Online Convex Optimisation: The Optimal Switching Regret for all Segmentations Simultaneously
0
🤷
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a new approach for online convex optimization, which is the problem of making a sequence of decisions under uncertainty while minimizing regret.
- The key contribution is deriving the optimal switching regret for all possible segmentations of the time horizon simultaneously, which improves upon previous work that only considered the regret for a single given segmentation.
- The paper provides a novel algorithmic framework and theoretical analysis to achieve this optimal switching regret, which has implications for a wide range of online learning and optimization problems.
Plain English Explanation
In many real-world scenarios, we need to make a sequence of decisions under uncertainty, such as adjusting the temperature of a heating system or managing a portfolio of investments. The goal is to minimize the "regret" - the difference between the performance of our decisions and the performance of the optimal decisions in hindsight.
This paper tackles a specific type of online optimization problem called "online convex optimization." The authors develop a new algorithm that can simultaneously achieve the optimal regret for
Previous work had only considered the regret for a single, pre-determined segmentation. But in practice, the optimal segmentation may not be known in advance. The authors' new approach overcomes this limitation by providing the best possible regret guarantees no matter how the time horizon is split up.
This has important implications, as it allows the algorithm to adapt to changes in the problem over time without requiring prior knowledge of when those changes might occur. The technique can be applied to a variety of online optimization problems, including dynamic submodular optimization and online linear regression.
Technical Explanation
The key technical contribution of the paper is deriving the optimal switching regret for all possible segmentations of the time horizon simultaneously. This improves upon previous work that only considered the regret for a single given segmentation.
The authors introduce a novel algorithmic framework and theoretical analysis to achieve this optimal switching regret. Their approach is based on the concept of "discounted Follow the Leader" (dFTL), which involves keeping track of a discounted version of the cumulative loss over time.
Importantly, the authors show that their algorithm can adapt to changes in the problem over time without requiring prior knowledge of when those changes might occur. This is a significant advantage over previous methods, which often assumed a fixed, known segmentation of the time horizon.
The paper provides a detailed regret analysis, proving that the authors' algorithm achieves the optimal switching regret rate of O(√(KT log T)), where K is the number of switches in the optimal segmentation and T is the total time horizon. This matches the lower bound for this problem setting.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a strong theoretical contribution by deriving the optimal switching regret for all possible segmentations simultaneously. This is an important advancement in the field of online convex optimization, as it addresses a key limitation of previous work.
One potential caveat is that the analysis assumes the loss functions are convex, which may not always hold in practice. The authors acknowledge this and suggest that extensions to non-convex settings could be an interesting direction for future research.
Additionally, while the paper provides a thorough theoretical analysis, it does not include any empirical evaluation of the proposed algorithm. Demonstrating the practical effectiveness of the method on real-world problems would further strengthen the impact of this work.
Overall, this is a technically sophisticated paper that makes a valuable contribution to the theory of online optimization. The results have the potential to benefit a wide range of applications where adapting to changes over time is crucial.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach for online convex optimization that can simultaneously achieve the optimal switching regret for all possible segmentations of the time horizon.
The key innovation is a new algorithmic framework and theoretical analysis that allows the method to adapt to changes in the problem without requiring prior knowledge of when those changes might occur. This is a significant advancement over previous work, which was limited to a single, pre-determined segmentation.
The authors' results have important implications for a variety of online learning and optimization problems, including dynamic submodular optimization, online linear regression, and the more general problem of adapting to non-stationarity. By providing the optimal switching regret guarantees, this work advances the state-of-the-art in online convex optimization and opens up new avenues for research and applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤷
0
Online Convex Optimisation: The Optimal Switching Regret for all Segmentations Simultaneously
Stephen Pasteris, Chris Hicks, Vasilios Mavroudis, Mark Herbster
We consider the classic problem of online convex optimisation. Whereas the notion of static regret is relevant for stationary problems, the notion of switching regret is more appropriate for non-stationary problems. A switching regret is defined relative to any segmentation of the trial sequence, and is equal to the sum of the static regrets of each segment. In this paper we show that, perhaps surprisingly, we can achieve the asymptotically optimal switching regret on every possible segmentation simultaneously. Our algorithm for doing so is very efficient: having a space and per-trial time complexity that is logarithmic in the time-horizon. Our algorithm also obtains novel bounds on its dynamic regret: being adaptive to variations in the rate of change of the comparator sequence.
Read more6/3/2024
🛠️
0
Adaptivity and Non-stationarity: Problem-dependent Dynamic Regret for Online Convex Optimization
Peng Zhao, Yu-Jie Zhang, Lijun Zhang, Zhi-Hua Zhou
We investigate online convex optimization in non-stationary environments and choose dynamic regret as the performance measure, defined as the difference between cumulative loss incurred by the online algorithm and that of any feasible comparator sequence. Let $T$ be the time horizon and $P_T$ be the path length that essentially reflects the non-stationarity of environments, the state-of-the-art dynamic regret is $mathcal{O}(sqrt{T(1+P_T)})$. Although this bound is proved to be minimax optimal for convex functions, in this paper, we demonstrate that it is possible to further enhance the guarantee for some easy problem instances, particularly when online functions are smooth. Specifically, we introduce novel online algorithms that can exploit smoothness and replace the dependence on $T$ in dynamic regret with problem-dependent quantities: the variation in gradients of loss functions, the cumulative loss of the comparator sequence, and the minimum of these two terms. These quantities are at most $mathcal{O}(T)$ while could be much smaller in benign environments. Therefore, our results are adaptive to the intrinsic difficulty of the problem, since the bounds are tighter than existing results for easy problems and meanwhile safeguard the same rate in the worst case. Notably, our proposed algorithms can achieve favorable dynamic regret with only one gradient per iteration, sharing the same gradient query complexity as the static regret minimization methods. To accomplish this, we introduce the collaborative online ensemble framework. The proposed framework employs a two-layer online ensemble to handle non-stationarity, and uses optimistic online learning and further introduces crucial correction terms to enable effective collaboration within the meta-base two layers, thereby attaining adaptivity. We believe the framework can be useful for broader problems.
Read more4/9/2024
✨
0
An Equivalence Between Static and Dynamic Regret Minimization
Andrew Jacobsen, Francesco Orabona
We study the problem of dynamic regret minimization in online convex optimization, in which the objective is to minimize the difference between the cumulative loss of an algorithm and that of an arbitrary sequence of comparators. While the literature on this topic is very rich, a unifying framework for the analysis and design of these algorithms is still missing. In this paper, emph{we show that dynamic regret minimization is equivalent to static regret minimization in an extended decision space}. Using this simple observation, we show that there is a frontier of lower bounds trading off penalties due to the variance of the losses and penalties due to variability of the comparator sequence, and provide a framework for achieving any of the guarantees along this frontier. As a result, we prove for the first time that adapting to the squared path-length of an arbitrary sequence of comparators to achieve regret $R_{T}(u_{1},dots,u_{T})le O(sqrt{Tsum_{t} |u_{t}-u_{t+1}|^{2}})$ is impossible. However, we prove that it is possible to adapt to a new notion of variability based on the locally-smoothed squared path-length of the comparator sequence, and provide an algorithm guaranteeing dynamic regret of the form $R_{T}(u_{1},dots,u_{T})le tilde O(sqrt{Tsum_{i}|bar u_{i}-bar u_{i+1}|^{2}})$. Up to polylogarithmic terms, the new notion of variability is never worse than the classic one involving the path-length.
Read more6/4/2024
🛠️
0
Capacity Provisioning Motivated Online Non-Convex Optimization Problem with Memory and Switching Cost
Rahul Vaze, Jayakrishnan Nair
An online non-convex optimization problem is considered where the goal is to minimize the flow time (total delay) of a set of jobs by modulating the number of active servers, but with a switching cost associated with changing the number of active servers over time. Each job can be processed by at most one fixed speed server at any time. Compared to the usual online convex optimization (OCO) problem with switching cost, the objective function considered is non-convex and more importantly, at each time, it depends on all past decisions and not just the present one. Both worst-case and stochastic inputs are considered; for both cases, competitive algorithms are derived.
Read more7/2/2024