Patient-centered data science: an integrative framework for evaluating and predicting clinical outcomes in the digital health era

Read original: arXiv:2408.02677 - Published 8/7/2024 by Mohsen Amoei, Dan Poenaru
Total Score

0

📊

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This study proposes a new, comprehensive framework for using patient data and artificial intelligence (AI) to improve healthcare.
  • The framework combines traditional clinical data with patient-reported information, social factors, and biological data to create detailed digital representations of patients.
  • It uses various AI techniques, including large language models, to analyze this complex, longitudinal (over time) data.
  • The goal is to optimize multiple patient outcomes while addressing biases and ensuring the approach can be applied broadly.
  • The researchers demonstrate how this framework can be implemented to create a "learning healthcare system" that continuously refines strategies for optimal patient care.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers have developed a novel framework that aims to transform healthcare by leveraging patient data and AI in a more comprehensive and patient-centered way. Traditionally, healthcare has relied heavily on clinical data like test results and doctor's notes. This new framework goes beyond that by also incorporating other important information about patients, such as how they report feeling, their social and environmental circumstances, and even genetic and molecular data.

By combining all these different types of data, the researchers can create detailed digital representations of individual patients. Then, they use various AI techniques, including powerful language models, to analyze this rich, longitudinal data. The goal is to optimize multiple aspects of patient care and outcomes, while also addressing potential biases in the data and ensuring the framework can be applied broadly, not just in specific settings.

The researchers envision this framework being used to create a "learning healthcare system" - one that can continuously learn and refine its approach to delivering the best possible care for each patient. This has the potential to significantly improve how digital health innovations are translated into real-world benefits for patients, addressing current limitations in AI-driven healthcare models. By taking a more comprehensive, patient-centered approach, this framework could be a major step forward in using data and AI to transform healthcare for the better.

Technical Explanation

The researchers developed a multidimensional model that combines traditional clinical data with patient-reported outcomes, social determinants of health, and multi-omic (genetic and molecular) data to create comprehensive digital patient representations. This approach aims to provide a more holistic understanding of each patient's health and circumstances.

To analyze this complex, longitudinal dataset, the framework employs a multi-agent AI approach, utilizing various machine learning techniques. This includes leveraging large language models, which are able to process and extract insights from vast amounts of unstructured data.

The goal of the model is to optimize multiple patient outcomes simultaneously, while also addressing potential biases in the data and ensuring the framework can be generalized to different healthcare settings. To achieve this, the researchers implemented techniques to detect and mitigate biases, as well as mechanisms to continuously validate and refine the model's performance.

The researchers demonstrate how this framework can be used to create a "learning healthcare system" - one that can continuously gather new data, update its algorithms, and refine strategies for optimal patient care. This approach has the potential to significantly improve the translation of digital health innovations into tangible clinical benefits, addressing current limitations in AI-driven healthcare models.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge several important caveats and limitations in their work. First, they note that the comprehensive data collection and integration required by this framework may present significant practical and logistical challenges for healthcare organizations. Careful consideration must be given to data privacy, security, and patient consent issues.

Additionally, the researchers highlight the need for continued validation and testing to ensure the model's performance remains robust and unbiased as it is applied in diverse real-world settings. Ongoing monitoring and refinement will be crucial, as healthcare data and patient populations can be highly heterogeneous and dynamic.

While the framework's emphasis on optimizing multiple outcomes is a strength, the researchers also recognize that this introduces complexities around how to prioritize and balance potentially competing objectives. Further research may be needed to develop principled approaches for managing these trade-offs.

Finally, the long-term sustainability and scalability of the "learning healthcare system" concept will depend on overcoming challenges related to data infrastructure, computational resources, and organizational change management. Careful consideration of these practical implementation factors will be essential for realizing the full potential of this innovative framework.

Conclusion

This study presents a novel, integrative framework for leveraging patient data and AI to drive meaningful improvements in healthcare. By combining traditional clinical data with a much broader range of patient information, the researchers have developed a comprehensive approach to creating digital patient representations.

Through the use of advanced AI techniques, including large language models, this framework aims to optimize multiple patient outcomes while addressing biases and ensuring generalizability. The researchers demonstrate how this can be implemented as a "learning healthcare system" that continuously refines its strategies for optimal patient care.

If successfully translated into practice, this framework has the potential to significantly enhance the impact of digital health innovations, addressing current limitations in AI-driven healthcare models. However, the researchers acknowledge several important challenges and caveats that will need to be carefully navigated. Continued validation, refinement, and attention to practical implementation factors will be crucial for realizing the full transformative potential of this patient-centered data science approach.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📊

Total Score

0

Patient-centered data science: an integrative framework for evaluating and predicting clinical outcomes in the digital health era

Mohsen Amoei, Dan Poenaru

This study proposes a novel, integrative framework for patient-centered data science in the digital health era. We developed a multidimensional model that combines traditional clinical data with patient-reported outcomes, social determinants of health, and multi-omic data to create comprehensive digital patient representations. Our framework employs a multi-agent artificial intelligence approach, utilizing various machine learning techniques including large language models, to analyze complex, longitudinal datasets. The model aims to optimize multiple patient outcomes simultaneously while addressing biases and ensuring generalizability. We demonstrate how this framework can be implemented to create a learning healthcare system that continuously refines strategies for optimal patient care. This approach has the potential to significantly improve the translation of digital health innovations into real-world clinical benefits, addressing current limitations in AI-driven healthcare models.

Read more

8/7/2024

👀

Total Score

0

Evaluating Physician-AI Interaction for Cancer Management: Paving the Path towards Precision Oncology

Zeshan Hussain, Barbara D. Lam, Fernando A. Acosta-Perez, Irbaz Bin Riaz, Maia Jacobs, Andrew J. Yee, David Sontag

We evaluated how clinicians approach clinical decision-making when given findings from both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and machine learning (ML) models. To do so, we designed a clinical decision support system (CDSS) that displays survival curves and adverse event information from a synthetic RCT and ML model for 12 patients with multiple myeloma. We conducted an interventional study in a simulated setting to evaluate how clinicians synthesized the available data to make treatment decisions. Participants were invited to participate in a follow-up interview to discuss their choices in an open-ended format. When ML model results were concordant with RCT results, physicians had increased confidence in treatment choice compared to when they were given RCT results alone. When ML model results were discordant with RCT results, the majority of physicians followed the ML model recommendation in their treatment selection. Perceived reliability of the ML model was consistently higher after physicians were provided with data on how it was trained and validated. Follow-up interviews revealed four major themes: (1) variability in what variables participants used for decision-making, (2) perceived advantages to an ML model over RCT data, (3) uncertainty around decision-making when the ML model quality was poor, and (4) perception that this type of study is an important thought exercise for clinicians. Overall, ML-based CDSSs have the potential to change treatment decisions in cancer management. However, meticulous development and validation of these systems as well as clinician training are required before deployment.

Read more

4/24/2024

📊

Total Score

0

Towards a potential paradigm shift in health data collection and analysis

David Josef Herzog, Nitsa Judith Herzog

Industrial Revolution 4.0 transforms healthcare systems. The first three technological revolutions changed the relationship between human and machine interaction due to the exponential growth of machine numbers. The fourth revolution put humans into a situation where heterogeneous data is produced with unmatched quantity and quality not only by traditional methods, enforced by digitization, but also by ubiquitous computing, machine-to-machine interactions and smart environment. The modern cyber-physical space underlines the role of the person in the expanding context of computerization and big data processing. In healthcare, where data collection and analysis particularly depend on human efforts, the disruptive nature of these developments is evident. Adaptation to this process requires deep scrutiny of the trends and recognition of future medical data technologies` evolution. Significant difficulties arise from discrepancies in requirements by healthcare, administrative and technology stakeholders. Black box and grey box decisions made in medical imaging and diagnostic Decision Support Software are often not transparent enough for the professional, social and medico-legal requirements. While Explainable AI proposes a partial solution for AI applications in medicine, the approach has to be wider and multiplex. LLM potential and limitations are also discussed. This paper lists the most significant issues in these topics and describes possible solutions.

Read more

4/3/2024

Designing for Complementarity: A Conceptual Framework to Go Beyond the Current Paradigm of Using XAI in Healthcare
Total Score

0

Designing for Complementarity: A Conceptual Framework to Go Beyond the Current Paradigm of Using XAI in Healthcare

Elisa Rubegni, Omran Ayoub, Stefania Maria Rita Rizzo, Marco Barbero, Guenda Bernegger, Francesca Faraci, Francesca Mangili, Emiliano Soldini, Pierpaolo Trimboli, Alessandro Facchini

The widespread use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools in the healthcare sector raises many ethical and legal problems, one of the main reasons being their black-box nature and therefore the seemingly opacity and inscrutability of their characteristics and decision-making process. Literature extensively discusses how this can lead to phenomena of over-reliance and under-reliance, ultimately limiting the adoption of AI. We addressed these issues by building a theoretical framework based on three concepts: Feature Importance, Counterexample Explanations, and Similar-Case Explanations. Grounded in the literature, the model was deployed within a case study in which, using a participatory design approach, we designed and developed a high-fidelity prototype. Through the co-design and development of the prototype and the underlying model, we advanced the knowledge on how to design AI-based systems for enabling complementarity in the decision-making process in the healthcare domain. Our work aims at contributing to the current discourse on designing AI systems to support clinicians' decision-making processes.

Read more

4/9/2024