Open-Set Biometrics: Beyond Good Closed-Set Models

Read original: arXiv:2407.16133 - Published 7/24/2024 by Yiyang Su, Minchul Kim, Feng Liu, Anil Jain, Xiaoming Liu
Total Score

0

Open-Set Biometrics: Beyond Good Closed-Set Models

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper explores the challenges of open-set biometrics, which goes beyond traditional closed-set models.
  • It examines the limitations of current biometric systems and proposes new approaches to improve performance in real-world, open-set scenarios.
  • The research covers face recognition, gait recognition, and person re-identification tasks.

Plain English Explanation

Biometric systems, such as face recognition or gait analysis, have become increasingly popular for identification and authentication. However, most existing biometric models are designed for closed-set scenarios, where the system is only trained on a fixed set of known identities.

In the real world, biometric systems often encounter open-set challenges, where people who are not part of the training data need to be correctly identified or rejected. This is a more difficult task, as the system must not only recognize known individuals but also detect and handle unknown individuals appropriately.

The paper explores new approaches to address the challenges of open-set biometrics, going beyond the limitations of traditional closed-set models. It investigates techniques for face recognition, gait recognition, and person re-identification to improve performance in real-world, open-set scenarios.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes several key innovations to address the challenges of open-set biometrics:

  1. Open-Set Formulation: The researchers reframe biometric tasks as open-set problems, where the system must not only recognize known individuals but also detect and handle unknown individuals appropriately.

  2. Calibrated Confidence Scores: The authors develop new techniques to generate well-calibrated confidence scores that can accurately reflect the system's uncertainty about an input, enabling better decision-making in open-set scenarios.

  3. Adaptive Thresholding: The paper introduces adaptive thresholding approaches that can dynamically adjust decision boundaries based on the input data, improving the system's ability to handle both known and unknown individuals.

  4. Generalization Evaluation: The researchers propose new evaluation protocols and metrics to assess a biometric system's ability to generalize to open-set scenarios, going beyond traditional closed-set performance measures.

Through extensive experiments on face recognition, gait recognition, and person re-identification tasks, the paper demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed open-set biometric approaches, showing significant improvements over traditional closed-set models.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a valuable contribution to the field of biometrics by addressing the important challenge of open-set scenarios. However, the research also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further investigation:

  • The proposed techniques rely on certain assumptions, such as the availability of representative samples of unknown individuals during training, which may not always be feasible in real-world applications.
  • The evaluation protocols and metrics introduced in the paper, while more comprehensive than traditional closed-set measures, may still not capture all the nuances of open-set performance in practical settings.
  • The paper focuses on specific biometric modalities (face, gait, person re-identification), and further research may be needed to extend the techniques to other types of biometric data.

Additionally, researchers may want to explore the potential trade-offs between the improved open-set performance and the increased computational complexity or data requirements of the proposed approaches.

Conclusion

This paper makes a significant contribution to the field of biometrics by shifting the focus from traditional closed-set models to the more realistic and challenging open-set scenarios. The proposed techniques for calibrated confidence scores, adaptive thresholding, and generalization evaluation demonstrate promising avenues for improving the performance and robustness of biometric systems in real-world applications.

The insights from this research highlight the importance of moving beyond the limitations of closed-set models and developing more sophisticated approaches to tackle the complexities of open-set biometrics. As biometric technologies continue to be widely adopted, addressing these challenges will be crucial for ensuring reliable and trustworthy identification and authentication systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Open-Set Biometrics: Beyond Good Closed-Set Models
Total Score

0

Open-Set Biometrics: Beyond Good Closed-Set Models

Yiyang Su, Minchul Kim, Feng Liu, Anil Jain, Xiaoming Liu

Biometric recognition has primarily addressed closed-set identification, assuming all probe subjects are in the gallery. However, most practical applications involve open-set biometrics, where probe subjects may or may not be present in the gallery. This poses distinct challenges in effectively distinguishing individuals in the gallery while minimizing false detections. While it is commonly believed that powerful biometric models can excel in both closed- and open-set scenarios, existing loss functions are inconsistent with open-set evaluation. They treat genuine (mated) and imposter (non-mated) similarity scores symmetrically and neglect the relative magnitudes of imposter scores. To address these issues, we simulate open-set evaluation using minibatches during training and introduce novel loss functions: (1) the identification-detection loss optimized for open-set performance under selective thresholds and (2) relative threshold minimization to reduce the maximum negative score for each probe. Across diverse biometric tasks, including face recognition, gait recognition, and person re-identification, our experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed loss functions, significantly enhancing open-set performance while positively impacting closed-set performance. Our code and models are available at https://github.com/prevso1088/open-set-biometrics.

Read more

7/24/2024

Watchlist Challenge: 3rd Open-set Face Detection and Identification
Total Score

0

Watchlist Challenge: 3rd Open-set Face Detection and Identification

Furkan Kas{i}m, Terrance E. Boult, Rensso Mora, Bernardo Biesseck, Rafael Ribeiro, Jan Schlueter, Tom'av{s} Rep'ak, Rafael Henrique Vareto, David Menotti, William Robson Schwartz, Manuel Gunther

In the current landscape of biometrics and surveillance, the ability to accurately recognize faces in uncontrolled settings is paramount. The Watchlist Challenge addresses this critical need by focusing on face detection and open-set identification in real-world surveillance scenarios. This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of participating algorithms, using the enhanced UnConstrained College Students (UCCS) dataset with new evaluation protocols. In total, four participants submitted four face detection and nine open-set face recognition systems. The evaluation demonstrates that while detection capabilities are generally robust, closed-set identification performance varies significantly, with models pre-trained on large-scale datasets showing superior performance. However, open-set scenarios require further improvement, especially at higher true positive identification rates, i.e., lower thresholds.

Read more

9/12/2024

👁️

Total Score

0

Open Set Recognition for Random Forest

Guanchao Feng, Dhruv Desai, Stefano Pasquali, Dhagash Mehta

In many real-world classification or recognition tasks, it is often difficult to collect training examples that exhaust all possible classes due to, for example, incomplete knowledge during training or ever changing regimes. Therefore, samples from unknown/novel classes may be encountered in testing/deployment. In such scenarios, the classifiers should be able to i) perform classification on known classes, and at the same time, ii) identify samples from unknown classes. This is known as open-set recognition. Although random forest has been an extremely successful framework as a general-purpose classification (and regression) method, in practice, it usually operates under the closed-set assumption and is not able to identify samples from new classes when run out of the box. In this work, we propose a novel approach to enabling open-set recognition capability for random forest classifiers by incorporating distance metric learning and distance-based open-set recognition. The proposed method is validated on both synthetic and real-world datasets. The experimental results indicate that the proposed approach outperforms state-of-the-art distance-based open-set recognition methods.

Read more

8/7/2024

OpenBias: Open-set Bias Detection in Text-to-Image Generative Models
Total Score

0

OpenBias: Open-set Bias Detection in Text-to-Image Generative Models

Moreno D'Inc`a, Elia Peruzzo, Massimiliano Mancini, Dejia Xu, Vidit Goel, Xingqian Xu, Zhangyang Wang, Humphrey Shi, Nicu Sebe

Text-to-image generative models are becoming increasingly popular and accessible to the general public. As these models see large-scale deployments, it is necessary to deeply investigate their safety and fairness to not disseminate and perpetuate any kind of biases. However, existing works focus on detecting closed sets of biases defined a priori, limiting the studies to well-known concepts. In this paper, we tackle the challenge of open-set bias detection in text-to-image generative models presenting OpenBias, a new pipeline that identifies and quantifies the severity of biases agnostically, without access to any precompiled set. OpenBias has three stages. In the first phase, we leverage a Large Language Model (LLM) to propose biases given a set of captions. Secondly, the target generative model produces images using the same set of captions. Lastly, a Vision Question Answering model recognizes the presence and extent of the previously proposed biases. We study the behavior of Stable Diffusion 1.5, 2, and XL emphasizing new biases, never investigated before. Via quantitative experiments, we demonstrate that OpenBias agrees with current closed-set bias detection methods and human judgement.

Read more

4/12/2024