A Physics Informed Neural Network (PINN) Methodology for Coupled Moving Boundary PDEs

Read original: arXiv:2409.10910 - Published 9/18/2024 by Shivprasad Kathane (Indian Institute of Technology Bombay Mumbai India), Shyamprasad Karagadde (Indian Institute of Technology Bombay Mumbai India)

A Physics Informed Neural Network (PINN) Methodology for Coupled Moving Boundary PDEs

Overview

A Physics Informed Neural Network (PINN) methodology is proposed for solving coupled moving boundary partial differential equations (PDEs)
The PINN approach integrates physical constraints directly into the neural network architecture to enhance model accuracy and stability
The method is demonstrated on two challenging moving boundary PDE problems involving Stefan-type phase change and the diffusion of moisture in wood

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a new technique called a Physics Informed Neural Network (PINN) for solving a certain type of mathematical problem involving moving boundaries.

These types of problems, known as coupled moving boundary partial differential equations (PDEs), are commonly found in areas like materials science, fluid dynamics, and phase change processes. They are notoriously difficult to solve accurately using traditional numerical methods.

The key innovation of the PINN approach is that it directly incorporates the physical constraints of the problem into the neural network architecture. This allows the model to learn the underlying physics of the system, rather than just fitting the data. As a result, the PINN method is more accurate and stable compared to standard black-box neural networks.

The researchers demonstrate the PINN methodology on two challenging moving boundary PDE problems:

Stefan-type phase change, which models the melting or freezing of a material
Diffusion of moisture in wood, which involves the movement of water through a porous material

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a Physics Informed Neural Network (PINN) framework for solving coupled moving boundary partial differential equations (PDEs). The PINN approach combines deep learning with the underlying physical constraints of the problem to enhance model accuracy and stability.

The key elements of the PINN methodology are:

Integrated Physical Constraints: The neural network architecture is designed to directly incorporate the governing equations, boundary conditions, and other physical constraints of the moving boundary PDE problem. This allows the model to learn the underlying physics, rather than just fitting the data.
Automatic Differentiation: The PINN leverages automatic differentiation techniques to compute the necessary spatial and temporal derivatives required by the physical constraints, without the need for numerical approximations.
Adaptive Training: The training process adaptively adjusts the network parameters to minimize the combined loss function, which includes both the data misfit and the physics-based constraints.

The researchers demonstrate the PINN approach on two challenging moving boundary PDE problems:

Stefan-type Phase Change: This models the melting or freezing of a material, where the location of the phase boundary (solid-liquid interface) is unknown and must be determined as part of the solution.
Moisture Diffusion in Wood: This models the transient diffusion of moisture through a porous material, where the moving boundary represents the drying front as the material loses water over time.

By embedding the physical laws governing these processes directly into the neural network, the PINN is able to provide robust and reliable solutions, even as the boundaries of the system change over time. This represents a significant advancement over traditional numerical methods, which often struggle with such moving boundary problems.

Critical Analysis

The PINN methodology presented in this paper offers a promising approach for solving a wide range of moving boundary PDE problems that arise in various scientific and engineering domains. The key strength of the PINN framework is its ability to directly incorporate the underlying physical constraints into the neural network architecture, which enhances the model's accuracy and stability compared to standard data-driven techniques.

One potential limitation of the PINN approach is the computational cost associated with the automatic differentiation required to compute the necessary derivatives. This may limit the practical applicability of the method for large-scale, computationally intensive problems. The authors acknowledge this issue and suggest further research into efficient implementation strategies to address this challenge.

Additionally, the paper focuses on two specific moving boundary PDE problems, and it would be valuable to see the PINN methodology applied to a broader range of moving boundary problems to further assess its versatility and generalization capabilities. Exploring the robustness of the PINN approach to different types of boundary conditions, nonlinearities, and physical complexities would also be a fruitful area for future research.

Overall, the Physics Informed Neural Network (PINN) methodology presented in this paper represents a significant advancement in the field of computational physics and provides a promising foundation for solving a wide range of challenging moving boundary PDE problems.

Conclusion

The paper introduces a novel Physics Informed Neural Network (PINN) methodology for solving coupled moving boundary partial differential equations (PDEs). The key innovation of the PINN approach is its ability to directly incorporate the underlying physical constraints into the neural network architecture, allowing the model to learn the governing physics of the system rather than just fitting the data.

The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of the PINN method on two challenging moving boundary PDE problems: Stefan-type phase change and moisture diffusion in wood. By embedding the physical laws directly into the neural network, the PINN is able to provide robust and reliable solutions, even as the boundaries of the system change over time.

This work represents a significant advancement in the field of computational physics and has the potential to impact a wide range of scientific and engineering domains where moving boundary PDE problems are prevalent. Further research into efficient implementation strategies and the application of the PINN methodology to a broader range of moving boundary problems could further strengthen the impact of this innovative approach.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

New!A Physics Informed Neural Network (PINN) Methodology for Coupled Moving Boundary PDEs

Shivprasad Kathane (Indian Institute of Technology Bombay Mumbai India), Shyamprasad Karagadde (Indian Institute of Technology Bombay Mumbai India)

Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) is a novel multi-task learning framework useful for solving physical problems modeled using differential equations (DEs) by integrating the knowledge of physics and known constraints into the components of deep learning. A large class of physical problems in materials science and mechanics involve moving boundaries, where interface flux balance conditions are to be satisfied while solving DEs. Examples of such systems include free surface flows, shock propagation, solidification of pure and alloy systems etc. While recent research works have explored applicability of PINNs for an uncoupled system (such as solidification of pure system), the present work reports a PINN-based approach to solve coupled systems involving multiple governing parameters (energy and species, along with multiple interface balance equations). This methodology employs an architecture consisting of a separate network for each variable with a separate treatment of each phase, a training strategy which alternates between temporal learning and adaptive loss weighting, and a scheme which progressively reduces the optimisation space. While solving the benchmark problem of binary alloy solidification, it is distinctly successful at capturing the complex composition profile, which has a characteristic discontinuity at the interface and the resulting predictions align well with the analytical solutions. The procedure can be generalised for solving other transient multiphysics problems especially in the low-data regime and in cases where measurements can reveal new physics.

9/18/2024

Data-Guided Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Solving Inverse Problems in Partial Differential Equations

Wei Zhou, Y. F. Xu

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) represent a significant advancement in scientific machine learning by integrating fundamental physical laws into their architecture through loss functions. PINNs have been successfully applied to solve various forward and inverse problems in partial differential equations (PDEs). However, a notable challenge can emerge during the early training stages when solving inverse problems. Specifically, data losses remain high while PDE residual losses are minimized rapidly, thereby exacerbating the imbalance between loss terms and impeding the overall efficiency of PINNs. To address this challenge, this study proposes a novel framework termed data-guided physics-informed neural networks (DG-PINNs). The DG-PINNs framework is structured into two distinct phases: a pre-training phase and a fine-tuning phase. In the pre-training phase, a loss function with only the data loss is minimized in a neural network. In the fine-tuning phase, a composite loss function, which consists of the data loss, PDE residual loss, and, if available, initial and boundary condition losses, is minimized in the same neural network. Notably, the pre-training phase ensures that the data loss is already at a low value before the fine-tuning phase commences. This approach enables the fine-tuning phase to converge to a minimal composite loss function with fewer iterations compared to existing PINNs. To validate the effectiveness, noise-robustness, and efficiency of DG-PINNs, extensive numerical investigations are conducted on inverse problems related to several classical PDEs, including the heat equation, wave equation, Euler--Bernoulli beam equation, and Navier--Stokes equation. The numerical results demonstrate that DG-PINNs can accurately solve these inverse problems and exhibit robustness against noise in training data.

7/16/2024

🧠

General-Kindred Physics-Informed Neural Network to the Solutions of Singularly Perturbed Differential Equations

Sen Wang, Peizhi Zhao, Qinglong Ma, Tao Song

Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) have become a promising research direction in the field of solving Partial Differential Equations (PDEs). Dealing with singular perturbation problems continues to be a difficult challenge in the field of PINN. The solution of singular perturbation problems often exhibits sharp boundary layers and steep gradients, and traditional PINN cannot achieve approximation of boundary layers. In this manuscript, we propose the General-Kindred Physics-Informed Neural Network (GKPINN) for solving Singular Perturbation Differential Equations (SPDEs). This approach utilizes asymptotic analysis to acquire prior knowledge of the boundary layer from the equation and establishes a novel network to assist PINN in approximating the boundary layer. It is compared with traditional PINN by solving examples of one-dimensional, two-dimensional, and time-varying SPDE equations. The research findings underscore the exceptional performance of our novel approach, GKPINN, which delivers a remarkable enhancement in reducing the $L_2$ error by two to four orders of magnitude compared to the established PINN methodology. This significant improvement is accompanied by a substantial acceleration in convergence rates, without compromising the high precision that is critical for our applications. Furthermore, GKPINN still performs well in extreme cases with perturbation parameters of ${1times10}^{-38}$, demonstrating its excellent generalization ability.

8/28/2024

VS-PINN: A Fast and efficient training of physics-informed neural networks using variable-scaling methods for solving PDEs with stiff behavior

Seungchan Ko, Sang Hyeon Park

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have recently emerged as a promising way to compute the solutions of partial differential equations (PDEs) using deep neural networks. However, despite their significant success in various fields, it remains unclear in many aspects how to effectively train PINNs if the solutions of PDEs exhibit stiff behaviors or high frequencies. In this paper, we propose a new method for training PINNs using variable-scaling techniques. This method is simple and it can be applied to a wide range of problems including PDEs with rapidly-varying solutions. Throughout various numerical experiments, we will demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method for these problems and confirm that it can significantly improve the training efficiency and performance of PINNs. Furthermore, based on the analysis of the neural tangent kernel (NTK), we will provide theoretical evidence for this phenomenon and show that our methods can indeed improve the performance of PINNs.

7/15/2024