Optimal Toffoli-Depth Quantum Adder

Read original: arXiv:2405.02523 - Published 5/7/2024 by Siyi Wang, Suman Deb, Ankit Mondal, Anupam Chattopadhyay
Total Score

0

Optimal Toffoli-Depth Quantum Adder

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents an optimized quantum adder circuit that minimizes the depth (number of time steps) required for Toffoli gates, which are a key building block of quantum circuits.
  • The proposed adder circuit is based on a carry-lookahead architecture and a Sklansky tree structure, which allows for more efficient addition operations compared to traditional quantum adders.
  • The authors analyze the Toffoli-depth and overall gate count of their adder and compare it to other state-of-the-art quantum adder designs, showing significant improvements in efficiency.

Plain English Explanation

In this paper, the researchers have developed a new way to design quantum circuits for addition operations. Quantum computers operate very differently from classical computers, and one of the key building blocks for quantum circuits are Toffoli gates. These gates are important, but they can also be quite expensive in terms of the time and resources required to implement them.

The researchers' new quantum adder circuit is based on a clever architecture called "carry-lookahead" and a specific tree-like structure called a "Sklansky tree." This allows the adder to perform addition much more efficiently than previous designs, by reducing the number of Toffoli gates needed and the overall depth (or number of time steps) of the circuit.

The authors thoroughly analyze the performance of their adder circuit, comparing it to other state-of-the-art quantum adders. They demonstrate significant improvements in terms of the Toffoli-depth optimization and overall gate count. This is an important advance for quantum arithmetic and could have valuable applications in quantum computing and quantum annealing.

Technical Explanation

The key innovation in this paper is the design of an optimized quantum adder circuit based on a carry-lookahead architecture and a Sklansky tree structure. The carry-lookahead approach allows the circuit to anticipate carry bits in advance, reducing the number of Toffoli gates required compared to traditional ripple-carry adders. The Sklansky tree structure further improves the efficiency by organizing the circuit in a hierarchical way that minimizes the overall Toffoli-depth.

The authors formally analyze the Toffoli-depth and total gate count of their adder circuit and compare it to other state-of-the-art quantum adder designs, such as the Draper adder and the Cuccaro adder. They show that their adder achieves significant reductions in both Toffoli-depth and overall gate count, making it a more efficient and practical option for implementing quantum addition operations.

Critical Analysis

The authors have provided a thorough analysis of their proposed quantum adder circuit and compared it extensively to prior work. The carry-lookahead architecture and Sklansky tree structure appear to be well-designed innovations that effectively optimize the circuit for reduced Toffoli-depth and gate count.

However, the paper does not address some potential limitations or areas for further research. For example, the authors do not discuss the practical challenges of implementing their adder circuit on real quantum hardware, such as the sensitivity to noise and decoherence that plague many quantum systems. Additionally, the analysis is focused solely on the arithmetic performance, without considering other important factors like circuit depth, qubit requirements, or overall circuit complexity.

It would be valuable for the authors to explore these aspects in future work, to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the trade-offs and practical considerations for deploying their optimized quantum adder in real-world quantum computing and quantum annealing applications.

Conclusion

This paper presents an innovative quantum adder circuit design that significantly improves upon the efficiency of previous quantum adder implementations. By leveraging a carry-lookahead architecture and a Sklansky tree structure, the authors have been able to minimize the Toffoli-depth and overall gate count of the adder, making it a more practical and valuable building block for quantum arithmetic and quantum computing applications.

The thorough analysis and comparison to other state-of-the-art quantum adders highlight the significant performance improvements achieved by this design. While the paper does not address all potential practical considerations, this work represents an important step forward in the development of efficient and scalable quantum circuits for quantum computing and quantum annealing.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Optimal Toffoli-Depth Quantum Adder
Total Score

0

Optimal Toffoli-Depth Quantum Adder

Siyi Wang, Suman Deb, Ankit Mondal, Anupam Chattopadhyay

Efficient quantum arithmetic circuits are commonly found in numerous quantum algorithms of practical significance. Till date, the logarithmic-depth quantum adders includes a constant coefficient k >= 2 while achieving the Toffoli-Depth of klog n + O(1). In this work, 160 alternative compositions of the carry-propagation structure are comprehensively explored to determine the optimal depth structure for a quantum adder. By extensively studying these structures, it is shown that an exact Toffoli-Depth of log n + O(1) is achievable. This presents a reduction of Toffoli-Depth by almost 50% compared to the best known quantum adder circuits presented till date. We demonstrate a further possible design by incorporating a different expansion of propagate and generate forms, as well as an extension of the modular framework. Our paper elaborates on these designs, supported by detailed theoretical analyses and simulation-based studies, firmly substantiating our claims of optimality. The results also mirror similar improvements, recently reported in classical adder circuit complexity.

Read more

5/7/2024

🔮

Total Score

0

Optimizing T and CNOT Gates in Quantum Ripple-Carry Adders and Comparators

Maxime Remaud

The state of the art of quantum circuits using the ripple-carry strategy for the addition and comparison of two n-bit numbers is presented, as well as optimizations in the Clifford+T gate set, both in terms of CNOT-depth and T-depth, or CNOT-count and T-count. In particular, we consider the adders presented by Cuccaro et al. and Takahashi et al., and exhibit an adder with a T-depth of 3n and a CNOT-depth of 8n, while without optimization of the original circuits, a T-depth of 6n is expected. Note that we have focused here on quantum ripple-carry adders using at most one ancilla, without any approximation of the 3-qubit gates involved (Toffoli, Peres and TR) or any strategy involving a measurement.

Read more

5/29/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Design and execution of quantum circuits using tens of superconducting qubits and thousands of gates for dense Ising optimization problems

Filip B. Maciejewski, Stuart Hadfield, Benjamin Hall, Mark Hodson, Maxime Dupont, Bram Evert, James Sud, M. Sohaib Alam, Zhihui Wang, Stephen Jeffrey, Bhuvanesh Sundar, P. Aaron Lott, Shon Grabbe, Eleanor G. Rieffel, Matthew J. Reagor, Davide Venturelli

We develop a hardware-efficient ansatz for variational optimization, derived from existing ansatze in the literature, that parametrizes subsets of all interactions in the Cost Hamiltonian in each layer. We treat gate orderings as a variational parameter and observe that doing so can provide significant performance boosts in experiments. We carried out experimental runs of a compilation-optimized implementation of fully-connected Sherrington-Kirkpatrick Hamiltonians on a 50-qubit linear-chain subsystem of Rigetti Aspen-M-3 transmon processor. Our results indicate that, for the best circuit designs tested, the average performance at optimized angles and gate orderings increases with circuit depth (using more parameters), despite the presence of a high level of noise. We report performance significantly better than using a random guess oracle for circuits involving up to approx 5000 two-qubit and approx 5000 one-qubit native gates. We additionally discuss various takeaways of our results toward more effective utilization of current and future quantum processors for optimization.

Read more

9/16/2024

🌿

Total Score

0

Resource Optimized Quantum Squaring Circuit

Afrin Sultana, Edgard Mu~noz-Coreas

Quantum squaring operation is a useful building block in implementing quantum algorithms such as linear regression, regularized least squares algorithm, order-finding algorithm, quantum search algorithm, Newton Raphson division, Euclidean distance calculation, cryptography, and in finding roots and reciprocals. Quantum circuits could be made fault-tolerant by using error correcting codes and fault-tolerant quantum gates (such as the Clifford + T-gates). However, the T-gate is very costly to implement. Two qubit gates (such as the CNOT-gate) are more prone to noise errors than single qubit gates. Consequently, in order to realize reliable quantum algorithms, the quantum circuits should have a low T-count and CNOT-count. In this paper, we present a novel quantum integer squaring architecture optimized for T-count, CNOT-count, T-depth, CNOT-depth, and $KQ_T$ that produces no garbage outputs. To reduce costs, we use a novel approach for arranging the generated partial products that allows us to reduce the number of adders by 50%. We also use the resource efficient logical-AND gate and uncomputation gate shown in [1] to further save resources. The proposed quantum squaring circuit sees an asymptotic reduction of 66.67% in T-count, 50% in T-depth, 29.41% in CNOT-count, 42.86% in CNOT-depth, and 25% in KQ T with respect to Thapliyal et al. [2]. With respect to Nagamani et al. [3] the design sees an asymptotic reduction of 77.27% in T-count, 68.75% in T-depth, 50% in CNOT-count, 61.90% in CNOT-depth, and 6.25% in the $KQ_T$.

Read more

6/5/2024