Planetary computing for data-driven environmental policy-making

Overview

• The paper makes a case for "planetary computing" - infrastructure to handle the ingestion, transformation, analysis, and publication of global data products for advancing environmental science and enabling better-informed policy-making.
• The authors draw on their experiences as a team of computer scientists working with environmental scientists on forest carbon and biodiversity preservation.
• They classify existing solutions based on their flexibility in scalably processing geospatial data and how well they support building trust in the results via traceability and reproducibility.
• The paper identifies research gaps at the intersection of computing and environmental science around handling continuously changing datasets collected over decades and requiring careful access control rather than being fully open access.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses the idea of "planetary computing" - developing the infrastructure and systems to effectively manage and analyze huge amounts of environmental data from around the world. This could help advance environmental science research and support better decision-making by policymakers.

The authors, who are computer scientists, have worked with environmental scientists on projects related to forests and biodiversity. They've looked at different existing technological solutions and evaluated how well they can handle large-scale geospatial data in a scalable way, as well as how transparent and reproducible the results from these systems are.

A key challenge they identify is that much of the environmental data being collected is constantly changing over time, often gathered over decades. This data also often requires careful control over who can access it, rather than being fully open to the public. The paper suggests there are gaps in research on how to best manage and analyze this type of complex, evolving environmental dataset.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes the concept of "planetary computing" - a computing infrastructure designed to ingest, transform, analyze, and publish global-scale environmental data products. This could support advancements in environmental science research and better-informed policymaking.

The authors draw on their experiences working as a team of computer scientists collaborating with environmental scientists on projects related to forest carbon and biodiversity preservation. They categorize existing technological solutions based on two key criteria: 1) the flexibility and scalability of the systems in processing large geospatial datasets, and 2) the degree to which the solutions support building trust in the results through traceability and reproducibility.

A key research gap identified in the paper is how to effectively handle environmental datasets that are continuously evolving over long time periods, often collected over decades, and require careful access controls rather than being fully open access. The authors suggest this intersection of computing and environmental science needs further investigation.

Critical Analysis

The paper rightly highlights the critical importance of developing robust computing infrastructure and systems to support the analysis and understanding of global-scale environmental data. As the authors note, this is essential for advancing environmental science research and informing effective policymaking around issues like climate change and biodiversity conservation.

The authors' focus on evaluating existing solutions based on scalability and result traceability/reproducibility is valuable. These are key attributes needed for environmental data platforms to be trusted and widely adopted. However, the paper does not provide much detail on the specific existing systems analyzed or the detailed criteria used for the evaluation.

Additionally, the paper could have gone further in exploring the challenges around managing continuously evolving environmental datasets with access control requirements. This is a significant hurdle that likely requires novel approaches beyond traditional data management techniques. More discussion of potential solutions or directions for future research in this area would have strengthened the paper.

Overall, the paper makes a compelling case for the need for "planetary computing" capabilities to support environmental science and policy. The identification of key research gaps is insightful and could help guide future work in this important interdisciplinary domain at the intersection of computing and environmental science.

Conclusion

This paper argues for the development of "planetary computing" infrastructure to enable the effective management and analysis of global environmental data. Such a system could drive advancements in environmental science research and support better-informed policymaking around critical issues like climate change and biodiversity.

The authors draw on their experiences working at the intersection of computer science and environmental science, evaluating existing technological solutions based on scalability and result transparency. They identify a key research gap around handling continuously evolving environmental datasets that require carefully controlled access.

Addressing the challenges outlined in this paper could lead to transformative improvements in our ability to understand and protect the planet's ecosystems. The vision of "planetary computing" put forth deserves further exploration and development by the research community.