Particle Semi-Implicit Variational Inference

2407.00649

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 7/2/2024 by Jen Ning Lim, Adam M. Johansen
Particle Semi-Implicit Variational Inference

Abstract

Semi-implicit variational inference (SIVI) enriches the expressiveness of variational families by utilizing a kernel and a mixing distribution to hierarchically define the variational distribution. Existing SIVI methods parameterize the mixing distribution using implicit distributions, leading to intractable variational densities. As a result, directly maximizing the evidence lower bound (ELBO) is not possible and so, they resort to either: optimizing bounds on the ELBO, employing costly inner-loop Markov chain Monte Carlo runs, or solving minimax objectives. In this paper, we propose a novel method for SIVI called Particle Variational Inference (PVI) which employs empirical measures to approximate the optimal mixing distributions characterized as the minimizer of a natural free energy functional via a particle approximation of an Euclidean--Wasserstein gradient flow. This approach means that, unlike prior works, PVI can directly optimize the ELBO; furthermore, it makes no parametric assumption about the mixing distribution. Our empirical results demonstrate that PVI performs favourably against other SIVI methods across various tasks. Moreover, we provide a theoretical analysis of the behaviour of the gradient flow of a related free energy functional: establishing the existence and uniqueness of solutions as well as propagation of chaos results.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The research paper presents a novel approach called Particle Semi-Implicit Variational Inference (PSIVI) for efficient and flexible Bayesian inference.
  • PSIVI combines the strengths of particle-based methods and semi-implicit variational inference to overcome the limitations of existing techniques.
  • The method introduces a flexible family of variational distributions that can capture complex posterior distributions, while maintaining computational tractability.

Plain English Explanation

Bayesian inference is a powerful tool for making decisions and predictions in the face of uncertainty. It allows us to update our beliefs about unknown quantities (e.g., model parameters) based on observed data. However, performing Bayesian inference can be challenging, especially when the underlying probability distributions are complex.

The Particle Semi-Implicit Variational Inference method proposed in this paper aims to address this challenge. It combines two key ideas:

  1. Particle-based methods: These methods represent the unknown distributions using a set of "particles" - discrete samples that can capture complex shapes. This flexibility is useful when dealing with non-Gaussian or multimodal distributions.

  2. Semi-implicit variational inference: This approach uses a mix of explicit and implicit (i.e., not easily computable) distributions to approximate the true posterior. The implicit component allows for greater expressiveness, while the explicit part maintains computational tractability.

By combining these two ideas, PSIVI can efficiently and accurately approximate complex posterior distributions, enabling more accurate Bayesian inference. This has important implications for a wide range of applications, from machine learning to scientific modeling, where accurate uncertainty quantification is crucial.

Technical Explanation

The Particle Semi-Implicit Variational Inference (PSIVI) method builds on the strengths of both particle-based methods and semi-implicit variational inference to address the limitations of existing techniques.

Particle-based methods, such as Kernel Density Estimation, represent the target distribution using a set of weighted particles. This allows them to capture complex, non-Gaussian posterior distributions. However, they can be computationally expensive and may suffer from the curse of dimensionality.

On the other hand, semi-implicit variational inference uses a mix of explicit and implicit distributions to approximate the true posterior. The implicit component allows for greater flexibility, while the explicit part maintains computational tractability. However, existing semi-implicit methods can be challenging to optimize and may not be able to capture all the complexities of the posterior.

PSIVI combines the strengths of these two approaches. It uses a particle-based representation for the implicit component of the variational distribution, while maintaining an explicit component for computational efficiency. This allows PSIVI to capture complex posterior distributions while remaining computationally tractable.

The paper also provides theoretical guarantees for the convergence of PSIVI and demonstrates its effectiveness on a range of probabilistic programming and uncertainty quantification tasks.

Critical Analysis

The Particle Semi-Implicit Variational Inference method proposed in the paper addresses an important challenge in Bayesian inference and offers a promising solution. The combination of particle-based methods and semi-implicit variational inference allows PSIVI to capture complex posterior distributions while maintaining computational efficiency.

However, the paper also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research:

  1. Tuning the particle-based component: The performance of PSIVI may depend on the choice of the particle-based component, including the number of particles and the kernel function. Developing systematic methods for tuning these hyperparameters could further improve the method's robustness and applicability.

  2. Scaling to high-dimensional problems: While the paper demonstrates the effectiveness of PSIVI on several benchmark tasks, the scalability of the method to high-dimensional problems is not extensively explored. Investigating ways to improve the efficiency of PSIVI in high-dimensional settings would be an important area for future research.

  3. Theoretical guarantees: The paper provides convergence guarantees for PSIVI, but further analysis of its statistical properties, such as posterior concentration rates and uncertainty quantification, could strengthen the theoretical understanding of the method.

  4. Comparison to other state-of-the-art techniques: While the paper compares PSIVI to several baseline methods, a more comprehensive evaluation against other recent advances in variational inference, such as Wasserstein Gradient Flows, could provide additional insights into the method's strengths and weaknesses.

Overall, the Particle Semi-Implicit Variational Inference method represents an important contribution to the field of Bayesian inference, offering a flexible and efficient approach to approximate complex posterior distributions. The identified limitations and areas for further research provide a roadmap for continued advancements in this domain.

Conclusion

The Particle Semi-Implicit Variational Inference (PSIVI) method presents a novel approach to Bayesian inference that combines the strengths of particle-based methods and semi-implicit variational inference. By leveraging a flexible family of variational distributions, PSIVI can accurately approximate complex posterior distributions while maintaining computational tractability.

The potential impact of this work is significant, as accurate Bayesian inference is crucial for a wide range of applications, from machine learning to scientific modeling, where quantifying uncertainty is paramount. The identified limitations and areas for further research provide a clear path forward for continued advancements in this important field.

Overall, the Particle Semi-Implicit Variational Inference method represents an important step forward in the pursuit of efficient and flexible Bayesian inference, with promising implications for both theoretical and practical applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Kernel Semi-Implicit Variational Inference

Kernel Semi-Implicit Variational Inference

Ziheng Cheng, Longlin Yu, Tianyu Xie, Shiyue Zhang, Cheng Zhang

YC

0

Reddit

0

Semi-implicit variational inference (SIVI) extends traditional variational families with semi-implicit distributions defined in a hierarchical manner. Due to the intractable densities of semi-implicit distributions, classical SIVI often resorts to surrogates of evidence lower bound (ELBO) that would introduce biases for training. A recent advancement in SIVI, named SIVI-SM, utilizes an alternative score matching objective made tractable via a minimax formulation, albeit requiring an additional lower-level optimization. In this paper, we propose kernel SIVI (KSIVI), a variant of SIVI-SM that eliminates the need for lower-level optimization through kernel tricks. Specifically, we show that when optimizing over a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS), the lower-level problem has an explicit solution. This way, the upper-level objective becomes the kernel Stein discrepancy (KSD), which is readily computable for stochastic gradient descent due to the hierarchical structure of semi-implicit variational distributions. An upper bound for the variance of the Monte Carlo gradient estimators of the KSD objective is derived, which allows us to establish novel convergence guarantees of KSIVI. We demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of KSIVI on both synthetic distributions and a variety of real data Bayesian inference tasks.

Read more

5/30/2024

šŸ¤”

Variational inference, Mixture of Gaussians, Bayesian Machine Learning

Tom Huix, Anna Korba, Alain Durmus, Eric Moulines

YC

0

Reddit

0

Variational inference (VI) is a popular approach in Bayesian inference, that looks for the best approximation of the posterior distribution within a parametric family, minimizing a loss that is typically the (reverse) Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence. Despite its empirical success, the theoretical properties of VI have only received attention recently, and mostly when the parametric family is the one of Gaussians. This work aims to contribute to the theoretical study of VI in the non-Gaussian case by investigating the setting of Mixture of Gaussians with fixed covariance and constant weights. In this view, VI over this specific family can be casted as the minimization of a Mollified relative entropy, i.e. the KL between the convolution (with respect to a Gaussian kernel) of an atomic measure supported on Diracs, and the target distribution. The support of the atomic measure corresponds to the localization of the Gaussian components. Hence, solving variational inference becomes equivalent to optimizing the positions of the Diracs (the particles), which can be done through gradient descent and takes the form of an interacting particle system. We study two sources of error of variational inference in this context when optimizing the mollified relative entropy. The first one is an optimization result, that is a descent lemma establishing that the algorithm decreases the objective at each iteration. The second one is an approximation error, that upper bounds the objective between an optimal finite mixture and the target distribution.

Read more

6/11/2024

šŸ¤Æ

Probabilistic Programming with Programmable Variational Inference

McCoy R. Becker, Alexander K. Lew, Xiaoyan Wang, Matin Ghavami, Mathieu Huot, Martin C. Rinard, Vikash K. Mansinghka

YC

0

Reddit

0

Compared to the wide array of advanced Monte Carlo methods supported by modern probabilistic programming languages (PPLs), PPL support for variational inference (VI) is less developed: users are typically limited to a predefined selection of variational objectives and gradient estimators, which are implemented monolithically (and without formal correctness arguments) in PPL backends. In this paper, we propose a more modular approach to supporting variational inference in PPLs, based on compositional program transformation. In our approach, variational objectives are expressed as programs, that may employ first-class constructs for computing densities of and expected values under user-defined models and variational families. We then transform these programs systematically into unbiased gradient estimators for optimizing the objectives they define. Our design enables modular reasoning about many interacting concerns, including automatic differentiation, density accumulation, tracing, and the application of unbiased gradient estimation strategies. Additionally, relative to existing support for VI in PPLs, our design increases expressiveness along three axes: (1) it supports an open-ended set of user-defined variational objectives, rather than a fixed menu of options; (2) it supports a combinatorial space of gradient estimation strategies, many not automated by today's PPLs; and (3) it supports a broader class of models and variational families, because it supports constructs for approximate marginalization and normalization (previously introduced only for Monte Carlo inference). We implement our approach in an extension to the Gen probabilistic programming system (genjax.vi, implemented in JAX), and evaluate on several deep generative modeling tasks, showing minimal performance overhead vs. hand-coded implementations and performance competitive with well-established open-source PPLs.

Read more

6/26/2024

Variational Inference for Uncertainty Quantification: an Analysis of Trade-offs

Variational Inference for Uncertainty Quantification: an Analysis of Trade-offs

Charles C. Margossian, Loucas Pillaud-Vivien, Lawrence K. Saul

YC

0

Reddit

0

Given an intractable distribution $p$, the problem of variational inference (VI) is to find the best approximation from some more tractable family $Q$. Commonly, one chooses $Q$ to be a family of factorized distributions (i.e., the mean-field assumption), even though~$p$ itself does not factorize. We show that this mismatch leads to an impossibility theorem: if $p$ does not factorize, then any factorized approximation $qin Q$ can correctly estimate at most one of the following three measures of uncertainty: (i) the marginal variances, (ii) the marginal precisions, or (iii) the generalized variance (which can be related to the entropy). In practice, the best variational approximation in $Q$ is found by minimizing some divergence $D(q,p)$ between distributions, and so we ask: how does the choice of divergence determine which measure of uncertainty, if any, is correctly estimated by VI? We consider the classic Kullback-Leibler divergences, the more general R'enyi divergences, and a score-based divergence which compares $nabla log p$ and $nabla log q$. We provide a thorough theoretical analysis in the setting where $p$ is a Gaussian and $q$ is a (factorized) Gaussian. We show that all the considered divergences can be textit{ordered} based on the estimates of uncertainty they yield as objective functions for~VI. Finally, we empirically evaluate the validity of this ordering when the target distribution $p$ is not Gaussian.

Read more

6/10/2024