Federated Transfer Learning with Differential Privacy

Read original: arXiv:2403.11343 - Published 4/10/2024 by Mengchu Li, Ye Tian, Yang Feng, Yi Yu
Total Score

0

🔄

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Federated learning is a machine learning approach that allows multiple parties to collaboratively train a model without directly sharing their data.
  • This paper addresses two key challenges in federated learning: data heterogeneity and privacy.
  • The authors propose a federated transfer learning framework that leverages information from multiple heterogeneous data sources while preserving privacy.
  • They introduce the concept of federated differential privacy, which provides privacy guarantees without a trusted central server.
  • The paper analyzes the performance of three statistical problems - univariate mean estimation, low-dimensional linear regression, and high-dimensional linear regression - under the federated differential privacy constraint.

Plain English Explanation

Federated learning is a way for multiple organizations or individuals to train a machine learning model together without directly sharing their private data. This is becoming increasingly popular, but it comes with some challenges.

Two key issues are data heterogeneity and privacy. Data heterogeneity means the data used to train the model can come from different sources and have different characteristics. Privacy is important because the data used to train the model may be sensitive or confidential.

This paper proposes a solution that addresses both of these challenges. The authors develop a federated transfer learning approach that allows the model to benefit from information across multiple heterogeneous data sources, while also preserving the privacy of the data.

The key innovation is the concept of federated differential privacy, which provides strong privacy guarantees without requiring a central server that all the data is shared with. The paper then analyzes how well this approach works for three common statistical problems: estimating the average of a dataset, simple linear regression, and more complex high-dimensional linear regression.

The analysis shows that federated differential privacy sits between two other well-known privacy models - local and central differential privacy. This means it offers a balance between the level of privacy protection and the ability to effectively train machine learning models.

Overall, this research highlights the fundamental trade-offs between data heterogeneity, privacy, and the performance of federated learning systems. By addressing these challenges, it aims to enable more powerful and practical federated learning applications.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a federated transfer learning framework that addresses both data heterogeneity and privacy in federated learning settings. To preserve privacy, the authors introduce the notion of federated differential privacy, which provides formal privacy guarantees for each data source without relying on a trusted central server.

Under this federated differential privacy constraint, the paper analyzes the performance of three classical statistical problems: univariate mean estimation, low-dimensional linear regression, and high-dimensional linear regression. By deriving the minimax rates and characterizing the costs of privacy for these problems, the authors show that federated differential privacy is an intermediate privacy model between the well-established local and central models of differential privacy.

The analysis incorporates both data heterogeneity and privacy considerations, underscoring the fundamental trade-offs involved. For example, the paper demonstrates that while knowledge transfer across heterogeneous data sources can improve model performance, it also incurs additional privacy costs.

These findings provide important insights into the design and analysis of federated learning systems. The work highlights the need to carefully balance the benefits of data sharing and knowledge transfer with the need to protect individual privacy, especially in settings with diverse data sources. The theoretical results can guide the development of more privacy-preserving federated learning algorithms and help practitioners understand the limitations and mitigation strategies for federated learning in heterogeneous environments.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes significant contributions to the understanding of federated learning by rigorously analyzing the interplay between data heterogeneity, privacy, and model performance. The authors' introduction of federated differential privacy is a novel and important concept that bridges the gap between the well-studied local and central differential privacy models.

However, the analysis is limited to relatively simple statistical problems, and it remains to be seen how the theoretical insights translate to more complex machine learning tasks. Additionally, the paper does not address practical implementation challenges, such as communication constraints or the vanishing variance problem in fully decentralized settings.

Future research could extend the theoretical analysis to deeper neural network architectures and investigate more realistic federated learning scenarios. Empirical studies validating the practical relevance of the theoretical insights would also be valuable. Overall, this paper lays an important foundation for understanding the fundamental trade-offs in federated learning and provides a springboard for further advancements in this rapidly evolving field.

Conclusion

This paper presents a federated transfer learning framework that addresses the challenges of data heterogeneity and privacy in federated learning. By introducing the concept of federated differential privacy, the authors offer a rigorous privacy-preserving approach that sits between the well-known local and central differential privacy models.

Through theoretical analysis of three statistical problems, the paper highlights the inherent trade-offs between data heterogeneity, privacy, and model performance in federated learning. These insights can guide the development of more effective and practical federated learning algorithms, helping to unlock the full potential of collaborative machine learning while respecting individual privacy concerns.

As federated learning continues to gain prominence, research like this will be crucial for advancing the state of the art and enabling widespread adoption of this powerful technique across a variety of domains.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🔄

Total Score

0

Federated Transfer Learning with Differential Privacy

Mengchu Li, Ye Tian, Yang Feng, Yi Yu

Federated learning is gaining increasing popularity, with data heterogeneity and privacy being two prominent challenges. In this paper, we address both issues within a federated transfer learning framework, aiming to enhance learning on a target data set by leveraging information from multiple heterogeneous source data sets while adhering to privacy constraints. We rigorously formulate the notion of textit{federated differential privacy}, which offers privacy guarantees for each data set without assuming a trusted central server. Under this privacy constraint, we study three classical statistical problems, namely univariate mean estimation, low-dimensional linear regression, and high-dimensional linear regression. By investigating the minimax rates and identifying the costs of privacy for these problems, we show that federated differential privacy is an intermediate privacy model between the well-established local and central models of differential privacy. Our analyses incorporate data heterogeneity and privacy, highlighting the fundamental costs of both in federated learning and underscoring the benefit of knowledge transfer across data sets.

Read more

4/10/2024

🤯

Total Score

0

Differentially Private Federated Learning: Servers Trustworthiness, Estimation, and Statistical Inference

Zhe Zhang, Ryumei Nakada, Linjun Zhang

Differentially private federated learning is crucial for maintaining privacy in distributed environments. This paper investigates the challenges of high-dimensional estimation and inference under the constraints of differential privacy. First, we study scenarios involving an untrusted central server, demonstrating the inherent difficulties of accurate estimation in high-dimensional problems. Our findings indicate that the tight minimax rates depends on the high-dimensionality of the data even with sparsity assumptions. Second, we consider a scenario with a trusted central server and introduce a novel federated estimation algorithm tailored for linear regression models. This algorithm effectively handles the slight variations among models distributed across different machines. We also propose methods for statistical inference, including coordinate-wise confidence intervals for individual parameters and strategies for simultaneous inference. Extensive simulation experiments support our theoretical advances, underscoring the efficacy and reliability of our approaches.

Read more

4/26/2024

🔮

Total Score

0

Differentially Private Federated Learning: A Systematic Review

Jie Fu, Yuan Hong, Xinpeng Ling, Leixia Wang, Xun Ran, Zhiyu Sun, Wendy Hui Wang, Zhili Chen, Yang Cao

In recent years, privacy and security concerns in machine learning have promoted trusted federated learning to the forefront of research. Differential privacy has emerged as the de facto standard for privacy protection in federated learning due to its rigorous mathematical foundation and provable guarantee. Despite extensive research on algorithms that incorporate differential privacy within federated learning, there remains an evident deficiency in systematic reviews that categorize and synthesize these studies. Our work presents a systematic overview of the differentially private federated learning. Existing taxonomies have not adequately considered objects and level of privacy protection provided by various differential privacy models in federated learning. To rectify this gap, we propose a new taxonomy of differentially private federated learning based on definition and guarantee of various differential privacy models and federated scenarios. Our classification allows for a clear delineation of the protected objects across various differential privacy models and their respective neighborhood levels within federated learning environments. Furthermore, we explore the applications of differential privacy in federated learning scenarios. Our work provide valuable insights into privacy-preserving federated learning and suggest practical directions for future research.

Read more

5/21/2024

Optimal Federated Learning for Nonparametric Regression with Heterogeneous Distributed Differential Privacy Constraints
Total Score

0

Optimal Federated Learning for Nonparametric Regression with Heterogeneous Distributed Differential Privacy Constraints

T. Tony Cai, Abhinav Chakraborty, Lasse Vuursteen

This paper studies federated learning for nonparametric regression in the context of distributed samples across different servers, each adhering to distinct differential privacy constraints. The setting we consider is heterogeneous, encompassing both varying sample sizes and differential privacy constraints across servers. Within this framework, both global and pointwise estimation are considered, and optimal rates of convergence over the Besov spaces are established. Distributed privacy-preserving estimators are proposed and their risk properties are investigated. Matching minimax lower bounds, up to a logarithmic factor, are established for both global and pointwise estimation. Together, these findings shed light on the tradeoff between statistical accuracy and privacy preservation. In particular, we characterize the compromise not only in terms of the privacy budget but also concerning the loss incurred by distributing data within the privacy framework as a whole. This insight captures the folklore wisdom that it is easier to retain privacy in larger samples, and explores the differences between pointwise and global estimation under distributed privacy constraints.

Read more

6/12/2024