Privacy-preserving federated prediction of pain intensity change based on multi-center survey data

Read original: arXiv:2409.07997 - Published 9/14/2024 by Supratim Das, Mahdie Rafie, Paula Kammer, S{o}ren T. Skou, Dorte T. Gr{o}nne, Ewa M. Roos, Andr'e Hajek, Hans-Helmut Konig, Md Shihab Ullaha, Niklas Probul and 2 others
Total Score

0

🔮

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Patient-reported survey data are used to train prognostic models for healthcare improvement.
  • This data is typically available from multiple medical centers, but cannot be centralized for privacy reasons.
  • Models trained locally are less accurate, robust, and generalizable.
  • The research presents privacy-preserving federated machine learning techniques for building prognostic models without centralizing the survey data.

Plain English Explanation

In the healthcare field, patient-reported survey data is used to train models that can predict a patient's future health outcomes. This type of data is often collected by multiple medical centers, but due to privacy concerns, it cannot be easily combined into a single centralized repository.

When models are trained using only the data from a single medical center, they tend to be less accurate, robust, and able to generalize to patients from other locations. To address this, the researchers in this paper explore a technique called federated learning.

Federated learning allows prognostic models to be trained across multiple medical centers without the need to share the underlying patient survey data. Instead, the model is trained simultaneously at each location, and the updates are shared to improve the overall model. This preserves patient privacy while still enabling the development of more powerful predictive models.

Technical Explanation

The researchers used centralized, local, and federated learning techniques to train prognostic models on two healthcare datasets: the GLA:D data from the five health regions of Denmark and the international SHARE data from 27 countries.

They trained linear regression, random forest regression, and random forest classification models using the different learning approaches and compared the performance. In the GLA:D data, the federated linear regression and random forest regression models outperformed their locally trained counterparts with statistical significance. The centralized models did not perform significantly better than the federated models.

For the SHARE data, the federated and centralized models both performed significantly better than the local models in terms of accuracy and AUC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve).

Critical Analysis

The paper demonstrates the potential of federated learning to enable the training of accurate prognostic models while preserving patient privacy. By not requiring the centralization of sensitive survey data, federated learning addresses a key challenge in developing healthcare prediction models.

However, the paper does not explore potential limitations or caveats of the federated learning approach. For example, it does not discuss the computational and communication overhead required to coordinate the training across multiple sites, or the impact of data heterogeneity and model drift across the participating centers.

Additionally, the paper could have provided more insight into the specific techniques used for federated learning, such as the aggregation methods and privacy-preserving mechanisms employed. This would allow readers to better understand the technical details and potential tradeoffs of the approach.

Conclusion

This research demonstrates the feasibility and potential benefits of using federated learning to train prognostic models from multi-center patient survey data without compromising privacy. By enabling accurate model development while preserving the legal and ethical boundaries of medical data, federated learning could play a significant role in improving healthcare outcomes and patient experiences across diverse healthcare systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🔮

Total Score

0

Privacy-preserving federated prediction of pain intensity change based on multi-center survey data

Supratim Das, Mahdie Rafie, Paula Kammer, S{o}ren T. Skou, Dorte T. Gr{o}nne, Ewa M. Roos, Andr'e Hajek, Hans-Helmut Konig, Md Shihab Ullaha, Niklas Probul, Jan Baumbacha, Linda Baumbach

Background: Patient-reported survey data are used to train prognostic models aimed at improving healthcare. However, such data are typically available multi-centric and, for privacy reasons, cannot easily be centralized in one data repository. Models trained locally are less accurate, robust, and generalizable. We present and apply privacy-preserving federated machine learning techniques for prognostic model building, where local survey data never leaves the legally safe harbors of the medical centers. Methods: We used centralized, local, and federated learning techniques on two healthcare datasets (GLA:D data from the five health regions of Denmark and international SHARE data of 27 countries) to predict two different health outcomes. We compared linear regression, random forest regression, and random forest classification models trained on local data with those trained on the entire data in a centralized and in a federated fashion. Results: In GLA:D data, federated linear regression (R2 0.34, RMSE 18.2) and federated random forest regression (R2 0.34, RMSE 18.3) models outperform their local counterparts (i.e., R2 0.32, RMSE 18.6, R2 0.30, RMSE 18.8) with statistical significance. We also found that centralized models (R2 0.34, RMSE 18.2, R2 0.32, RMSE 18.5, respectively) did not perform significantly better than the federated models. In SHARE, the federated model (AC 0.78, AUROC: 0.71) and centralized model (AC 0.84, AUROC: 0.66) perform significantly better than the local models (AC: 0.74, AUROC: 0.69). Conclusion: Federated learning enables the training of prognostic models from multi-center surveys without compromising privacy and with only minimal or no compromise regarding model performance.

Read more

9/14/2024

🔮

Total Score

0

Federated Diabetes Prediction in Canadian Adults Using Real-world Cross-Province Primary Care Data

Guojun Tang, Jason E. Black, Tyler S. Williamson, Steve H. Drew

Integrating Electronic Health Records (EHR) and the application of machine learning present opportunities for enhancing the accuracy and accessibility of data-driven diabetes prediction. In particular, developing data-driven machine learning models can provide early identification of patients with high risk for diabetes, potentially leading to more effective therapeutic strategies and reduced healthcare costs. However, regulation restrictions create barriers to developing centralized predictive models. This paper addresses the challenges by introducing a federated learning approach, which amalgamates predictive models without centralized data storage and processing, thus avoiding privacy issues. This marks the first application of federated learning to predict diabetes using real clinical datasets in Canada extracted from the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN) without crossprovince patient data sharing. We address class-imbalance issues through downsampling techniques and compare federated learning performance against province-based and centralized models. Experimental results show that the federated MLP model presents a similar or higher performance compared to the model trained with the centralized approach. However, the federated logistic regression model showed inferior performance compared to its centralized peer.

Read more

8/23/2024

Improving the Classification Effect of Clinical Images of Diseases for Multi-Source Privacy Protection
Total Score

0

Improving the Classification Effect of Clinical Images of Diseases for Multi-Source Privacy Protection

Tian Bowen, Xu Zhengyang, Yin Zhihao, Wang Jingying, Yue Yutao

Privacy data protection in the medical field poses challenges to data sharing, limiting the ability to integrate data across hospitals for training high-precision auxiliary diagnostic models. Traditional centralized training methods are difficult to apply due to violations of privacy protection principles. Federated learning, as a distributed machine learning framework, helps address this issue, but it requires multiple hospitals to participate in training simultaneously, which is hard to achieve in practice. To address these challenges, we propose a medical privacy data training framework based on data vectors. This framework allows each hospital to fine-tune pre-trained models on private data, calculate data vectors (representing the optimization direction of model parameters in the solution space), and sum them up to generate synthetic weights that integrate model information from multiple hospitals. This approach enhances model performance without exchanging private data or requiring synchronous training. Experimental results demonstrate that this method effectively utilizes dispersed private data resources while protecting patient privacy. The auxiliary diagnostic model trained using this approach significantly outperforms models trained independently by a single hospital, providing a new perspective for resolving the conflict between medical data privacy protection and model training and advancing the development of medical intelligence.

Read more

8/26/2024

📈

Total Score

0

Federated learning model for predicting major postoperative complications

Yonggi Park, Yuanfang Ren, Benjamin Shickel, Ziyuan Guan, Ayush Patela, Yingbo Ma, Zhenhong Hu, Tyler J. Loftus, Parisa Rashidi, Tezcan Ozrazgat-Baslanti, Azra Bihorac

Background: The accurate prediction of postoperative complication risk using Electronic Health Records (EHR) and artificial intelligence shows great potential. Training a robust artificial intelligence model typically requires large-scale and diverse datasets. In reality, collecting medical data often encounters challenges surrounding privacy protection. Methods: This retrospective cohort study includes adult patients who were admitted to UFH Gainesville (GNV) (n = 79,850) and Jacksonville (JAX) (n = 28,636) for any type of inpatient surgical procedure. Using perioperative and intraoperative features, we developed federated learning models to predict nine major postoperative complications (i.e., prolonged intensive care unit stay and mechanical ventilation). We compared federated learning models with local learning models trained on a single site and central learning models trained on pooled dataset from two centers. Results: Our federated learning models achieved the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) values ranged from 0.81 for wound complications to 0.92 for prolonged ICU stay at UFH GNV center. At UFH JAX center, these values ranged from 0.73-0.74 for wound complications to 0.92-0.93 for hospital mortality. Federated learning models achieved comparable AUROC performance to central learning models, except for prolonged ICU stay, where the performance of federated learning models was slightly higher than central learning models at UFH GNV center, but slightly lower at UFH JAX center. In addition, our federated learning model obtained comparable performance to the best local learning model at each center, demonstrating strong generalizability. Conclusion: Federated learning is shown to be a useful tool to train robust and generalizable models from large scale data across multiple institutions where data protection barriers are high.

Read more

4/11/2024