OPERA: Automatic Offline Policy Evaluation with Re-weighted Aggregates of Multiple Estimators

Read original: arXiv:2405.17708 - Published 5/29/2024 by Allen Nie, Yash Chandak, Christina J. Yuan, Anirudhan Badrinath, Yannis Flet-Berliac, Emma Brunskil
Total Score

0

OPERA: Automatic Offline Policy Evaluation with Re-weighted Aggregates of Multiple Estimators

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

• The paper introduces a new offline policy evaluation (OPE) method called OPERA, which combines multiple OPE estimators in a principled way to improve the accuracy of policy evaluation.

• OPERA automatically selects the best combination of OPE estimators for a given dataset and target policy, without requiring manual tuning or prior knowledge about the data distribution.

Plain English Explanation

Evaluating the performance of a policy (a set of rules that an agent uses to make decisions) is an important challenge in reinforcement learning. This is especially true when the policy has not been tested in the real world, but only in a simulated environment - a situation known as "offline" policy evaluation.

The paper proposes a new method called OPERA that aims to improve the accuracy of offline policy evaluation. OPERA does this by combining multiple existing policy evaluation techniques, each of which has its own strengths and weaknesses, in an automatic and principled way. This allows OPERA to take advantage of the strengths of each individual technique and produce a more reliable overall evaluation.

The key innovation of OPERA is that it can adaptively choose the best combination of evaluation techniques for a given dataset and target policy, without requiring the user to manually tune or configure the method. This makes OPERA easier to use and more broadly applicable than existing approaches.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a new offline policy evaluation (OPE) method called OPERA. OPE is the problem of estimating the value (i.e., expected cumulative reward) of a target policy using only historical data, without actually executing the policy.

OPERA addresses this problem by combining multiple OPE estimators, each of which has different strengths and weaknesses, in a principled way. Specifically, OPERA learns a set of weights that are used to re-weight the individual OPE estimates and produce a final aggregated estimate.

The weights are learned automatically based on the characteristics of the dataset and the target policy, without requiring manual tuning or prior knowledge about the data distribution. This is achieved by formulating the weight learning problem as a constrained optimization problem that balances the bias and variance of the final OPE estimate.

The paper provides theoretical analysis showing that OPERA can achieve better performance than the individual OPE estimators, and demonstrates the practical effectiveness of OPERA through extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a compelling case for the OPERA approach and provides a thorough technical and experimental evaluation. Some potential limitations or areas for further research include:

  • The paper focuses on a specific set of OPE estimators and does not explore the performance of OPERA when combined with other, potentially more diverse, OPE methods. [link to related work on cross-validated OPE]
  • The theoretical analysis assumes that the individual OPE estimators are unbiased, which may not always hold in practice. An analysis of OPERA's performance with biased estimators would be valuable. [link to related work on data poisoning attacks on OPE]
  • The experiments are conducted on a relatively limited set of environments and policies. Testing OPERA's performance on a wider range of real-world scenarios would help validate its practical utility. [link to related work on off-policy estimation for adaptively collected data]
  • While the automatic weight learning is a key strength of OPERA, the optimization problem itself may be computationally expensive for large-scale problems. Exploring more efficient optimization techniques could expand OPERA's applicability. [link to related work on doubly robust off-policy evaluation]

Overall, the OPERA method represents a promising advance in offline policy evaluation, and the paper provides a solid foundation for further research and development in this important area of reinforcement learning.

Conclusion

The OPERA method introduced in this paper offers a principled and automated approach to improving the accuracy of offline policy evaluation in reinforcement learning. By combining multiple OPE estimators in an adaptive way, OPERA can leverage the strengths of different techniques to produce more reliable evaluations, without requiring manual tuning or prior knowledge about the data.

The paper's theoretical and experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of OPERA, and highlight several avenues for further research to expand its capabilities and applicability. As the use of reinforcement learning continues to grow, robust and efficient offline policy evaluation will become increasingly crucial, making OPERA a valuable contribution to the field.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

OPERA: Automatic Offline Policy Evaluation with Re-weighted Aggregates of Multiple Estimators
Total Score

0

OPERA: Automatic Offline Policy Evaluation with Re-weighted Aggregates of Multiple Estimators

Allen Nie, Yash Chandak, Christina J. Yuan, Anirudhan Badrinath, Yannis Flet-Berliac, Emma Brunskil

Offline policy evaluation (OPE) allows us to evaluate and estimate a new sequential decision-making policy's performance by leveraging historical interaction data collected from other policies. Evaluating a new policy online without a confident estimate of its performance can lead to costly, unsafe, or hazardous outcomes, especially in education and healthcare. Several OPE estimators have been proposed in the last decade, many of which have hyperparameters and require training. Unfortunately, choosing the best OPE algorithm for each task and domain is still unclear. In this paper, we propose a new algorithm that adaptively blends a set of OPE estimators given a dataset without relying on an explicit selection using a statistical procedure. We prove that our estimator is consistent and satisfies several desirable properties for policy evaluation. Additionally, we demonstrate that when compared to alternative approaches, our estimator can be used to select higher-performing policies in healthcare and robotics. Our work contributes to improving ease of use for a general-purpose, estimator-agnostic, off-policy evaluation framework for offline RL.

Read more

5/29/2024

AutoOPE: Automated Off-Policy Estimator Selection
Total Score

0

AutoOPE: Automated Off-Policy Estimator Selection

Nicol`o Felicioni, Michael Benigni, Maurizio Ferrari Dacrema

The Off-Policy Evaluation (OPE) problem consists of evaluating the performance of counterfactual policies with data collected by another one. This problem is of utmost importance for various application domains, e.g., recommendation systems, medical treatments, and many others. To solve the OPE problem, we resort to estimators, which aim to estimate in the most accurate way possible the performance that the counterfactual policies would have had if they were deployed in place of the logging policy. In the literature, several estimators have been developed, all with different characteristics and theoretical guarantees. Therefore, there is no dominant estimator, and each estimator may be the best one for different OPE problems, depending on the characteristics of the dataset at hand. While the selection of the estimator is a crucial choice for an accurate OPE, this problem has been widely overlooked in the literature. We propose an automated data-driven OPE estimator selection method based on machine learning. In particular, the core idea we propose in this paper is to create several synthetic OPE tasks and use a machine learning model trained to predict the best estimator for those synthetic tasks. We empirically show how our method is able to generalize to unseen tasks and make a better estimator selection compared to a baseline method on several real-world datasets, with a computational cost significantly lower than the one of the baseline.

Read more

6/27/2024

Offline Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learning with Adaptively Collected Data
Total Score

0

Offline Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learning with Adaptively Collected Data

Sunil Madhow, Dan Qiao, Ming Yin, Yu-Xiang Wang

Developing theoretical guarantees on the sample complexity of offline RL methods is an important step towards making data-hungry RL algorithms practically viable. Currently, most results hinge on unrealistic assumptions about the data distribution -- namely that it comprises a set of i.i.d. trajectories collected by a single logging policy. We consider a more general setting where the dataset may have been gathered adaptively. We develop theory for the TMIS Offline Policy Evaluation (OPE) estimator in this generalized setting for tabular MDPs, deriving high-probability, instance-dependent bounds on its estimation error. We also recover minimax-optimal offline learning in the adaptive setting. Finally, we conduct simulations to empirically analyze the behavior of these estimators under adaptive and non-adaptive regimes.

Read more

5/2/2024

IntOPE: Off-Policy Evaluation in the Presence of Interference
Total Score

0

IntOPE: Off-Policy Evaluation in the Presence of Interference

Yuqi Bai, Ziyu Zhao, Minqin Zhu, Kun Kuang

Off-Policy Evaluation (OPE) is employed to assess the potential impact of a hypothetical policy using logged contextual bandit feedback, which is crucial in areas such as personalized medicine and recommender systems, where online interactions are associated with significant risks and costs. Traditionally, OPE methods rely on the Stable Unit Treatment Value Assumption (SUTVA), which assumes that the reward for any given individual is unaffected by the actions of others. However, this assumption often fails in real-world scenarios due to the presence of interference, where an individual's reward is affected not just by their own actions but also by the actions of their peers. This realization reveals significant limitations of existing OPE methods in real-world applications. To address this limitation, we propose IntIPW, an IPW-style estimator that extends the Inverse Probability Weighting (IPW) framework by integrating marginalized importance weights to account for both individual actions and the influence of adjacent entities. Extensive experiments are conducted on both synthetic and real-world data to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed IntIPW method.

Read more

8/27/2024