PINNs for Medical Image Analysis: A Survey
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the use of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) in medical image analysis.
- PINNs are a machine learning technique that incorporates physical laws and domain knowledge into the neural network architecture.
- The paper explores how PINNs can be applied to various medical imaging tasks, including segmentation, reconstruction, and disease detection.
Plain English Explanation
PINNs for Medical Image Analysis: A Survey examines how a new type of machine learning model called Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) can be used to analyze medical images.
PINNs are a special kind of neural network that don't just learn patterns from data, but also incorporate physical laws and domain knowledge into their design. This allows them to better understand the underlying structure and properties of the medical images they're analyzing.
The paper looks at how PINNs can be applied to different medical imaging tasks, such as:
- Segmentation: Identifying and separating different tissues or structures within an image.
- Reconstruction: Restoring or filling in missing or unclear parts of an image.
- Disease detection: Identifying signs of disease or abnormalities in the image.
By combining the power of neural networks with physical principles, the researchers believe PINNs can lead to more accurate and reliable medical image analysis. This could have important implications for medical diagnosis, treatment planning, and monitoring.
Technical Explanation
Physics-informed Machine Learning (PIML) is an approach that seeks to incorporate physical laws and domain knowledge into machine learning models. PINNs are a type of PIML model that use neural networks to learn the solution to partial differential equations (PDEs) that govern physical phenomena.
The paper examines how PINNs can be applied to various medical imaging tasks:
Segmentation: PINNs can be used to segment medical images by incorporating physical constraints, such as the continuity of tissue boundaries, into the neural network architecture.
Reconstruction: PINNs can be used to reconstruct missing or corrupted parts of medical images by leveraging physical principles that govern the image formation process.
Disease Detection: PINNs can be used to detect signs of disease in medical images by incorporating physical models of disease progression or tissue abnormalities into the neural network.
The key advantage of PINNs is their ability to learn complex relationships in medical images while respecting the underlying physical constraints, which can lead to more accurate and robust models.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough overview of the potential applications of PINNs in medical image analysis, but it also acknowledges several challenges and limitations:
- Data Availability: The performance of PINNs is heavily dependent on the availability of high-quality, labeled training data, which can be scarce in many medical imaging domains.
- Model Complexity: Incorporating physical constraints into the neural network architecture can increase the complexity of the model, making it more difficult to train and interpret.
- Computational Cost: The iterative nature of PINN training can be computationally intensive, which may limit their practical deployment in real-time medical applications.
Additionally, the paper does not address the potential ethical concerns around the use of AI-based medical image analysis, such as issues of bias, transparency, and patient privacy.
Conclusion
PINNs for Medical Image Analysis: A Survey presents a promising approach for leveraging physical principles and domain knowledge to enhance the performance of machine learning models in medical imaging tasks. By combining the strengths of neural networks and physical modeling, PINNs have the potential to lead to more accurate and reliable medical image analysis, which could ultimately improve patient outcomes and healthcare delivery. However, the paper also highlights the need to address technical and practical challenges, as well as ethical considerations, before PINNs can be widely adopted in the medical field.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
PINNs for Medical Image Analysis: A Survey
Chayan Banerjee, Kien Nguyen, Olivier Salvado, Truyen Tran, Clinton Fookes
The incorporation of physical information in machine learning frameworks is transforming medical image analysis (MIA). By integrating fundamental knowledge and governing physical laws, these models achieve enhanced robustness and interpretability. In this work, we explore the utility of physics-informed approaches for MIA (PIMIA) tasks such as registration, generation, classification, and reconstruction. We present a systematic literature review of over 80 papers on physics-informed methods dedicated to MIA. We propose a unified taxonomy to investigate what physics knowledge and processes are modelled, how they are represented, and the strategies to incorporate them into MIA models. We delve deep into a wide range of image analysis tasks, from imaging, generation, prediction, inverse imaging (super-resolution and reconstruction), registration, and image analysis (segmentation and classification). For each task, we thoroughly examine and present in a tabular format the central physics-guided operation, the region of interest (with respect to human anatomy), the corresponding imaging modality, the dataset used for model training, the deep network architecture employed, and the primary physical process, equation, or principle utilized. Additionally, we also introduce a novel metric to compare the performance of PIMIA methods across different tasks and datasets. Based on this review, we summarize and distil our perspectives on the challenges, open research questions, and directions for future research. We highlight key open challenges in PIMIA, including selecting suitable physics priors and establishing a standardized benchmarking platform.
Read more8/6/2024
🏋️
0
Physics-Informed Computer Vision: A Review and Perspectives
Chayan Banerjee, Kien Nguyen, Clinton Fookes, George Karniadakis
The incorporation of physical information in machine learning frameworks is opening and transforming many application domains. Here the learning process is augmented through the induction of fundamental knowledge and governing physical laws. In this work, we explore their utility for computer vision tasks in interpreting and understanding visual data. We present a systematic literature review of more than 250 papers on formulation and approaches to computer vision tasks guided by physical laws. We begin by decomposing the popular computer vision pipeline into a taxonomy of stages and investigate approaches to incorporate governing physical equations in each stage. Existing approaches in computer vision tasks are analyzed with regard to what governing physical processes are modeled and formulated, and how they are incorporated, i.e. modification of input data (observation bias), modification of network architectures (inductive bias), and modification of training losses (learning bias). The taxonomy offers a unified view of the application of the physics-informed capability, highlighting where physics-informed learning has been conducted and where the gaps and opportunities are. Finally, we highlight open problems and challenges to inform future research. While still in its early days, the study of physics-informed computer vision has the promise to develop better computer vision models that can improve physical plausibility, accuracy, data efficiency, and generalization in increasingly realistic applications.
Read more5/14/2024
0
Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Extensions
Maziar Raissi, Paris Perdikaris, Nazanin Ahmadi, George Em Karniadakis
In this paper, we review the new method Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) that has become the main pillar in scientific machine learning, we present recent practical extensions, and provide a specific example in data-driven discovery of governing differential equations.
Read more9/2/2024
0
PINQI: An End-to-End Physics-Informed Approach to Learned Quantitative MRI Reconstruction
Felix F Zimmermann, Christoph Kolbitsch, Patrick Schuenke, Andreas Kofler
Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (qMRI) enables the reproducible measurement of biophysical parameters in tissue. The challenge lies in solving a nonlinear, ill-posed inverse problem to obtain the desired tissue parameter maps from acquired raw data. While various learned and non-learned approaches have been proposed, the existing learned methods fail to fully exploit the prior knowledge about the underlying MR physics, i.e. the signal model and the acquisition model. In this paper, we propose PINQI, a novel qMRI reconstruction method that integrates the knowledge about the signal, acquisition model, and learned regularization into a single end-to-end trainable neural network. Our approach is based on unrolled alternating optimization, utilizing differentiable optimization blocks to solve inner linear and non-linear optimization tasks, as well as convolutional layers for regularization of the intermediate qualitative images and parameter maps. This design enables PINQI to leverage the advantages of both the signal model and learned regularization. We evaluate the performance of our proposed network by comparing it with recently published approaches in the context of highly undersampled $T_1$-mapping, using both a simulated brain dataset, as well as real scanner data acquired from a physical phantom and in-vivo data from healthy volunteers. The results demonstrate the superiority of our proposed solution over existing methods and highlight the effectiveness of our method in real-world scenarios.
Read more5/8/2024