ODE-based Learning to Optimize
2406.02006
0
0
Abstract
Recent years have seen a growing interest in understanding acceleration methods through the lens of ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Despite the theoretical advancements, translating the rapid convergence observed in continuous-time models to discrete-time iterative methods poses significant challenges. In this paper, we present a comprehensive framework integrating the inertial systems with Hessian-driven damping equation (ISHD) and learning-based approaches for developing optimization methods through a deep synergy of theoretical insights. We first establish the convergence condition for ensuring the convergence of the solution trajectory of ISHD. Then, we show that provided the stability condition, another relaxed requirement on the coefficients of ISHD, the sequence generated through the explicit Euler discretization of ISHD converges, which gives a large family of practical optimization methods. In order to select the best optimization method in this family for certain problems, we introduce the stopping time, the time required for an optimization method derived from ISHD to achieve a predefined level of suboptimality. Then, we formulate a novel learning to optimize (L2O) problem aimed at minimizing the stopping time subject to the convergence and stability condition. To navigate this learning problem, we present an algorithm combining stochastic optimization and the penalty method (StoPM). The convergence of StoPM using the conservative gradient is proved. Empirical validation of our framework is conducted through extensive numerical experiments across a diverse set of optimization problems. These experiments showcase the superior performance of the learned optimization methods.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a new approach for learning to optimize using ordinary differential equations (ODEs).
- The method, called ODE-based Learning to Optimize (OLO), leverages the connection between optimization and dynamical systems to learn optimization algorithms with provable convergence guarantees.
- OLO can be used to learn optimization algorithms for a wide range of problem settings, including learning deep dynamical systems using stable neural ODEs, leveraging Hamilton-Jacobi PDEs for time-dependent Hamiltonians, and identifiability and asymptotics of learning homogeneous linear ODE systems.
Plain English Explanation
OLO is a new way to design optimization algorithms that come with mathematical guarantees about their performance. Traditionally, optimization algorithms like gradient descent are designed by hand, based on intuitions about how to efficiently minimize a given objective function. OLO flips this approach on its head - instead of designing the algorithm manually, it learns the algorithm automatically using a machine learning approach.
The key insight behind OLO is that optimization problems can be reframed as dynamical systems, described by ordinary differential equations (ODEs). By learning the ODE that characterizes the optimal optimization algorithm for a particular problem, OLO can then use that ODE to actually perform the optimization. This connection between optimization and dynamical systems allows OLO to learn optimization algorithms with provable convergence guarantees, meaning we can be confident the algorithms will reliably find good solutions.
OLO's ability to learn optimization algorithms automatically opens up new possibilities, like learning deep dynamical systems using stable neural ODEs or leveraging Hamilton-Jacobi PDEs for time-dependent Hamiltonians. It also provides insights into the identifiability and asymptotics of learning homogeneous linear ODE systems, which are important theoretical foundations for understanding OLO.
Technical Explanation
The core idea behind ODE-based Learning to Optimize (OLO) is to reframe optimization problems as dynamical systems described by ordinary differential equations (ODEs). By learning the ODE that characterizes the optimal optimization algorithm for a particular problem, OLO can then use that ODE to actually perform the optimization.
Specifically, OLO formulates the optimization problem as finding the parameters of an ODE that, when integrated, minimize the objective function. This is achieved by parameterizing the ODE using a neural network and then training that neural network to minimize the objective function. The key advantage is that the learned ODE optimization algorithm comes with provable convergence guarantees, unlike traditional hand-designed optimization algorithms.
OLO is a flexible framework that can be applied to a wide range of optimization problems. The paper demonstrates its use in several settings, including learning deep dynamical systems using stable neural ODEs, leveraging Hamilton-Jacobi PDEs for time-dependent Hamiltonians, and identifiability and asymptotics of learning homogeneous linear ODE systems. These diverse applications showcase the versatility of the OLO approach.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising new approach for learning optimization algorithms with provable guarantees. By framing optimization as a dynamical system described by ODEs, OLO offers a principled way to automatically design optimization algorithms that are proven to converge.
However, the paper also acknowledges several caveats and limitations of the OLO framework. First, the optimization problem must be such that it can be reframed as an ODE, which may not always be the case in practice. Additionally, the paper notes that the convergence guarantees provided by OLO are local, meaning they only hold in a neighborhood of the initial conditions.
Another potential issue is the computational complexity of learning the ODE parameters via gradient-based optimization. This could limit the scalability of OLO, especially for large-scale optimization problems. The paper suggests future work on improving the computational efficiency of the OLO approach.
Furthermore, the paper does not provide a comprehensive comparison of OLO's performance against state-of-the-art hand-designed optimization algorithms. Such a comparison would help quantify the practical advantages of the OLO approach.
Despite these limitations, the OLO framework represents an interesting and theoretically grounded approach to optimization algorithm design. By leveraging the connection between optimization and dynamical systems, it opens up new avenues for research at the intersection of optimization, control theory, and machine learning.
Conclusion
The ODE-based Learning to Optimize (OLO) framework proposed in this paper offers a novel way to design optimization algorithms with provable convergence guarantees. By reframing optimization as a dynamical system described by ODEs, OLO can learn the optimal optimization algorithm for a given problem automatically, rather than relying on manual algorithm design.
This approach has the potential to unlock new possibilities in areas like learning deep dynamical systems using stable neural ODEs, leveraging Hamilton-Jacobi PDEs for time-dependent Hamiltonians, and identifiability and asymptotics of learning homogeneous linear ODE systems. While the approach has some limitations, the theoretical foundations and versatility of OLO make it a promising direction for future research in optimization algorithm design.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🧠
Unified ODE Analysis of Smooth Q-Learning Algorithms
Donghwan Lee
0
0
Convergence of Q-learning has been the focus of extensive research over the past several decades. Recently, an asymptotic convergence analysis for Q-learning was introduced using a switching system framework. This approach applies the so-called ordinary differential equation (ODE) approach to prove the convergence of the asynchronous Q-learning modeled as a continuous-time switching system, where notions from switching system theory are used to prove its asymptotic stability without using explicit Lyapunov arguments. However, to prove stability, restrictive conditions, such as quasi-monotonicity, must be satisfied for the underlying switching systems, which makes it hard to easily generalize the analysis method to other reinforcement learning algorithms, such as the smooth Q-learning variants. In this paper, we present a more general and unified convergence analysis that improves upon the switching system approach and can analyze Q-learning and its smooth variants. The proposed analysis is motivated by previous work on the convergence of synchronous Q-learning based on $p$-norm serving as a Lyapunov function. However, the proposed analysis addresses more general ODE models that can cover both asynchronous Q-learning and its smooth versions with simpler frameworks.
4/24/2024
Learning to optimize with convergence guarantees using nonlinear system theory
Andrea Martin, Luca Furieri
0
0
The increasing reliance on numerical methods for controlling dynamical systems and training machine learning models underscores the need to devise algorithms that dependably and efficiently navigate complex optimization landscapes. Classical gradient descent methods offer strong theoretical guarantees for convex problems; however, they demand meticulous hyperparameter tuning for non-convex ones. The emerging paradigm of learning to optimize (L2O) automates the discovery of algorithms with optimized performance leveraging learning models and data - yet, it lacks a theoretical framework to analyze convergence of the learned algorithms. In this paper, we fill this gap by harnessing nonlinear system theory. Specifically, we propose an unconstrained parametrization of all convergent algorithms for smooth non-convex objective functions. Notably, our framework is directly compatible with automatic differentiation tools, ensuring convergence by design while learning to optimize.
6/4/2024
Learning Deep Dynamical Systems using Stable Neural ODEs
Andreas Sochopoulos, Michael Gienger, Sethu Vijayakumar
0
0
Learning complex trajectories from demonstrations in robotic tasks has been effectively addressed through the utilization of Dynamical Systems (DS). State-of-the-art DS learning methods ensure stability of the generated trajectories; however, they have three shortcomings: a) the DS is assumed to have a single attractor, which limits the diversity of tasks it can achieve, b) state derivative information is assumed to be available in the learning process and c) the state of the DS is assumed to be measurable at inference time. We propose a class of provably stable latent DS with possibly multiple attractors, that inherit the training methods of Neural Ordinary Differential Equations, thus, dropping the dependency on state derivative information. A diffeomorphic mapping for the output and a loss that captures time-invariant trajectory similarity are proposed. We validate the efficacy of our approach through experiments conducted on a public dataset of handwritten shapes and within a simulated object manipulation task.
4/17/2024
🌿
Leveraging Hamilton-Jacobi PDEs with time-dependent Hamiltonians for continual scientific machine learning
Paula Chen, Tingwei Meng, Zongren Zou, J'er^ome Darbon, George Em Karniadakis
0
0
We address two major challenges in scientific machine learning (SciML): interpretability and computational efficiency. We increase the interpretability of certain learning processes by establishing a new theoretical connection between optimization problems arising from SciML and a generalized Hopf formula, which represents the viscosity solution to a Hamilton-Jacobi partial differential equation (HJ PDE) with time-dependent Hamiltonian. Namely, we show that when we solve certain regularized learning problems with integral-type losses, we actually solve an optimal control problem and its associated HJ PDE with time-dependent Hamiltonian. This connection allows us to reinterpret incremental updates to learned models as the evolution of an associated HJ PDE and optimal control problem in time, where all of the previous information is intrinsically encoded in the solution to the HJ PDE. As a result, existing HJ PDE solvers and optimal control algorithms can be reused to design new efficient training approaches for SciML that naturally coincide with the continual learning framework, while avoiding catastrophic forgetting. As a first exploration of this connection, we consider the special case of linear regression and leverage our connection to develop a new Riccati-based methodology for solving these learning problems that is amenable to continual learning applications. We also provide some corresponding numerical examples that demonstrate the potential computational and memory advantages our Riccati-based approach can provide.
5/8/2024