Physics-Informed Neural Network for Concrete Manufacturing Process Optimization

Read original: arXiv:2408.14502 - Published 8/29/2024 by Sam Varghese, Rahul Anand, Dr. Gaurav Paliwal
Total Score

0

🧠

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Concrete manufacturing projects are common for consulting agencies.
  • The dependency between input materials (ash, water, cement, superplasticizer, etc.) and the resulting concrete strength is highly non-linear.
  • This makes it difficult for traditional machine learning models to capture the relationship and perform cost optimizations.
  • This paper explores how Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) can be useful in this scenario.
  • PINNs are compared to traditional models like Linear Regression, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and Deep Neural Network.

Plain English Explanation

Concrete is a common building material, and companies that design or consult on concrete projects often need to figure out the right mix of ingredients (like cement, water, and other additives) to get the desired strength and performance. This is a tricky problem because the relationship between the ingredients and the final concrete strength is very complex and non-linear.

Traditional machine learning models can struggle to accurately capture this relationship, which makes it hard to optimize the concrete mix for cost or other factors. This paper looks at a new type of model called a Physics Informed Neural Network (PINN) as a potential solution.

PINNs are a special kind of neural network that incorporates physical knowledge about the problem, which can help them learn the complex relationships more effectively. The researchers compared PINNs to other common machine learning models, and found that PINNs were able to predict concrete strength more accurately, even with less training data.

In addition, the paper shows how PINNs can be combined with an optimization technique called Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) to figure out the ideal mix of concrete ingredients to achieve a target strength at the lowest cost. This could be really useful for concrete manufacturers and construction companies trying to save money without sacrificing quality.

Technical Explanation

The paper explores the use of Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) to model the relationship between concrete ingredient quantities and the resulting concrete strength. PINNs are a type of neural network that incorporates domain-specific physical knowledge into the model, helping it better capture complex non-linear dependencies.

The researchers compared the performance of PINNs against traditional machine learning models like Linear Regression, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and Deep Neural Networks on a concrete manufacturing dataset. They found that PINNs were able to achieve a 26.3% lower loss compared to the Deep Neural Network, even with 40% less training data.

In addition, the paper demonstrates how PINNs can be integrated with a Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) heuristic to optimize the quantities of concrete ingredients required to achieve a target strength at the lowest cost. This hybrid approach leverages the strengths of both PINNs and PSO to address the complex optimization problem.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach for modeling and optimizing concrete manufacturing processes using PINNs. The key strength of this method is its ability to capture the highly non-linear relationships between concrete ingredients and strength, even with limited data.

However, the paper does not address some potential limitations of the PINN approach. For example, the authors do not discuss the sensitivity of PINNs to the choice of physical constraints and how this might impact the model's performance. Additionally, the paper only evaluates the PINN on a single concrete manufacturing dataset, and more extensive testing on diverse datasets would be needed to assess the generalizability of the method.

Further research could also explore the integration of PINNs with other optimization techniques beyond PSO, as well as investigate the computational efficiency of the PINN-based optimization approach compared to traditional methods.

Conclusion

This paper demonstrates the potential of Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for modeling and optimizing concrete manufacturing processes. PINNs were able to outperform traditional machine learning models, even with reduced dataset sizes, highlighting their ability to capture complex non-linear relationships.

The integration of PINNs with Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) also showed promise for cost-effective concrete formulation, which could be highly valuable for construction companies and concrete manufacturers.

While the paper presents an interesting and impactful application of PINNs, further research is needed to address potential limitations and explore the broader applicability of this approach across different domains.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🧠

Total Score

0

Physics-Informed Neural Network for Concrete Manufacturing Process Optimization

Sam Varghese, Rahul Anand, Dr. Gaurav Paliwal

Concrete manufacturing projects are one of the most common ones for consulting agencies. Because of the highly non-linear dependency of input materials like ash, water, cement, superplastic, etc; with the resultant strength of concrete, it gets difficult for machine learning models to successfully capture this relation and perform cost optimizations. This paper highlights how PINNs (Physics Informed Neural Networks) can be useful in the given situation. This state-of-the-art model shall also get compared with traditional models like Linear Regression, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and Deep Neural Network. Results of the research highlights how well PINNs performed even with reduced dataset, thus resolving one of the biggest issues of limited data availability for ML models. On an average, PINN got the loss value reduced by 26.3% even with 40% lesser data compared to the Deep Neural Network. In addition to predicting strength of the concrete given the quantity of raw materials, the paper also highlights the use of heuristic optimization method like Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) in predicting quantity of raw materials required to manufacture concrete of given strength with least cost.

Read more

8/29/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Unveiling the optimization process of Physics Informed Neural Networks: How accurate and competitive can PINNs be?

Jorge F. Urb'an, Petros Stefanou, Jos'e A. Pons

This study investigates the potential accuracy boundaries of physics-informed neural networks, contrasting their approach with previous similar works and traditional numerical methods. We find that selecting improved optimization algorithms significantly enhances the accuracy of the results. Simple modifications to the loss function may also improve precision, offering an additional avenue for enhancement. Despite optimization algorithms having a greater impact on convergence than adjustments to the loss function, practical considerations often favor tweaking the latter due to ease of implementation. On a global scale, the integration of an enhanced optimizer and a marginally adjusted loss function enables a reduction in the loss function by several orders of magnitude across diverse physical problems. Consequently, our results obtained using compact networks (typically comprising 2 or 3 layers of 20-30 neurons) achieve accuracies comparable to finite difference schemes employing thousands of grid points. This study encourages the continued advancement of PINNs and associated optimization techniques for broader applications across various fields.

Read more

5/8/2024

Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Extensions
Total Score

0

Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Extensions

Maziar Raissi, Paris Perdikaris, Nazanin Ahmadi, George Em Karniadakis

In this paper, we review the new method Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) that has become the main pillar in scientific machine learning, we present recent practical extensions, and provide a specific example in data-driven discovery of governing differential equations.

Read more

9/2/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Dynamic Process Operations with Limited Physical Knowledge and Data

Mehmet Velioglu, Song Zhai, Sophia Rupprecht, Alexander Mitsos, Andreas Jupke, Manuel Dahmen

In chemical engineering, process data are expensive to acquire, and complex phenomena are difficult to fully model. We explore the use of physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for dynamic processes with incomplete mechanistic semi-explicit differential-algebraic equation systems and scarce process data. In particular, we focus on estimating states for which neither direct observational data nor constitutive equations are available. We propose an easy-to-apply heuristic to assess whether estimation of such states may be possible. As numerical examples, we consider a continuously stirred tank reactor and a liquid-liquid separator. We find that PINNs can infer unmeasured states with reasonable accuracy, and they generalize better in low-data scenarios than purely data-driven models. We thus show that PINNs are capable of modeling processes when relatively few experimental data and only partially known mechanistic descriptions are available, and conclude that they constitute a promising avenue that warrants further investigation.

Read more

7/9/2024