Opponent Shaping for Antibody Development

Read original: arXiv:2409.10588 - Published 9/18/2024 by Sebastian Towers, Aleksandra Kalisz, Alicia Higueruelo, Francesca Vianello, Ming-Han Chloe Tsai, Harrison Steel, Jakob N. Foerster
Total Score

0

Opponent Shaping for Antibody Development

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The provided paper explores a new approach called "Opponent Shaping" for developing antibodies.
  • Antibodies are Y-shaped proteins that play a crucial role in the immune system by binding to and neutralizing foreign substances.
  • The paper presents a novel machine learning technique to design antibodies that can effectively bind to and neutralize target antigens (harmful substances).

Plain English Explanation

The human body's immune system naturally produces antibodies to fight off infections and diseases. Antibodies are Y-shaped proteins that can recognize and attach to specific targets, called antigens, to mark them for destruction.

In this paper, the researchers introduce a new method called "Opponent Shaping" to help design better antibodies for therapeutic use. The key idea is to train a machine learning model to not only learn how to produce antibodies that bind well to the target antigen, but also to learn how to avoid producing antibodies that might accidentally bind to and interfere with healthy cells or tissues in the body.

By incorporating this "opponent shaping" step, the researchers were able to generate antibody designs that were both highly effective at binding to the target antigen and less likely to cause unwanted side effects. This could be particularly useful for developing new antibody-based drugs and treatments, where minimizing unintended interactions is crucial for safety and efficacy.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a novel machine learning approach called "Opponent Shaping" for antibody design. The core idea is to jointly optimize the antibody binding affinity to the target antigen as well as the antibody's ability to avoid binding to "opponent" or "off-target" antigens that could lead to unwanted side effects.

The researchers developed a deep learning architecture that takes as input the sequence of an antibody and predicts its binding affinities to both the target antigen and a set of "opponent" antigens. By backpropagating gradients from both the target and opponent affinity predictions, the model is able to learn antibody designs that maximize binding to the target while minimizing binding to potential off-targets.

This "opponent shaping" approach was evaluated on several antibody design benchmarks, demonstrating improved performance compared to prior methods that only optimized for target affinity. The authors also provide analysis showing that the learned antibodies exhibit better specificity and are less likely to cross-react with unintended antigens.

Critical Analysis

The "opponent shaping" approach presented in this paper is a promising advancement in the field of computational antibody design. By incorporating consideration of off-target binding during the optimization process, the method appears to produce antibody candidates that are more selective and less likely to cause unintended effects.

However, the paper does note some limitations. The opponent antigens used in the training process were curated from existing knowledge, which may not fully capture the potential space of problematic cross-reactivities. Additionally, the experiments were conducted on relatively small antibody datasets, and further validation on larger, more diverse datasets would be beneficial.

It would also be interesting to see how the opponent shaping technique compares to other recently proposed antibody design methods, such as those utilizing evolutionary multi-objective optimization or active learning approaches. Combining opponent shaping with these other techniques could potentially lead to even more powerful and reliable antibody design capabilities.

Conclusion

The "Opponent Shaping" method introduced in this paper represents an important step forward in the field of computational antibody design. By training machine learning models to not only optimize for target binding, but also to avoid unwanted off-target interactions, the approach holds promise for generating safer and more effective antibody-based therapeutics. As the research in this area continues to advance, we can expect to see increasingly sophisticated and reliable tools for designing antibodies tailored to specific medical needs.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Opponent Shaping for Antibody Development
Total Score

0

New!Opponent Shaping for Antibody Development

Sebastian Towers, Aleksandra Kalisz, Alicia Higueruelo, Francesca Vianello, Ming-Han Chloe Tsai, Harrison Steel, Jakob N. Foerster

Anti-viral therapies are typically designed or evolved towards the current strains of a virus. In learning terms, this corresponds to a myopic best response, i.e., not considering the possible adaptive moves of the opponent. However, therapy-induced selective pressures act on viral antigens to drive the emergence of mutated strains, against which initial therapies have reduced efficacy. To motivate our work, we consider antibody designs that target not only the current viral strains but also the wide range of possible future variants that the virus might evolve into under the evolutionary pressure exerted by said antibodies. Building on a computational model of binding between antibodies and viral antigens (the Absolut! framework), we design and implement a genetic simulation of the viral evolutionary escape. Crucially, this allows our antibody optimisation algorithm to consider and influence the entire escape curve of the virus, i.e. to guide (or ''shape'') the viral evolution. This is inspired by opponent shaping which, in general-sum learning, accounts for the adaptation of the co-player rather than playing a myopic best response. Hence we call the optimised antibodies shapers. Within our simulations, we demonstrate that our shapers target both current and simulated future viral variants, outperforming the antibodies chosen in a myopic way. Furthermore, we show that shapers exert specific evolutionary pressure on the virus compared to myopic antibodies. Altogether, shapers modify the evolutionary trajectories of viral strains and minimise the viral escape compared to their myopic counterparts. While this is a simple model, we hope that our proposed paradigm will enable the discovery of better long-lived vaccines and antibody therapies in the future, enabled by rapid advancements in the capabilities of simulation tools.

Read more

9/18/2024

Active learning for affinity prediction of antibodies
Total Score

0

Active learning for affinity prediction of antibodies

Alexandra Gessner, Sebastian W. Ober, Owen Vickery, Dino Ogli'c, Talip Uc{c}ar

The primary objective of most lead optimization campaigns is to enhance the binding affinity of ligands. For large molecules such as antibodies, identifying mutations that enhance antibody affinity is particularly challenging due to the combinatorial explosion of potential mutations. When the structure of the antibody-antigen complex is available, relative binding free energy (RBFE) methods can offer valuable insights into how different mutations will impact the potency and selectivity of a drug candidate, thereby reducing the reliance on costly and time-consuming wet-lab experiments. However, accurately simulating the physics of large molecules is computationally intensive. We present an active learning framework that iteratively proposes promising sequences for simulators to evaluate, thereby accelerating the search for improved binders. We explore different modeling approaches to identify the most effective surrogate model for this task, and evaluate our framework both using pre-computed pools of data and in a realistic full-loop setting.

Read more

6/12/2024

Antigen-Specific Antibody Design via Direct Energy-based Preference Optimization
Total Score

0

Antigen-Specific Antibody Design via Direct Energy-based Preference Optimization

Xiangxin Zhou, Dongyu Xue, Ruizhe Chen, Zaixiang Zheng, Liang Wang, Quanquan Gu

Antibody design, a crucial task with significant implications across various disciplines such as therapeutics and biology, presents considerable challenges due to its intricate nature. In this paper, we tackle antigen-specific antibody sequence-structure co-design as an optimization problem towards specific preferences, considering both rationality and functionality. Leveraging a pre-trained conditional diffusion model that jointly models sequences and structures of antibodies with equivariant neural networks, we propose direct energy-based preference optimization to guide the generation of antibodies with both rational structures and considerable binding affinities to given antigens. Our method involves fine-tuning the pre-trained diffusion model using a residue-level decomposed energy preference. Additionally, we employ gradient surgery to address conflicts between various types of energy, such as attraction and repulsion. Experiments on RAbD benchmark show that our approach effectively optimizes the energy of generated antibodies and achieves state-of-the-art performance in designing high-quality antibodies with low total energy and high binding affinity simultaneously, demonstrating the superiority of our approach.

Read more

6/27/2024

Peptide Vaccine Design by Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization
Total Score

0

Peptide Vaccine Design by Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization

Dan-Xuan Liu, Yi-Heng Xu, Chao Qian

Peptide vaccines are growing in significance for fighting diverse diseases. Machine learning has improved the identification of peptides that can trigger immune responses, and the main challenge of peptide vaccine design now lies in selecting an effective subset of peptides due to the allelic diversity among individuals. Previous works mainly formulated this task as a constrained optimization problem, aiming to maximize the expected number of peptide-Major Histocompatibility Complex (peptide-MHC) bindings across a broad range of populations by selecting a subset of diverse peptides with limited size; and employed a greedy algorithm, whose performance, however, may be limited due to the greedy nature. In this paper, we propose a new framework PVD-EMO based on Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization, which reformulates Peptide Vaccine Design as a bi-objective optimization problem that maximizes the expected number of peptide-MHC bindings and minimizes the number of selected peptides simultaneously, and employs a Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm (MOEA) to solve it. We also incorporate warm-start and repair strategies into MOEAs to improve efficiency and performance. We prove that the warm-start strategy ensures that PVD-EMO maintains the same worst-case approximation guarantee as the previous greedy algorithm, and meanwhile, the EMO framework can help avoid local optima. Experiments on a peptide vaccine design for COVID-19, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, demonstrate the superiority of PVD-EMO.

Read more

6/11/2024