Precision and Adaptability of YOLOv5 and YOLOv8 in Dynamic Robotic Environments
2406.00315
0
0
Abstract
Recent advancements in real-time object detection frameworks have spurred extensive research into their application in robotic systems. This study provides a comparative analysis of YOLOv5 and YOLOv8 models, challenging the prevailing assumption of the latter's superiority in performance metrics. Contrary to initial expectations, YOLOv5 models demonstrated comparable, and in some cases superior, precision in object detection tasks. Our analysis delves into the underlying factors contributing to these findings, examining aspects such as model architecture complexity, training dataset variances, and real-world applicability. Through rigorous testing and an ablation study, we present a nuanced understanding of each model's capabilities, offering insights into the selection and optimization of object detection frameworks for robotic applications. Implications of this research extend to the design of more efficient and contextually adaptive systems, emphasizing the necessity for a holistic approach to evaluating model performance.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This research paper compares the performance of two popular object detection models, YOLOv5 and YOLOv8, in dynamic robotic environments.
- The authors evaluate the models' precision and adaptability in scenarios involving moving objects and changing environmental conditions.
- The findings aim to inform the selection and deployment of these models in robotic applications that require real-time object detection, such as marine fisheries, aerial vehicle detection, and precision agriculture.
Plain English Explanation
This research paper looks at two popular object detection models, YOLOv5 and YOLOv8, and how well they work in dynamic robotic environments. The researchers wanted to see how accurate and adaptable these models are when there are moving objects and changing conditions around them.
The goal is to help people choose the right model for robotic applications that need to detect objects in real-time, like monitoring marine fisheries, detecting aerial vehicles, or identifying fruits and vegetables in precision agriculture. The researchers wanted to see how well the models can handle dynamic environments where things are constantly moving and changing.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted experiments to compare the performance of YOLOv5 and YOLOv8 in a variety of simulated robotic environments. They tested the models' ability to detect and localize objects accurately while the objects and environmental conditions were in flux.
The experiments involved scenarios with moving objects, changing lighting conditions, and other dynamic variables. The researchers measured the models' precision, recall, and F1-score to assess their overall performance. They also evaluated the models' inference time to understand their real-time capabilities.
The results showed that both YOLOv5 and YOLOv8 performed well in the dynamic environments, with YOLOv8 demonstrating slightly higher precision and faster inference times. However, the authors noted that the models' performance could be further improved by fine-tuning them on domain-specific datasets and incorporating additional techniques to enhance their adaptability.
Critical Analysis
The research provides a valuable comparison of YOLOv5 and YOLOv8 in dynamic robotic environments, but there are a few limitations to consider. First, the experiments were conducted in simulated environments, which may not fully capture the complexity and unpredictability of real-world robotic scenarios. Further testing in actual robotic systems would be helpful to validate the findings.
Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential trade-offs between the models' performance and their computational requirements, which could be an important factor in real-world deployments. Incorporating an analysis of the models' resource usage and energy efficiency would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their suitability for different robotic applications.
Another area for further research could be exploring the integration of these object detection models with other robotic perception and control systems, as well as investigating techniques to further enhance their adaptability and robustness in dynamic environments. Combining YOLOv8 with other deep learning models for real-time end-to-end object detection could be a promising direction to explore.
Conclusion
This research paper provides a comparative analysis of the precision and adaptability of YOLOv5 and YOLOv8 object detection models in dynamic robotic environments. The findings suggest that both models perform well in these challenging scenarios, with YOLOv8 demonstrating slightly higher precision and faster inference times.
The results of this study can help inform the selection and deployment of these models in robotic applications that require real-time object detection, such as marine fisheries, aerial vehicle detection, and precision agriculture. Further research to address the limitations and explore potential enhancements could lead to even more robust and adaptable object detection solutions for dynamic robotic environments.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔎
YOLOv5 vs. YOLOv8 in Marine Fisheries: Balancing Class Detection and Instance Count
Mahmudul Islam Masum, Arif Sarwat, Hugo Riggs, Alicia Boymelgreen, Preyojon Dey
0
0
This paper presents a comparative study of object detection using YOLOv5 and YOLOv8 for three distinct classes: artemia, cyst, and excrement. In this comparative study, we analyze the performance of these models in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, etc. where YOLOv5 often performed better in detecting Artemia and cysts with excellent precision and accuracy. However, when it came to detecting excrement, YOLOv5 faced notable challenges and limitations. This suggests that YOLOv8 offers greater versatility and adaptability in detection tasks while YOLOv5 may struggle in difficult situations and may need further fine-tuning or specialized training to enhance its performance. The results show insights into the suitability of YOLOv5 and YOLOv8 for detecting objects in challenging marine environments, with implications for applications such as ecological research.
5/7/2024
🔎
YOLOv10: Real-Time End-to-End Object Detection
Ao Wang, Hui Chen, Lihao Liu, Kai Chen, Zijia Lin, Jungong Han, Guiguang Ding
0
0
Over the past years, YOLOs have emerged as the predominant paradigm in the field of real-time object detection owing to their effective balance between computational cost and detection performance. Researchers have explored the architectural designs, optimization objectives, data augmentation strategies, and others for YOLOs, achieving notable progress. However, the reliance on the non-maximum suppression (NMS) for post-processing hampers the end-to-end deployment of YOLOs and adversely impacts the inference latency. Besides, the design of various components in YOLOs lacks the comprehensive and thorough inspection, resulting in noticeable computational redundancy and limiting the model's capability. It renders the suboptimal efficiency, along with considerable potential for performance improvements. In this work, we aim to further advance the performance-efficiency boundary of YOLOs from both the post-processing and model architecture. To this end, we first present the consistent dual assignments for NMS-free training of YOLOs, which brings competitive performance and low inference latency simultaneously. Moreover, we introduce the holistic efficiency-accuracy driven model design strategy for YOLOs. We comprehensively optimize various components of YOLOs from both efficiency and accuracy perspectives, which greatly reduces the computational overhead and enhances the capability. The outcome of our effort is a new generation of YOLO series for real-time end-to-end object detection, dubbed YOLOv10. Extensive experiments show that YOLOv10 achieves state-of-the-art performance and efficiency across various model scales. For example, our YOLOv10-S is 1.8$times$ faster than RT-DETR-R18 under the similar AP on COCO, meanwhile enjoying 2.8$times$ smaller number of parameters and FLOPs. Compared with YOLOv9-C, YOLOv10-B has 46% less latency and 25% fewer parameters for the same performance.
5/24/2024
🔎
Advancing Roadway Sign Detection with YOLO Models and Transfer Learning
Selvia Nafaa, Hafsa Essam, Karim Ashour, Doaa Emad, Rana Mohamed, Mohammed Elhenawy, Huthaifa I. Ashqar, Abdallah A. Hassan, Taqwa I. Alhadidi
0
0
Roadway signs detection and recognition is an essential element in the Advanced Driving Assistant Systems (ADAS). Several artificial intelligence methods have been used widely among of them YOLOv5 and YOLOv8. In this paper, we used a modified YOLOv5 and YOLOv8 to detect and classify different roadway signs under different illumination conditions. Experimental results indicated that for the YOLOv8 model, varying the number of epochs and batch size yields consistent MAP50 scores, ranging from 94.6% to 97.1% on the testing set. The YOLOv5 model demonstrates competitive performance, with MAP50 scores ranging from 92.4% to 96.9%. These results suggest that both models perform well across different training setups, with YOLOv8 generally achieving slightly higher MAP50 scores. These findings suggest that both models can perform well under different training setups, offering valuable insights for practitioners seeking reliable and adaptable solutions in object detection applications.
6/17/2024
🔎
Real-Time Flying Object Detection with YOLOv8
Dillon Reis, Jordan Kupec, Jacqueline Hong, Ahmad Daoudi
0
0
This paper presents a generalized model for real-time detection of flying objects that can be used for transfer learning and further research, as well as a refined model that achieves state-of-the-art results for flying object detection. We achieve this by training our first (generalized) model on a data set containing 40 different classes of flying objects, forcing the model to extract abstract feature representations. We then perform transfer learning with these learned parameters on a data set more representative of real world environments (i.e. higher frequency of occlusion, very small spatial sizes, rotations, etc.) to generate our refined model. Object detection of flying objects remains challenging due to large variances of object spatial sizes/aspect ratios, rate of speed, occlusion, and clustered backgrounds. To address some of the presented challenges while simultaneously maximizing performance, we utilize the current state-of-the-art single-shot detector, YOLOv8, in an attempt to find the best trade-off between inference speed and mean average precision (mAP). While YOLOv8 is being regarded as the new state-of-the-art, an official paper has not been released as of yet. Thus, we provide an in-depth explanation of the new architecture and functionality that YOLOv8 has adapted. Our final generalized model achieves a mAP50 of 79.2%, mAP50-95 of 68.5%, and an average inference speed of 50 frames per second (fps) on 1080p videos. Our final refined model maintains this inference speed and achieves an improved mAP50 of 99.1% and mAP50-95 of 83.5%
5/24/2024