the broader societal and ethical implications of the AI technology.

By considering these different perspectives, the nested model aims to create a comprehensive framework for ensuring the safety, reliability, and trustworthiness of AI systems. This approach recognizes that the development and deployment of AI is not just a technical challenge, but also involves ethical, regulatory, and contextual factors.

Technical Explanation

The nested model proposed in this paper consists of three main layers:

Technical Layer: This innermost layer focuses on the technical design and validation of the AI model itself. It examines the model's architecture, training process, and other low-level technical details to ensure the model's robustness and reliability.
Use Case Layer: The middle layer considers the intended use case and real-world deployment of the AI system. This involves assessing the system's performance, safety, and alignment with the specified use case.
Societal Layer: The outermost layer examines the broader societal and ethical implications of the AI technology. This includes considering the system's potential impact on human rights, privacy, and other social and ethical concerns.

By nesting these layers, the model aims to create a comprehensive and holistic approach to AI design and validation. The authors argue that this multi-layered approach is necessary to address the complex challenges faced in AI regulation and governance.

Critical Analysis

The nested model proposed in this paper is a thoughtful and comprehensive approach to addressing the challenges of AI regulation and governance. The authors recognize the importance of considering not just the technical aspects of AI, but also the real-world use cases and societal implications.

One potential limitation of the model is the practical challenges in implementing it. Coordinating the various stakeholders (e.g., technical experts, domain experts, ethicists) and aligning their perspectives may be difficult in practice. Additionally, the authors acknowledge that further research is needed to develop specific methods and tools for implementing the nested model.

Another area for further exploration is the potential trade-offs and tensions between the different layers of the model. For example, optimizing for technical performance may not always align with societal considerations. The authors could delve deeper into how to navigate these potential conflicts and find suitable compromises.

Overall, the nested model presented in this paper is a valuable contribution to the ongoing discussion around AI regulation and governance. It provides a conceptual framework for a more holistic and systematic approach to ensuring the safety, reliability, and trustworthiness of AI systems.

Conclusion

The paper's nested model for AI design and validation offers a promising approach to addressing the complex challenges in AI regulation and governance. By considering the technical, use case, and societal layers of AI systems, the model aims to create a comprehensive framework for ensuring the safety, reliability, and trustworthiness of AI technologies.

While the practical implementation of the model may face some challenges, the authors' recognition of the multifaceted nature of AI development and deployment is a significant step forward. As the field of AI continues to evolve, this type of holistic and systemic approach will be crucial in building truly trustworthy and responsible AI systems that benefit society as a whole.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📈

A Nested Model for AI Design and Validation

Akshat Dubey, Zewen Yang, Georges Hattab

The growing AI field faces trust, transparency, fairness, and discrimination challenges. Despite the need for new regulations, there is a mismatch between regulatory science and AI, preventing a consistent framework. A five-layer nested model for AI design and validation aims to address these issues and streamline AI application design and validation, improving fairness, trust, and AI adoption. This model aligns with regulations, addresses AI practitioner's daily challenges, and offers prescriptive guidance for determining appropriate evaluation approaches by identifying unique validity threats. We have three recommendations motivated by this model: authors should distinguish between layers when claiming contributions to clarify the specific areas in which the contribution is made and to avoid confusion, authors should explicitly state upstream assumptions to ensure that the context and limitations of their AI system are clearly understood, AI venues should promote thorough testing and validation of AI systems and their compliance with regulatory requirements.

8/2/2024

A Decision-driven Methodology for Designing Uncertainty-aware AI Self-Assessment

Gregory Canal, Vladimir Leung, Philip Sage, Eric Heim, I-Jeng Wang

Artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized decision-making processes and systems throughout society and, in particular, has emerged as a significant technology in high-impact scenarios of national interest. Yet, despite AI's impressive predictive capabilities in controlled settings, it still suffers from a range of practical setbacks preventing its widespread use in various critical scenarios. In particular, it is generally unclear if a given AI system's predictions can be trusted by decision-makers in downstream applications. To address the need for more transparent, robust, and trustworthy AI systems, a suite of tools has been developed to quantify the uncertainty of AI predictions and, more generally, enable AI to self-assess the reliability of its predictions. In this manuscript, we categorize methods for AI self-assessment along several key dimensions and provide guidelines for selecting and designing the appropriate method for a practitioner's needs. In particular, we focus on uncertainty estimation techniques that consider the impact of self-assessment on the choices made by downstream decision-makers and on the resulting costs and benefits of decision outcomes. To demonstrate the utility of our methodology for self-assessment design, we illustrate its use for two realistic national-interest scenarios. This manuscript is a practical guide for machine learning engineers and AI system users to select the ideal self-assessment techniques for each problem.

8/6/2024

🤖

The Switch, the Ladder, and the Matrix: Models for Classifying AI Systems

Jakob Mokander, Margi Sheth, David Watson, Luciano Floridi

Organisations that design and deploy artificial intelligence (AI) systems increasingly commit themselves to high-level, ethical principles. However, there still exists a gap between principles and practices in AI ethics. One major obstacle organisations face when attempting to operationalise AI Ethics is the lack of a well-defined material scope. Put differently, the question to which systems and processes AI ethics principles ought to apply remains unanswered. Of course, there exists no universally accepted definition of AI, and different systems pose different ethical challenges. Nevertheless, pragmatic problem-solving demands that things should be sorted so that their grouping will promote successful actions for some specific end. In this article, we review and compare previous attempts to classify AI systems for the purpose of implementing AI governance in practice. We find that attempts to classify AI systems found in previous literature use one of three mental model. The Switch, i.e., a binary approach according to which systems either are or are not considered AI systems depending on their characteristics. The Ladder, i.e., a risk-based approach that classifies systems according to the ethical risks they pose. And the Matrix, i.e., a multi-dimensional classification of systems that take various aspects into account, such as context, data input, and decision-model. Each of these models for classifying AI systems comes with its own set of strengths and weaknesses. By conceptualising different ways of classifying AI systems into simple mental models, we hope to provide organisations that design, deploy, or regulate AI systems with the conceptual tools needed to operationalise AI governance in practice.

7/9/2024

🤖

Science based AI model certification for new operational environments with application in traffic state estimation

Daryl Mupupuni, Anupama Guntu, Liang Hong, Kamrul Hasan, Leehyun Keel

The expanding role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in diverse engineering domains highlights the challenges associated with deploying AI models in new operational environments, involving substantial investments in data collection and model training. Rapid application of AI necessitates evaluating the feasibility of utilizing pre-trained models in unobserved operational settings with minimal or no additional data. However, interpreting the opaque nature of AI's black-box models remains a persistent challenge. Addressing this issue, this paper proposes a science-based certification methodology to assess the viability of employing pre-trained data-driven models in new operational environments. The methodology advocates a profound integration of domain knowledge, leveraging theoretical and analytical models from physics and related disciplines, with data-driven AI models. This novel approach introduces tools to facilitate the development of secure engineering systems, providing decision-makers with confidence in the trustworthiness and safety of AI-based models across diverse environments characterized by limited training data and dynamic, uncertain conditions. The paper demonstrates the efficacy of this methodology in real-world safety-critical scenarios, particularly in the context of traffic state estimation. Through simulation results, the study illustrates how the proposed methodology efficiently quantifies physical inconsistencies exhibited by pre-trained AI models. By utilizing analytical models, the methodology offers a means to gauge the applicability of pre-trained AI models in new operational environments. This research contributes to advancing the understanding and deployment of AI models, offering a robust certification framework that enhances confidence in their reliability and safety across a spectrum of operational conditions.

5/14/2024