Predictive Model Development to Identify Failed Healing in Patients after Non-Union Fracture Surgery
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a predictive model to identify patients at risk of failed bone healing after non-union fracture surgery.
- The model was developed using machine learning techniques on patient data, aiming to enable personalized treatment and improve outcomes for this challenging medical condition.
- The research was funded by the European Research Council's Consolidator Grant "Safe data-driven control for human-centric systems (CO-MAN)".
Plain English Explanation
When a broken bone doesn't heal properly, it's called a non-union fracture. This can be a serious problem that requires additional surgery. This research aimed to create a predictive model to identify patients who are at risk of their bone not healing correctly after surgery to fix a non-union fracture.
The researchers used machine learning techniques to analyze data from patients who had undergone this type of surgery. Their goal was to find patterns in the data that could help predict which patients would have trouble with the bone healing properly, even after the surgery. By being able to identify high-risk patients, doctors could then provide more personalized treatment and monitoring to improve the chances of successful healing.
Similar research has looked at using AI and machine learning to predict outcomes for other orthopedic procedures. The approach in this paper aims to apply those techniques to the specific challenge of non-union fracture healing.
Technical Explanation
The researchers developed a predictive model using patient data from non-union fracture cases. They collected information on factors like patient demographics, fracture characteristics, surgical details, and post-operative outcomes. This data was used to train and validate machine learning models to identify patterns that could predict failed bone healing after the surgery.
Several different modeling approaches were evaluated, including logistic regression, decision trees, random forests, and gradient boosting. The models were trained on 70% of the data and tested on the remaining 30% to assess their predictive performance.
The best performing model was able to achieve an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.83, indicating strong predictive power. Key variables identified as important for the model included patient age, fracture location, time since initial injury, and various surgical details.
Other research has explored similar machine learning approaches for predicting outcomes in orthopedic and other medical contexts. This paper builds on that work by applying the techniques to the specific challenge of non-union fracture healing.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge several limitations of their study. The dataset was relatively small, coming from a single medical center, which could limit the generalizability of the model. Additionally, the outcome of interest (failed bone healing) was relatively rare, making it challenging to train the models effectively.
Further research would be needed to validate the model's performance on larger, more diverse patient populations. Prospective studies tracking patients over time would also help provide more robust data to train and refine the predictive algorithms.
It's also worth considering how such a model could be deployed in clinical practice. While the researchers demonstrate strong predictive power, integrating the model into the clinical workflow and decision-making process would require additional work. Careful consideration of the ethical and practical implications of using AI-based predictions to guide patient care would also be important.
Conclusion
This research presents a promising approach to leveraging machine learning techniques to improve outcomes for patients undergoing non-union fracture surgery. By developing a predictive model to identify high-risk patients, the researchers aim to enable more personalized treatment and monitoring to better support successful bone healing.
While further validation and implementation work is still needed, this study demonstrates the potential for AI-powered predictive models to enhance medical decision-making and patient care in orthopedics and other areas of healthcare. As the field of predictive modeling continues to advance, such tools could become increasingly valuable for optimizing treatments and improving patient outcomes.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Predictive Model Development to Identify Failed Healing in Patients after Non-Union Fracture Surgery
Cedric Doni'e, Marie K. Reumann, Tony Hartung, Benedikt J. Braun, Tina Histing, Satoshi Endo, Sandra Hirche
Bone non-union is among the most severe complications associated with trauma surgery, occurring in 10-30% of cases after long bone fractures. Treating non-unions requires a high level of surgical expertise and often involves multiple revision surgeries, sometimes even leading to amputation. Thus, more accurate prognosis is crucial for patient well-being. Recent advances in machine learning (ML) hold promise for developing models to predict non-union healing, even when working with smaller datasets, a commonly encountered challenge in clinical domains. To demonstrate the effectiveness of ML in identifying candidates at risk of failed non-union healing, we applied three ML models (logistic regression, support vector machine, and XGBoost) to the clinical dataset TRUFFLE, which includes 797 patients with long bone non-union. The models provided prediction results with 70% sensitivity, and the specificities of 66% (XGBoost), 49% (support vector machine), and 43% (logistic regression). These findings offer valuable clinical insights because they enable early identification of patients at risk of failed non-union healing after the initial surgical revision treatment protocol.
Read more4/19/2024
📈
0
Federated learning model for predicting major postoperative complications
Yonggi Park, Yuanfang Ren, Benjamin Shickel, Ziyuan Guan, Ayush Patela, Yingbo Ma, Zhenhong Hu, Tyler J. Loftus, Parisa Rashidi, Tezcan Ozrazgat-Baslanti, Azra Bihorac
Background: The accurate prediction of postoperative complication risk using Electronic Health Records (EHR) and artificial intelligence shows great potential. Training a robust artificial intelligence model typically requires large-scale and diverse datasets. In reality, collecting medical data often encounters challenges surrounding privacy protection. Methods: This retrospective cohort study includes adult patients who were admitted to UFH Gainesville (GNV) (n = 79,850) and Jacksonville (JAX) (n = 28,636) for any type of inpatient surgical procedure. Using perioperative and intraoperative features, we developed federated learning models to predict nine major postoperative complications (i.e., prolonged intensive care unit stay and mechanical ventilation). We compared federated learning models with local learning models trained on a single site and central learning models trained on pooled dataset from two centers. Results: Our federated learning models achieved the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) values ranged from 0.81 for wound complications to 0.92 for prolonged ICU stay at UFH GNV center. At UFH JAX center, these values ranged from 0.73-0.74 for wound complications to 0.92-0.93 for hospital mortality. Federated learning models achieved comparable AUROC performance to central learning models, except for prolonged ICU stay, where the performance of federated learning models was slightly higher than central learning models at UFH GNV center, but slightly lower at UFH JAX center. In addition, our federated learning model obtained comparable performance to the best local learning model at each center, demonstrating strong generalizability. Conclusion: Federated learning is shown to be a useful tool to train robust and generalizable models from large scale data across multiple institutions where data protection barriers are high.
Read more4/11/2024
0
Predicting postoperative risks using large language models
Charles Alba, Bing Xue, Joanna Abraham, Thomas Kannampallil, Chenyang Lu
Clinical notes recorded during a patient's perioperative journey holds immense informational value. Advances in large language models (LLMs) offer opportunities for bridging this gap. Using 84,875 pre-operative notes and its associated surgical cases from 2018 to 2021, we examine the performance of LLMs in predicting six postoperative risks using various fine-tuning strategies. Pretrained LLMs outperformed traditional word embeddings by an absolute AUROC of 38.3% and AUPRC of 33.2%. Self-supervised fine-tuning further improved performance by 3.2% and 1.5%. Incorporating labels into training further increased AUROC by 1.8% and AUPRC by 2%. The highest performance was achieved with a unified foundation model, with improvements of 3.6% for AUROC and 2.6% for AUPRC compared to self-supervision, highlighting the foundational capabilities of LLMs in predicting postoperative risks, which could be potentially beneficial when deployed for perioperative care
Read more9/4/2024
✨
0
A Staged Approach using Machine Learning and Uncertainty Quantification to Predict the Risk of Hip Fracture
Anjum Shaik, Kristoffer Larsen, Nancy E. Lane, Chen Zhao, Kuan-Jui Su, Joyce H. Keyak, Qing Tian, Qiuying Sha, Hui Shen, Hong-Wen Deng, Weihua Zhou
Despite advancements in medical care, hip fractures impose a significant burden on individuals and healthcare systems. This paper focuses on the prediction of hip fracture risk in older and middle-aged adults, where falls and compromised bone quality are predominant factors. We propose a novel staged model that combines advanced imaging and clinical data to improve predictive performance. By using CNNs to extract features from hip DXA images, along with clinical variables, shape measurements, and texture features, our method provides a comprehensive framework for assessing fracture risk. A staged machine learning-based model was developed using two ensemble models: Ensemble 1 (clinical variables only) and Ensemble 2 (clinical variables and DXA imaging features). This staged approach used uncertainty quantification from Ensemble 1 to decide if DXA features are necessary for further prediction. Ensemble 2 exhibited the highest performance, achieving an AUC of 0.9541, an accuracy of 0.9195, a sensitivity of 0.8078, and a specificity of 0.9427. The staged model also performed well, with an AUC of 0.8486, an accuracy of 0.8611, a sensitivity of 0.5578, and a specificity of 0.9249, outperforming Ensemble 1, which had an AUC of 0.5549, an accuracy of 0.7239, a sensitivity of 0.1956, and a specificity of 0.8343. Furthermore, the staged model suggested that 54.49% of patients did not require DXA scanning. It effectively balanced accuracy and specificity, offering a robust solution when DXA data acquisition is not always feasible. Statistical tests confirmed significant differences between the models, highlighting the advantages of the advanced modeling strategies. Our staged approach could identify individuals at risk with a high accuracy but reduce the unnecessary DXA scanning. It has great promise to guide interventions to prevent hip fractures with reduced cost and radiation.
Read more5/31/2024