P^3SUM: Preserving Author's Perspective in News Summarization with Diffusion Language Models

Read original: arXiv:2311.09741 - Published 4/5/2024 by Yuhan Liu, Shangbin Feng, Xiaochuang Han, Vidhisha Balachandran, Chan Young Park, Sachin Kumar, Yulia Tsvetkov
Total Score

0

💬

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This research aims to develop summarization systems that are faithful to the original author's intent, not just the semantic content of the article.
  • The researchers focus on a case study of preserving political perspectives in news summarization, finding that existing approaches often alter the political opinions and stances of news articles in over 50% of summaries.
  • To address this, the researchers propose P^3SUM, a diffusion model-based summarization approach controlled by political perspective classifiers, which aims to preserve the original political stance of the article.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers wanted to create a summarization system that not only captures the main ideas of an article, but also preserves the original author's perspective and intentions. They focused on news articles with political content, and found that existing summarization approaches often change the political opinions and stances expressed in the original articles, misrepresenting the author's intent.

To fix this, the researchers developed a new summarization model called P^3SUM. This model uses a diffusion-based approach, where the political leaning of the generated summary is constantly evaluated and any drift from the original article's stance is penalized. This helps ensure that the final summary stays true to the author's original political perspective, not just the factual content.

Through extensive testing on news summarization datasets, the researchers showed that P^3SUM outperforms other state-of-the-art summarization systems in preserving the author's political stance, while still maintaining competitive performance on standard measures of summary quality. This research highlights an important limitation in existing summarization models and provides a new approach to generate summaries that are more faithful to the original author's intentions.

Technical Explanation

The researchers propose a new summarization approach called P^3SUM that aims to preserve the original political perspectives expressed in news articles. They find that existing summarization models, even state-of-the-art ones, often alter the political opinions and stances of news articles in over 50% of generated summaries.

To address this, P^3SUM uses a diffusion model-based approach where the political leaning of the generated summary is iteratively evaluated at each decoding step. Any drift from the article's original stance incurs a loss that is backpropagated to the embedding layers, steering the political stance of the summary towards the author's original perspective.

The researchers extensively evaluate P^3SUM on three news summarization datasets and show that it outperforms other state-of-the-art summarization systems by up to 13.7% in terms of successfully preserving the original political stance, while maintaining competitive performance on standard summarization quality metrics.

This work presents a first analysis of preserving pragmatic features like political perspectives in summarization, and highlights the limitations of existing models in this regard. The development of P^3SUM demonstrates a new approach to generating summaries that are more faithful to the author's intent, not just the semantic content.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge that their work is a first step towards designing summarization systems that preserve author intent, and there are still several avenues for further research. For example, the paper only focuses on political perspective as a case study, and the techniques may need to be extended to preserve other types of author intent, such as emotional tone or rhetorical devices.

Additionally, the paper does not provide a thorough analysis of the types of political biases or stances that the P^3SUM model is able to preserve. It would be valuable to understand the model's limitations in handling more nuanced or complex political perspectives.

Another potential concern is the reliance on political perspective classifiers, whose accuracy and robustness could have a significant impact on the performance of the P^3SUM model. More research may be needed to ensure these classifiers are reliable and do not introduce additional biases.

Overall, this work presents an important step forward in developing summarization systems that are more faithful to author intent, but there is still room for improvement and further exploration of the challenges in this area.

Conclusion

This research takes an important step towards creating summarization systems that preserve the original author's intent, not just the factual content of the article. By focusing on a case study of preserving political perspectives in news summarization, the researchers demonstrate that existing approaches often significantly alter the original political stances expressed in the articles.

To address this, the researchers developed P^3SUM, a novel summarization model that uses a diffusion-based approach to iteratively evaluate and maintain the political leaning of the generated summary. Through extensive testing, they show that P^3SUM outperforms other state-of-the-art summarization systems in preserving author intent while still producing high-quality summaries.

This work highlights a critical limitation in current summarization models and offers a new approach to generating summaries that are more faithful to the original author's perspective and intentions. As summarization systems become increasingly prevalent, preserving pragmatic features like political stance will be essential for ensuring these systems accurately represent the original content. The insights and techniques from this research could help pave the way for the development of more trustworthy and transparent summarization technologies.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

💬

Total Score

0

P^3SUM: Preserving Author's Perspective in News Summarization with Diffusion Language Models

Yuhan Liu, Shangbin Feng, Xiaochuang Han, Vidhisha Balachandran, Chan Young Park, Sachin Kumar, Yulia Tsvetkov

In this work, we take a first step towards designing summarization systems that are faithful to the author's intent, not only the semantic content of the article. Focusing on a case study of preserving political perspectives in news summarization, we find that existing approaches alter the political opinions and stances of news articles in more than 50% of summaries, misrepresenting the intent and perspectives of the news authors. We thus propose P^3SUM, a diffusion model-based summarization approach controlled by political perspective classifiers. In P^3SUM, the political leaning of a generated summary is iteratively evaluated at each decoding step, and any drift from the article's original stance incurs a loss back-propagated to the embedding layers, steering the political stance of the summary at inference time. Extensive experiments on three news summarization datasets demonstrate that P^3SUM outperforms state-of-the-art summarization systems and large language models by up to 13.7% in terms of the success rate of stance preservation, with competitive performance on standard metrics of summarization quality. Our findings present a first analysis of preservation of pragmatic features in summarization, highlight the lacunae in existing summarization models -- that even state-of-the-art models often struggle to preserve author's intents -- and develop new summarization systems that are more faithful to author's perspectives.

Read more

4/5/2024

Polarity Calibration for Opinion Summarization
Total Score

0

Polarity Calibration for Opinion Summarization

Yuanyuan Lei, Kaiqiang Song, Sangwoo Cho, Xiaoyang Wang, Ruihong Huang, Dong Yu

Opinion summarization is automatically generating summaries from a variety of subjective information, such as product reviews or political opinions. The challenge of opinions summarization lies in presenting divergent or even conflicting opinions. We conduct an analysis of previous summarization models, which reveals their inclination to amplify the polarity bias, emphasizing the majority opinions while ignoring the minority opinions. To address this issue and make the summarizer express both sides of opinions, we introduce the concept of polarity calibration, which aims to align the polarity of output summary with that of input text. Specifically, we develop a reinforcement training approach for polarity calibration. This approach feeds the polarity distance between output summary and input text as reward into the summarizer, and also balance polarity calibration with content preservation and language naturality. We evaluate our Polarity Calibration model (PoCa) on two types of opinions summarization tasks: summarizing product reviews and political opinions articles. Automatic and human evaluation demonstrate that our approach can mitigate the polarity mismatch between output summary and input text, as well as maintain the content semantic and language quality.

Read more

4/3/2024

🔗

Total Score

0

Bias in News Summarization: Measures, Pitfalls and Corpora

Julius Steen, Katja Markert

Summarization is an important application of large language models (LLMs). Most previous evaluation of summarization models has focused on their content selection, faithfulness, grammaticality and coherence. However, it is well known that LLMs can reproduce and reinforce harmful social biases. This raises the question: Do biases affect model outputs in a constrained setting like summarization? To help answer this question, we first motivate and introduce a number of definitions for biased behaviours in summarization models, along with practical operationalizations. Since we find that biases inherent to input documents can confound bias analysis in summaries, we propose a method to generate input documents with carefully controlled demographic attributes. This allows us to study summarizer behavior in a controlled setting, while still working with realistic input documents. We measure gender bias in English summaries generated by both purpose-built summarization models and general purpose chat models as a case study. We find content selection in single document summarization to be largely unaffected by gender bias, while hallucinations exhibit evidence of bias. To demonstrate the generality of our approach, we additionally investigate racial bias, including intersectional settings.

Read more

6/7/2024

🐍

Total Score

0

PSentScore: Evaluating Sentiment Polarity in Dialogue Summarization

Yongxin Zhou, Fabien Ringeval, Franc{c}ois Portet

Automatic dialogue summarization is a well-established task with the goal of distilling the most crucial information from human conversations into concise textual summaries. However, most existing research has predominantly focused on summarizing factual information, neglecting the affective content, which can hold valuable insights for analyzing, monitoring, or facilitating human interactions. In this paper, we introduce and assess a set of measures PSentScore, aimed at quantifying the preservation of affective content in dialogue summaries. Our findings indicate that state-of-the-art summarization models do not preserve well the affective content within their summaries. Moreover, we demonstrate that a careful selection of the training set for dialogue samples can lead to improved preservation of affective content in the generated summaries, albeit with a minor reduction in content-related metrics.

Read more

5/6/2024