Overview of AI-Debater 2023: The Challenges of Argument Generation Tasks
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper provides an overview of the AI-Debater 2023 workshop, which focuses on the challenges of argument generation tasks.
- The workshop covers recent advancements in areas like argument mining, generation, and summarization.
- Key topics include datasets, models, and evaluation metrics for argument-centric AI systems.
Plain English Explanation
The provided paper gives an overview of the AI-Debater 2023 workshop, which is focused on the challenges of generating arguments using artificial intelligence (AI) systems. Argument generation is a complex task that involves tasks like argument mining, where AI models extract arguments from text, and argument generation, where AI models create new arguments on a given topic.
The workshop covers recent advancements in these areas, including new datasets that can be used to train and evaluate argument-centric AI systems, as well as models that can generate convincing arguments. The goal is to better understand the capabilities and limitations of current AI systems when it comes to tasks like multi-perspective argument generation.
Overall, the workshop aims to provide a forum for researchers and practitioners to discuss the latest developments and challenges in this important area of AI.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents an overview of the AI-Debater 2023 workshop, which focuses on the challenges and recent advancements in argument generation tasks. The workshop covers a range of topics, including:
- Argument Mining: Techniques for extracting arguments from text, such as identifying claim-evidence structures.
- Argument Generation: Methods for generating coherent and persuasive arguments on a given topic.
- Argument Summarization: Approaches for summarizing a set of arguments into a concise representation.
The workshop features presentations and discussions on new datasets, models, and evaluation metrics for these argument-centric AI tasks. For example, the paper mentions datasets like FinGen for argument generation in the finance domain, and OpenDebateEvidence for large-scale argument mining and summarization.
Additionally, the workshop covers advances in models for multi-task argument generation and multi-perspective argument generation, which aim to generate arguments from different viewpoints.
The goal of the AI-Debater 2023 workshop is to foster discussion and collaboration around the challenges and opportunities in this emerging field of argument-centric AI.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a high-level overview of the AI-Debater 2023 workshop, highlighting the key topics and trends in argument generation tasks. However, it does not go into depth on the specific challenges or limitations of the current approaches.
For example, the paper does not discuss the difficulties in generating coherent and persuasive arguments, or the potential biases that may be introduced in the datasets and models used for these tasks. Additionally, the paper does not address the potential ethical concerns around the use of AI for argument generation, such as the risk of generating misleading or manipulative content.
Further research and discussion are needed to fully understand the strengths, weaknesses, and societal implications of argument-centric AI systems. The AI-Debater workshop provides a valuable platform for this ongoing exploration, but the paper itself could have provided a more critical analysis of the current state of the field.
Conclusion
The AI-Debater 2023 workshop is an important event that brings together researchers and practitioners working on the challenges of argument generation tasks. The paper provides a high-level overview of the topics covered, including recent advancements in argument mining, generation, and summarization.
By highlighting new datasets, models, and evaluation metrics, the workshop aims to drive progress in this emerging field of argument-centric AI. However, the paper lacks a more critical analysis of the current limitations and potential risks of these technologies.
Overall, the AI-Debater 2023 workshop represents an important step in understanding the capabilities and challenges of using AI for argument-related tasks, which have significant implications for fields like decision-making, policy, and public discourse.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Overview of AI-Debater 2023: The Challenges of Argument Generation Tasks
Jiayu Lin, Guanrong Chen, Bojun Jin, Chenyang Li, Shutong Jia, Wancong Lin, Yang Sun, Yuhang He, Caihua Yang, Jianzhu Bao, Jipeng Wu, Wen Su, Jinglu Chen, Xinyi Li, Tianyu Chen, Mingjie Han, Shuaiwen Du, Zijian Wang, Jiyin Li, Fuzhong Suo, Hao Wang, Nuanchen Lin, Xuanjing Huang, Changjian Jiang, RuiFeng Xu, Long Zhang, Jiuxin Cao, Ting Jin, Zhongyu Wei
In this paper we present the results of the AI-Debater 2023 Challenge held by the Chinese Conference on Affect Computing (CCAC 2023), and introduce the related datasets. We organize two tracks to handle the argumentative generation tasks in different scenarios, namely, Counter-Argument Generation (Track 1) and Claim-based Argument Generation (Track 2). Each track is equipped with its distinct dataset and baseline model respectively. In total, 32 competing teams register for the challenge, from which we received 11 successful submissions. In this paper, we will present the results of the challenge and a summary of the systems, highlighting commonalities and innovations among participating systems. Datasets and baseline models of the AI-Debater 2023 Challenge have been already released and can be accessed through the official website of the challenge.
Read more7/25/2024
0
Overview of the CAIL 2023 Argument Mining Track
Jingcong Liang, Junlong Wang, Xinyu Zhai, Yungui Zhuang, Yiyang Zheng, Xin Xu, Xiandong Ran, Xiaozheng Dong, Honghui Rong, Yanlun Liu, Hao Chen, Yuhan Wei, Donghai Li, Jiajie Peng, Xuanjing Huang, Chongde Shi, Yansong Feng, Yun Song, Zhongyu Wei
We give a detailed overview of the CAIL 2023 Argument Mining Track, one of the Chinese AI and Law Challenge (CAIL) 2023 tracks. The main goal of the track is to identify and extract interacting argument pairs in trial dialogs. It mainly uses summarized judgment documents but can also refer to trial recordings. The track consists of two stages, and we introduce the tasks designed for each stage; we also extend the data from previous events into a new dataset -- CAIL2023-ArgMine -- with annotated new cases from various causes of action. We outline several submissions that achieve the best results, including their methods for different stages. While all submissions rely on language models, they have incorporated strategies that may benefit future work in this field.
Read more6/21/2024
0
FinGen: A Dataset for Argument Generation in Finance
Chung-Chi Chen, Hiroya Takamura, Ichiro Kobayashi, Yusuke Miyao
Thinking about the future is one of the important activities that people do in daily life. Futurists also pay a lot of effort into figuring out possible scenarios for the future. We argue that the exploration of this direction is still in an early stage in the NLP research. To this end, we propose three argument generation tasks in the financial application scenario. Our experimental results show these tasks are still big challenges for representative generation models. Based on our empirical results, we further point out several unresolved issues and challenges in this research direction.
Read more6/3/2024
0
Which Side Are You On? A Multi-task Dataset for End-to-End Argument Summarisation and Evaluation
Hao Li, Yuping Wu, Viktor Schlegel, Riza Batista-Navarro, Tharindu Madusanka, Iqra Zahid, Jiayan Zeng, Xiaochi Wang, Xinran He, Yizhi Li, Goran Nenadic
With the recent advances of large language models (LLMs), it is no longer infeasible to build an automated debate system that helps people to synthesise persuasive arguments. Previous work attempted this task by integrating multiple components. In our work, we introduce an argument mining dataset that captures the end-to-end process of preparing an argumentative essay for a debate, which covers the tasks of claim and evidence identification (Task 1 ED), evidence convincingness ranking (Task 2 ECR), argumentative essay summarisation and human preference ranking (Task 3 ASR) and metric learning for automated evaluation of resulting essays, based on human feedback along argument quality dimensions (Task 4 SQE). Our dataset contains 14k examples of claims that are fully annotated with the various properties supporting the aforementioned tasks. We evaluate multiple generative baselines for each of these tasks, including representative LLMs. We find, that while they show promising results on individual tasks in our benchmark, their end-to-end performance on all four tasks in succession deteriorates significantly, both in automated measures as well as in human-centred evaluation. This challenge presented by our proposed dataset motivates future research on end-to-end argument mining and summarisation. The repository of this project is available at https://github.com/HaoBytes/ArgSum-Datatset
Read more8/21/2024