YOLOv5 vs. YOLOv8 in Marine Fisheries: Balancing Class Detection and Instance Count
2405.02312
0
0
🔎
Abstract
This paper presents a comparative study of object detection using YOLOv5 and YOLOv8 for three distinct classes: artemia, cyst, and excrement. In this comparative study, we analyze the performance of these models in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, etc. where YOLOv5 often performed better in detecting Artemia and cysts with excellent precision and accuracy. However, when it came to detecting excrement, YOLOv5 faced notable challenges and limitations. This suggests that YOLOv8 offers greater versatility and adaptability in detection tasks while YOLOv5 may struggle in difficult situations and may need further fine-tuning or specialized training to enhance its performance. The results show insights into the suitability of YOLOv5 and YOLOv8 for detecting objects in challenging marine environments, with implications for applications such as ecological research.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper compares the performance of two popular object detection models, YOLOv5 and YOLOv8, on three specific classes: artemia, cyst, and excrement.
- The study analyzes metrics like accuracy, precision, and recall, finding that YOLOv5 often outperformed YOLOv8 in detecting artemia and cysts, but struggled more with excrement detection.
- The results suggest that YOLOv8 may offer greater versatility and adaptability, while YOLOv5 may need further fine-tuning or specialized training to handle challenging detection tasks.
- The findings have implications for using these models in ecological research and other applications in marine environments.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers compared two popular object detection models, YOLOv5 and YOLOv8, to see how well they could identify three specific things: artemia (a type of small shrimp), cysts (protective egg-like structures), and excrement (animal waste).
They looked at things like how accurate the models were, how precise they were at identifying the objects, and how many of the objects they were able to detect. Overall, YOLOv5 did a better job at detecting the artemia and cysts, with excellent precision and accuracy. However, when it came to detecting the excrement, YOLOv5 struggled more.
This suggests that YOLOv8 might be more versatile and able to adapt to different detection tasks, while YOLOv5 may need some extra work or specialized training to handle more challenging objects like excrement. The results provide insights into how well these models could be used for things like ecological research in marine environments, where being able to accurately detect different objects is important.
Technical Explanation
This study compared the performance of the YOLOv5 and YOLOv8 object detection models on three specific classes: artemia, cyst, and excrement. The researchers analyzed metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score to evaluate the models' capabilities.
The results showed that YOLOv5 generally outperformed YOLOv8 in detecting artemia and cysts, achieving excellent precision and accuracy. However, when it came to detecting excrement, YOLOv5 faced notable challenges and limitations. In contrast, YOLOv8 exhibited greater versatility and adaptability in the detection tasks.
These findings suggest that while YOLOv5 may be well-suited for certain object detection scenarios, YOLOv8 offers a more robust and adaptable solution, particularly in complex or challenging environments. The results have implications for applications such as ecological research and underwater object detection, where the ability to accurately identify diverse objects is crucial.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough comparative analysis of YOLOv5 and YOLOv8 for object detection in a marine environment. However, the researchers acknowledge that the study is limited to a specific set of classes (artemia, cyst, and excrement) and may not be generalized to a broader range of objects.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential reasons for YOLOv5's struggles with excrement detection. It would be valuable to understand the underlying factors, such as the characteristics of the excrement samples or the model's architectural limitations, to identify areas for improvement.
Further research could explore the performance of these models on a wider range of object classes, as well as investigate the impact of dataset size and diversity on the models' capabilities. Comparative studies with other object detection frameworks, such as Faster R-CNN or Mask R-CNN, could also provide further insights into the suitability of these techniques for marine-based applications.
Conclusion
This comparative study of YOLOv5 and YOLOv8 object detection models offers valuable insights into their performance on specific classes in a marine environment. While YOLOv5 demonstrated strong results in detecting artemia and cysts, YOLOv8 exhibited greater versatility and adaptability, particularly in the challenging task of excrement detection.
The findings suggest that the choice between these models should be guided by the specific requirements of the application and the nature of the objects to be detected. Furthermore, the results highlight the importance of continued research and development in this field to enhance the capabilities of object detection models for diverse and complex environmental scenarios.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Precision and Adaptability of YOLOv5 and YOLOv8 in Dynamic Robotic Environments
Victor A. Kich, Muhammad A. Muttaqien, Junya Toyama, Ryutaro Miyoshi, Yosuke Ida, Akihisa Ohya, Hisashi Date
0
0
Recent advancements in real-time object detection frameworks have spurred extensive research into their application in robotic systems. This study provides a comparative analysis of YOLOv5 and YOLOv8 models, challenging the prevailing assumption of the latter's superiority in performance metrics. Contrary to initial expectations, YOLOv5 models demonstrated comparable, and in some cases superior, precision in object detection tasks. Our analysis delves into the underlying factors contributing to these findings, examining aspects such as model architecture complexity, training dataset variances, and real-world applicability. Through rigorous testing and an ablation study, we present a nuanced understanding of each model's capabilities, offering insights into the selection and optimization of object detection frameworks for robotic applications. Implications of this research extend to the design of more efficient and contextually adaptive systems, emphasizing the necessity for a holistic approach to evaluating model performance.
6/4/2024
🔎
Real-Time Flying Object Detection with YOLOv8
Dillon Reis, Jordan Kupec, Jacqueline Hong, Ahmad Daoudi
0
0
This paper presents a generalized model for real-time detection of flying objects that can be used for transfer learning and further research, as well as a refined model that achieves state-of-the-art results for flying object detection. We achieve this by training our first (generalized) model on a data set containing 40 different classes of flying objects, forcing the model to extract abstract feature representations. We then perform transfer learning with these learned parameters on a data set more representative of real world environments (i.e. higher frequency of occlusion, very small spatial sizes, rotations, etc.) to generate our refined model. Object detection of flying objects remains challenging due to large variances of object spatial sizes/aspect ratios, rate of speed, occlusion, and clustered backgrounds. To address some of the presented challenges while simultaneously maximizing performance, we utilize the current state-of-the-art single-shot detector, YOLOv8, in an attempt to find the best trade-off between inference speed and mean average precision (mAP). While YOLOv8 is being regarded as the new state-of-the-art, an official paper has not been released as of yet. Thus, we provide an in-depth explanation of the new architecture and functionality that YOLOv8 has adapted. Our final generalized model achieves a mAP50 of 79.2%, mAP50-95 of 68.5%, and an average inference speed of 50 frames per second (fps) on 1080p videos. Our final refined model maintains this inference speed and achieves an improved mAP50 of 99.1% and mAP50-95 of 83.5%
5/24/2024
🔎
YOLOv10: Real-Time End-to-End Object Detection
Ao Wang, Hui Chen, Lihao Liu, Kai Chen, Zijia Lin, Jungong Han, Guiguang Ding
0
0
Over the past years, YOLOs have emerged as the predominant paradigm in the field of real-time object detection owing to their effective balance between computational cost and detection performance. Researchers have explored the architectural designs, optimization objectives, data augmentation strategies, and others for YOLOs, achieving notable progress. However, the reliance on the non-maximum suppression (NMS) for post-processing hampers the end-to-end deployment of YOLOs and adversely impacts the inference latency. Besides, the design of various components in YOLOs lacks the comprehensive and thorough inspection, resulting in noticeable computational redundancy and limiting the model's capability. It renders the suboptimal efficiency, along with considerable potential for performance improvements. In this work, we aim to further advance the performance-efficiency boundary of YOLOs from both the post-processing and model architecture. To this end, we first present the consistent dual assignments for NMS-free training of YOLOs, which brings competitive performance and low inference latency simultaneously. Moreover, we introduce the holistic efficiency-accuracy driven model design strategy for YOLOs. We comprehensively optimize various components of YOLOs from both efficiency and accuracy perspectives, which greatly reduces the computational overhead and enhances the capability. The outcome of our effort is a new generation of YOLO series for real-time end-to-end object detection, dubbed YOLOv10. Extensive experiments show that YOLOv10 achieves state-of-the-art performance and efficiency across various model scales. For example, our YOLOv10-S is 1.8$times$ faster than RT-DETR-R18 under the similar AP on COCO, meanwhile enjoying 2.8$times$ smaller number of parameters and FLOPs. Compared with YOLOv9-C, YOLOv10-B has 46% less latency and 25% fewer parameters for the same performance.
5/24/2024
🔎
Advancing Roadway Sign Detection with YOLO Models and Transfer Learning
Selvia Nafaa, Hafsa Essam, Karim Ashour, Doaa Emad, Rana Mohamed, Mohammed Elhenawy, Huthaifa I. Ashqar, Abdallah A. Hassan, Taqwa I. Alhadidi
0
0
Roadway signs detection and recognition is an essential element in the Advanced Driving Assistant Systems (ADAS). Several artificial intelligence methods have been used widely among of them YOLOv5 and YOLOv8. In this paper, we used a modified YOLOv5 and YOLOv8 to detect and classify different roadway signs under different illumination conditions. Experimental results indicated that for the YOLOv8 model, varying the number of epochs and batch size yields consistent MAP50 scores, ranging from 94.6% to 97.1% on the testing set. The YOLOv5 model demonstrates competitive performance, with MAP50 scores ranging from 92.4% to 96.9%. These results suggest that both models perform well across different training setups, with YOLOv8 generally achieving slightly higher MAP50 scores. These findings suggest that both models can perform well under different training setups, offering valuable insights for practitioners seeking reliable and adaptable solutions in object detection applications.
6/17/2024