Normalise for Fairness: A Simple Normalisation Technique for Fairness in Regression Machine Learning Problems

Read original: arXiv:2202.00993 - Published 8/21/2024 by Mostafa M. Amin, Bjorn W. Schuller
Total Score

0

↗️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Algorithms and machine learning (ML) are increasingly affecting everyday life and decision-making processes.
  • Fairness in such applications is crucial, as models should not discriminate based on race, gender, or other protected groups.
  • Fairness is not commonly studied for regression problems compared to binary classification problems.
  • The paper presents a simple yet effective method called FaiReg to minimize the impact of unfairness in regression problems, especially due to labelling bias.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses the importance of fairness in machine learning applications, where the models should treat people equally regardless of their race, gender, or other protected characteristics. This is particularly crucial for sensitive applications like interview invitations or predicting the likelihood of someone returning to prison.

The researchers present a new method called FaiReg that aims to make regression models (which predict continuous values) more fair. Regression problems are less studied for fairness compared to classification problems (which predict categorical outcomes). FaiReg uses a normalization technique to reduce the impact of unfairness in the data, especially when there are biases in how the target variable (the thing the model is trying to predict) is measured or labeled.

The paper also introduces a hybrid approach called FaiRegH, which combines FaiReg with another fairness technique called data balancing, to address both labeling and sampling biases. The researchers evaluate these methods on a dataset that predicts personality traits and interview screening scores, measuring fairness using two common metrics: Equal Accuracy and Statistical Parity.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a fairness-aware regression method called FaiReg that aims to minimize the impact of unfairness in regression problems. The key idea is to normalize the target variable based on the protected attributes (e.g., race, gender) to reduce the influence of labeling bias.

The researchers provide a theoretical analysis of the FaiReg method and compare it empirically against two standard fairness techniques: data balancing and adversarial training. They also introduce a hybrid approach called FaiRegH, which combines FaiReg with data balancing to address both labeling and sampling biases.

The experiments are conducted on the multimodal First Impressions (FI) dataset, which includes labels for Big-Five personality prediction and interview screening scores. Fairness is evaluated using the Equal Accuracy (EA) and Statistical Parity (SP) metrics.

The results show that FaiReg outperforms the baseline fairness techniques in reducing unfairness, without significantly degrading the original task performance as much as adversarial training. The hybrid FaiRegH approach also demonstrates promising results in addressing both labeling and sampling biases simultaneously.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and effective approach to addressing fairness in regression problems, which is an important and often overlooked area of study. The theoretical analysis and empirical evaluation on the FI dataset provide a robust validation of the FaiReg method.

One potential limitation of the study is that it only considers a single dataset and a limited set of protected attributes (e.g., race, gender). It would be valuable to evaluate the method on a broader range of regression tasks and datasets to assess its generalizability.

Additionally, the paper does not discuss the computational complexity or scalability of the FaiReg and FaiRegH methods, which could be an important consideration for real-world applications. Further research could explore the trade-offs between fairness improvements and computational efficiency.

Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of fair machine learning and provides a promising direction for addressing fairness in regression problems.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel fairness-aware regression method called FaiReg, which aims to minimize the impact of unfairness in regression problems, particularly due to labeling bias. The researchers also introduce a hybrid approach, FaiRegH, that combines FaiReg with data balancing to address both labeling and sampling biases.

The empirical results show that FaiReg outperforms standard fairness techniques in reducing unfairness, without significantly degrading the original task performance. This work makes an important contribution to the field of fair machine learning by addressing fairness in regression problems, which have traditionally received less attention compared to classification tasks.

The findings of this paper have the potential to inform the development of more equitable and responsible machine learning systems, particularly in sensitive domains where fairness is of utmost importance.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

↗️

Total Score

0

Normalise for Fairness: A Simple Normalisation Technique for Fairness in Regression Machine Learning Problems

Mostafa M. Amin, Bjorn W. Schuller

Algorithms and Machine Learning (ML) are increasingly affecting everyday life and several decision-making processes, where ML has an advantage due to scalability or superior performance. Fairness in such applications is crucial, where models should not discriminate their results based on race, gender, or other protected groups. This is especially crucial for models affecting very sensitive topics, like interview invitation or recidivism prediction. Fairness is not commonly studied for regression problems compared to binary classification problems; hence, we present a simple, yet effective method based on normalisation (FaiReg), which minimises the impact of unfairness in regression problems, especially due to labelling bias. We present a theoretical analysis of the method, in addition to an empirical comparison against two standard methods for fairness, namely data balancing and adversarial training. We also include a hybrid formulation (FaiRegH), merging the presented method with data balancing, in an attempt to face labelling and sampling biases simultaneously. The experiments are conducted on the multimodal dataset First Impressions (FI) with various labels, namely Big-Five personality prediction and interview screening score. The results show the superior performance of diminishing the effects of unfairness better than data balancing, also without deteriorating the performance of the original problem as much as adversarial training. Fairness is evaluated based on the Equal Accuracy (EA) and Statistical Parity (SP) constraints. The experiments present a setup that enhances the fairness for several protected variables simultaneously.

Read more

8/21/2024

🔍

Total Score

0

Individual Fairness Through Reweighting and Tuning

Abdoul Jalil Djiberou Mahamadou, Lea Goetz, Russ Altman

Inherent bias within society can be amplified and perpetuated by artificial intelligence (AI) systems. To address this issue, a wide range of solutions have been proposed to identify and mitigate bias and enforce fairness for individuals and groups. Recently, Graph Laplacian Regularizer (GLR), a regularization technique from the semi-supervised learning literature has been used as a substitute for the common Lipschitz condition to enhance individual fairness. Notable prior work has shown that enforcing individual fairness through a GLR can improve the transfer learning accuracy of AI models under covariate shifts. However, the prior work defines a GLR on the source and target data combined, implicitly assuming that the target data are available at train time, which might not hold in practice. In this work, we investigated whether defining a GLR independently on the train and target data could maintain similar accuracy. Furthermore, we introduced the Normalized Fairness Gain score (NFG) to measure individual fairness by measuring the amount of gained fairness when a GLR is used versus not. We evaluated the new and original methods under NFG, the Prediction Consistency (PC), and traditional classification metrics on the German Credit Approval dataset. The results showed that the two models achieved similar statistical mean performances over five-fold cross-validation. Furthermore, the proposed metric showed that PC scores can be misleading as the scores can be high and statistically similar to fairness-enhanced models while NFG scores are small. This work therefore provides new insights into when a GLR effectively enhances individual fairness and the pitfalls of PC.

Read more

5/9/2024

Implementing Fairness: the view from a FairDream
Total Score

0

Implementing Fairness: the view from a FairDream

Thomas Souverain, Johnathan Nguyen, Nicolas Meric, Paul 'Egr'e

In this paper, we propose an experimental investigation of the problem of AI fairness in classification. We train an AI model and develop our own fairness package FairDream to detect inequalities and then to correct for them, using income prediction as a case study. Our experiments show that it is a property of FairDream to fulfill fairness objectives which are conditional on the ground truth (Equalized Odds), even when the algorithm is set the task of equalizing positives across groups (Demographic Parity). While this may be seen as an anomaly, we explain this property by comparing our approach with a closely related fairness method (GridSearch), which can enforce Demographic Parity at the expense of Equalized Odds. We grant that a fairness metric conditioned on true labels does not give a sufficient criterion to reach fairness, but we argue that it gives us at least a necessary condition to implement Demographic Parity cautiously. We also explain why neither Equal Calibration nor Equal Precision stand as relevant fairness criteria in classification. Addressing their limitations to warn the decision-maker for any disadvantaging rate, Equalized Odds avoids the peril of strict conservatism, while keeping away the utopia of a whole redistribution of resources through algorithms.

Read more

7/23/2024

Fair Generalized Linear Mixed Models
Total Score

0

Fair Generalized Linear Mixed Models

Jan Pablo Burgard, Jo~ao Vitor Pamplona

When using machine learning for automated prediction, it is important to account for fairness in the prediction. Fairness in machine learning aims to ensure that biases in the data and model inaccuracies do not lead to discriminatory decisions. E.g., predictions from fair machine learning models should not discriminate against sensitive variables such as sexual orientation and ethnicity. The training data often in obtained from social surveys. In social surveys, oftentimes the data collection process is a strata sampling, e.g. due to cost restrictions. In strata samples, the assumption of independence between the observation is not fulfilled. Hence, if the machine learning models do not account for the strata correlations, the results may be biased. Especially high is the bias in cases where the strata assignment is correlated to the variable of interest. We present in this paper an algorithm that can handle both problems simultaneously, and we demonstrate the impact of stratified sampling on the quality of fair machine learning predictions in a reproducible simulation study.

Read more

5/24/2024