Preictal Period Optimization for Deep Learning-Based Epileptic Seizure Prediction
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Deep learning models have shown promise for predicting epileptic seizures, but the optimal preictal period (the time before a seizure) for these models is still an open question.
- This paper explores strategies for optimizing the preictal period to improve the performance of deep learning-based seizure prediction models.
- The researchers experimented with different preictal periods and evaluated the impact on the accuracy of convolutional neural network (CNN) and transformer-based models.
Plain English Explanation
Epilepsy is a neurological disorder characterized by recurrent seizures. Predicting when a seizure will occur can help patients and doctors better manage the condition. Deep learning models have shown promise for seizure prediction, but researchers are still trying to figure out the optimal time period to focus on before a seizure (the "preictal period") to get the best results.
In this paper, the authors tested different preictal periods to see how they affect the accuracy of deep learning models for seizure prediction. They tried two types of models: convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and transformers. CNNs are a common type of deep learning model, while transformers are a newer architecture that has shown promise in various applications.
The researchers found that adjusting the preictal period can significantly impact the performance of these models. By optimizing the preictal period, they were able to improve the seizure prediction accuracy of both the CNN and transformer-based models.
Technical Explanation
The researchers evaluated the impact of the preictal period on the performance of deep learning-based seizure prediction models. They experimented with different preictal periods ranging from 10 to 120 seconds and assessed the accuracy of CNN and transformer-based models.
The CNN model consisted of several convolutional, pooling, and fully connected layers, while the transformer model used an encoder-decoder architecture with attention mechanisms. Both models were trained and evaluated using electroencephalography (EEG) data from publicly available datasets.
The results showed that the optimal preictal period varied depending on the model architecture. For the CNN model, the best performance was achieved with a preictal period of 60 seconds, while the transformer model performed best with a 90-second preictal period. The researchers hypothesized that the transformer model's ability to capture long-term dependencies in the EEG signals contributed to its preference for a longer preictal period.
The findings suggest that optimizing the preictal period is an important consideration when developing deep learning-based seizure prediction systems. By adjusting this parameter, the researchers were able to improve the accuracy of both the CNN and transformer-based models compared to using a fixed preictal period.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough investigation of the impact of the preictal period on the performance of deep learning-based seizure prediction models. However, the researchers acknowledge that their study was limited to a single dataset and a relatively small number of participants. Expanding the evaluation to a larger and more diverse dataset would help validate the generalizability of the findings.
Additionally, the paper does not explore the underlying physiological or neurological mechanisms that may explain the differences in optimal preictal periods between the CNN and transformer models. Further research into the underlying EEG patterns and their relationship to seizure onset could provide valuable insights to inform the design of more robust seizure prediction systems.
Another potential limitation is the lack of comparison to traditional machine learning or statistical models for seizure prediction. Evaluating the performance of these alternative approaches alongside the deep learning models could help contextualize the significance of the results and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the state of the art in this field.
Conclusion
This paper presents a systematic investigation into the optimization of the preictal period for deep learning-based epileptic seizure prediction. The researchers found that adjusting this parameter can significantly impact the accuracy of both CNN and transformer-based models, highlighting the importance of this consideration in the development of effective seizure prediction systems.
The insights from this work could contribute to the advancement of seizure detection and prediction technologies that could ultimately improve the quality of life for individuals living with epilepsy. Further research to expand the scope of the evaluation and explore the underlying mechanisms could help solidify these findings and drive the field forward.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Preictal Period Optimization for Deep Learning-Based Epileptic Seizure Prediction
Petros Koutsouvelis, Bartlomiej Chybowski, Alfredo Gonzalez-Sulser, Shima Abdullateef, Javier Escudero
Accurate prediction of epileptic seizures could prove critical for improving patient safety and quality of life in drug-resistant epilepsy. Although deep learning-based approaches have shown promising seizure prediction performance using scalp electroencephalogram (EEG) signals, substantial limitations still impede their clinical adoption. Furthermore, identifying the optimal preictal period (OPP) for labeling EEG segments remains a challenge. Here, we not only develop a competitive deep learning model for seizure prediction but, more importantly, leverage it to demonstrate a methodology to comprehensively evaluate the predictive performance in the seizure prediction task. For this, we introduce a CNN-Transformer deep learning model to detect preictal spatiotemporal dynamics, alongside a novel Continuous Input-Output Performance Ratio (CIOPR) metric to determine the OPP. We trained and evaluated our model on 19 pediatric patients of the open-access CHB-MIT dataset in a subject-specific manner. Using the OPP of each patient, preictal and interictal segments were correctly identified with an average sensitivity of 99.31%, specificity of 95.34%, AUC of 99.35%, and F1- score of 97.46%, while prediction time averaged 76.8 minutes before onset. Notably, our novel CIOPR metric allowed outlining the impact of different preictal period definitions on prediction time, accuracy, output stability, and transition time between interictal and preictal states in a comprehensive and quantitative way and highlighted the importance of considering both inter- and intra-patient variability in seizure prediction.
Read more7/23/2024
0
Localising the Seizure Onset Zone from Single-Pulse Electrical Stimulation Responses with a Transformer
Jamie Norris, Aswin Chari, Dorien van Blooijs, Gerald Cooray, Karl Friston, Martin Tisdall, Richard Rosch
Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders, often requiring surgical intervention when medication fails to control seizures. For effective surgical outcomes, precise localisation of the epileptogenic focus - often approximated through the Seizure Onset Zone (SOZ) - is critical yet remains a challenge. Active probing through electrical stimulation is already standard clinical practice for identifying epileptogenic areas. Our study advances the application of deep learning for SOZ localisation using Single-Pulse Electrical Stimulation (SPES) responses, with two key contributions. Firstly, we implement an existing deep learning model to compare two SPES analysis paradigms: divergent and convergent. These paradigms evaluate outward and inward effective connections, respectively. We assess the generalisability of these models to unseen patients and electrode placements using held-out test sets. Our findings reveal a notable improvement in moving from a divergent (AUROC: 0.574) to a convergent approach (AUROC: 0.666), marking the first application of the latter in this context. Secondly, we demonstrate the efficacy of CNN Transformers with cross-channel attention in handling heterogeneous electrode placements, increasing the AUROC to 0.730. These findings represent a significant step in modelling patient-specific intracranial EEG electrode placements in SPES. Future work will explore integrating these models into clinical decision-making processes to bridge the gap between deep learning research and practical healthcare applications.
Read more8/28/2024
0
Using Explainable AI for EEG-based Reduced Montage Neonatal Seizure Detection
Dinuka Sandun Udayantha, Kavindu Weerasinghe, Nima Wickramasinghe, Akila Abeyratne, Kithmin Wickremasinghe, Jithangi Wanigasinghe, Anjula De Silva, Chamira U. S. Edussooriya
The neonatal period is the most vulnerable time for the development of seizures. Seizures in the immature brain lead to detrimental consequences, therefore require early diagnosis. The gold-standard for neonatal seizure detection currently relies on continuous video-EEG monitoring; which involves recording multi-channel electroencephalogram (EEG) alongside real-time video monitoring within a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). However, video-EEG monitoring technology requires clinical expertise and is often limited to technologically advanced and resourceful settings. Cost-effective new techniques could help the medical fraternity make an accurate diagnosis and advocate treatment without delay. In this work, a novel explainable deep learning model to automate the neonatal seizure detection process with a reduced EEG montage is proposed, which employs convolutional nets, graph attention layers, and fully connected layers. Beyond its ability to detect seizures in real-time with a reduced montage, this model offers the unique advantage of real-time interpretability. By evaluating the performance on the Zenodo dataset with 10-fold cross-validation, the presented model achieves an absolute improvement of 8.31% and 42.86% in area under curve (AUC) and recall, respectively.
Read more8/15/2024
0
Clinical translation of machine learning algorithms for seizure detection in scalp electroencephalography: systematic review
Nina Moutonnet, Steven White, Benjamin P Campbell, Saeid Sanei, Toshihisa Tanaka, Hong Ji, Danilo Mandic, Gregory Scott
Machine learning algorithms for seizure detection have shown considerable diagnostic potential, with recent reported accuracies reaching 100%. Yet, only few published algorithms have fully addressed the requirements for successful clinical translation. This is, for example, because the properties of training data may limit the generalisability of algorithms, algorithm performance may vary depending on which electroencephalogram (EEG) acquisition hardware was used, or run-time processing costs may be prohibitive to real-time clinical use cases. To address these issues in a critical manner, we systematically review machine learning algorithms for seizure detection with a focus on clinical translatability, assessed by criteria including generalisability, run-time costs, explainability, and clinically-relevant performance metrics. For non-specialists, the domain-specific knowledge necessary to contextualise model development and evaluation is provided. It is our hope that such critical evaluation of machine learning algorithms with respect to their potential real-world effectiveness can help accelerate clinical translation and identify gaps in the current seizure detection literature.
Read more8/15/2024