Projection-free Online Learning over Strongly Convex Sets

2010.08177

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 6/26/2024 by Yuanyu Wan, Lijun Zhang

🌿

Abstract

To efficiently solve online problems with complicated constraints, projection-free algorithms including online frank-wolfe (OFW) and its variants have received significant interest recently. However, in the general case, existing efficient projection-free algorithms only achieved the regret bound of $O(T^{3/4})$, which is worse than the regret of projection-based algorithms, where $T$ is the number of decision rounds. In this paper, we study the special case of online learning over strongly convex sets, for which we first prove that OFW can enjoy a better regret bound of $O(T^{2/3})$ for general convex losses. The key idea is to refine the decaying step-size in the original OFW by a simple line search rule. Furthermore, for strongly convex losses, we propose a strongly convex variant of OFW by redefining the surrogate loss function in OFW. We show that it achieves a regret bound of $O(T^{2/3})$ over general convex sets and a better regret bound of $O(sqrt{T})$ over strongly convex sets.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper focuses on developing efficient projection-free algorithms for online learning with complicated constraints.
  • Existing efficient projection-free algorithms, such as Online Frank-Wolfe (OFW) and its variants, have only achieved a regret bound of $O(T^{3/4})$, which is worse than projection-based algorithms.
  • The paper studies the special case of online learning over strongly convex sets and proposes improvements to OFW to achieve better regret bounds.

Plain English Explanation

When faced with online optimization problems that have complex constraints, projection-free algorithms like Online Frank-Wolfe (OFW) have gained attention as an efficient solution. However, in general, these algorithms have only been able to achieve a regret bound of $O(T^{3/4})$, which means their performance is not as good as projection-based algorithms, where $T$ is the number of decision rounds.

The researchers in this paper look at a special case where the feasible set is strongly convex. For this setting, they show that by refining the step-size rule used in the original OFW algorithm, they can achieve a better regret bound of $O(T^{2/3})$ for general convex loss functions. Furthermore, they propose a strongly convex variant of OFW that can achieve an even better regret bound of $O(\sqrt{T})$ over strongly convex sets.

The key ideas are to use a simple line search rule to set the step-size in OFW and to redefine the surrogate loss function in a way that exploits the strong convexity of the feasible set. These modifications allow the algorithms to converge faster and achieve tighter regret bounds compared to the original OFW.

Technical Explanation

The paper studies the problem of online learning with complicated constraints, where projection-free algorithms like Online Frank-Wolfe (OFW) and its variants have shown promise. However, in the general case, the best regret bound achieved by these efficient projection-free algorithms is $O(T^{3/4})$, which is worse than the regret of projection-based algorithms.

To address this, the researchers focus on the special case of online learning over strongly convex sets. They first prove that by refining the decaying step-size rule in the original OFW algorithm, it can enjoy a better regret bound of $O(T^{2/3})$ for general convex loss functions.

Furthermore, the researchers propose a strongly convex variant of OFW, where they redefine the surrogate loss function used in the original OFW. This strongly convex variant achieves a regret bound of $O(T^{2/3})$ over general convex sets and an even better regret bound of $O(\sqrt{T})$ over strongly convex sets.

The key insights behind these improvements are:

  1. Using a simple line search rule to set the step-size in OFW, rather than the original decaying step-size, can lead to faster convergence and tighter regret bounds.
  2. Redefining the surrogate loss function in OFW to better exploit the strong convexity of the feasible set can further improve the regret bounds.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents an interesting approach to improving the performance of projection-free algorithms, like Online Frank-Wolfe (OFW), for online learning problems with complicated constraints. The researchers focus on the special case of strongly convex feasible sets, which is a reasonable assumption in many practical applications.

One potential limitation of the work is that it may not generalize well to more general, non-strongly convex feasible sets. The researchers acknowledge this and suggest that extending their techniques to the general case is an important direction for future research.

Additionally, the paper does not provide any experimental validation of the proposed algorithms. While the theoretical analysis is well-developed, it would be helpful to see how the algorithms perform in practice and how they compare to other state-of-the-art projection-free and projection-based algorithms.

Overall, the paper presents a solid theoretical contribution, but further empirical evaluation and exploration of the limitations of the proposed techniques would strengthen the work and provide a more complete picture of their potential impact on the field of online optimization.

Conclusion

This paper focuses on improving the performance of projection-free algorithms, such as Online Frank-Wolfe (OFW) and its variants, for online learning problems with complicated constraints. By studying the special case of online learning over strongly convex sets, the researchers were able to develop refinements to the OFW algorithm that achieve better regret bounds compared to the original OFW.

The key ideas include using a simple line search rule to set the step-size in OFW and redefining the surrogate loss function to better exploit the strong convexity of the feasible set. These modifications allow the algorithms to converge faster and achieve tighter regret bounds, with the strongly convex variant achieving an $O(\sqrt{T})$ regret bound over strongly convex sets.

While the theoretical contributions of this work are significant, further empirical evaluation and exploration of the limitations of the proposed techniques would help to fully assess their potential impact on the field of online optimization and their applicability to real-world problems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

👁️

Improved Dynamic Regret for Online Frank-Wolfe

Yuanyu Wan, Lijun Zhang, Mingli Song

YC

0

Reddit

0

To deal with non-stationary online problems with complex constraints, we investigate the dynamic regret of online Frank-Wolfe (OFW), which is an efficient projection-free algorithm for online convex optimization. It is well-known that in the setting of offline optimization, the smoothness of functions and the strong convexity of functions accompanying specific properties of constraint sets can be utilized to achieve fast convergence rates for the Frank-Wolfe (FW) algorithm. However, for OFW, previous studies only establish a dynamic regret bound of $O(sqrt{T}(V_T+sqrt{D_T}+1))$ by utilizing the convexity of problems, where $T$ is the number of rounds, $V_T$ is the function variation, and $D_T$ is the gradient variation. In this paper, we derive improved dynamic regret bounds for OFW by extending the fast convergence rates of FW from offline optimization to online optimization. The key technique for this extension is to set the step size of OFW with a line search rule. In this way, we first show that the dynamic regret bound of OFW can be improved to $O(sqrt{T(V_T+1)})$ for smooth functions. Second, we achieve a better dynamic regret bound of $O(T^{1/3}(V_T+1)^{2/3})$ when functions are smooth and strongly convex, and the constraint set is strongly convex. Finally, for smooth and strongly convex functions with minimizers in the interior of the constraint set, we demonstrate that the dynamic regret of OFW reduces to $O(V_T+1)$, and can be further strengthened to $O(min{P_T^ast,S_T^ast,V_T}+1)$ by performing a constant number of FW iterations per round, where $P_T^ast$ and $S_T^ast$ denote the path length and squared path length of minimizers, respectively.

Read more

6/26/2024

Riemannian Projection-free Online Learning

Zihao Hu, Guanghui Wang, Jacob Abernethy

YC

0

Reddit

0

The projection operation is a critical component in a wide range of optimization algorithms, such as online gradient descent (OGD), for enforcing constraints and achieving optimal regret bounds. However, it suffers from computational complexity limitations in high-dimensional settings or when dealing with ill-conditioned constraint sets. Projection-free algorithms address this issue by replacing the projection oracle with more efficient optimization subroutines. But to date, these methods have been developed primarily in the Euclidean setting, and while there has been growing interest in optimization on Riemannian manifolds, there has been essentially no work in trying to utilize projection-free tools here. An apparent issue is that non-trivial affine functions are generally non-convex in such domains. In this paper, we present methods for obtaining sub-linear regret guarantees in online geodesically convex optimization on curved spaces for two scenarios: when we have access to (a) a separation oracle or (b) a linear optimization oracle. For geodesically convex losses, and when a separation oracle is available, our algorithms achieve $O(T^{1/2}:)$ and $O(T^{3/4};)$ adaptive regret guarantees in the full information setting and the bandit setting, respectively. When a linear optimization oracle is available, we obtain regret rates of $O(T^{3/4};)$ for geodesically convex losses and $O(T^{2/3}; log T )$ for strongly geodesically convex losses.

Read more

6/4/2024

🛠️

Universal Online Convex Optimization with $1$ Projection per Round

Wenhao Yang, Yibo Wang, Peng Zhao, Lijun Zhang

YC

0

Reddit

0

To address the uncertainty in function types, recent progress in online convex optimization (OCO) has spurred the development of universal algorithms that simultaneously attain minimax rates for multiple types of convex functions. However, for a $T$-round online problem, state-of-the-art methods typically conduct $O(log T)$ projections onto the domain in each round, a process potentially time-consuming with complicated feasible sets. In this paper, inspired by the black-box reduction of Cutkosky and Orabona (2018), we employ a surrogate loss defined over simpler domains to develop universal OCO algorithms that only require $1$ projection. Embracing the framework of prediction with expert advice, we maintain a set of experts for each type of functions and aggregate their predictions via a meta-algorithm. The crux of our approach lies in a uniquely designed expert-loss for strongly convex functions, stemming from an innovative decomposition of the regret into the meta-regret and the expert-regret. Our analysis sheds new light on the surrogate loss, facilitating a rigorous examination of the discrepancy between the regret of the original loss and that of the surrogate loss, and carefully controlling meta-regret under the strong convexity condition. In this way, with only $1$ projection per round, we establish optimal regret bounds for general convex, exponentially concave, and strongly convex functions simultaneously. Furthermore, we enhance the expert-loss to exploit the smoothness property, and demonstrate that our algorithm can attain small-loss regret for multiple types of convex and smooth functions.

Read more

5/31/2024

👨‍🏫

Fully Unconstrained Online Learning

Ashok Cutkosky, Zakaria Mhammedi

YC

0

Reddit

0

We provide an online learning algorithm that obtains regret $G|w_star|sqrt{Tlog(|w_star|Gsqrt{T})} + |w_star|^2 + G^2$ on $G$-Lipschitz convex losses for any comparison point $w_star$ without knowing either $G$ or $|w_star|$. Importantly, this matches the optimal bound $G|w_star|sqrt{T}$ available with such knowledge (up to logarithmic factors), unless either $|w_star|$ or $G$ is so large that even $G|w_star|sqrt{T}$ is roughly linear in $T$. Thus, it matches the optimal bound in all cases in which one can achieve sublinear regret, which arguably most interesting scenarios.

Read more

6/3/2024