Network-Aware and Welfare-Maximizing Dynamic Pricing for Energy Sharing
2404.02458
0
0
Abstract
The proliferation of behind-the-meter (BTM) distributed energy resources (DER) within the electrical distribution network presents significant supply and demand flexibilities, but also introduces operational challenges such as voltage spikes and reverse power flows. In response, this paper proposes a network-aware dynamic pricing framework tailored for energy-sharing coalitions that aggregate small, but ubiquitous, BTM DER downstream of a distribution system operator's (DSO) revenue meter that adopts a generic net energy metering (NEM) tariff. By formulating a Stackelberg game between the energy-sharing market leader and its prosumers, we show that the dynamic pricing policy induces the prosumers toward a network-safe operation and decentrally maximizes the energy-sharing social welfare. The dynamic pricing mechanism involves a combination of a locational {em ex-ante} dynamic price and an {em ex-post} allocation, both of which are functions of the energy sharing's BTM DER. The {em ex-post} allocation is proportionate to the price differential between the DSO NEM price and the energy sharing locational price. Simulation results using real DER data and the IEEE 13-bus test systems illustrate the dynamic nature of network-aware pricing at each bus, and its impact on voltage.
Create account to get full access
Overview
ā¢ The paper presents a framework for dynamic pricing of energy sharing in a network, with the goal of maximizing social welfare. ā¢ The proposed approach considers network constraints and heterogeneous user preferences to optimize energy sharing and pricing. ā¢ Key features include real-time adjustments to pricing, network-aware decision making, and welfare maximization.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores a system for managing the sharing of energy, such as electricity, among different users or entities connected in a network. The main objective is to determine the best prices for buying and selling energy in a way that maximizes the overall benefit or "welfare" of everyone involved.
Imagine a neighborhood with solar panels, batteries, and other energy sources and consumers. The goal is to efficiently distribute the available energy to meet everyone's needs, while ensuring no individual part of the network becomes overloaded. The paper proposes a pricing mechanism that can dynamically adjust the rates for buying and selling energy. This allows the system to respond to changes in supply, demand, and network conditions in real-time.
By considering the unique preferences and constraints of each user or location in the network, the pricing can be tailored to achieve the greatest collective benefit. For example, homes with solar panels may be incentivized to sell excess energy during peak demand, while energy-intensive businesses could be encouraged to shift their usage to off-peak times when prices are lower. The dynamic, network-aware pricing aims to ensure the energy is distributed in the most efficient and equitable way.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a framework for network-aware and welfare-maximizing dynamic pricing of energy sharing. The key components include:
-
Network model: The energy network is represented as a graph, with nodes corresponding to energy sources/consumers and edges representing the physical connections and capacity constraints.
-
User preferences: Each user is modeled with a utility function that captures their willingness to buy or sell energy based on price.
-
Optimization problem: The goal is to determine the optimal prices that maximize the total social welfare, defined as the sum of all user utilities, subject to the network constraints.
-
Dynamic pricing: The prices are updated in real-time based on changes in supply, demand, and network conditions to continuously optimize the energy distribution.
The paper formulates the problem as a non-convex optimization and proposes an iterative algorithm to solve it. The approach considers heterogeneous user preferences and network constraints to find the welfare-maximizing prices. Simulations demonstrate the effectiveness of the dynamic pricing strategy in improving energy efficiency and fairness compared to static pricing schemes.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a comprehensive framework for dynamic energy pricing that accounts for network constraints and user preferences. The authors acknowledge the non-convex nature of the optimization problem and the potential challenges in finding the global optimum. They propose an iterative algorithm, but the convergence properties and computational complexity are not fully explored.
One potential limitation is the assumption of perfect information about user preferences and network conditions. In practice, this data may be incomplete or uncertain, which could impact the effectiveness of the dynamic pricing approach. Additionally, the paper does not consider strategic user behavior, where individuals may attempt to manipulate the system to their advantage.
Further research could investigate more robust optimization techniques, incorporate uncertainty, and explore the behavioral aspects of user interactions in the energy sharing market. Practical implementation considerations, such as communication infrastructure and data privacy, may also warrant additional study.
Conclusion
The paper presents an innovative framework for network-aware and welfare-maximizing dynamic pricing of energy sharing. By considering the unique characteristics of the energy network and user preferences, the proposed approach aims to optimize the distribution of energy resources to maximize the overall social benefit. The dynamic pricing mechanism allows the system to adapt to changing conditions in real-time, improving efficiency and fairness. While the technical details are complex, the core idea of using intelligent pricing to coordinate energy sharing in a network is a promising concept with potential applications in renewable energy integration, smart grid management, and sustainable energy systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Distributed Management of Fluctuating Energy Resources in Dynamic Networked Systems
Xiaotong Cheng, Ioannis Tsetis, Setareh Maghsudi
0
0
Modern power systems integrate renewable distributed energy resources (DERs) as an environment-friendly enhancement to meet the ever-increasing demands. However, the inherent unreliability of renewable energy renders developing DER management algorithms imperative. We study the energy-sharing problem in a system consisting of several DERs. Each agent harvests and distributes renewable energy in its neighborhood to optimize the network's performance while minimizing energy waste. We model this problem as a bandit convex optimization problem with constraints that correspond to each node's limitations for energy production. We propose distributed decision-making policies to solve the formulated problem, where we utilize the notion of dynamic regret as the performance metric. We also include an adjustment strategy in our developed algorithm to reduce the constraint violations. Besides, we design a policy that deals with the non-stationary environment. Theoretical analysis shows the effectiveness of our proposed algorithm. Numerical experiments using a real-world dataset show superior performance of our proposal compared to state-of-the-art methods.
5/30/2024
Socially Optimal Energy Usage via Adaptive Pricing
Jiayi Li, Matthew Motoki, Baosen Zhang
0
0
A central challenge in using price signals to coordinate the electricity consumption of a group of users is the operator's lack of knowledge of the users due to privacy concerns. In this paper, we develop a two-time-scale incentive mechanism that alternately updates between the users and a system operator. As long as the users can optimize their own consumption subject to a given price, the operator does not need to know or attempt to learn any private information of the users for price design. Users adjust their consumption following the price and the system redesigns the price based on the users' consumption. We show that under mild assumptions, this iterative process converges to the social welfare solution. In particular, the cost of the users need not always be convex and its consumption can be the output of a machine learning-based load control algorithm.
4/1/2024
Aggregate Peak EV Charging Demand: The Impact of Segmented Network Tariffs
Nanda Kishor Panda, Na Li, Simon H. Tindemans
0
0
Aggregate peak Electric Vehicle (EV) charging demand is a matter of growing concern for network operators as it severely limits the network's capacity, preventing its reliable operation. Various tariff schemes have been proposed to limit peak demand by incentivizing flexible asset users to shift their demand from peak periods. However, fewer studies quantify the effect of these tariff schemes on the aggregate level. In this paper, we compare the effect of a multi-level segmented network tariff with and without dynamic energy prices for individual EV users on the aggregate peak demand. Results based on real charging transactions from over 1200 public charging points in the Netherlands show that the segmented network tariff with flat energy prices results in more diverse load profiles with increasing aggregation, as compared to cost-optimized dispatch based on only dynamic day-ahead energy prices. When paired with dynamic energy prices, the segmented tariff still outperforms only dynamic energy price-based tariffs in reducing peaks. Results show that a balance between power thresholds and price per threshold is crucial in designing a suitable tariff, taking into account the needs of the power network. We also provide valuable insights to network operators by calculating the diversity factor for various peak demands per charging point.
4/3/2024
Energy Storage Arbitrage in Two-settlement Markets: A Transformer-Based Approach
Saud Alghumayjan, Jiajun Han, Ningkun Zheng, Ming Yi, Bolun Xu
0
0
This paper presents an integrated model for bidding energy storage in day-ahead and real-time markets to maximize profits. We show that in integrated two-stage bidding, the real-time bids are independent of day-ahead settlements, while the day-ahead bids should be based on predicted real-time prices. We utilize a transformer-based model for real-time price prediction, which captures complex dynamical patterns of real-time prices, and use the result for day-ahead bidding design. For real-time bidding, we utilize a long short-term memory-dynamic programming hybrid real-time bidding model. We train and test our model with historical data from New York State, and our results showed that the integrated system achieved promising results of almost a 20% increase in profit compared to only bidding in real-time markets, and at the same time reducing the risk in terms of the number of days with negative profits.
4/30/2024