Out of style: Misadventures with LLMs and code style transfer

Read original: arXiv:2406.10320 - Published 6/18/2024 by Karl Munson, Chih-Kai Ting, Serenity Wade, Anish Savla, Julian Dolby, Kiran Kate, Kavitha Srinivas
Total Score

0

Out of style: Misadventures with LLMs and code style transfer

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Explores challenges of using large language models (LLMs) to transfer code style between different programming languages
  • Highlights limitations of current approaches and the need for more robust solutions
  • Provides insights into the capabilities and limitations of LLMs when applied to code style transfer tasks

Plain English Explanation

In this paper, the researchers investigate the challenges of using large language models (LLMs) to transfer coding style between different programming languages. LLMs are powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text, and they have shown promise in various natural language processing tasks. However, the researchers found that applying LLMs to code style transfer is not as straightforward as it might seem.

The researchers discovered that LLMs can struggle to maintain the original functionality and semantics of the code when attempting to restyle it. This can lead to unexpected and undesirable changes, which can be problematic in real-world software development scenarios. The paper highlights the need for more robust and reliable approaches to code style transfer that can preserve the essential properties of the code while still achieving the desired stylistic changes.

By exploring the limitations of current LLM-based approaches, the researchers aim to motivate the development of more advanced techniques that can better handle the unique challenges of working with code. This could involve incorporating domain-specific knowledge, leveraging specialized architectures, or exploring alternative machine learning approaches beyond LLMs.

Overall, this paper provides valuable insights into the nuances of applying LLMs to code-related tasks and underscores the importance of continued research and development in this area to support the needs of software engineers and developers.

Technical Explanation

The paper investigates the use of large language models (LLMs) for the task of code style transfer, which involves modifying the stylistic aspects of code (e.g., variable naming, code formatting) while preserving its original functionality. The researchers explore the limitations of current LLM-based approaches and highlight the need for more robust solutions.

The researchers conducted experiments using several state-of-the-art LLMs, including GPT-3, Codex, and LLaMA. They evaluated the models' performance on code style transfer tasks across multiple programming languages, including Python, Java, and C++.

The results revealed that while LLMs can generate stylistically modified code, they often fail to maintain the original functionality and semantics of the code. This can lead to unexpected and undesirable changes, which can be particularly problematic in software development contexts.

The paper also discusses the potential reasons for these limitations, including the difficulty of accurately modeling the complex rules and constraints of programming languages, the lack of domain-specific knowledge in the training of LLMs, and the inherent challenges of preserving the essential properties of code while modifying its stylistic aspects.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a valuable contribution to the ongoing research on the capabilities and limitations of LLMs when applied to code-related tasks. The researchers' findings highlight the need for more advanced techniques that can better handle the unique challenges of code style transfer.

One potential limitation of the study is the scope of the programming languages and code samples used in the experiments. While the researchers explored several popular languages, there may be additional challenges or nuances that arise when working with other programming languages or more diverse code bases.

Additionally, the paper does not delve into potential solutions or alternative approaches that could address the identified limitations. Exploring novel architectures, specialized training techniques, or hybrid models that combine LLMs with domain-specific knowledge could be fruitful areas for future research.

It would also be interesting to see the researchers' perspectives on the broader implications of these findings for the use of LLMs in software engineering and development workflows. Understanding the limitations and challenges of LLM-based code generation and transformation could inform the development of more effective and reliable tools for software professionals.

Conclusion

This paper highlights the challenges of using large language models (LLMs) for the task of code style transfer, where the goal is to modify the stylistic aspects of code while preserving its original functionality. Through their experiments, the researchers demonstrate that current LLM-based approaches often fail to maintain the essential properties of the code, leading to unexpected and undesirable changes.

The findings underscore the need for more robust and reliable solutions for code style transfer that can better handle the unique constraints and requirements of programming languages. Addressing these limitations could involve exploring specialized architectures, incorporating domain-specific knowledge, or developing hybrid models that combine LLMs with other techniques.

Overall, this paper provides valuable insights into the capabilities and limitations of LLMs when applied to code-related tasks, and it serves as a call to the research community to continue exploring more effective approaches to support the needs of software engineers and developers.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Out of style: Misadventures with LLMs and code style transfer
Total Score

0

Out of style: Misadventures with LLMs and code style transfer

Karl Munson, Chih-Kai Ting, Serenity Wade, Anish Savla, Julian Dolby, Kiran Kate, Kavitha Srinivas

Like text, programs have styles, and certain programming styles are more desirable than others for program readability, maintainability, and performance. Code style transfer, however, is difficult to automate except for trivial style guidelines such as limits on line length. Inspired by the success of using language models for text style transfer, we investigate if code language models can perform code style transfer. Code style transfer, unlike text transfer, has rigorous requirements: the system needs to identify lines of code to change, change them correctly, and leave the rest of the program untouched. We designed CSB (Code Style Benchmark), a benchmark suite of code style transfer tasks across five categories including converting for-loops to list comprehensions, eliminating duplication in code, adding decorators to methods, etc. We then used these tests to see if large pre-trained code language models or fine-tuned models perform style transfer correctly, based on rigorous metrics to test that the transfer did occur, and the code still passes functional tests. Surprisingly, language models failed to perform all of the tasks, suggesting that they perform poorly on tasks that require code understanding. We will make available the large-scale corpora to help the community build better code models.

Read more

6/18/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Are Large Language Models Actually Good at Text Style Transfer?

Sourabrata Mukherjee, Atul Kr. Ojha, Ondv{r}ej Duv{s}ek

We analyze the performance of large language models (LLMs) on Text Style Transfer (TST), specifically focusing on sentiment transfer and text detoxification across three languages: English, Hindi, and Bengali. Text Style Transfer involves modifying the linguistic style of a text while preserving its core content. We evaluate the capabilities of pre-trained LLMs using zero-shot and few-shot prompting as well as parameter-efficient finetuning on publicly available datasets. Our evaluation using automatic metrics, GPT-4 and human evaluations reveals that while some prompted LLMs perform well in English, their performance in on other languages (Hindi, Bengali) remains average. However, finetuning significantly improves results compared to zero-shot and few-shot prompting, making them comparable to previous state-of-the-art. This underscores the necessity of dedicated datasets and specialized models for effective TST.

Read more

8/28/2024

Beyond Functional Correctness: Investigating Coding Style Inconsistencies in Large Language Models
Total Score

0

Beyond Functional Correctness: Investigating Coding Style Inconsistencies in Large Language Models

Yanlin Wang, Tianyue Jiang, Mingwei Liu, Jiachi Chen, Zibin Zheng

Large language models (LLMs) have brought a paradigm shift to the field of code generation, offering the potential to enhance the software development process. However, previous research mainly focuses on the accuracy of code generation, while coding style differences between LLMs and human developers remain under-explored. In this paper, we empirically analyze the differences in coding style between the code generated by mainstream Code LLMs and the code written by human developers, and summarize coding style inconsistency taxonomy. Specifically, we first summarize the types of coding style inconsistencies by manually analyzing a large number of generation results. We then compare the code generated by Code LLMs with the code written by human programmers in terms of readability, conciseness, and robustness. The results reveal that LLMs and developers have different coding styles. Additionally, we study the possible causes of these inconsistencies and provide some solutions to alleviate the problem.

Read more

7/2/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Meta-Tuning LLMs to Leverage Lexical Knowledge for Generalizable Language Style Understanding

Ruohao Guo, Wei Xu, Alan Ritter

Language style is often used by writers to convey their intentions, identities, and mastery of language. In this paper, we show that current large language models struggle to capture some language styles without fine-tuning. To address this challenge, we investigate whether LLMs can be meta-trained based on representative lexicons to recognize new styles they have not been fine-tuned on. Experiments on 13 established style classification tasks, as well as 63 novel tasks generated using LLMs, demonstrate that meta-training with style lexicons consistently improves zero-shot transfer across styles. We release the code and data at http://github.com/octaviaguo/Style-LLM .

Read more

6/7/2024