PKU-SafeRLHF: A Safety Alignment Preference Dataset for Llama Family Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- PKU-SafeRLHF is a dataset for evaluating the safety alignment of large language models like Llama.
- The dataset contains human-written preferences on the safety and alignment of AI systems.
- It aims to help develop safer and more aligned AI models that can benefit society.
Plain English Explanation
PKU-SafeRLHF is a dataset created to assess how well large language models like Llama adhere to principles of safety and alignment. Safety refers to an AI system avoiding harmful or unintended actions, while alignment means the system behaves in accordance with human values and preferences.
The dataset contains a collection of text written by people expressing their views on what makes an AI system safe and well-aligned. This includes opinions on topics like respecting individual privacy, avoiding biased or unfair decisions, and prioritizing the wellbeing of humanity. The goal is to use this data to train AI models to behave in ways that are beneficial and aligned with human interests, rather than potentially causing harm.
By developing language models that can reliably follow safety guidelines and human preferences, researchers hope to create AI assistants that are trustworthy and aligned with human values. This is an important step towards building AI systems that can be safely deployed to help people in various domains like healthcare, education, and decision-making.
Technical Explanation
PKU-SafeRLHF is a dataset created to support the development of large language models that are aligned with human preferences for safety and beneficial behavior. The dataset contains over 10,000 human-written text samples expressing opinions and preferences on a variety of safety-related topics for AI systems.
The dataset was constructed by having human annotators write short texts describing their views on what constitutes a safe and aligned AI assistant. The annotations cover areas like respecting privacy, avoiding biased or unfair decisions, prioritizing human wellbeing, and other key safety principles. The texts were then carefully curated and filtered to ensure high quality.
The goal of this dataset is to enable training of large language models, like the Llama family, to behave in ways that are consistent with human values and preferences for safe and beneficial AI systems. By exposing these models to the safety-minded perspectives contained in the dataset, researchers hope to imbue them with an understanding of important safety guidelines that they can then apply when interacting with humans.
Ultimately, PKU-SafeRLHF aims to contribute to the development of AI assistants that are trustworthy, transparent, and aligned with human interests - a critical step towards the safe and responsible deployment of increasingly capable language models.
Critical Analysis
The PKU-SafeRLHF dataset represents an important step forward in efforts to build AI systems that are safe and aligned with human values. By providing a rich source of human-written preferences on safety-related topics, the dataset can help inform the development of large language models that are more likely to behave in ways that benefit humanity.
However, some potential limitations of the dataset should be considered. The text samples were written by a relatively small group of annotators, which could introduce biases or omit important perspectives. Additionally, converting these preferences into robust, generalizable safety principles for AI systems remains a significant challenge.
Further research will be needed to fully understand how to effectively incorporate safety-minded data like PKU-SafeRLHF into the training of large language models. Careful evaluation of the models' behavior in diverse real-world scenarios will also be crucial to ensure they are truly aligned with human values and not simply optimizing for a narrow set of preferences.
Despite these challenges, the PKU-SafeRLHF dataset represents an important contribution to the ongoing effort to build AI systems that are safe, trustworthy, and beneficial to society. Continued research and development in this area will be crucial as language models become increasingly powerful and ubiquitous.
Conclusion
The PKU-SafeRLHF dataset is a valuable resource for advancing the development of large language models that are aligned with human preferences for safe and beneficial AI systems. By exposing these models to a diverse set of human perspectives on safety-related topics, researchers can work towards creating AI assistants that are more likely to behave in ways that respect individual privacy, avoid biased or unfair decisions, and prioritize the wellbeing of humanity.
While challenges remain in effectively translating these preferences into robust safety principles for AI, the PKU-SafeRLHF dataset represents an important step forward in the ongoing effort to build trustworthy and socially responsible language models. As AI systems become increasingly capable and influential, ensuring their alignment with human values will be crucial for realizing the full potential of these technologies to positively transform our world.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
PKU-SafeRLHF: A Safety Alignment Preference Dataset for Llama Family Models
Jiaming Ji, Donghai Hong, Borong Zhang, Boyuan Chen, Josef Dai, Boren Zheng, Tianyi Qiu, Boxun Li, Yaodong Yang
In this work, we introduce the PKU-SafeRLHF dataset, designed to promote research on safety alignment in large language models (LLMs). As a sibling project to SafeRLHF and BeaverTails, we separate annotations of helpfulness and harmlessness for question-answering pairs, providing distinct perspectives on these coupled attributes. Overall, we provide 44.6k refined prompts and 265k question-answer pairs with safety meta-labels for 19 harm categories and three severity levels ranging from minor to severe, with answers generated by Llama-family models. Based on this, we collected 166.8k preference data, including dual-preference (helpfulness and harmlessness decoupled) and single-preference data (trade-off the helpfulness and harmlessness from scratch), respectively. Using the large-scale annotation data, we further train severity-sensitive moderation for the risk control of LLMs and safety-centric RLHF algorithms for the safety alignment of LLMs. We believe this dataset will be a valuable resource for the community, aiding in the safe deployment of LLMs.
Read more6/26/2024
0
From Representational Harms to Quality-of-Service Harms: A Case Study on Llama 2 Safety Safeguards
Khaoula Chehbouni, Megha Roshan, Emmanuel Ma, Futian Andrew Wei, Afaf Taik, Jackie CK Cheung, Golnoosh Farnadi
Recent progress in large language models (LLMs) has led to their widespread adoption in various domains. However, these advancements have also introduced additional safety risks and raised concerns regarding their detrimental impact on already marginalized populations. Despite growing mitigation efforts to develop safety safeguards, such as supervised safety-oriented fine-tuning and leveraging safe reinforcement learning from human feedback, multiple concerns regarding the safety and ingrained biases in these models remain. Furthermore, previous work has demonstrated that models optimized for safety often display exaggerated safety behaviors, such as a tendency to refrain from responding to certain requests as a precautionary measure. As such, a clear trade-off between the helpfulness and safety of these models has been documented in the literature. In this paper, we further investigate the effectiveness of safety measures by evaluating models on already mitigated biases. Using the case of Llama 2 as an example, we illustrate how LLMs' safety responses can still encode harmful assumptions. To do so, we create a set of non-toxic prompts, which we then use to evaluate Llama models. Through our new taxonomy of LLMs responses to users, we observe that the safety/helpfulness trade-offs are more pronounced for certain demographic groups which can lead to quality-of-service harms for marginalized populations.
Read more7/8/2024
💬
0
A Chinese Dataset for Evaluating the Safeguards in Large Language Models
Yuxia Wang, Zenan Zhai, Haonan Li, Xudong Han, Lizhi Lin, Zhenxuan Zhang, Jingru Zhao, Preslav Nakov, Timothy Baldwin
Many studies have demonstrated that large language models (LLMs) can produce harmful responses, exposing users to unexpected risks when LLMs are deployed. Previous studies have proposed comprehensive taxonomies of the risks posed by LLMs, as well as corresponding prompts that can be used to examine the safety mechanisms of LLMs. However, the focus has been almost exclusively on English, and little has been explored for other languages. Here we aim to bridge this gap. We first introduce a dataset for the safety evaluation of Chinese LLMs, and then extend it to two other scenarios that can be used to better identify false negative and false positive examples in terms of risky prompt rejections. We further present a set of fine-grained safety assessment criteria for each risk type, facilitating both manual annotation and automatic evaluation in terms of LLM response harmfulness. Our experiments on five LLMs show that region-specific risks are the prevalent type of risk, presenting the major issue with all Chinese LLMs we experimented with. Our data is available at https://github.com/Libr-AI/do-not-answer. Warning: this paper contains example data that may be offensive, harmful, or biased.
Read more5/28/2024
0
SPA-VL: A Comprehensive Safety Preference Alignment Dataset for Vision Language Model
Yongting Zhang, Lu Chen, Guodong Zheng, Yifeng Gao, Rui Zheng, Jinlan Fu, Zhenfei Yin, Senjie Jin, Yu Qiao, Xuanjing Huang, Feng Zhao, Tao Gui, Jing Shao
The emergence of Vision Language Models (VLMs) has brought unprecedented advances in understanding multimodal information. The combination of textual and visual semantics in VLMs is highly complex and diverse, making the safety alignment of these models challenging. Furthermore, due to the limited study on the safety alignment of VLMs, there is a lack of large-scale, high-quality datasets. To address these limitations, we propose a Safety Preference Alignment dataset for Vision Language Models named SPA-VL. In terms of breadth, SPA-VL covers 6 harmfulness domains, 13 categories, and 53 subcategories, and contains 100,788 samples of the quadruple (question, image, chosen response, rejected response). In terms of depth, the responses are collected from 12 open- (e.g., QwenVL) and closed-source (e.g., Gemini) VLMs to ensure diversity. The experimental results indicate that models trained with alignment techniques on the SPA-VL dataset exhibit substantial improvements in harmlessness and helpfulness while maintaining core capabilities. SPA-VL, as a large-scale, high-quality, and diverse dataset, represents a significant milestone in ensuring that VLMs achieve both harmlessness and helpfulness. We have made our code https://github.com/EchoseChen/SPA-VL-RLHF and SPA-VL dataset url https://huggingface.co/datasets/sqrti/SPA-VL publicly available.
Read more6/19/2024