Paired Completion: Flexible Quantification of Issue-framing at Scale with LLMs

Overview

• Presents a new method called "Paired Completion" for quantifying issue framing in large language models (LLMs) at scale
• Demonstrates the method on political news articles to measure framing of political issues
• Provides a flexible, scalable approach to analyze how language models portray different perspectives on complex topics

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces a new technique called "Paired Completion" that allows researchers to quantify how large language models [like GPT-3] frame complex issues, such as political topics, at a large scale.

The key idea is to present the language model with a prompt that frames an issue in a particular way, and then measure how the model completes that prompt. By comparing completions across different framing prompts, the researchers can gain insights into how the model portrays different perspectives on the issue.

For example, the researchers might give the model a prompt like "The issue of immigration is primarily about [BLANK]." By measuring how the model completes that prompt when the blank is filled in with different words (e.g. "border security" vs. "humanitarian concerns"), they can assess how the model's responses reflect different framings of the immigration issue.

This approach provides a flexible and scalable way to analyze how language models represent complex, multi-faceted topics. Rather than relying on manual analysis of model outputs, the Paired Completion method allows researchers to systematically quantify framing at a large scale.

Technical Explanation

The core of the Paired Completion method is to create "framing prompts" that represent different perspectives on an issue, and then measure how a language model completes those prompts.

For example, to analyze framing of the immigration issue, the researchers might create prompts like:

• "The issue of immigration is primarily about [BLANK]"
• "Immigration policy should focus on [BLANK]"
• "The main challenge with immigration is [BLANK]"

By filling in the blank with different words/phrases, they can create prompts that reflect different frames, such as "border security," "humanitarianism," "cultural identity," etc. They then have the language model complete each of these prompts and analyze the differences in the completions.

The researchers demonstrate this approach on a corpus of political news articles, showing how it can uncover systematic differences in how language models portray issues like immigration, gun control, and abortion based on the framing of the prompts.

Importantly, the Paired Completion method is flexible - it can be applied to analyze framing on any complex, multi-faceted topic, not just political issues. And it scales easily to large language models and text corpora, providing a powerful tool for quantifying issue framing at scale.

Critical Analysis

The Paired Completion method represents an innovative approach to studying how language models portray complex topics. By systematically varying the framing of prompts, it provides a flexible and scalable way to uncover biases and differences in model outputs.

That said, the paper acknowledges some key limitations. First, the method relies on the researcher's ability to create appropriate framing prompts - the results will only be as good as the prompts themselves. There is also the potential for model responses to be influenced by factors beyond just the prompt framing, such as the model's training data and internal biases.

Additionally, while the paper demonstrates the method on political issues, it remains to be seen how well it will generalize to other domains. Analyzing framing for more technical or scientific topics may require different strategies for creating effective prompts.

Overall, the Paired Completion technique is a promising new tool for studying language model biases and issue framing. However, as with any analysis method, its results should be interpreted cautiously and in conjunction with other forms of model evaluation and validation.

Conclusion

The Paired Completion method introduced in this paper provides a novel approach for quantifying how large language models frame complex, multi-faceted issues. By systematically varying the prompts given to the models, researchers can gain insights into the different perspectives and biases reflected in the model outputs.

This flexible, scalable technique has the potential to unlock new ways of studying and understanding the knowledge and decision-making capabilities of large language models. As these models become increasingly influential, tools like Paired Completion will be crucial for unpacking their implicit biases and ensuring they are deployed responsibly.

While the method has some limitations, it represents an important step forward in the ongoing effort to build more transparent and accountable AI systems. By continuing to develop innovative analysis techniques, the research community can work towards realizing the full potential of large language models while mitigating their risks.