Predictive Coding Networks and Inference Learning: Tutorial and Survey

Read original: arXiv:2407.04117 - Published 7/23/2024 by Bjorn van Zwol, Ro Jefferson, Egon L. van den Broek
Total Score

0

Predictive Coding Networks and Inference Learning: Tutorial and Survey

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Provides a tutorial and survey on Predictive Coding Networks (PCNs), a type of generalized artificial neural network (ANN)
  • Explains the core principles of PCNs and how they differ from traditional ANNs
  • Covers the key elements of PCN architecture and training, including inference learning
  • Discusses the potential benefits and applications of PCNs compared to other neural network models

Plain English Explanation

Predictive Coding Networks (PCNs) are a special type of artificial neural network that work a bit differently from the traditional ones. In a regular neural network, information flows in one direction - from the input, through the hidden layers, to the output. But in a PCN, the information flows back and forth, with the network constantly making predictions and comparing them to the actual inputs.

This two-way flow of information allows PCNs to learn and adapt in a more dynamic way. They can pick up on patterns and regularities in the data, and use that knowledge to make better predictions going forward. This makes them well-suited for tasks like recognizing objects, understanding natural language, and even modeling the brain itself.

The key insight behind PCNs is that our brains don't just passively absorb information - they're constantly making guesses about what's going to happen next, and using that predictive ability to learn and make sense of the world. PCNs try to mimic this kind of "predictive coding" by building that feedback loop right into the network architecture.

By taking this predictive approach, PCNs can often achieve better performance than traditional neural nets, especially on complex, real-world problems. They're also more efficient, since they can focus their computational resources on learning the most important patterns and regularities, rather than just blindly memorizing training data.

Of course, like any new technology, PCNs also have their own unique challenges and limitations. But overall, they represent an exciting advance in the field of artificial intelligence, and could pave the way for even more powerful and flexible neural network models in the future.

Technical Explanation

At a high level, Predictive Coding Networks (PCNs) are a generalized form of artificial neural networks (ANNs) that incorporate a feedback loop between the different layers of the network. In a traditional ANN, information flows in a strictly feedforward manner - from the input layer, through the hidden layers, to the output layer.

In contrast, PCNs allow for bidirectional information flow, where the higher layers of the network can send "predictions" back down to the lower layers. These predictions are then compared to the actual inputs, and the difference (or "prediction error") is used to update the network's internal representations and parameters.

This predictive coding mechanism is inspired by neuroscientific theories of how the brain processes sensory information. The idea is that the brain is not just passively absorbing inputs, but is actively generating hypotheses about the causes of those inputs, and using the mismatch between the predictions and reality to refine its understanding.

From an architectural standpoint, PCNs typically consist of an encoder module that maps the inputs to a compressed latent representation, and a decoder module that attempts to reconstruct the original inputs from this latent code. The key distinction is that the decoder not only produces the outputs, but also generates top-down predictions that are fed back to the encoder.

This bidirectional flow of information allows PCNs to learn more efficient and robust internal representations, as the network is incentivized to discover the underlying structure and regularities in the data, rather than just memorizing the training examples.

The training process for PCNs is also somewhat different from standard ANNs. Instead of just optimizing the network to map inputs to outputs, PCNs are trained to minimize the total prediction error across all layers. This "inference learning" approach encourages the network to actively infer the causes of its inputs, rather than passively associating inputs with outputs.

Overall, the key advantages of PCNs compared to traditional ANNs are their ability to learn more flexible and generalizable representations, their potential for more efficient and robust performance, and their closer alignment with neuroscientific theories of brain function. However, the additional architectural complexity and training requirements of PCNs also present some practical challenges that are still being actively researched.

Critical Analysis

One potential limitation of Predictive Coding Networks (PCNs) highlighted in the paper is the increased computational complexity and training requirements compared to traditional feedforward neural networks. The bidirectional information flow and inference learning process can be more resource-intensive, which may make PCNs less practical for certain applications with strict latency or efficiency constraints.

Additionally, the paper notes that the exact architectural choices and hyperparameter settings for PCNs can have a significant impact on their performance, and that there is still relatively limited empirical evidence on the optimal configurations for different types of problems. More research may be needed to fully understand the design principles and best practices for effectively deploying PCNs in real-world scenarios.

Another area for further exploration is the interpretability and explainability of PCN models. Since they learn more abstract and structured internal representations, it may be more challenging to understand the decision-making process of a PCN, compared to a "black box" feedforward network. Developing better techniques for interpreting and explaining the inner workings of PCNs could be an important step in building trust and acceptance for these models, especially in high-stakes applications.

Finally, the paper highlights that while PCNs are inspired by neuroscientific theories of brain function, the extent to which they actually capture the true computational principles of the brain is still an open question. More research connecting the theoretical frameworks of PCNs with empirical neuroscience findings could help bridge this gap and lead to even more biologically plausible and cognitively-grounded neural network architectures.

Overall, the tutorial and survey provided in this paper offers a valuable introduction to the key concepts and potential benefits of Predictive Coding Networks. While there are some open challenges and areas for further exploration, the ideas presented here represent an exciting direction in the ongoing evolution of artificial neural network models.

Conclusion

This paper provides a comprehensive tutorial and survey on Predictive Coding Networks (PCNs), a type of generalized artificial neural network that incorporates a bidirectional flow of information and an inference learning training process.

The core premise of PCNs is that they can learn more efficient and robust internal representations by actively predicting the causes of their inputs, rather than just passively mapping inputs to outputs. This "predictive coding" approach is inspired by neuroscientific theories of how the brain processes sensory information.

By comparing their predictions to the actual inputs and using the resulting prediction error to update their internal parameters, PCNs can discover underlying patterns and regularities in the data, potentially leading to better performance and generalization compared to traditional feedforward neural networks.

While PCNs offer some compelling advantages, the paper also highlights some of the practical challenges, such as increased computational complexity and the need for careful architectural and hyperparameter tuning. Additionally, more research is needed to fully understand the interpretability, biological plausibility, and optimal deployment of these models.

Overall, this tutorial and survey provides a valuable introduction to the key principles and potential benefits of Predictive Coding Networks, as well as a balanced assessment of the current state of the field and areas for future exploration. As the field of artificial intelligence continues to evolve, ideas like those presented in this paper may help pave the way for even more powerful and flexible neural network models.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on š• ā†’

Related Papers

Predictive Coding Networks and Inference Learning: Tutorial and Survey
Total Score

0

Predictive Coding Networks and Inference Learning: Tutorial and Survey

Bjorn van Zwol, Ro Jefferson, Egon L. van den Broek

Recent years have witnessed a growing call for renewed emphasis on neuroscience-inspired approaches in artificial intelligence research, under the banner of NeuroAI. A prime example of this is predictive coding networks (PCNs), based on the neuroscientific framework of predictive coding. This framework views the brain as a hierarchical Bayesian inference model that minimizes prediction errors through feedback connections. Unlike traditional neural networks trained with backpropagation (BP), PCNs utilize inference learning (IL), a more biologically plausible algorithm that explains patterns of neural activity that BP cannot. Historically, IL has been more computationally intensive, but recent advancements have demonstrated that it can achieve higher efficiency than BP with sufficient parallelization. Furthermore, PCNs can be mathematically considered a superset of traditional feedforward neural networks (FNNs), significantly extending the range of trainable architectures. As inherently probabilistic (graphical) latent variable models, PCNs provide a versatile framework for both supervised learning and unsupervised (generative) modeling that goes beyond traditional artificial neural networks. This work provides a comprehensive review and detailed formal specification of PCNs, particularly situating them within the context of modern ML methods. Additionally, we introduce a Python library (PRECO) for practical implementation. This positions PC as a promising framework for future ML innovations.

Read more

7/23/2024

Online Training of Hopfield Networks using Predictive Coding
Total Score

0

Online Training of Hopfield Networks using Predictive Coding

Ehsan Ganjidoost, Mallory Snow, Jeff Orchard

Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence (AI) have progressed in tandem, each contributing to our understanding of the brain, and inspiring recent developments in biologically-plausible neural networks (NNs) and learning rules. Predictive coding (PC), and its learning rule, have been shown to approximate error backpropagation in a biologically relevant manner, with local weight updates that depend only on the activity of the pre- and post-synaptic neurons. Unlike traditional feedforward NNs where the flow of information goes in one direction, PC models mimic the brain more accurately by passing information bidirectionally: prediction in one direction, and correction/error in the other. PC models learn by clamping some neurons to target values and running the network to equilibrium. At equilibrium, the network calculates its own error gradients right at the location where they are used for weight updates. Traditional backprop requires the computation graph to be feedforward. However, the PC version of backprop does not have this requirement. Amazingly, no one has demonstrated the application of PC learning directly to recurrent neural networks (RNNs). Hopfield networks (HNs) are RNNs that implement a content-addressable memory, learning patterns (or ``memories'') that can be retrieved from partial or corrupted patterns. In this paper, we show that a HN can be trained using the PC learning rules without modification. To our knowledge, this is the first time PC learning has been applied directly to train a RNN, without the need to unroll it in time. Our results indicate that the PC-trained HNs behave like classical HNs.

Read more

6/24/2024

A Review of Pulse-Coupled Neural Network Applications in Computer Vision and Image Processing
Total Score

0

A Review of Pulse-Coupled Neural Network Applications in Computer Vision and Image Processing

Nurul Rafi, Pablo Rivas

Research in neural models inspired by mammal's visual cortex has led to many spiking neural networks such as pulse-coupled neural networks (PCNNs). These models are oscillating, spatio-temporal models stimulated with images to produce several time-based responses. This paper reviews PCNN's state of the art, covering its mathematical formulation, variants, and other simplifications found in the literature. We present several applications in which PCNN architectures have successfully addressed some fundamental image processing and computer vision challenges, including image segmentation, edge detection, medical imaging, image fusion, image compression, object recognition, and remote sensing. Results achieved in these applications suggest that the PCNN architecture generates useful perceptual information relevant to a wide variety of computer vision tasks.

Read more

6/4/2024

Fast Deep Predictive Coding Networks for Videos Feature Extraction without Labels
Total Score

0

Fast Deep Predictive Coding Networks for Videos Feature Extraction without Labels

Wenqian Xue, Chi Ding, Jose Principe

Brain-inspired deep predictive coding networks (DPCNs) effectively model and capture video features through a bi-directional information flow, even without labels. They are based on an overcomplete description of video scenes, and one of the bottlenecks has been the lack of effective sparsification techniques to find discriminative and robust dictionaries. FISTA has been the best alternative. This paper proposes a DPCN with a fast inference of internal model variables (states and causes) that achieves high sparsity and accuracy of feature clustering. The proposed unsupervised learning procedure, inspired by adaptive dynamic programming with a majorization-minimization framework, and its convergence are rigorously analyzed. Experiments in the data sets CIFAR-10, Super Mario Bros video game, and Coil-100 validate the approach, which outperforms previous versions of DPCNs on learning rate, sparsity ratio, and feature clustering accuracy. Because of DCPN's solid foundation and explainability, this advance opens the door for general applications in object recognition in video without labels.

Read more

9/10/2024