PopulAtion Parameter Averaging (PAPA)
2304.03094
0
21
🌿
Abstract
Ensemble methods combine the predictions of multiple models to improve performance, but they require significantly higher computation costs at inference time. To avoid these costs, multiple neural networks can be combined into one by averaging their weights. However, this usually performs significantly worse than ensembling. Weight averaging is only beneficial when different enough to benefit from combining them, but similar enough to average well. Based on this idea, we propose PopulAtion Parameter Averaging (PAPA): a method that combines the generality of ensembling with the efficiency of weight averaging. PAPA leverages a population of diverse models (trained on different data orders, augmentations, and regularizations) while slowly pushing the weights of the networks toward the population average of the weights. We also propose PAPA variants (PAPA-all, and PAPA-2) that average weights rarely rather than continuously; all methods increase generalization, but PAPA tends to perform best. PAPA reduces the performance gap between averaging and ensembling, increasing the average accuracy of a population of models by up to 0.8% on CIFAR-10, 1.9% on CIFAR-100, and 1.6% on ImageNet when compared to training independent (non-averaged) models.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- Ensemble methods combine multiple models to improve performance, but they are computationally expensive.
- Weight averaging, where the weights of multiple neural networks are combined into a single model, is more efficient but typically performs worse than ensembling.
- The paper proposes a method called PopulAtion Parameter Averaging (PAPA) that aims to combine the benefits of ensembling and weight averaging.
Plain English Explanation
PAPA is a technique that tries to get the best of both worlds: the improved performance of ensembling multiple models, and the efficiency of a single model. The key idea is to train a "population" of diverse models, each with slightly different training data, augmentations, and regularizations. These models are then gradually pushed towards a shared average of their weights, rather than just taking the average at the end.
This approach allows the models to benefit from their diversity, while still ending up as a single, efficient model. The authors show that this PAPA method can improve the accuracy of the final model compared to simply training independent models and then averaging their weights. The improvements are particularly significant on challenging datasets like CIFAR-100 and ImageNet.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes the PopulAtion Parameter Averaging (PAPA) method, which combines the power of ensemble learning with the efficiency of weight averaging. The key steps are:
- Train a "population" of diverse neural network models, each with slightly different training data, augmentations, and regularizations.
- Instead of simply averaging the weights of these models at the end, slowly push the weights of each model towards the average of the population.
- This allows the models to benefit from their diversity, while still ending up as a single, efficient model.
The paper also introduces two variants of PAPA: PAPA-all and PAPA-2. PAPA-all averages the weights of all models in the population, while PAPA-2 only averages the weights of the two most different models.
The experiments show that PAPA can significantly improve the average accuracy of the population, compared to training independent models and then averaging their weights. For example, PAPA boosts accuracy by up to 0.8% on CIFAR-10, 1.9% on CIFAR-100, and 1.6% on ImageNet.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach to combining the benefits of ensembling and weight averaging. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
- The computational overhead of maintaining and updating the population of models may limit the practical applicability of PAPA, especially for very large models or datasets. Sparse weight averaging techniques could be explored to further improve efficiency.
- The paper does not delve into the theoretical foundations of why PAPA works well. A more rigorous analysis of the underlying dynamics and convergence properties could provide additional insights.
- The experiments focus on computer vision tasks; it would be interesting to see how PAPA performs on other domains, such as natural language processing or speech recognition.
Overall, the PAPA method represents an interesting step towards bridging the gap between the performance of ensemble methods and the efficiency of weight averaging. Further research and real-world applications could help solidify its practical benefits and limitations.
Conclusion
The PopulAtion Parameter Averaging (PAPA) method proposed in this paper offers a compelling approach to combining the strengths of ensemble learning and weight averaging. By training a population of diverse models and gradually pushing their weights towards a shared average, PAPA is able to improve the average accuracy of the final model compared to simpler weight averaging techniques. This could have significant implications for deploying high-performing, yet efficient, machine learning models in real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📈
BayesBlend: Easy Model Blending using Pseudo-Bayesian Model Averaging, Stacking and Hierarchical Stacking in Python
Nathaniel Haines, Conor Goold
0
0
Averaging predictions from multiple competing inferential models frequently outperforms predictions from any single model, providing that models are optimally weighted to maximize predictive performance. This is particularly the case in so-called $mathcal{M}$-open settings where the true model is not in the set of candidate models, and may be neither mathematically reifiable nor known precisely. This practice of model averaging has a rich history in statistics and machine learning, and there are currently a number of methods to estimate the weights for constructing model-averaged predictive distributions. Nonetheless, there are few existing software packages that can estimate model weights from the full variety of methods available, and none that blend model predictions into a coherent predictive distribution according to the estimated weights. In this paper, we introduce the BayesBlend Python package, which provides a user-friendly programming interface to estimate weights and blend multiple (Bayesian) models' predictive distributions. BayesBlend implements pseudo-Bayesian model averaging, stacking and, uniquely, hierarchical Bayesian stacking to estimate model weights. We demonstrate the usage of BayesBlend with examples of insurance loss modeling.
5/2/2024
💬
Fisher Mask Nodes for Language Model Merging
Thennal D K, Ganesh Nathan, Suchithra M S
0
0
Fine-tuning pre-trained models provides significant advantages in downstream performance. The ubiquitous nature of pre-trained models such as BERT and its derivatives in natural language processing has also led to a proliferation of task-specific fine-tuned models. As these models typically only perform one task well, additional training or ensembling is required in multi-task scenarios. The growing field of model merging provides a solution, dealing with the challenge of combining multiple task-specific models into a single multi-task model. In this study, we introduce a novel model merging method for Transformers, combining insights from previous work in Fisher-weighted averaging and the use of Fisher information in model pruning. Utilizing the Fisher information of mask nodes within the Transformer architecture, we devise a computationally efficient weighted-averaging scheme. Our method exhibits a regular and significant performance increase across various models in the BERT family, outperforming full-scale Fisher-weighted averaging in a fraction of the computational cost, with baseline performance improvements of up to +6.5 and a speedup between 57.4x and 321.7x across models. Our results prove the potential of our method in current multi-task learning environments and suggest its scalability and adaptability to new model architectures and learning scenarios.
5/6/2024
📈
Estimating Model Performance Under Covariate Shift Without Labels
Jakub Bia{l}ek, Wojtek Kuberski, Nikolaos Perrakis, Albert Bifet
0
0
Machine learning models often experience performance degradation post-deployment due to shifts in data distribution. It is challenging to assess post-deployment performance accurately when labels are missing or delayed. Existing proxy methods, such as drift detection, fail to measure the effects of these shifts adequately. To address this, we introduce a new method for evaluating classification models on unlabeled data that accurately quantifies the impact of covariate shift on model performance and call it Probabilistic Adaptive Performance Estimation (PAPE). It is model and data-type agnostic and works for any performance metric. Crucially, PAPE operates independently of the original model, relying only on its predictions and probability estimates, and does not need any assumptions about the nature of the shift, learning directly from data instead. We tested PAPE using over 900 dataset-model combinations from US census data, assessing its performance against several benchmarks through various metrics. Our findings show that PAPE outperforms other methodologies, making it a superior choice for estimating the performance of classification models.
5/13/2024
📈
Beyond Bayesian Model Averaging over Paths in Probabilistic Programs with Stochastic Support
Tim Reichelt, Luke Ong, Tom Rainforth
0
0
The posterior in probabilistic programs with stochastic support decomposes as a weighted sum of the local posterior distributions associated with each possible program path. We show that making predictions with this full posterior implicitly performs a Bayesian model averaging (BMA) over paths. This is potentially problematic, as BMA weights can be unstable due to model misspecification or inference approximations, leading to sub-optimal predictions in turn. To remedy this issue, we propose alternative mechanisms for path weighting: one based on stacking and one based on ideas from PAC-Bayes. We show how both can be implemented as a cheap post-processing step on top of existing inference engines. In our experiments, we find them to be more robust and lead to better predictions compared to the default BMA weights.
4/15/2024