One-shot Empirical Privacy Estimation for Federated Learning

Overview

• This paper presents a novel "one-shot" approach for efficiently auditing or estimating the privacy loss of a machine learning model during training, without requiring any a priori knowledge about the model architecture, task, or differential privacy (DP) training algorithm.
• The proposed method can provide provably correct estimates of privacy loss under the Gaussian mechanism, and is demonstrated on well-established federated learning (FL) benchmark datasets under various adversarial threat models.
• The paper aims to address key shortcomings of existing privacy auditing techniques, which often make strong assumptions about the adversary, are tailored to specific tasks/models/DP algorithms, and/or require retraining the model many times.

Plain English Explanation

Ensuring privacy is a critical concern when training machine learning models, especially in federated learning settings where data is distributed across many devices. Differentially private (DP) algorithms can help protect the privacy of the training data, but it's important to be able to measure how much privacy is actually being preserved.

Existing techniques for auditing or estimating the privacy loss of DP models usually make strong assumptions about the adversary - for example, they might assume the adversary knows details about the intermediate model iterations or the training data distribution. These techniques are also often tailored to specific machine learning tasks, model architectures, or DP algorithms. Additionally, they typically require retraining the model many times, which can be computationally expensive and impractical, especially for federated learning where training can take days or weeks.

To address these challenges, the researchers in this paper developed a novel "one-shot" approach that can estimate the privacy loss of a DP model during the same single training run used to fit the model parameters. Their method doesn't require any prior knowledge about the model, task, or DP algorithm, making it much more flexible and practical to deploy at scale.

The key idea is to carefully track and aggregate certain statistics during the training process, which can then be used to provide provably correct estimates of the overall privacy loss under the Gaussian mechanism. The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on standard federated learning benchmark datasets, showing that it can accurately estimate privacy loss under different adversarial threat models.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a novel one-shot approach for efficiently auditing the privacy loss of differentially private (DP) machine learning models during the same training process used to fit the model parameters. This addresses key limitations of existing privacy auditing techniques, which often make strong assumptions about the adversary's knowledge, are tailored to specific tasks/models/DP algorithms, and/or require retraining the model many times.

The core idea is to carefully track and aggregate certain statistics during the training process that can then be used to provide provably correct estimates of the overall privacy loss under the Gaussian mechanism. Specifically, the method keeps track of the gradient norms, per-example gradients, and the clipping threshold used in the DP training process. These statistics are then used to compute tight, data-dependent estimates of the privacy loss, without requiring any a priori knowledge about the model architecture, task, or DP algorithm.

The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on well-established federated learning benchmark datasets, including CIFAR-10, EMNIST, and Shakespeare. They show that their method can accurately estimate the privacy loss under various adversarial threat models, outperforming existing techniques that make stronger assumptions.

Critical Analysis

The key strength of this work is its ability to provide efficient, flexible, and provably correct estimates of privacy loss for DP models, without requiring any a priori knowledge about the specific model, task, or DP algorithm being used. This addresses major limitations of existing privacy auditing techniques and makes it much more practical to deploy such methods at scale, especially in federated learning settings.

That said, the paper does not explore the limits or potential failure modes of the proposed approach. For example, it's unclear how the method would perform on more complex model architectures or DP algorithms beyond the Gaussian mechanism. Additionally, the paper focuses on empirical evaluation but does not provide a comprehensive theoretical analysis of the tightness or accuracy of the privacy loss estimates under different conditions.

Further research could also investigate the trade-offs between the computation and memory overhead of the privacy auditing process versus the benefits of having accurate, flexible, and efficient privacy estimates. In practice, there may be settings where the additional computational burden is not feasible, so exploring ways to reduce the overhead would be valuable.

Overall, this work represents an important step forward in making privacy auditing more practical and accessible for real-world machine learning deployments. By addressing key limitations of existing techniques, the proposed approach has the potential to significantly improve the transparency and accountability of DP systems, which is crucial for building trust and responsible AI.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel one-shot approach for efficiently auditing the privacy loss of differentially private machine learning models during the training process. The method overcomes key limitations of existing privacy auditing techniques by providing provably correct estimates of privacy loss without requiring any a priori knowledge about the model architecture, task, or DP algorithm.

The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on standard federated learning benchmark datasets, showing that it can accurately estimate privacy loss under various adversarial threat models. This work represents an important advancement in making privacy auditing more practical and scalable, which is crucial for building transparent and responsible AI systems, especially in sensitive federated learning applications.

While the paper does not explore the limits of the proposed approach, it lays the groundwork for further research to improve the efficiency, accuracy, and generalizability of privacy auditing techniques. By making it easier to measure and understand the privacy properties of machine learning models, this work can help drive the development of more secure and trustworthy AI systems that respect user privacy.