ProGRes: Prompted Generative Rescoring on ASR n-Best

Read original: arXiv:2409.00217 - Published 9/10/2024 by Ada Defne Tur, Adel Moumen, Mirco Ravanelli
Total Score

0

ProGRes: Prompted Generative Rescoring on ASR n-Best

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper proposes a method called ProGRes (Prompted Generative Rescoring on ASR N-Best) to improve automatic speech recognition (ASR) by leveraging large language models (LLMs).
  • ProGRes takes the N-best hypotheses from an ASR system and rescores them using an LLM prompted to continue the partially decoded text.
  • The LLM-based rescorer aims to select the hypothesis that is most likely to be the correct transcription.

Plain English Explanation

Automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems are used to convert spoken language into text, but they don't always get the transcription right on the first try. ProGRes: Prompted Generative Rescoring on ASR N-Best proposes a way to improve ASR accuracy by using a more sophisticated language model.

ASR systems typically provide a list of the N most likely transcriptions, ranked by their confidence. The researchers behind ProGRes realized that these N-best hypotheses could be further improved by running them through a large language model (LLM) - a powerful AI system trained on massive amounts of text data.

The key idea is to "prompt" the LLM with the partial transcription from the ASR system, and have the LLM continue generating the rest of the sentence. This allows the LLM to assess how natural and coherent each of the N-best hypotheses is, and re-rank them accordingly. The hypothesis that the LLM thinks is the most plausible is then selected as the final transcription.

By leveraging the language understanding capabilities of LLMs, ProGRes aims to correct errors and produce more accurate transcriptions compared to the original ASR output. This could have important applications in areas like voice-controlled interfaces, speech-to-text transcription, and automated captioning.

Technical Explanation

The ProGRes method works as follows:

  1. ASR N-Best Hypotheses: The ASR system generates an N-best list of potential transcriptions for a given audio input.

  2. LLM Prompting: For each N-best hypothesis, ProGRes prompts a large language model (LLM) with the partial transcription. The LLM is then tasked with continuing the text to generate a full, coherent sentence.

  3. Hypothesis Rescoring: ProGRes computes a rescoring score for each N-best hypothesis based on the LLM's generated continuation. Hypotheses that result in more natural, fluent sentences are scored higher.

  4. Transcription Selection: The N-best hypothesis with the highest rescoring score is selected as the final transcription output.

The key innovation of ProGRes is leveraging the powerful language understanding capabilities of LLMs to improve upon the initial ASR output. By prompting the LLM to complete the partial transcriptions, ProGRes can identify the hypothesis that best fits the overall context and language patterns.

The researchers evaluated ProGRes on several standard ASR benchmarks and found that it consistently outperformed the baseline ASR systems, providing more accurate transcriptions. This demonstrates the potential of integrating LLMs into the ASR pipeline to enhance performance.

Critical Analysis

The ProGRes paper presents a promising approach, but there are a few important considerations:

  • Computational Overhead: Prompting an LLM for each N-best hypothesis adds significant computational cost compared to the original ASR system. The researchers acknowledge this tradeoff and suggest exploring ways to reduce the computational burden.

  • Generalization Ability: The paper evaluates ProGRes on a limited set of datasets and domains. More research is needed to understand how well the approach generalizes to a wider range of speech recognition scenarios, accents, and languages.

  • Prompt Engineering: The effectiveness of ProGRes relies heavily on the design of the prompts used to guide the LLM. Optimizing prompt engineering could be an important area for further investigation.

  • Interpretability: As with many LLM-based systems, the inner workings of ProGRes can be difficult to interpret. Enhancing the transparency and explainability of the rescoring process could improve trust and adoptability.

Despite these considerations, the core idea of ProGRes - leveraging the language understanding capabilities of LLMs to refine ASR output - is a compelling approach that could lead to meaningful improvements in speech recognition accuracy and robustness.

Conclusion

ProGRes: Prompted Generative Rescoring on ASR N-Best presents a novel method for enhancing automatic speech recognition by incorporating large language models. By prompting LLMs to continue the partially decoded text from ASR systems, ProGRes is able to select the transcription hypothesis that is most coherent and natural-sounding.

The results demonstrate the potential of integrating advanced language models into the ASR pipeline, which could have far-reaching implications for voice-based interfaces, transcription services, and other applications that rely on accurate speech recognition. While there are some practical challenges to address, the core ideas behind ProGRes represent an exciting step forward in bridging the gap between ASR and natural language processing.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

ProGRes: Prompted Generative Rescoring on ASR n-Best
Total Score

0

ProGRes: Prompted Generative Rescoring on ASR n-Best

Ada Defne Tur, Adel Moumen, Mirco Ravanelli

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown their ability to improve the performance of speech recognizers by effectively rescoring the n-best hypotheses generated during the beam search process. However, the best way to exploit recent generative instruction-tuned LLMs for hypothesis rescoring is still unclear. This paper proposes a novel method that uses instruction-tuned LLMs to dynamically expand the n-best speech recognition hypotheses with new hypotheses generated through appropriately-prompted LLMs. Specifically, we introduce a new zero-shot method for ASR n-best rescoring, which combines confidence scores, LLM sequence scoring, and prompt-based hypothesis generation. We compare Llama-3-Instruct, GPT-3.5 Turbo, and GPT-4 Turbo as prompt-based generators with Llama-3 as sequence scorer LLM. We evaluated our approach using different speech recognizers and observed significant relative improvement in the word error rate (WER) ranging from 5% to 25%.

Read more

9/10/2024

Towards interfacing large language models with ASR systems using confidence measures and prompting
Total Score

0

Towards interfacing large language models with ASR systems using confidence measures and prompting

Maryam Naderi, Enno Hermann, Alexandre Nanchen, Sevada Hovsepyan, Mathew Magimai. -Doss

As large language models (LLMs) grow in parameter size and capabilities, such as interaction through prompting, they open up new ways of interfacing with automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems beyond rescoring n-best lists. This work investigates post-hoc correction of ASR transcripts with LLMs. To avoid introducing errors into likely accurate transcripts, we propose a range of confidence-based filtering methods. Our results indicate that this can improve the performance of less competitive ASR systems.

Read more

8/1/2024

Multi-stage Large Language Model Correction for Speech Recognition
Total Score

0

Multi-stage Large Language Model Correction for Speech Recognition

Jie Pu, Thai-Son Nguyen, Sebastian Stuker

In this paper, we investigate the usage of large language models (LLMs) to improve the performance of competitive speech recognition systems. Different from previous LLM-based ASR error correction methods, we propose a novel multi-stage approach that utilizes uncertainty estimation of ASR outputs and reasoning capability of LLMs. Specifically, the proposed approach has two stages: the first stage is about ASR uncertainty estimation and exploits N-best list hypotheses to identify less reliable transcriptions; The second stage works on these identified transcriptions and performs LLM-based corrections. This correction task is formulated as a multi-step rule-based LLM reasoning process, which uses explicitly written rules in prompts to decompose the task into concrete reasoning steps. Our experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method by showing 10% ~ 20% relative improvement in WER over competitive ASR systems -- across multiple test domains and in zero-shot settings.

Read more

6/18/2024

Evolutionary Prompt Design for LLM-Based Post-ASR Error Correction
Total Score

0

Evolutionary Prompt Design for LLM-Based Post-ASR Error Correction

Rithik Sachdev, Zhong-Qiu Wang, Chao-Han Huck Yang

Building upon the strength of modern large language models (LLMs), generative error correction (GEC) has emerged as a promising paradigm that can elevate the performance of modern automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems. One representative approach is to leverage in-context learning to prompt LLMs so that a better hypothesis can be generated by the LLMs based on a carefully-designed prompt and an $N$-best list of hypotheses produced by ASR systems. However, it is yet unknown whether the existing prompts are the most effective ones for the task of post-ASR error correction. In this context, this paper first explores alternative prompts to identify an initial set of effective prompts, and then proposes to employ an evolutionary prompt optimization algorithm to refine the initial prompts. Evaluations results on the CHiME-4 subset of the Task $1$ of the SLT $2024$ GenSEC challenge show the effectiveness and potential of the proposed algorithms.

Read more

7/24/2024