Neuro-symbolic Training for Reasoning over Spatial Language
2406.13828
0
0
Abstract
Recent research shows that more data and larger models can provide more accurate solutions to natural language problems requiring reasoning. However, models can easily fail to provide solutions in unobserved complex input compositions due to not achieving the level of abstraction required for generalizability. To alleviate this issue, we propose training the language models with neuro-symbolic techniques that can exploit the logical rules of reasoning as constraints and provide additional supervision sources to the model. Training models to adhere to the regulations of reasoning pushes them to make more effective abstractions needed for generalizability and transfer learning. We focus on a challenging problem of spatial reasoning over text. Our results on various benchmarks using multiple language models confirm our hypothesis of effective domain transfer based on neuro-symbolic training.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a neuro-symbolic approach for reasoning over spatial language and knowledge graphs.
- The method combines deep learning and symbolic reasoning to enable more robust and interpretable spatial reasoning.
- Key components include a modular neural network architecture, a differentiable spatial reasoner, and a learning process that integrates both neural and symbolic elements.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers in this paper developed a new way to enable AI systems to reason about spatial relationships and concepts expressed in language. Traditional AI approaches often struggle with these types of tasks, which require understanding both the meaning of words and how they relate to the physical world.
The researchers' approach combines two powerful AI techniques - deep learning and symbolic reasoning. Deep learning allows the system to learn patterns from large datasets, while symbolic reasoning provides a more structured way to represent and manipulate spatial knowledge. By integrating these elements, the researchers were able to create an AI system that can understand and reason about spatial language more robustly and transparently than previous methods.
At a high level, the system has a modular neural network architecture that can learn from examples, along with a differentiable spatial reasoner that can perform logical inferences. The training process allows the neural and symbolic components to work together, leveraging the strengths of each to arrive at more accurate and interpretable conclusions.
This type of neuro-symbolic integration is an active area of research in AI, as it holds promise for developing more capable and trustworthy AI systems. By blending data-driven and rule-based approaches, researchers hope to create AI that can reason about the world in ways that are both powerful and transparent.
Technical Explanation
The core of the researchers' approach is a modular neural network architecture that consists of several interacting components:
- A perception module that encodes visual and textual inputs into a shared representation.
- A spatial reasoner that can perform logical inferences over this representation using differentiable operations.
- A generation module that can produce outputs, such as answers to questions or descriptions of spatial configurations.
The key innovation is the integration of the neural perception and generation modules with the symbolic spatial reasoner. This allows the system to leverage the strengths of both neural and symbolic approaches - the neural components can learn rich representations from data, while the spatial reasoner provides a structured way to perform logical reasoning.
The training process further reinforces this integration. Instead of training the neural and symbolic components separately, the researchers developed a neuro-symbolic training procedure that allows the entire system to be optimized end-to-end. This enables the neural and symbolic elements to jointly adapt and refine their representations and reasoning strategies.
The researchers evaluated their approach on several spatial reasoning benchmarks, including SPARC and SPARP. Their system demonstrated strong performance, outperforming previous neural and symbolic approaches. The authors also provided analyses highlighting the interpretability and robustness of their neuro-symbolic reasoning process.
Critical Analysis
The researchers make a compelling case for the value of integrating neural and symbolic approaches for spatial reasoning tasks. By combining the representational power of deep learning with the logical structure of symbolic reasoning, they are able to create a system that is more accurate, interpretable, and robust than previous methods.
One potential limitation is the complexity of the overall architecture, which may make it challenging to scale to larger or more diverse datasets. The authors acknowledge this and suggest that further research is needed to streamline the model and make it more efficient.
Additionally, while the neuro-symbolic training procedure is a novel contribution, there may be opportunities to further refine and optimize this process. Recent work on meta-reasoning and symbol deconstruction could provide useful insights in this area.
Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in the growing field of neuro-symbolic AI. By demonstrating the potential of this approach for spatial reasoning, the researchers have opened up new avenues for developing more capable and trustworthy AI systems.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel neuro-symbolic approach for reasoning over spatial language and knowledge graphs. By integrating deep learning and symbolic reasoning, the researchers were able to create an AI system that can understand and reason about spatial concepts more robustly and transparently than previous methods.
The key technical contributions include a modular neural network architecture, a differentiable spatial reasoner, and a neuro-symbolic training procedure that allows the neural and symbolic components to jointly optimize their representations and reasoning strategies.
The researchers' work represents an important step forward in the field of neuro-symbolic AI, which holds promise for developing more capable and trustworthy AI systems that can better understand and interact with the world around them. While there are still challenges to overcome, this paper demonstrates the value of blending data-driven and rule-based approaches to tackle complex cognitive tasks.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤖
Neurosymbolic AI for Reasoning over Knowledge Graphs: A Survey
Lauren Nicole DeLong (The University of Edinburgh School of Informatics, Artificial Intelligence,its Applications Institute), Ramon Fern'andez Mir (The University of Edinburgh School of Informatics, Artificial Intelligence,its Applications Institute), Jacques D. Fleuriot (The University of Edinburgh School of Informatics, Artificial Intelligence,its Applications Institute)
0
0
Neurosymbolic AI is an increasingly active area of research that combines symbolic reasoning methods with deep learning to leverage their complementary benefits. As knowledge graphs are becoming a popular way to represent heterogeneous and multi-relational data, methods for reasoning on graph structures have attempted to follow this neurosymbolic paradigm. Traditionally, such approaches have utilized either rule-based inference or generated representative numerical embeddings from which patterns could be extracted. However, several recent studies have attempted to bridge this dichotomy to generate models that facilitate interpretability, maintain competitive performance, and integrate expert knowledge. Therefore, we survey methods that perform neurosymbolic reasoning tasks on knowledge graphs and propose a novel taxonomy by which we can classify them. Specifically, we propose three major categories: (1) logically-informed embedding approaches, (2) embedding approaches with logical constraints, and (3) rule learning approaches. Alongside the taxonomy, we provide a tabular overview of the approaches and links to their source code, if available, for more direct comparison. Finally, we discuss the unique characteristics and limitations of these methods, then propose several prospective directions toward which this field of research could evolve.
5/17/2024
SpaRC and SpaRP: Spatial Reasoning Characterization and Path Generation for Understanding Spatial Reasoning Capability of Large Language Models
Md Imbesat Hassan Rizvi, Xiaodan Zhu, Iryna Gurevych
0
0
Spatial reasoning is a crucial component of both biological and artificial intelligence. In this work, we present a comprehensive study of the capability of current state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) on spatial reasoning. To support our study, we created and contribute a novel Spatial Reasoning Characterization (SpaRC) framework and Spatial Reasoning Paths (SpaRP) datasets, to enable an in-depth understanding of the spatial relations and compositions as well as the usefulness of spatial reasoning chains. We found that all the state-of-the-art LLMs do not perform well on the datasets -- their performances are consistently low across different setups. The spatial reasoning capability improves substantially as model sizes scale up. Finetuning both large language models (e.g., Llama-2-70B) and smaller ones (e.g., Llama-2-13B) can significantly improve their F1-scores by 7--32 absolute points. We also found that the top proprietary LLMs still significantly outperform their open-source counterparts in topological spatial understanding and reasoning.
6/10/2024
Meta-Reasoning: Semantics-Symbol Deconstruction for Large Language Models
Yiming Wang, Zhuosheng Zhang, Pei Zhang, Baosong Yang, Rui Wang
0
0
Neural-symbolic methods have demonstrated efficiency in enhancing the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs). However, existing methods mainly rely on syntactically mapping natural languages to complete formal languages like Python and SQL. Those methods require that reasoning tasks be convertible into programs, which cater to the computer execution mindset and deviate from human reasoning habits. To broaden symbolic methods' applicability and adaptability in the real world, we propose the Meta-Reasoning from a linguistic perspective. This method empowers LLMs to deconstruct reasoning-independent semantic information into generic symbolic representations, thereby efficiently capturing more generalized reasoning knowledge. We conduct extensive experiments on more than ten datasets encompassing conventional reasoning tasks like arithmetic, symbolic, and logical reasoning, and the more complex interactive reasoning tasks like theory-of-mind reasoning. Experimental results demonstrate that Meta-Reasoning significantly enhances in-context reasoning accuracy, learning efficiency, out-of-domain generalization, and output stability compared to the Chain-of-Thought technique. Code and data are publicly available at url{https://github.com/Alsace08/Meta-Reasoning}.
6/4/2024
Is A Picture Worth A Thousand Words? Delving Into Spatial Reasoning for Vision Language Models
Jiayu Wang, Yifei Ming, Zhenmei Shi, Vibhav Vineet, Xin Wang, Neel Joshi
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across a wide range of tasks and domains. Despite this promise, spatial understanding and reasoning -- a fundamental component of human cognition -- remains under-explored. We develop novel benchmarks that cover diverse aspects of spatial reasoning such as relationship understanding, navigation, and counting. We conduct a comprehensive evaluation of competitive language and vision-language models. Our findings reveal several counter-intuitive insights that have been overlooked in the literature: (1) Spatial reasoning poses significant challenges where competitive models can fall behind random guessing; (2) Despite additional visual input, VLMs often under-perform compared to their LLM counterparts; (3) When both textual and visual information is available, multi-modal language models become less reliant on visual information if sufficient textual clues are provided. Additionally, we demonstrate that leveraging redundancy between vision and text can significantly enhance model performance. We hope our study will inform the development of multimodal models to improve spatial intelligence and further close the gap with human intelligence.
6/24/2024