A Policy-Gradient Approach to Solving Imperfect-Information Games with Iterate Convergence

Read original: arXiv:2408.00751 - Published 8/2/2024 by Mingyang Liu, Gabriele Farina, Asuman Ozdaglar
Total Score

0

💬

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Policy gradient methods have become a standard tool in single-agent reinforcement learning.
  • They offer desirable properties like iterative convergence, efficient use of stochastic trajectory feedback, and theoretical guarantees.
  • However, in multi-agent imperfect-information settings (extensive-form games), it's unclear if policy gradients can provide the same benefits while maintaining theoretical guarantees.
  • Instead, methods for extensive-form games rely on approximating counterfactual values, which are incompatible with policy gradient approaches.
  • This paper investigates whether policy gradient can be safely used in two-player zero-sum imperfect-information extensive-form games (EFGs).

Plain English Explanation

Policy gradient methods are a type of reinforcement learning algorithm that have become very popular in single-agent settings. They have some nice properties, like the ability to gradually improve a policy over time, efficient use of the information from trial-and-error experiences, and solid theoretical foundations.

However, when you move to more complex multi-agent scenarios with imperfect information, like strategic board games or negotiation scenarios, it's not clear if these policy gradient methods can still provide the same benefits while keeping their theoretical guarantees. Instead, the standard approach in these settings is to focus on approximating something called "counterfactual values" rather than the typical "Q-values" used in policy gradients.

This paper sets out to investigate whether policy gradients can still be used effectively and safely in these multi-agent imperfect-information games. Specifically, they look at two-player zero-sum extensive-form games, which model interactive, sequential decision-making with hidden information. The key finding is that yes, policy gradients can work in this setting - the authors show, for the first time, that a policy gradient method can provably converge to a regularized Nash equilibrium in self-play in these games.

Technical Explanation

The paper establishes positive results, showing that a policy gradient method can lead to provable best-iterate convergence to a regularized Nash equilibrium in self-play in two-player zero-sum imperfect-information extensive-form games (EFGs).

This is an important finding because in multi-agent imperfect-information settings, the standard techniques rely on approximating counterfactual values rather than the Q-values used in typical policy gradient methods. The authors demonstrate that policy gradients can in fact be applied safely in this context, providing the same desirable properties - iterative convergence, efficient use of stochastic trajectory feedback, and theoretical guarantees - that make them so useful in single-agent reinforcement learning.

The key insight is that by incorporating a carefully designed entropy-regularized objective, the policy gradient approach can still converge to a regularized Nash equilibrium in these complex multi-agent games. This represents an important advance, as it expands the applicability of policy gradient methods beyond their typical single-agent domain.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a compelling case that policy gradient methods can be successfully applied to two-player zero-sum imperfect-information extensive-form games, providing theoretical guarantees on convergence to a regularized Nash equilibrium. This is a notable contribution, as the standard techniques in this domain have relied on approximating counterfactual values rather than leveraging policy gradients.

That said, the authors acknowledge several caveats and limitations to their results. First, the analysis is restricted to the two-player zero-sum setting, and it's not clear if the findings would extend to more general multi-agent games. Second, the results rely on a specific entropy-regularized objective function, and it's uncertain whether similar guarantees would hold for other policy gradient variants.

Additionally, the paper does not address practical implementation challenges that may arise when applying these methods to realistic large-scale extensive-form games. Issues like sample complexity, function approximation, and exploration may require further investigation to enable effective real-world deployment.

Future research could explore generalizing the policy gradient approach to general-sum games, investigating alternative regularization schemes, and addressing the practical obstacles to scaling these methods. A more thorough empirical evaluation on challenging benchmark games would also help solidify the potential impact of this work.

Overall, this paper represents an important theoretical advance, but there remains significant work to be done to fully realize the benefits of policy gradients in complex multi-agent settings.

Conclusion

This paper makes a significant contribution by demonstrating that policy gradient methods can be applied effectively and with theoretical guarantees in two-player zero-sum imperfect-information extensive-form games. This is an important result, as it expands the applicability of these powerful reinforcement learning techniques beyond their traditional single-agent domain.

The key insight is that by incorporating a carefully designed entropy-regularized objective, policy gradients can converge to a regularized Nash equilibrium in these complex multi-agent scenarios. This represents an important step forward, as the standard approaches in this domain have relied on approximating counterfactual values rather than leveraging the strengths of policy gradients.

While the paper acknowledges several limitations and caveats, it opens the door to further research and development of policy gradient methods for a wider range of multi-agent problems. As reinforcement learning continues to advance, techniques like those presented in this work may play an increasingly important role in enabling artificial agents to navigate strategic, imperfect-information environments effectively.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

💬

Total Score

0

A Policy-Gradient Approach to Solving Imperfect-Information Games with Iterate Convergence

Mingyang Liu, Gabriele Farina, Asuman Ozdaglar

Policy gradient methods have become a staple of any single-agent reinforcement learning toolbox, due to their combination of desirable properties: iterate convergence, efficient use of stochastic trajectory feedback, and theoretically-sound avoidance of importance sampling corrections. In multi-agent imperfect-information settings (extensive-form games), however, it is still unknown whether the same desiderata can be guaranteed while retaining theoretical guarantees. Instead, sound methods for extensive-form games rely on approximating counterfactual values (as opposed to Q values), which are incompatible with policy gradient methodologies. In this paper, we investigate whether policy gradient can be safely used in two-player zero-sum imperfect-information extensive-form games (EFGs). We establish positive results, showing for the first time that a policy gradient method leads to provable best-iterate convergence to a regularized Nash equilibrium in self-play.

Read more

8/2/2024

Last-iterate Convergence Separation between Extra-gradient and Optimism in Constrained Periodic Games
Total Score

0

Last-iterate Convergence Separation between Extra-gradient and Optimism in Constrained Periodic Games

Yi Feng, Ping Li, Ioannis Panageas, Xiao Wang

Last-iterate behaviors of learning algorithms in repeated two-player zero-sum games have been extensively studied due to their wide applications in machine learning and related tasks. Typical algorithms that exhibit the last-iterate convergence property include optimistic and extra-gradient methods. However, most existing results establish these properties under the assumption that the game is time-independent. Recently, (Feng et al, 2023) studied the last-iterate behaviors of optimistic and extra-gradient methods in games with a time-varying payoff matrix, and proved that in an unconstrained periodic game, extra-gradient method converges to the equilibrium while optimistic method diverges. This finding challenges the conventional wisdom that these two methods are expected to behave similarly as they do in time-independent games. However, compared to unconstrained games, games with constrains are more common both in practical and theoretical studies. In this paper, we investigate the last-iterate behaviors of optimistic and extra-gradient methods in the constrained periodic games, demonstrating that similar separation results for last-iterate convergence also hold in this setting.

Read more

6/18/2024

Linear Convergence of Independent Natural Policy Gradient in Games with Entropy Regularization
Total Score

0

Linear Convergence of Independent Natural Policy Gradient in Games with Entropy Regularization

Youbang Sun, Tao Liu, P. R. Kumar, Shahin Shahrampour

This work focuses on the entropy-regularized independent natural policy gradient (NPG) algorithm in multi-agent reinforcement learning. In this work, agents are assumed to have access to an oracle with exact policy evaluation and seek to maximize their respective independent rewards. Each individual's reward is assumed to depend on the actions of all the agents in the multi-agent system, leading to a game between agents. We assume all agents make decisions under a policy with bounded rationality, which is enforced by the introduction of entropy regularization. In practice, a smaller regularization implies the agents are more rational and behave closer to Nash policies. On the other hand, agents with larger regularization acts more randomly, which ensures more exploration. We show that, under sufficient entropy regularization, the dynamics of this system converge at a linear rate to the quantal response equilibrium (QRE). Although regularization assumptions prevent the QRE from approximating a Nash equilibrium, our findings apply to a wide range of games, including cooperative, potential, and two-player matrix games. We also provide extensive empirical results on multiple games (including Markov games) as a verification of our theoretical analysis.

Read more

5/7/2024

🐍

Total Score

0

On the Second-Order Convergence of Biased Policy Gradient Algorithms

Siqiao Mu, Diego Klabjan

Since the objective functions of reinforcement learning problems are typically highly nonconvex, it is desirable that policy gradient, the most popular algorithm, escapes saddle points and arrives at second-order stationary points. Existing results only consider vanilla policy gradient algorithms with unbiased gradient estimators, but practical implementations under the infinite-horizon discounted reward setting are biased due to finite-horizon sampling. Moreover, actor-critic methods, whose second-order convergence has not yet been established, are also biased due to the critic approximation of the value function. We provide a novel second-order analysis of biased policy gradient methods, including the vanilla gradient estimator computed from Monte-Carlo sampling of trajectories as well as the double-loop actor-critic algorithm, where in the inner loop the critic improves the approximation of the value function via TD(0) learning. Separately, we also establish the convergence of TD(0) on Markov chains irrespective of initial state distribution.

Read more

5/15/2024