The Platonic Representation Hypothesis
2405.07987
33
0
🔎
Abstract
We argue that representations in AI models, particularly deep networks, are converging. First, we survey many examples of convergence in the literature: over time and across multiple domains, the ways by which different neural networks represent data are becoming more aligned. Next, we demonstrate convergence across data modalities: as vision models and language models get larger, they measure distance between datapoints in a more and more alike way. We hypothesize that this convergence is driving toward a shared statistical model of reality, akin to Plato's concept of an ideal reality. We term such a representation the platonic representation and discuss several possible selective pressures toward it. Finally, we discuss the implications of these trends, their limitations, and counterexamples to our analysis.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Representations in AI models, particularly deep networks, are converging over time and across multiple domains.
- This convergence suggests a shared statistical model of reality, akin to Plato's concept of an ideal reality.
- The paper explores potential selective pressures driving this "platonic representation" and discusses its implications, limitations, and counterexamples.
Plain English Explanation
As AI models, especially large deep neural networks, continue to advance, the researchers have observed an interesting trend - the ways in which these models represent and process data are becoming more aligned over time and across different types of data, such as vision and language.
This convergence in representations suggests that these models may be converging towards a shared, underlying statistical model of reality, similar to the idea of an "ideal reality" proposed by the ancient Greek philosopher Plato. The researchers refer to this converged representation as the "platonic representation."
The paper explores possible reasons why this platonic representation might be emerging, such as selective pressures that favor models with more generalized and robust representations. The researchers also discuss the implications of this trend, as well as its limitations and potential counterexamples that may challenge their analysis.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by surveying numerous examples from the literature that demonstrate the convergence of representations in different AI models, across time and domains. The researchers show that as vision models and language models grow larger, they start to measure the distance between data points in increasingly similar ways, converging towards a shared statistical model.
The researchers hypothesize that this convergence is driving towards a "platonic representation" - a shared, idealized model of reality, akin to Plato's concept. They discuss several possible selective pressures that could be favoring the emergence of this platonic representation, such as the complexity-driven bias in feature representations and the benefits of having a unified knowledge-based system that can bridge between different state representations.
Critical Analysis
The paper raises some intriguing ideas, but also acknowledges several limitations and potential counterexamples to their analysis. The researchers note that the convergence they observe may be limited to certain types of models and tasks, and that there could be important differences in representations that are not captured by the measures they use.
Additionally, the concept of a "platonic representation" is speculative, and the researchers do not provide a clear, testable definition of what such a representation would look like or how it could be empirically verified. More work would be needed to solidify this theoretical framework and connect it more directly to the observations made in the paper.
Conclusion
Overall, this paper presents an interesting hypothesis about the convergence of representations in AI models and its potential connection to a shared, idealized model of reality. While the ideas are thought-provoking, more research is needed to fully substantiate the claims and explore the implications in depth. The paper serves as a valuable starting point for further exploration and critical discussion around the nature of representations in advanced AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
New!Dimensions underlying the representational alignment of deep neural networks with humans
Florian P. Mahner, Lukas Muttenthaler, Umut Guc{c}lu, Martin N. Hebart
0
0
Determining the similarities and differences between humans and artificial intelligence is an important goal both in machine learning and cognitive neuroscience. However, similarities in representations only inform us about the degree of alignment, not the factors that determine it. Drawing upon recent developments in cognitive science, we propose a generic framework for yielding comparable representations in humans and deep neural networks (DNN). Applying this framework to humans and a DNN model of natural images revealed a low-dimensional DNN embedding of both visual and semantic dimensions. In contrast to humans, DNNs exhibited a clear dominance of visual over semantic features, indicating divergent strategies for representing images. While in-silico experiments showed seemingly-consistent interpretability of DNN dimensions, a direct comparison between human and DNN representations revealed substantial differences in how they process images. By making representations directly comparable, our results reveal important challenges for representational alignment, offering a means for improving their comparability.
6/28/2024
Representations as Language: An Information-Theoretic Framework for Interpretability
Henry Conklin, Kenny Smith
0
0
Large scale neural models show impressive performance across a wide array of linguistic tasks. Despite this they remain, largely, black-boxes - inducing vector-representations of their input that prove difficult to interpret. This limits our ability to understand what they learn, and when the learn it, or describe what kinds of representations generalise well out of distribution. To address this we introduce a novel approach to interpretability that looks at the mapping a model learns from sentences to representations as a kind of language in its own right. In doing so we introduce a set of information-theoretic measures that quantify how structured a model's representations are with respect to its input, and when during training that structure arises. Our measures are fast to compute, grounded in linguistic theory, and can predict which models will generalise best based on their representations. We use these measures to describe two distinct phases of training a transformer: an initial phase of in-distribution learning which reduces task loss, then a second stage where representations becoming robust to noise. Generalisation performance begins to increase during this second phase, drawing a link between generalisation and robustness to noise. Finally we look at how model size affects the structure of the representational space, showing that larger models ultimately compress their representations more than their smaller counterparts.
6/5/2024
🤖
Eight challenges in developing theory of intelligence
Haiping Huang
0
0
A good theory of mathematical beauty is more practical than any current observation, as new predictions of physical reality can be verified self-consistently. This belief applies to the current status of understanding deep neural networks including large language models and even the biological intelligence. Toy models provide a metaphor of physical reality, allowing mathematically formulating that reality (i.e., the so-called theory), which can be updated as more conjectures are justified or refuted. One does not need to pack all details into a model, but rather, more abstract models are constructed, as complex systems like brains or deep networks have many sloppy dimensions but much less stiff dimensions that strongly impact macroscopic observables. This kind of bottom-up mechanistic modeling is still promising in the modern era of understanding the natural or artificial intelligence. Here, we shed light on eight challenges in developing theory of intelligence following this theoretical paradigm. Theses challenges are representation learning, generalization, adversarial robustness, continual learning, causal learning, internal model of the brain, next-token prediction, and finally the mechanics of subjective experience.
6/24/2024
📊
Efficiency for Free: Ideal Data Are Transportable Representations
Peng Sun, Yi Jiang, Tao Lin
0
0
Data, the seminal opportunity and challenge in modern machine learning, currently constrains the scalability of representation learning and impedes the pace of model evolution. Existing paradigms tackle the issue of learning efficiency over massive datasets from the perspective of self-supervised learning and dataset distillation independently, while neglecting the untapped potential of accelerating representation learning from an intermediate standpoint. In this work, we delve into defining the ideal data properties from both optimization and generalization perspectives. We propose that model-generated representations, despite being trained on diverse tasks and architectures, converge to a shared linear space, facilitating effective linear transport between models. Furthermore, we demonstrate that these representations exhibit properties conducive to the formation of ideal data. The theoretical/empirical insights therein inspire us to propose a Representation Learning Accelerator (ReLA), which leverages a task- and architecture-agnostic, yet publicly available, free model to form a dynamic data subset and thus accelerate (self-)supervised learning. For instance, employing a CLIP ViT B/16 as a prior model for dynamic data generation, ReLA-aided BYOL can train a ResNet-50 from scratch with 50% of ImageNet-1K, yielding performance surpassing that of training on the full dataset. Additionally, employing a ResNet-18 pre-trained on CIFAR-10 can enhance ResNet-50 training on 10% of ImageNet-1K, resulting in a 7.7% increase in accuracy.
5/24/2024